emails are fine.
Could someone please advise what or where I can look to resolve this
Thank you
ifty
_
From: Kunal Soni [mailto:kunalso...@gmail.com]
Sent: 01 March 2013 11:45
To: qmail-scanner-general@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] Qmail-scann
On 13/06/13 17:05, Kunal Soni wrote:
> Dear Jason,
>
> Thanks for the details. We have been using Spamassassin + ClamAV with
> Qmail Scanner. Please let us know the steps to configure the DLP
> Monitor with ClamAV and Qmail Scanner and How we can monitoer the
> emails with the reserved words with
Dear Jason,
Thanks for the details. We have been using Spamassassin + ClamAV with Qmail
Scanner. Please let us know the steps to configure the DLP Monitor with
ClamAV and Qmail Scanner and How we can monitoer the emails with the
reserved words with this.
Thanks again.
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 7:
A new version, 2.11 is now available.
Besides some minor bug fixes for the new MHR support, one new feature appears.
Qmail-Scanner will from now on try to push any "metadata" it figures out while
parsing an email back into the email via "X-Qmail-Scanner-" headers - so that
SpamAssassin can the
On 02/03/13 00:44, Kunal Soni wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> This is with reference to the SA:0(?/?). We have followed the given
> below solution from the list. We have tried to increase the spamc
> --max-size=10485760 (10mb), while executed the command, it doesnt
> return any output but screen is standstil
Hi Kunal
I don't understand what you mean with 'the execution of the command'.
There are two ways of changing the max-size:
1) You can reconfigure qmail-scanner (reinstalling it) adding the option
--max-size 10485760
2) Edit the file qmail-scanner-queue.pl (usually in
/var/qmail/bin/q
Hi List,
This is with reference to the SA:0(?/?). We have followed the given below
solution from the list. We have tried to increase the spamc
--max-size=10485760 (10mb), while executed the command, it doesnt return
any output but screen is standstill.
Before executing the command, we have also s
|| &error_condition("mhr: cannot open file - '$file'");
$sha->addfile(*OFILE);
my $digest = $sha->hexdigest;
debug("mhr: digest of $file is $digest",5);
$result=&MHRviaDNS($digest);
close(OFILE);
last if ($result);
}
line 3540 is : $s
On 07/11/2012 09:49 AM, Salvatore Toribio wrote:
Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] qmail-scanner-2.10 problem for
Hi Adrian
Line 3540 must be ad antivirus routine. So your antivirus couldn't
read the file.
What antivirus are you using at line 3540?
Try to increase the memory assigned to qmail-smt
Hi Adrian
Line 3540 must be ad antivirus routine. So your antivirus couldn't
read the file.
What antivirus are you using at line 3540?
Try to increase the memory assigned to qmail-smtpd, just a guess.
ST
At 18:18 +0200 6-11-2012, Adrian Bulgariu wrote:
hi
i recently discovered those error
hi
i recently discovered those error messages in the logs
can someone help me with this. As I understand is a problem that in the
subject there is a "+" caracter ?
thanks
Tue, 06 Nov 2012 18:13:50 EET:15398: -- Process 15398 finished.
Total of 0.430018 secs
Tue, 06 Nov 2012 18:14:55 EET
>>
>> Il 16/02/2012 10:56, Salvatore Toribio ha scritto:
>> > Hi Alessio
>> >
>> > I am quite busy at this time... I will try to have a look at the issue
>> > on the weekend.
>> >
>> > Just one thing:
>> >
>> > --scanners "clamdscan,verbose_spamassassin" This is a bad idea...
>>
>> Yes I know but
Il 16/02/2012 10:56, Salvatore Toribio ha scritto:
> Hi Alessio
>
> I am quite busy at this time... I will try to have a look at the issue
> on the weekend.
>
> Just one thing:
>
> --scanners "clamdscan,verbose_spamassassin" This is a bad idea...
Yes I know but is the only one method for having sp
Well it is feature or bug of QS. It happen very often, that you proceed
email by QS, client drop connection due to timeout, but QS inject email
into queue instead of dropping email, because client has closed
connection. It often happen with email, that need longer time to proceed
(+30 seconds).
