ctorant impertinent aft conceit chilean morel delude godfrey
> deniable capstan actinic studio chloride copter caustic speedy cottrell fit piper
> beta dialect wendy role collapsible total baptiste lofty crowberry enforceable
> huckleberry sinclair tied
>
>
> --95731644074591056620
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 15:28:31 + (UTC) Peggy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone know where to download HTML::Parser 3.24 for SunOS 5.9 from as I
> always got the following warning when I run the command "perl Makefile.PL
> PREFIX=${Prefix} SYSCONFDIR=/prod/config" for Mail-SpamAssassin-2
Hi,
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004, AltGrendel wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 15:19, Justin Mason wrote:
> >
> > svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/spamassassin/trunk
> >
> > or http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/incubator/spamassassin/trunk/?root=Apache-SVN
>
> I tried those and got a connecti
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, AltGrendel wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 00:14, Bob Apthorpe wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 15:12:06 -0600 Wagner One <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On 1/22/2004 1:15 PM, Bob Apthorpe wrote:
> > >
&g
Hi,
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 17:15:19 -0600 "Smart,Dan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I would suggest you use SpamStats from http://www.gryzor.com/tools/
> I ran both, and SpamStats reported more of both Spam and Ham. I
> suspect sa-stats is missing some records.
Actually, I'm starting to believe the
Hi,
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 22:09:28 -0600 "Vermyndax" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bob...
>
> Once again, excellent work.
Thanks - I give back what I can.
> I think my only complaint now is that my master.cf is messing with your
> script's ability to report the top spam receivers.
[section on us
Hi,
Use Postfix? Use spamd? Have a small mail log? Ever wonder which hosts
are sending the most spam into your system? Wonder no longer -
spamsources.sh is here to answer all your questions about who is
spamming you. Maybe.
http://www.cynistar.net/~apthorpe/code/sa-contrib/spamsources.sh
This 's
Hi,
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 15:12:06 -0600 Wagner One <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/22/2004 1:15 PM, Bob Apthorpe wrote:
>
> > Note: I think this my hacked-up version of sa-stats.pl at
> > http://www.cynistar.net/~apthorpe/code/sa-contrib/sa-stats.pl
> >
> &
Hi,
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 00:25:02 +0100 (MET) Matthias Fuhrmann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Vermyndax wrote:
>
> > Matthias...
> >
> > Argh, that looked abysmally easy. I guess I could have taken a crack at
> > that after all.
>
> may i take this as a sign of success (my e
Hi,
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Vermyndax wrote:
> I know you probably don't want to hear this, but I still get the same
> results. I'm with you, I'm sure the regexp is wrong, but I don't know
> perl so I'm not helping I'm sure.
The bug is a known issue and IIRC it's been resolved in sa-stats.pl beyon
Hi,
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Vermyndax wrote:
> Hi Bob...
>
> Thanks for the suggestions. I downloaded the latest sa-stats.pl from
> www.sf.net CVS (v1.3) and tried as you suggested, but I'm still getting
> all zeros.
>
> Details...
>
> My mail logs are at /var/log/mail/maillog.
Try this:
sa-stats
Hi,
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 06:57:02 -0600 "Vermyndax" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings all...
>
> I am trying to implement a way to generate statistics for Spamassassin.
> I've tried numerous perl scripts but most of them return all zeros for
> the stats. The biggest example I can think of i
Hi,
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 10:51:12 + "Spyros Tsiolis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello list !
>
> I am kinda new here chaps, so please bare with me.
>
> A simple question (which I didn't pose on the xmail forum in case I
> get flamed/cursed) :-)
This list is usually civil, probably the mos
Hi,
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 00:44:35 -0500 Pedro Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I take an opposite view point. ISP's should disable a user's account,
> if that account is found to be launching any malicious attacks,
> regardless of whether that account was intentionally malicious or was
> simply h
Hi,
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Marcus Frischherz wrote:
> Charles Gregory wrote:
>
> >I'm starting to see mail with TEXT obfuscation, such as:
> > I heard you need viagrPa.
> >Note the capital P thrown in to our favorite 'v' word.
> >It is really beginning to look like we need a genuine spelling chec
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 15:28:00 +0200 Marc Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi There,
>
> I have been trying to install spam assassin on my OpenBSD3.1 machine. Qmail
> is installed and has been patch with QMAILQUEUE. I installed the latest
> version, but had errors when starting spamd or spamas
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 10:55:58 -0500 (EST) "Steven W. Orr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any idea when we'll get RPMs available for the new release?
