Hi, On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 17:15:19 -0600 "Smart,Dan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would suggest you use SpamStats from http://www.gryzor.com/tools/ > I ran both, and SpamStats reported more of both Spam and Ham. I > suspect sa-stats is missing some records. Actually, I'm starting to believe the opposite: # rm /tmp/spamcompare.txt; (/usr/local/bin/raa_spamstats.pl -file \ /var/log/mail > /tmp/spamcompare.txt & \ ~apthorpe/pjx/sa-stats/sa-stats.pl -l /var/log/mail -s "Jan 27 23:55" \ -e now >> /tmp/spamcompare.txt) ##### /tmp/spamcompare.txt ##### File /var/log/mail : from Jan 27 23:55:08 to Jan 28 04:11:39 Total number of emails processed by the spam filter : 76 Number of spams : 3 ( 3.95%) Number of clean messages : 73 ( 96.05%) Average message analysis time : 10.15 seconds Average spam analysis time : 4.90 seconds Average clean message analysis time : 10.36 seconds Average message score : -31.18 Average spam score : 28.63 Average clean message score : -33.57 Total spam volume : 38 kbytes Total clean volume : 551 kbytes Report Title : SpamAssassin - Spam Statistics Report Date : 2004-01-28 Period Beginning : Tue Jan 27 23:55:00 2004 Period Ending : Wed Jan 28 04:13:52 2004 Reporting Period : 4.31 hrs -------------------------------------------------- Note: 'ham' = 'nonspam' Total spam detected : 3 ( 3.85%) Total ham accepted : 75 ( 96.15%) ------------------- Total emails processed : 78 ( 18/hr) Average spam threshold : 6.30 Average spam score : 28.63 Average ham score : -33.57 Spam kbytes processed : 38 ( 9 kb/hr) Ham kbytes processed : 551 ( 128 kb/hr) Total kbytes processed : 590 ( 137 kb/hr) Spam analysis time : 14 s ( 3 s/hr) Ham analysis time : 776 s ( 180 s/hr) Total analysis time : 791 s ( 183 s/hr) Statistics by Hour ------------------------------------- Hour Spam Ham -------------- -------- -------- 2004-01-27, 23 0 7 2004-01-28, 00 1 26 2004-01-28, 01 2 12 2004-01-28, 02 0 18 2004-01-28, 03 0 10 2004-01-28, 04 0 2 Done. Report generated in 0 sec by /home/apthorpe/pjx/sa-stats/sa-stats.pl, version 1.13. Running `egrep 'spamd\[[0-9]*\]' /var/log/mail | egrep -c 'clean message|identified spam'` turns up 78 lines; I haven't had the time to walk through spamstats.pl (I've hacked on this code as well, so it's not like I'm playing favorites...) The results are inconsistent, it's 4am local time, I've had three glasses of wine (hooray for Australian reds!), and I'm burned out from studying for Oracle certification - something isn't right, I don't know what, but given that sa-stats.pl and egrep agree on totals, I suspect spamstats.pl (probably a regex failing on an edge case...) I need to run a known test case for both scripts and then anaylze it by hand to figure out what's broken. Any other JAPHs out there that want to take a crack at analyzing both scripts for consistency? -- Bob ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