Hi Alessio
I am quite busy at this time... I will try to have a look at the
issue on the weekend.
Just one thing:
--scanners "clamdscan,verbose_spamassassin" This is a bad idea...
Try with fast_spamassassin and set sa-debug and sa-report to 1, this
will give you almost the same information a
Il 16/02/2012 08:47, Jason Haar ha scritto:
> Oh - that's not qmail-scanner - that's qmail-scanner-st
>
> I'll leave it to Salvatore to leap in
>
> Jason
Ok, I'll wait Salvatore :-)
--
Alessio Cecchi is:
@ ILS -> http://www.linux.it/~alessice/
on LinkedIn -> http://www.linkedin.com/in/alessice
A
Oh - that's not qmail-scanner - that's qmail-scanner-st
I'll leave it to Salvatore to leap in
Jason
On 16/02/12 20:29, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
> Il 16/02/2012 06:48, Jason Haar ha scritto:
>> Hi Alessio
>>
>> What you describe doesn't explain the duplicate emails. Qmail-Scanner
>> doesn't like wha
Il 16/02/2012 06:48, Jason Haar ha scritto:
> Hi Alessio
>
> What you describe doesn't explain the duplicate emails. Qmail-Scanner
> doesn't like what spamd is returning and after trying three times will
> do a "temp fail" to the SMTP sender and will not deliver the message.
> Later on the sender t
Hi Alessio
What you describe doesn't explain the duplicate emails. Qmail-Scanner
doesn't like what spamd is returning and after trying three times will
do a "temp fail" to the SMTP sender and will not deliver the message.
Later on the sender tries again and probably fails again - end result
should
Hi,
I have two qmail+vpopmail+qmail-scanner (one with 2.08 and one with
2.10)+spamassassin 3.3.1 from Debian 6 repo.
Some times happens that a user receive the same email every 3 minutes.
During the last week was happens two times with two different users and
two differents senders.
Below the
A new version, 2.10 is now available.
Besides some minor bug fixes, a couple of new features managed to sneak
their way in. There's also a jump from 2.08 to 2.10, as the 2.09 release
never saw the light of day.
New features include
* DLPmonitor: if you use clamav as part of a Data Loss Preventio
Hi there
The latest release of maildrop (which contains reformime) has some
localization changes that are incompatible with Qmail-Scanner and break
it. I've talked to the author and he's looking into it - but I've had
reports that the newest maildrop is now flowing out to Linux repos and
so system
On 02/14/2010 04:35 PM, Archives wrote:
>
> According to the guy who developed reformime (who i talked to today),
> reformime inherits $LANG from it's parent process, it might be as simple
> as putting in a special case where $LANG is set before calling
> reformime... but I didn't have confidenc
On 2/13/2010 7:16 PM, Jason Haar wrote:
> On 02/14/2010 03:55 PM, Archives wrote:
>
>> Which is why reformime breaks. Setting it to:
>>
>> $ENV{'LC_ALL'}= $ENV{'LANG'} = $ENV{'LANGUAGE'} = 'en_US.UTF-8';
>> POSIX::setlocale(&POSIX::LC_ALL,'en_US.UTF-8');
>>
>> Results in a perfectly working, u
On 02/14/2010 03:55 PM, Archives wrote:
> Which is why reformime breaks. Setting it to:
>
> $ENV{'LC_ALL'}= $ENV{'LANG'} = $ENV{'LANGUAGE'} = 'en_US.UTF-8';
> POSIX::setlocale(&POSIX::LC_ALL,'en_US.UTF-8');
>
> Results in a perfectly working, unbroken system. (On my machine $LANG=
> 'en_US.UTF-8
Using maildrop v2.3+ causes qmail-scanner to break with "Unknown
character set: ANSI_X3.4-1968". Reverting to 2.2 causes the errors to
go away.
Running the reformime commands manually (both from 2.2 and 2.4) produces
no errors, which leads me to suspect the issue isn't a problem with
maildrop
Qmail-Scanner 2.08 has been released. It's really a "2.07a" release -
but these days I hate that kind of fiddly versioning ;-)
It is purely a single bugfix release. One issue was discovered soon
after the release of 2.07 with the default timeout setting for spamc.