It's (usually) not difficult to build your own. This initial directory
is for SuSE; Red Hat hides their build tree elsewhere, like
/usr/src/redhat:
#
Hi,
Based on SPAM-L posts from admins at Outblaze (Suresh) and rambler.ru, I
conjured up a few simple rules to detect forgeries from these domains:
header RAA_FORGED_FROM_OUTBLAZE Received =~ /\.mr\.outblaze\.com/
describe RAA_FORGED_FROM_OUTBLAZE Received line forged to implicate
Hi,
On Sat, 17 Jan 2004 15:44:14 +0200 "Hylton Conacher (ZR1HPC)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> My query is this: Can I use SA if I am using Mozilla as my MTA to send
> and receive my POP email ie no sendmail, qmail, fetchmail, just Mozilla
> and sorting it into my local folders on Mozilla?
Ye
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Rose, Bobby wrote:
> From: Alexander Litvinov
>
> > Hint: I think we should store these things in a SQL database instead
> > of in the file system, shouldn't we?
> Can't you hide messages in jpeg? If they created an engine that
> embedded a hidden random word in the ima
Hi,
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Mike Batchelor wrote:
> --On Wednesday, January 14, 2004 8:28 AM -0600 Bob Apthorpe
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > IDP broadband
> > providers that give their customers direct access to port 25 on remote
> > systems by default.
>
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:48:00 +0100 Kristian Köhntopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please have a look at the article at http://www.jerf.org/writings/
> bayesReport.html from Jeremy Bowers. Jeremy has written a tool shown at
> http://www.jerf.org/images/spam.writer.full.png that assists in writing
Hi,
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Jeff Koch wrote:
> We run SA 2.55, qmail-mail scanner (with F-Secure) and vpopmail on a 2.4Ghz
> P4 Dell Server with 1GB RAM and 120GB 10K ATA drive. Last week the server
> virus/spam filtered and popped 423,325 messages. During the last 2.5 days
> the server's handled 37
Hi,
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
> o.k... now a little off topic :)
>
> what would really be nice, is to be able to return a score from an
> eval... instead of just true/false and then scoring based on a "score
> RULENAME" line.
>
> that would prevent having to call an eval a do
Hi,
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 03:31 AM 1/13/2004, DanB wrote:
> >Just installed spamassassin 2.60 - there are two things I haven't
> >figured yet:
> >
> >- can I whitelist somebody by the ip of the mta that gives me that
> >mail?
>
> Within SA, no
What about the trusted_n
Hi,
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 23:58:37 -0800 "Gary Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As with all all other attempts we really need to see the proof in the
> pudding... If the zombies start using it then who do you sue?
The same people you always sue: the people with the money. :)
> Then we receive
Hi,
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 02:10:17 -0500 (EST) Chuck Peters
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think I received my first " Habeas SWE (tm)" email today and what do you
> know, it's V|@gra spam.
There's a lot of that going around today. My copy came from an open
proxy in SBC netowrk space somewhere
Hi,
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Gary Smith wrote:
> In postfix I use the body.regexp for the body checks.
> file: /etc/postfix/main.cf
> body_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/body_checks.regexp
>
> Contents (only three in there at this time)
>
> /^RSLxwtYBDB6FCv8ybBcS0zp9VU5of3K4BXuwyehTM0RI9IrSjVuwP94xfn0wg
Hi,
On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, Andrew Lazarewicz wrote:
> Hello -- I'd like to try again -- as a home user, I connect to a POP
> server at my ISP, download my mail -- and that's it. I run Mandrake 9.2
> linux only, with KMail as my mail "client".
[...]
>
> Is it possible to run SA in my configuration a
[N.B. Resubjecticated]
On Mon, 5 Jan 2004 08:55:38 -0500 "Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can Anybody tell me how to configure spamassassin on redhat
> > 8.0/ sendmail
> >
> > With Regards,
> > Sarvesh Singhal
> >
> > Abhikalak Consultants
> > (Systems and Security Division)
> > B-326, Sa
On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 20:35:21 -0500 "Keith C. Ivey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scott Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Would a useful check be to reject anything where the relay domain is not
> > part of the sender domain?
