, May 31, 2006 8:53 PM
To: PC audio discussion list.
Subject: Re: Admin RE: gold wave vs sound forge
Here is an audio question for everybody.
Has anyone looked at the latest release of WavePad, and how accessible would
it be for a beginner just wanting to start getting their feet wet on a
simple
19 AM
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
> Where do you get this tutorial? I've tried searching for it using google
> and
> have had no luck.
>
> HF
> - Original Message -
> From: "dennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "PC audio discussio
Where do you get this tutorial? I've tried searching for it using google and
have had no luck.
HF
- Original Message -
From: "dennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 1:35 PM
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound f
o discussion list. "
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 9:34 PM
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
> Contact me of
> -line. I am not sure I have version 5.0 any more, but I think I may still
> have a copy of version 6.0, and you can get the Jaws scripts from
> www.snowmanradio.
Hi!
I don't know the answer, but I've modified the subject to reflect the change
of topic.
Allison
- Original Message -
From: "David Tanner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 8:52 PM
Subject: Re
ED]>
To: "'PC audio discussion list. '"
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 8:29 AM
Subject: Admin RE: gold wave vs sound forge
: Guys we're now starting to drift well off the topic of this list. Please
: let's keep on track with discussion of audio on the PC.
:
: Jonat
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 12:57 AM
Subject: Re[2]: gold wave vs sound forge
: Hello the,
:
: On Wednesday, May 31, 2006, 12:28:50 AM, you bellowed the following:
: > I'm 28, and I used dos. I am not old thank you very m
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 12:01 AM
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
: now was that wordperfect 4.2? At least you didn't have to type w wa
: out in edlin.
:
: Rick
: - Original Message -
: From:
ot;
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 11:58 PM
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
: someone earlier mentioned that sf v5 had scripts available. Where can I
: find an copy of sf v5.0 to play with?
: - Original Message -
: From: "David Tanner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: To: "PC
, and used transistors, microchips had
not come into use yet. All input was done with punchcards.
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 11:37 PM
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
ssage -
From: "Curtis Delzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 6:09 PM
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
> Gold wave takes about 4 times the time to noise reduce than the NR
> plug-in for Sound Forge, the interfac
ve to
park my hd when shutting down.
Rick
- Original Message -
From: "Patrick Perdue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 1:57 AM
Subject: Re[2]: gold wave vs sound forge
> Hello the,
>
> On Wednesday,
exactly. i use goldwave to do all of my radio work as well and its very
smooth.
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 6:33 PM
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
>
the mighty spork [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 31 May 2006 12:01 a.m.
To: PC audio discussion list.
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
now was that wordperfect 4.2? At least you didn't have to type w wa
out in edlin.
Rick
- Original Message -
From: "
;The chief handicap of the blind is not blindness, but the attitude of
seeing people towards them."
- Helen Keller, 1925
- Original Message -
From: "the mighty spork" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 1:01 AM
Su
Didn't you know? Bruce wrote it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of David Tanner
Sent: 2006/05/30 21:23
To: PC audio discussion list.
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
Man you must be old. You actually used DOS!!!
Sorry, I
Hello the,
On Wednesday, May 31, 2006, 12:28:50 AM, you bellowed the following:
> I'm 28, and I used dos. I am not old thank you very much lol.
Likewise, I am 22 and used Dos.
Actually, I started out using a Mac 2SI (16 MHZ processor, 4 MB ram and
a 40 MB hard drive). Despite these specs, in 19
0, 2006 10:16 PM
>Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
>
>
>Frankly, I wouldn't want to be without either of them. I find plenty of
>uses for both, and Studio Recorder.
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Rick Harmon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: &q
now was that wordperfect 4.2? At least you didn't have to type w wa
out in edlin.
Rick
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 12:37 AM
Subject: Re: gold wave vs
someone earlier mentioned that sf v5 had scripts available. Where can I
find an copy of sf v5.0 to play with?
- Original Message -
From: "David Tanner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 10:16 PM
Subject: Re
audio discussion list. "
> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 6:33 PM
> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
>
>
> : You'll find that it's a realy powerful way to get precision, especially
> : given that you can slow rewind and fast forward to slower than normal
> : sp
gt;
> - Original Message -
> From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "PC audio discussion list. "
> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 6:33 PM
> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
>
>
> : You'll find that it's a realy powerful way to
I'm 28, and I used dos. I am not old thank you very much lol.