Qmail-Scanner defaults to a 30 se
Qmail-Scanner 2.07 has been released.
It contains support for AVAST! for Unix and support for new version of
NOD32.
Besides a few minor changes, the biggest change is in SpamAssassin
support. From now on Qmail-Scanner will treat SpamAssassin (spamd)
identically to AV products: namely if Qmail-Sca
Salvatore Toribio wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I don't know why you want to do this, one very good thing of rbl is
> that it saves bandwidth because it rejects the message before the
> helo/ehlo command. But anyway, the answer is that you need to patch
> qmail-scanner-st, it shouldn't be difficult, have a
At 6:47 +0200 26-04-2009, Phibee Network Operation Center wrote:
>Hi
>
>i am search a small information:
>
> I use actually a front end qmail server without qmail-scanner
>but with rbldnsd direct reject. This server sent after the mail at
>a SpamAssassin/Qmail/Qmail6Scanner server for spam dete
Hi
i am search a small information:
I use actually a front end qmail server without qmail-scanner
but with rbldnsd direct reject. This server sent after the mail at
a SpamAssassin/Qmail/Qmail6Scanner server for spam detection.
With this solution, my first qmail close the connection befor
2.06 is out the door with no major changes since the last rc2 release.
2.06 adds support for the current f-prot engine and contains a few
bugfixes for minor issues associated with MIME mail, sophie and weird
zip files.
Download when ready from http://qmail-scanner.sourceforge.net/
--
Cheers
J
Arno Slatius wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It's been quite some time since the 2.06-rc2. Any thoughts on when it'll be
> released officially??
>
I've been very busy and SF changed their site design enough to force me
to have to figure out how to use it again. At my age that means I'm
flapping around for a
et
Subject: [Qmail-scanner-general] [Qmail-scanner-announce]
qmail-scanner-2.06-rc2 (new f-prot support)
Hi there
Hopefully a final change has been made to the f-prot support.
Can some f-prot users give this version a go, and if it sings, I'll
release the final version of 2.06
http://qmail-scann
e to share some of his statistics
on the (echo 'First M. Last'; cat SYSDEF) outputs on what scanners are
popular??
Cheers,
Arno Slatius
-Original Message-
From: Jason Haar [mailto:jason.h...@trimble.co.nz]
Sent: maandag 16 februari 2009 23:20
To: qmail-scanner-general@lists.so
Well few facts.
Fpscan is not deamonized and its detection time is 20x-100x slower that
Clamav or Fpscand. It also double load of your server.
Fpscand is running in single thread and quite often get stuck. I belive,
that it can't handle huge traffic. (more that 10 emails per second)
Clama
Hi there
Hopefully a final change has been made to the f-prot support.
Can some f-prot users give this version a go, and if it sings, I'll
release the final version of 2.06
http://qmail-scanner.sf.net/qmail-scanner-2.06-rc2.tgz
http://qmail-scanner.sf.net/qmail-scanner-2.06-rc2.tgz
Thanks
-
Arno Slatius wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First of all, two enthusiastic thumbs up for including support for F-Prot 6.
> I installed the new scanner on a backup MX for now. I do have some issues
> which are fixable:
>
> The installer keeps 'detecting' the binary vars incorrect. I end up with
> this:
> my $
to edit output @scanner_array after each install?
Best regards,
Arno Slatius
-Original Message-
From: Jason Haar [mailto:jason.h...@trimble.co.nz]
Sent: maandag 9 februari 2009 0:04
To: qmail-scanner-annou...@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Qmail-scanner-general] [Qmail-scanner-announce]
Hi there
A new version of Qmail-Scanner is on the cards. I've aggregated the
f-prot patches that have been received, and given them a bit of testing,
but don't know how good they'll be in production. So this is an
opportunity for people using F-prot to give it a go and see if it sings.
There are
On Friday 19 September 2008, Jason Haar wrote:
> Futhwo wrote:
> > The new version of f-prot antivirus changed executables names and
> > scanning return codes, so by now using f-prot 6 with qmail-scanner is
> > not possible.