> > Or would this be to restrictive?
> >
> > My first thoughs are
On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 17:47:43 + Barry Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/01/2004 16:03, Brad Koehn wrote:
>
[...]
> > Yes, I'm paranoid, but the spammers have been going after sites using
> > increasingly sophisticated techniques (DD
Hi,
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 11:40:22 -0800 "Gary Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Greg Webster
> Sent: Tue 12/30/2003 11:31 AM
>
> Not 100% a spamassassin issue, but I've got a ton of spammers trying any
>
On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 22:47:39 -0500 Joe Landman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Folks:
[...]
> I did not want to monkey around with the base system scoring if
> possible. I simply wanted to integrate another spam filter with its own
> scoring into SpamAssassin. As I have been playing with bogof
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 11:31:29 -0800 Greg Webster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> Not 100% a spamassassin issue, but I've got a ton of spammers trying any
> address they possibly can on my domain. Postfix responds to each one
> with a 'reject: unknown user', but of course spammers don't
On Sun, 28 Dec 2003 23:38:15 +0200 cami <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I do not know if this is the right place to complain as I could not find an
> > email address that offers feedback to the company. This arrogance stinks,
> > too. As if software developers don't need public feedback about the
On Thu, 25 Dec 2003 23:00:14 -0800 "schafer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To Spamassassin:
>
> My publication is double-opted in by 15,000 families with children with
> autism. We are routinely victimized by incompetent software like
> spamassassin because of false positives. This is just as in
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 17:00:20 -0500 "Padmanabha Vegesna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am the system administrator for my company. We are in the process of
> creating an autoresponder and are willing to download the SpamAssassin
> for the spam filter for the email sent through the autoresponder.
>
On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 18:37:34 -0500 "Alex J. Avriette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yow, how am I supposed to stop spam like this? There isn't anything to filter
> on except the word 'adult'. I guess 'rape' works as well.. But I'm not really
> inclined to filter messages with the word rape in them
reviously saved in a file. This file can be
either the one specified by the -f flag or, by default,
the standard system activity daily data file."
hth,
--
Bob Apthorpe
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: I
Hi!
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 23:22:27 -0800 (PST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Don Caprio) wrote:
> I looked through the FAQ and couldn't find the answer. So sorry if I missed
> it.
Check the mailing list archives at
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=spamassassin-talk&r=1&w=2 or
http://news.gmane.org/thread.ph
Hi,
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, News wrote:
> Does anyone know how to run SpamAssassin in non taint-mode?
You don't want to do that. Read on.
> I'm using Vipul's Razor version 2.36 which won't work with SA 2.61
> running in taint mode (the default). How do you turn it off? I know
> it's a security f
Hi,
After spending tireless minutes directing people to the SA-Talk
archives[1], I can't seem to get at them. Does
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=spamassassin-talk
work, and if not, is there a better place to peruse the archives?
Just covering all my bases here...
-- Bob
[1]
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Gary Funck wrote:
> Soundex might be a practical solution. Perhaps a manageable approach
> is to first apply a spelling check using both a regular dictionary
> and augmenting it with a set of spammer mis-spellings. Then, send the
> output of that step into Soundex. The Soundex
Hi,
> While gargling concrete, "Dan Jacobson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed:
>
> > However, anything in language [X] is always spam, so let me ban [X]
> > without having to unban every other possible language.
>
> Pretty Draconian. Must be nice to be able to do that.
Not 'nice' but 'convenient'; I d
Hi,
[N.B. Reformatted into a sensible whole. Please trim your posts, line
wrap and (I know this sounds petty) please don't top post if you expect
follow-ups. Thanks.]
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:22:06 -0600 "JRiley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Efren Pedroza
> > On Behalf Of gentian
> > > I a
Hi,
[Note: please set your mailer to wrap lines]
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 10:01:24 -0500 "gentian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am a baby to spamassassin and before I start getting my hands dirty on
> it I am still collecting information about it.
> No Spam Today for windows (which implements spamas
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003 12:25:56 -0500 "Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IMHO, the best way to handle html mail is bit-bucket the message and send a
> note to the sender that html messages are not accepted by the server and
> include a link on how to kill html in their mailer.
... except that most s
On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 10:59:13 -0800 Mike D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone know how to config spamassassin to delete messages with a score
> above a certain threshold?
