i luv it,
it has been working flawless for me
using suse 8.2
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay
Get office equipment for less on eBay!
http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5
__
Ben M. VanWagner wrote on Wed, 28 May 2003 14:48:09 -0500:
> How about adding a section in the HOWTO that lists customizing the
> message as a CRUCIAL step in configuring the software.
>
cvs-2.60 includes now a routine which asks for a custom email address or
URL.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin
ons, 28.05.2003 kl. 09.46 skrev Tony Earnshaw:
> Is changed in 2.50-CVS, last night's version (wasn't a couple of days
> ago.).
2.60-CVS.
Tony
--
Tony Earnshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay
Get office equi
At 19:23 27/05/03 -0400, Christopher M. Iarocci wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 04:49:55PM -0500, Ben M. VanWagner wrote:
> > What amazes me is that everytime some idiot does this.. everyone agrees
> > that the information in the email needs to be changed and then it never
is.
>
> Here's an id
Stop smoking Crack :-), I was being figurative. I don't literally mean that everyone
should send an apology email to every moron in this world. Obviously that would take
to long. A simple change once and for all to the SA report that places the blame on
the ISP and does not refer them to SA w
> tir, 27.05.2003 kl. 23.49 skrev Ben M. VanWagner:
>
> > What amazes me is that everytime some idiot does this..
...and gets answered, they never reply back! This guy was most likely a
spammer trying to get our goat or harvest more addresses. Look at all the
time wasted talking about this. Ha
tir, 27.05.2003 kl. 23.49 skrev Ben M. VanWagner:
> What amazes me is that everytime some idiot does this.. everyone agrees that the
> information in the email needs to be changed and then it never is.
>
> I have mostly been a spectator on this list for the past 6 to 8 months. I have seen
> t
most people who actually have done usability testing discover that
almost nobody *reads* documentation (even readme files), though some
people attempt to refer to them to answer questions. they instead
prefer to use well-developed intuitions. what happens when the
software is counterintuitive is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> On Tue, 27 May 2003, Cassandra Lynette Brockett wrote:
>
> > I just checked a spam message from 2.55 and this is what it says inside :-
> > See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
> > And that connects me to the Spamassassin Information for End-Users page
On Tue, 27 May 2003 12:14:35 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> sure he can complain to his isp, but...
>
> i am amazed that, in this day and age, software developers will not
> listen to usability complaints for what they are (referring to the
> several replies to this note already posted on this
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of William Stearns
> As a side note, you might consider how your original
> message comes
> across; someone reading it quickly might mistake your
> phrasing for someone
> who's taking out thei
> Because of you I am changing ISP's. There is no such thing as a
> whitelist that works. Even if I receive valid mail and you have
> targeted it as spam I cannot read it because you control freaks have
> altered the e-mail. Anyone else having similar problems? Why not let
> us have control of
On Tue, 27 May 2003, Christopher M. Iarocci wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 04:49:55PM -0500, Ben M. VanWagner wrote:
> > > What amazes me is that everytime some idiot does this.. everyone agrees
> > > that the information in the email needs to be changed and then it never
> is.
> >
>
On Tue, 27 May 2003, Cassandra Lynette Brockett wrote:
> I just checked a spam message from 2.55 and this is what it says inside :-
> See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
> And that connects me to the Spamassassin Information for End-Users page
Well... I just had this idea. Wh
On Tue, 27 May 2003, Mike Anderson wrote:
> Because of you I am changing ISP's. There is no such thing as a
> whitelist that works. Even if I receive valid mail and you have
> targeted it as spam I cannot read it because you control freaks have
> altered the e-mail. Anyone else having similar p
On Tuesday 27 May 2003 15:34, Ed Kasky wrote:
> At 04:49 PM Tuesday, 5/27/2003, Ben M. VanWagner wrote -=>
>
> >All the active members of this list should apologize to every idiot who
> >makes this kind of complaint in the wrong place.
>
> This is an issue that I deal with all the time and some of
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] I hate SpamAssassin
> On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 04:49:55PM -0500, Ben M. VanWagner wrote:
> > What amazes me is that everytime some idiot does this.. everyone
agrees
> > that the information in the email needs to be changed and then it
never
is.
>
Michael Weber wrote:
I hope this won't be another 30+ message thread trying to convince a
user that he is not talking to the right group of people.
Too late. :)
-ste
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore.
If flattening out C++ or
> On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 04:49:55PM -0500, Ben M. VanWagner wrote:
> > What amazes me is that everytime some idiot does this.. everyone agrees
> > that the information in the email needs to be changed and then it never
is.
>
> Here's an idea. What about changing the default text used to say so
ge tag...
Regards,
Cassandra
- Original Message -
From: "Ben M. VanWagner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 2:49 PM
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] I hate SpamAssassin
> >Because of you I am changing ISP's. There is no
At 04:49 PM Tuesday, 5/27/2003, Ben M. VanWagner wrote -=>
All the active members of this list should apologize to every idiot who
makes this kind of complaint in the wrong place.