[...]
> I certainly don't have "free access" to every AV out there, so if
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:qmail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Jason Haar
> Verzonden: vrijdag 19 september 2008 0:45
> Aan: qmail-scanner-general@lists.sourceforge.net
> Onderwerp: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] qmail-scanner and f-prot 6
>
> Futhwo wrote:
> > Hi
> > Th
Futhwo wrote:
> Hi
> The new version of f-prot antivirus changed executables names and
> scanning return codes, so by now using f-prot 6 with qmail-scanner is
> not possible.
>
> I'd like to know if this problem is gonna be addressed by developers.
>
Hi there
I certainly don't have "free ac
Hi
The new version of f-prot antivirus changed executables names and
scanning return codes, so by now using f-prot 6 with qmail-scanner is
not possible.
I'd like to know if this problem is gonna be addressed by developers.
Greetings
Futhwo
---
A bugfix upgrade to Qmail-Scanner has been released.
A fault was found in the SpamAssassin (SA) module WRT Message-ID
detection. It would lead to SA mis-classifying certain classes of mail.
All users are urged to upgrade to correct this flaw.
2.05 is available from http://qmail-scanner.sf.net
At 13:35 +0200 25-05-2008, Daniel Garcia Bruno wrote:
>After the minimal ./configure --sa-reject yes --sa-delete 5 --sa-
>quarantine 3 :
>
>The result commented ./configure in the script is:
>
># ./configure --qs-user qscand --admin root --domain dl380 --admin-
>description "System Anti-Virus A
Salvatore,
Thank's for your quick answer.
I assure you I've created the configure arguments reading the
definition one by one, around 10 times, but maybe I've been
lobotomized in my sleep.
I modified the script by hand because it did not work after creating
the script so many times ... so ap
At 0:41 +0200 25-05-2008, Daniel Garcia Bruno wrote:
>Hi everybody,
>I've been using QS for a while now. I'm trying
>to configure qmal-scannet-st to reject mail.
>
>I've tried many combinations but still QS always
>lets pass the SA tagged messages to maildirs
>As can see in the configure command
Hi everybody,
I've been using QS for a while now. I'm trying to configure qmal-
scannet-st to reject mail.
I've tried many combinations but still QS always lets pass the SA
tagged messages to maildirs
As can see in the configure command the --sa-reject --sa-delete --sa-
quarantine-reject ar
I'm afraid very shortly after 2.03 was released, a bug was discovered in
how it handled Message-ID matching in particularly broken spam.
It really shouldn't have any adverse effects, but certainly causes
Qmail-Scanner to exit with an error instead of killing the spam like
it's meant to - so you
The latest release is out at last! It fixes a few issues to do with
updated AV and SA products, and contains a couple of updates to some
features.
Changes include:
* Updated nod32 support
* Enhanced perlscanner to be able to policy-block attachments based on
arbitrary sizes
* Workaround for
Any progress on this?
Best Regards,
John Gates
Dimante Computer Services LLC
http://www.dimante.net
-
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Op
Glenn Remstedt wrote:
> hi list,
> i have an QMS-2.02st installed together with clamav+SA. the log down here is
> showing
> something happening as far as i know, every morning at this very same time.
> could you do
> point me to on where i should look into for to have this sorted out - or is
>
hi list,
i have an QMS-2.02st installed together with clamav+SA. the log down here is
showing
something happening as far as i know, every morning at this very same time.
could you do
point me to on where i should look into for to have this sorted out - or is
this running
in normal behavior -
Hi
I am running qmail-scanner 2.01 with clamdscan: 0.91.2/6457. spamassassin: 3.2.3
I am planning to upgrade qmail scanner along with clamd and
spamassassin. Is there some gotcha
that I need to watch out for.
I am running all these with qmail
--
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.
Hi,
I have been trying to make spamassassin with qmail scanner work aginst SQL user
preferences wothout any luck.