This question gets asked every 3-5 days and really ought to be in the FAQ.
Answers generally focus on:
a) procmail
b)
_Compared.html
and the current (11/22/2003) effectiveness comparison here
http://www.sdsc.edu/~jeff/spam/cbc.html
As always, YMMV...
--
Bob Apthorpe
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 11:59:13 -0500 Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> CC'd to list for opinions.
>
> OK, this one actually bothers me. The URIs hitting are Pull\.xmr3\.com and
> xmr3\.com . Googleing on these shows many people blocking this domain. Has
> this person signed up for this "Sa
On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 15:29:37 -0600 Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --On Tuesday, December 02, 2003 16:26:11 -0500 Vee Persaud
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > BIG HUGE NEWS
>
> > This seems awesome. If I never used EvilRules before, is it easy t
Hi,
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Scott Renda wrote:
> I am running SA 2.60 with Postfix, it has simply done an amazing job since
> implemented. I did have several questions though.
>
> 1. Can anybody tell me how to read the values obtained from sa-learn --dump?
> The results of my dump are below:
>
> 0.0
> please all).
>
> tried |/usr/bin/spamassasin -x in procmailrc since i read no user_prefs no
> spam handling.
> tried ~/.no-spamfilter
>
> Done a google search but not found an answer to disable on a per user basis.
Take a look at
perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
especia
#x27;ve whitelisted
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Works like a charm.
If none of your mailservers HELO as example.com and your organization is
the only one that might legitimately send mail with that HELO, why
bother accepting the traffic at all? This sounds like a job for your
MTA's access list. Bonu
Hi,
On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 19:56:07 -0800 John Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 06:24:38PM -0800, Robert Menschel wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Hello John,
> >
> > Saturday, November 22, 2003, 4:24:01 PM, you wrote:
> >
> > JO> I s
Hi,
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Smart,Dan wrote:
> Is there a reason that the Bayes scoring is NOT a normal distribution from
> 50% to 100%, and negative from 0% to 50%?
Yes, check the [SAtalk] list archives; this may well be a FAQ.
Short answer: all scores including those from Bayes are generated by a
Hi,
Can one of the mailing list Powers That Be disable whichever subscriber is
routing mail to thewizard.net? I'm tired of pool.com's useless autoack
ads, especially due to a suspicious piece of their URL (below.)
Thanks,
-- Bob
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> We were unable to
Hi,
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Dan wrote:
> Hey guys!
>
> Yesterday we were talking about blocking certain words. The suggestion came
> up to put the following in:
> body LOCAL_SWEARWORD /\b(?:word1|word2|word3|word4)\b/i
>
> I put this in the bottom of my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
>
> It see
Hi,
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Tyler Montbriand wrote:
> Not having ever run a UNIX mail server, I find the existing
> documentation and configuration info for spamassasin quite mystifying.
> I'd prefer not to go with the UNIX method of handling mail and
> mailboxes, and I certainly don't want it screw
Hi,
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Frank Pineau wrote:
> So, I get this message in my inbox this morning. Unless I'm totally
> misreading the headers, it appears that it actually is from oem-cd.biz.
Nope, it's from an AOL dialup [172.190.115.221]:
$ nslookup 221.115.190.172.dynablock.easynet.nl
Non-auth
Hi,
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, maarten van den Berg wrote:
> On Friday 07 November 2003 22:34, David B Funk wrote:
> > IIRC, this was due to a bug in one of the versions of CPAN.
> > Try updating your CPAN
>
> I already doubted this, so thanks a lot for that info. However, I'm kinda
> stuck since insta
Hi,
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Evan Platt wrote:
> --On Friday, November 07, 2003 12:06 PM -0800 Jeff Lasman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What's likely to happen if I run these 563 spams without running any
> > hams?
>
> I thought I recall the help file stating that running HAMS without SPAM (or
>
Hi,
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003 17:37:10 -0500 "Dave Malone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am a lawyer, not a programmer, so many of the technical discussions I have
> found on the web have been less than useful. All I want to know is this:
> If I have collected 1,000 e-mails in my SPAM folder through S
me the command?
`perldoc sa-learn` or `sa-learn --help`
Try
sa-learn --showdots --spam /path/to/spam/folder
sa-learn --showdots --ham /path/to/ham/folder
Get rid of --showdots once you're confident sa-learn is working for you.
hth,
--
Bob Apthorpe
--
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Daniel wrote:
> So does nobody have an idea for the problem below?
