Hi, On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 22:09:28 -0600 "Vermyndax" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bob... > > Once again, excellent work. Thanks - I give back what I can. > I think my only complaint now is that my master.cf is messing with your > script's ability to report the top spam receivers. [section on using sa-stats.pl with sitewide tagging under Postfix snipped] > Looking back over the logfile, it would seem to me that this is more of > a Postfix problem than with your script, since my spamd never reports > the recipient (but Postfix does). Is there any way to get the user > information into spamd? Not with sa-stats.pl as it's currently written. I'm thinking about a more generic tool that can stitch together syslog entries to (for example) tie a particular spamd score back to a sender's IP address or tie a recipient to MTA-level filter score. I'm not sure how hard this will be but I think it needs to be done if we're going get more detailed statistics or use SA for more than reactively tagging spam. > *sigh* - guess this is going to be a problem with my master.cf. Anyone > have any spectacular recommendations to solve this? This Postfix/Spamd > is functioning as a gateway to Exchange. This will be difficult without hacking a much more complex log analyzer into sa-stats.pl. :( Give me a little time to start working on a more general solution. > Sorry if I offend with the somewhat offtopic discussion (after > review)... IMHO this is completely on-topic. -- Bob ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