My local.cf contains.
user_scores_dsn
DBI:mysql:spamassassin:mysql_socket=/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock
user_scores_sql_username username
user_scores_sql_passwo
What's odd is looking at qmail-scanner-queue.pl the command that I see is
basically:
clamdscan --version when I do this from the shell it returns:
ClamAV 0.92.1
So to me it seems really weird that it would not work as it always did.. But
then again I am not as versed with Perl, but I think t
It's a bug. ClamAV has changed the format they use for reporting versioning.
In fact clamscan/clamdscan no longer report the "pattern file" number at
all. I'm going to have to build a new version that uses freshclam to
figure out the version number instead. Pretty minor - should have it out
nex
Using qmail-scanner-2.02. The last update of clamav and running of the
following command:
setuidgid qscand /var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl -z
is not placing the clamdscan verison into qmail-scanner-queue-version.txt just
my spamassassin version. This has always worked in the past
Bookworm wrote:
> anageable number, at least to start.
>
> Then, you need to find out why your system isn't deleting the files
> _out_. My guess is that because the files are being created as RW only
> to qscand, the next process in line can't touch them.
>
Mattew, did you read the bit in
0 PM
> To: qmail-scanner-general@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] Qmail-Scanner Working Directory
> Overfloweth
>
> Matthew Goodman wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Currently my /var/spool/qmailscan/working folder is not being cleared out.
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Bookworm
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 1:30 PM
To: qmail-scanner-general@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] Qmail-Scanner Working Directory
Overfloweth
Matthew Goodman wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Cur
Matthew Goodman wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Currently my /var/spool/qmailscan/working folder is not being cleared out.
>
> What exactly is in this folder, and why are there thousands and thousands
> of files in there? Is there any easy way to flush that out and recover the
> space?
>
> Every night my back
Hi all,
Currently my /var/spool/qmailscan/working folder is not being cleared out.
What exactly is in this folder, and why are there thousands and thousands
of files in there? Is there any easy way to flush that out and recover the
space?
Every night my backup routine runs, it takes hours for t
Hello,
i 've problem with qmail-scanner (st patch). Some messages can timeout
qmail-scanner only (sa works ok).
Mail-1.log is from log from spamassassin (which shows that scanning
was successfull and returns score) - message is message-1.msg, same
second example (sa scan took 8.9 seconds but in m
Roger Mutangadura wrote:
> Hello All.
>
> I am having a bit of a problem. I have installed qmail-scanner-2.02. I
> am having a problem in getting it to work with spamassassin and clamav.
>
> It sees the spamassassin fine but then it cannot see the clamav, because
> i installed it in
>
> /usr/local
Hello All.
I am having a bit of a problem. I have installed qmail-scanner-2.02. I
am having a problem in getting it to work with spamassassin and clamav.
It sees the spamassassin fine but then it cannot see the clamav, because
i installed it in
/usr/local/clamav/
When i add as follows in /var/
Raul Glogovetan wrote:
>
> Hello Everybody
>
>
>
> I have a big problem I installed netqmail 1.05 it works like a charm…
> until I instaled and configured qmail-scanner + clamav + spamassassin
>
>
>
> The problem is at follows :
>
>
>
> ClamAV works, SpamAssassin works, but when I enable qmai
Hello Everybody
I have a big problem I installed netqmail 1.05 it works like a charm. until
I instaled and configured qmail-scanner + clamav + spamassassin
The problem is at follows :
ClamAV works, SpamAssassin works, but when I enable qmail-scanner ( throught
/service/qmail-smtp/run ),
This release introduces a bunch of new tweaks to improve the
effectiveness of Qmail-Scanner.
As usual, the release can be got from SourceForge:
http://qmail-scanner.sourceforge.net/
Changes include:
* Support for generating SMTP permanent errors for quarantine events -
including high-scoring
This release introduces a bunch of new tweaks to improve the
effectiveness of Qmail-Scanner.