Have you restarted spamd after patching Razor (assuming you're using
spamc/spamd)?
-- Bob
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
D
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 11:30:29 -0800 "Josiah DeWitt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just installed SpamAssassin and got it working, but it just drops or
> marks spam after it has already accepted it. While this /dev/null type
> behavior is great, I would rather discourage spammers by refusing the
>
es at each end, and will make it case
> insensitive (ie: to match penis or peNiS)
I wonder how
/\bP[^[:alpha:]\s]{0,3}e[^[:alpha:]\s]{0,3}n[^[:alpha:]\s]{0,3}i[^[:alpha:]\s]{0,3}s\b/i
would fare...
--
Bob Apthorpe
---
This SF.net email is
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 09:47:07 -0700 "Steven Manross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> I see everyone's concerns, and they are duly noted. Yes, real
> businesses have IPs in dynamic/DSL ranges for real reasons.
No doubt the huge price difference between 'residential-class' and
'business-class' s
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 19:50:49 -0800 Patrick Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steven Manross wrote:
>
> >I'm seeing a few/lot of spam that has a reverse lookup name that is like the
> >originating IP.
> >
> >i.e. If it were 192.168.52.45 that was the originating IP, the reverse
> >lookup might
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 10:24:19 -0500 Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> /* era */ wrote:
> >
> > Yrg'f ubcr gurl qba'g qvfpbire Havpbqr nal gvzr fbba.
>
> Ook. ?huh? ^^
perldoc Crypt::Rot13 :)
-- Bob
---
This SF.net em
out updating the full application.
--
Bob Apthorpe
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU! C
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 09:50:37 -0500 "Jennifer Wheeler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Larry
>
> > I have had some very good success with a rawbody and subject test
> which
> > looks for
> >
> > 4 or more consonants
> > followed by 1 or 2 vowels
> > followed by 3 or more consonants or digit
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 21:08:14 -0800 Robert Menschel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tuesday, October 28, 2003, 9:00:23 PM, you wrote:
> >> If you have the flexibility, use a different email program. My
> >> personal favorite is The Bat!; Eudora is also very good.
> >> Netscape's Messenger is also exce
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program.
> Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open
> Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new
> features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
> _
Hi,
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 16:22:33 +0200 "Jeffrey Schilperoord"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is the easyest way to change the 5.0 spampoints to a higher level ?
Add something like
required_hits 6.5
to ~/.spamassassin/user_pref
On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 15:57:18 +0100 (BST) Martin Radford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> At Fri Oct 24 19:38:50 2003, Matt Kettler wrote:
>
> > goes. There's serious discussion about dumping support for any perl under
> > 5.6 in future releases. Apparently trying to make SA work under 5.00x,
>
absorb. And don't top post... :)
Have fun!
--
Bob Apthorpe
[*] Summary of arguments: C/R systems can be abused to mailbomb people
(forge many requests to known C/R from a single recipient.) Spammers
either a) won't confirm, so you're sending a challenge that won't be
a
int is
doing the right thing here.
You probably want
/free\s+of\s+charge/i
or
/free\s{0,10}of\s{0,10}charge/i (similar to /free\s*of\s*charge/i)
The difference between /b and /s tripped me up for a long time because I
kept thinking 'blank' not 'boundary' when I saw '
others to stop using it too. monkeys.com is dead.
> When I enable IM in my MailScanner setup for SpamAssassin, all outgoing mail
> from my servers gets kicked into la-la land - I scan all outgoing Email -
> because it's matching on Infinite-
Hi,
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Matt Kettler wrote:
[...]
>
> The partiuclar message you were testing against is a common virus email..
> SA isn't designed to catch viruses, and has no rules to catch this one.. if
> you really want to catch them, search in the archives of this list for SWEN
> and you sh
.
> Do you know how to check the DB_File version so I can confirm it's at
> 1.806?
perl -MDB_File -e 'print $DB_File::VERSION, "\n";'
--
Bob Apthorpe
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Sou
Hi,
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Stewart, John wrote:
> > Nope, it looks like WordPad is a bad place to edit :)
> > Apparently it has some
> > hidden characters in it. AS of 4:40 EST today, I resaved it
> > under MSDOS text
> > format in the hopes it fixed it. Did you get the file before then?
gvim work
Hi,
On Thu, 09 Oct 2003 11:56:29 -0300 Fabiano Bonin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am using SpamAssassin sice yesterday and i put it in production today,
> site wide.