This is an issue that I deal with all the time and some of the more
experienced SA users have to deal with me about
At 02:49 PM 05/27/2003, you wrote:
What amazes me is that everytime some idiot does this.. everyone agrees
that the information in the email needs to be changed and then it never is.
I'm sure it's incredibly high on the list of to-do's for the developers.
I have mostly been a spectator on this
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 04:49:55PM -0500, Ben M. VanWagner wrote:
> What amazes me is that everytime some idiot does this.. everyone agrees
> that the information in the email needs to be changed and then it never is.
Here's an idea. What about changing the default text used to say something
like
>Because of you I am changing ISP's. There is no such thing as a
>whitelist that works. Even if I receive valid mail and you have
>targeted it as spam I cannot read it because you control freaks have
>altered the e-mail. Anyone else having similar problems? Why not let
>us have control of what happ
Title: Message
Ya'll
need to really ignore this crap since all it is, is the spammers way of venting
their frustrations.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mairhtin O'FeannagSent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 15:00To:
Mike Anderson; [EMAI
So what are you going to do when your next ISP gets smart and implements Spam
Assassin? Change ISP's again?
I think you have a lot to learn before you come in here and bash Spam Assassin. If
you are having troubles you should be talking to your ISP. Is it Spam Assassin's
fault that your ISP is i
Um... Here we go again!
I hope this won't be another 30+ message thread trying to convince a
user that he is not talking to the right group of people.
Mike,
This list is for users of the SpamAssassin product. None of us here
have any control whatsoever over the use or (probably in your opinion
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 1:54 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] I hate SpamAssassin
> Why not let
> us have control of what happens at the PC level as opposed to the
> network level?
Probably because you'd co
Mike,
The developers of SpamAssassin, have nothing to do with your problems. You
need to talk to your ISP about their use of SpamAssassin, no one on this
list can help with your problems as they have no control over what your ISP
does.
I'd start here or if they aren't helpful, then like ya said..
Good afternoon, Mike,
On Tue, 27 May 2003, Mike Anderson wrote:
> Because of you I am changing ISP's. There is no such thing as a
> whitelist that works. Even if I receive valid mail and you have
> targeted it as spam I cannot read it because you control freaks have
> altered the e-mail. Anyon
$10 says it is a harvester!
Kyle: After all that? Shenanigans! Shenanigans SHENANIGANS!!
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 1:54 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] I hate SpamAssassin
>
>
> Because of
Hi,
Let's take this very slowly...
On Tue, 27 May 2003, Mike Anderson wrote:
> Because of you I am changing ISP's.
'You' is an ambiguous term. Who specifically is this 'you' that has
coerced you into changing ISPs?
> There is no such thing as a whitelist that works.
That is a false statement.
sure he can complain to his isp, but...
i am amazed that, in this day and age, software developers will not
listen to usability complaints for what they are (referring to the
several replies to this note already posted on this list).
it would suggest, or you could infer, that the default install
--On Tuesday, May 27, 2003 11:59 AM -0700 Mairhtin O'Feannag
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Whoa! Dude!
You might want to direct any anger at you ISP, AT YOUR ISP. This
discussion group/list is for those who are working with SA, not trying to
fight it.
Ask your question(s) about whitelists here, and
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 11:54:29AM -0600, Mike Anderson wrote:
|Because of you I am changing ISP's. There is no such thing as a
|whitelist that works. Even if I receive valid mail and you have
|targeted it as spam I cannot read it because you control freaks have
|altered the e-mail. Anyone else
Whoa! Dude!
You might want to direct any anger at you ISP, AT YOUR ISP. This discussion group/list is for those who are working with SA, not trying to fight it.
Ask your question(s) about whitelists here, and you will find kind, cooperative, knowlegable people WILLING TO HELP.
At le
Mike Anderson wrote:
Because of you I am changing ISP's. There is no such thing as a
whitelist that works. Even if I receive valid mail and you have
targeted it as spam I cannot read it because you control freaks have
altered the e-mail. Anyone else having similar problems? Why not let
us have
--On Tuesday, May 27, 2003 11:54 AM -0600 Mike Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Because of you I am changing ISP's. There is no such thing as a
whitelist that works. Even if I receive valid mail and you have
targeted it as spam I cannot read it because you control freaks have
altered the e-m
Because the economics of spam dictate a solution on the network level. If
the mail makes it through to your PC, then the damage is done, it has
already consumed bandwidth, space, and time. You may feel marginally
inconvenienced, but the fact of the matter is, spam can cost an ISP or a
buisnesses te
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 11:54:29AM -0600, Mike Anderson is rumored to have said:
> Because of you I am changing ISP's. There is no such thing as a
> whitelist that works. Even if I receive valid mail and you have
> targeted it as spam I cannot read it because you control freaks have
> altered the
40 matches
Mail list logo