As usual, the release can be got from SourceForge:
http://qmail-scanner.sourceforge.net/
Changes include:
* Support for generating SMTP permanent errors for quarantine events -
including high-scoring SP
Salvatore,
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 17:17:13 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi,
> > On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 23:09:18 +1000
> > Christian Lerrahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > I'm rying to get validrcptto to work. I'm using the patch from
> > > http://www.lukasfeiler.com/rocketscience/qm
> Hi,
> On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 23:09:18 +1000
> Christian Lerrahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I'm rying to get validrcptto to work. I'm using the patch from
> > http://www.lukasfeiler.com/rocketscience/qmail/ but all the other
> > patches that are in this patch, I have already been using
Hi,
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 23:09:18 +1000
Christian Lerrahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm rying to get validrcptto to work. I'm using the patch from
> http://www.lukasfeiler.com/rocketscience/qmail/ but all the other
> patches that are in this patch, I have already been using before. Now
> a
Hi,
I'm rying to get validrcptto to work. I'm using the patch from
http://www.lukasfeiler.com/rocketscience/qmail/ but all the other
patches that are in this patch, I have already been using before. Now
as soon as I use this additional patch, I see errors like
X-Qmail-Scanner-1.25st:[mail119046629
Salvatore Toribio wrote:
> Hi Arno
>
> You are right, that check is wrong, and it is also wrong in the
> original version I hope Jason should read this email.
>
>
Got it - thanks!
--
Cheers
Jason Haar
Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd.
Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 96
At 14:20 +0200 30-05-2007, Arno Slatius wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I found a small problem in the ST patched version (20070204) of the
>Qmail-scanner (it might also occur in the original version, havent looked
>it to it).
>
>I've had a few spam messages that already contained the X-Spam-Status line
>in the or
At 14:20 +0200 30-05-2007, Arno Slatius wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I found a small problem in the ST patched version (20070204) of the
>Qmail-scanner (it might also occur in the original version, havent looked
>it to it).
>
>I've had a few spam messages that already contained the X-Spam-Status line
>in the or
Hi,
I found a small problem in the ST patched version (20070204) of the
Qmail-scanner (it might also occur in the original version, havent looked
it to it).
I've had a few spam messages that already contained the X-Spam-Status line
in the original header which the verbose Spamassassin looks for:
dimaki wrote:
>
> The problem is, that there are error codes (>8) that are actually only
> warnings. IMHO these warnings should not result in rejecting the whole
> mail.
>
> I would recommend to throw a warning instead of exiting in that case.
> I attach a patch for that.
I agree - your patch looks
Hi,
there seems to be a small but very bad bug in the f-prot scanning part of
qmail-scanner.
The error codes of f-prot scanner are not evaluated correctly. Thus mail may be
rejected/not delivered although scanning was quite ok.
The problem is, that there are error codes (>8) that are actually
Hello,
i'm using qmail-scanner 2.01 from jason haar (default, little changed
by me to work as i needed). But i need domain specific settings -
moving spam to separate directory for soem doamins, forwarding to
special users - this should be no problem for st patch. But question
is if st patch is ab
I solved the previous problem but new problems come. Following is my output for
qmail-scanner-queue.pl -h/-g/-z
What I can figure out is the spamassassin 3.18 is using new configure file that
doesn't include those Global symbol in previous version while
qmail-scanner-queue is still looking for
At 12:39 -0500 6-02-2007, Steve Kamerman wrote:
>version:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] teratech]# cat
>/var/spool/qscan/qmail-scanner-queue-version.txt
>clamdscan: 0.88.7/2527. spamassassin: 3.0.6. perlscan: 2.01st.
>
>I have tried to enable the archive option for qmail-scanner in
>/etc/qmail-scanner.ini l
Dear ALL
I have qmail-ldap setup with qmail-scanner but when some
users send mail via squirrel webmail thn qmail-scanner not check those mail via
webmail but whn i send mail through outlook thn it is working fine and show me
hit point of spam and as well as TAG what is the p
version:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] teratech]# cat
/var/spool/qscan/qmail-scanner-queue-version.txt
clamdscan: 0.88.7/2527. spamassassin: 3.0.6. perlscan: 2.01st.