> It's amazing.
> It's filtering 95% on my daily messages, and all blocked messages are
> really spams.
>
> BUT, in my particula
Hi,
[apologies for this being so far off-topic]
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Peter P. Benac wrote:
> And this lack of response is due to what???
Lazy, stupid, apathetic, incompetent, or ambivalent members of the law
enforcement and ISP community? Insufficient network diagnostic and
security tools, maki
Hi,
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 23:13:19 +0100 Daniel Bird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Forrest Aldrich wrote:
>
> > A new approach to DNSBL might be considered, where there is a
> > peer-to-peer sharing (authentication, scoring whatever) that mirrors
> > content -- something of that nature, whereby t
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 19:04:35 -0400 "Dan Didier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Running redhat8 with qmail and spamassassin as well as trying to get
> razor2 working.
>
> If I look in my log files, I have entries like this:
>
> Sep 24 19:04:16 sandbox spamd[14130]: connection from localhos
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002 00:28:59 +1100 Trevor Rhodes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While installing I get the following error. Anyone have any clue as to why
> and what I can do?
Looks like make can't find INSTALL. Try
touch INSTALL
followed by
make clean
perl Makefile.PL
make
and see if
Hi,
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Jonathan Nichols wrote:
> Great.. is this going to affect SpamAssassin like it did when osirusoft
> went offline?
No, not unless Ron does something crazy like blacklisting 0.0.0.0/0. I
expect he'd give people fair warning first if he was going to do that. I
also expect i
Hi,
Just seen on SPAM-L:
Apparently Ron's proxy honeynet hit a nerve in the hardcore spammer
community.
First Osirusoft, now monkeys.com. Which DNSBL is next? When do the
crosshairs move to SpamAssassin?
And when will the lawyers and Feds visit the asleep-at-the-wheel
instituions and ISPs hosti
the low scores); it
should be interesting to see how this behaves.
--
Bob Apthorpe
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 11:41:46 +0200 Federico Giannici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm using SA 2.60 RC6.
> I have noticed that Bayesian scores are not monotonically increasing.
> For example, score for BAYES_90 is LESS then the score for BAYES_70
> (when network is used)!
>
> Is this correct?
Ye
Hi,
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 23:45:35 -0500 "Mike Loiterman"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just reading the release notes for 2.60 and noticed this:
>
> - spamd now supports UNIX-domain sockets for low-overhead scanning,
> thanks
> to Steve Friedl for this. This is strongly recommended if you'r
ING 0.0
Also, use sa-learn on those messages that sneak past SA.
hth,
--
Bob Apthorpe
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-t
Hi,
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 21:09:09 -0700 "Mike Klein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> When I attempt to run the verification tests, spamassassin just sits there
> doing nothing it seems.
>
> spamassassin -t sample-nonspam.txt
>
> Just 'hangs'.
>
> What might I need to configure/reconfigure?
Hi,
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
> This new virus appears to generate many (random?) subjects, so it's getting
> difficult to narrow down.
>
> Has anyone filters for Spamassassin that will correctly identify this
> virus? I'd like to score this one high so they are rejected (via
>
Hi,
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 12:55:46 + "Muhannad Tamemi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "Chr. von Stuckrad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 09:38:53AM +, Muhannad Tamemi wrote:
> > > Dear All ,
> > >
> > > Kindly note that am new to spammassassin ..
> > >
> > > I have Su
Hi,
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 18:13:12 +0200 "Hubert Daubmeier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> my postmaster has pointed me to this discussion list
>
> --
>
[...]
> I would like to outline a problem and like to ask for updating the
> manufacturer strings for Microsoft Out
Hi,
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Jennifer Wheeler wrote:
> what am i doing wrong here? I am trying to unblacklist an address
> getting tagged by Infinite-Monkeys.
>
> using spamassassin 2.55
>
> i put the following line in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf with all my
> other rules and whitelisted address
AS 5378 - Clueless & Witless .UK
*.wsA 216.35.187.246
AS 3561 - Clueless & Witless .US
Internet death penalties pending.
--
Bob Apthorpe
-
1 - 100 of 194 matches
Mail list logo