I have tried to enable the archive option for qmail-scanner in
/etc/qmail-scanner.ini like this:
ARCHIVE="(addr1|addr2|addr3)[EMAIL PRO
Dear guys
I want to setup virtualdomain with qmail but i want to
qmail-scanner qurantine mail base on domain so is it possible qmail-scanner
scan mail per domain basies and one more thing can spamassassin scan mail
domain base caz i have multiple domain hosted on my DataCent
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007 19:20:45 +0100
Salvatore Toribio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is no problem on doing that for you, I don't really remember
> why I removed the '!' maybe because there are some checks about
> sa_subject and if it starts with a '!' some of the could be
> broken...
Do you
At 13:21 -0600 1-01-2007, Josh Trutwin wrote:
> if (/\;|\!/) {
>
>to this:
>
> if (/\;/) {
>
>Is there a valid reason for not allowing the "!" character in the
>file? It seems to work fine with this modification.
Hi
There is no problem on doing that for you, I don't really remember
why I
Hi,
I finally made the jump from 1.25 to 2.01 and decided this would be
a good time to also apply the qmail-scanner patch from Salvatore.
First off, this is excellent work, I will be sending a donation. I
did run into a few issues though, mainly with the
settings-per-domain option.
Here is a
At 13:18 -0400 9-10-2006, Asif Iqbal wrote:
>I am getting lot of these in /var/log/qmai/smtpd/current file
>
>2006-10-09 12:58:13.655750500 X-QWESTIP-NET-QMAIL-SCANNER-1.25-st-qms:
>Process 16550 closed, parent process died
>
>Has anyone seen this? What would be a recommended way to troubleshoot
>
I am getting lot of these in /var/log/qmai/smtpd/current file
2006-10-09 12:58:13.655750500 X-QWESTIP-NET-QMAIL-SCANNER-1.25-st-qms:
Process 16550 closed, parent process died
2006-10-09 12:59:18.425187500 X-QWESTIP-NET-QMAIL-SCANNER-1.25-st-qms:
Process 17322 closed, parent process died
2006-10-09
Is there, a so call "whitelist" on qmail-scanner-queue.pl?? that allow
to bypass certain domains of being checked??
Please let me know.
Many thanks.
--
Facundo Agustin Barrera
IT Management.
Buenos Aires - Argentina.
-
Usi
Hi,
There is now a new version of Sophos (v5.0), which seems to be using
/opt/sophos-av/bin/savscan instead of the old sweep. The installer also
includes an on-access scanner which is disabled on the mail server. Sophos
have seemed to not support as highly the older versions, our enterprise
mana
Facundo Barrera wrote:
> Global symbol "$nprocess" requires explicit package name at
> /var/qmail/bin/qmail- scanner-queue.pl line 657.
> BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at
> /var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl line 1238.
Qmail-Scanner has no mention of the string "$nprocess". Yo
i have re-installed clamav and SA they are both running well but when compile i still get the following error, i google for it and still nothing.Global symbol "$nprocess" requires explicit package name at /var/qmail/bin/qmail-
scanner-queue.pl line 657.BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation abor
Hi list this is my first post, i hope i get any lucky this is the error when trying to install:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/downloads/qmail-scanner-2.01# ./configure --domain
kmmnet.net --admin postmaster --local-domains "
kmmnet.net,kmm.com.ar
,chuky.com.ar" --add-dscr-hdrs yes --ignore-eol-check yes -
I am aware of qmail-scanner's ability to block email messages if they
contain attachments with an extension that is on a block list. Is
anyone aware of a way to only allow messages with attachments that are
on an allow list? We are trying to move away from "allow by default/
block by exceptio
-general]Qmail-scanner with Clam-AV
Dear All.
1. I have installed Clam-AV 0.87 with user clamav and then i install
qmailscanner with user qscand, although they have a different user but
qmail-scanner can scan email with Clam-AV and i accept a bounce for
virus.
question:
I just upgraded Clam-av to
Dear All.
1. I have installed Clam-AV 0.87 with user clamav and then i install
qmailscanner with user qscand, although they have a different user but
qmail-scanner can scan email with Clam-AV and i accept a bounce for virus.
question:
I just upgraded Clam-av to 0.88 and the configuration for
1 - 100 of 805 matches
Mail list logo