Rick
- Original Message -
From: "David Tanner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 12:23 AM
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
> Man y
Man you must be old. You actually used DOS!!!
Sorry, I just couldn't resist!!! (SMILE)
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 6:33 PM
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound fo
"PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 6:22 PM
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
: Never had it have a problem.
:
: - Original Message -
: From: "Jerry Richer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: To: "PC audio discussion list. "
: Sent: Monday
Frankly, I wouldn't want to be without either of them. I find plenty of uses
for both, and Studio Recorder.
- Original Message -
From: "Rick Harmon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 6:09 PM
Subject: Re:
D]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 7:33 PM
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
You'll find that it's a realy powerful way to get precision, especially
given that you can slow rewind and fast forward to slower than normal
speeds. I do all
; seeing people towards them."
> - Helen Keller, 1925
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "PC audio discussion list. "
> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 7:16 PM
> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
Never had it have a problem.
- Original Message -
From: "Jerry Richer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 3:45 AM
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
> That q thing doesn't work so well for me all t
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 7:16 PM
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
You're confusing moving the markers witht he arrow/control/shift keys and
finer adjustments such as moving with fast forward and rewind and direct
input of
en Keller, 1925
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "PC audio discussion list. "
> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 6:38 PM
> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
>
>
> I suspect that the finenes
."
- Helen Keller, 1925
- Original Message -
From: "Curtis Delzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 7:05 PM
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
Hey man I dig GW for a lot of reasons, just the editing is
iginal Message -
>From: "Curtis Delzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "PC audio discussion list. "
>Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 6:22 PM
>Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
>
>
>There are many times I wish to do better than 1 one hundredth of a
>seco
le than that.
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Brent Harding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "PC audio discussion list. "
>Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 11:00 AM
>Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
>
>
> > Yeah, I used it a few times on
Tuesday, May 30, 2006 6:38 PM
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
I suspect that the fineness of the editing is not defined by Gold Wave,
which allows for up to five places after the decimal point for seconds,
but rather in the attributes of a sound file. A higher sampling rate, I'm
gue
eeing people towards them."
> - Helen Keller, 1925
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Curtis Delzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "PC audio discussion list. "
> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 6:22 PM
> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
&g
the attitude of
seeing people towards them."
- Helen Keller, 1925
- Original Message -
From: "Curtis Delzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 6:22 PM
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
There are many times
f handicap of the blind is not blindness, but the attitude of
>seeing people towards them."
>- Helen Keller, 1925
>
>
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Gary Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "PC audio discussion list. "
>Sent: Thursday, M
tis Delzer
At 06:37 AM 5/23/2006, you wrote:
>Fyi, I never use sets with SF.
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Jim Noseworthy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "PC audio discussion list. "
>Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 7:09 AM
>Subject: Re: gold wave
nifit of GoldWave over SoundForge is that Goldwave is much less
>processor intensive.
>
>Cheers.
>
>
>
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Chuck Adkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "PC audio discussion list. "
>Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 5
That q thing doesn't work so well for me all the time. What do you
know, it's working right now.
Thanks.
Jerry
Chirp|Chirp|Chirp: It's the Bat, Chirping Bat .Com
! Edirol R-09: $359.00, includes delivery within the USA, add $30 outside
! DEC-TALK USB: $650.00, includes d
Or because it was a form of square wave which cannot be handled by noise
reduction.
- Original Message -
From: "Rick Harmon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 2:07 PM
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
>
Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 1:59 PM
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
Doesn't prove anything except that you can't use it to do what you want.
You need more of a sample than that.
- Original Message -
From: "Brent Harding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "
Doesn't prove anything except that you can't use it to do what you want.
You need more of a sample than that.
- Original Message -
From: "Brent Harding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 11:00 AM
S
If I understand what you mean, you don't need it in 6, either. However, you
do have to set cue to on.
- Original Message -
From: "Jerry Richer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 10:33 AM
Subjec
Daveed! If scrubbing in Sound Forge is important to you for your work
then you probably should upgrade to 8.0. You don't need scripts to scrub in
8.0.
Jerry
Chirp|Chirp|Chirp: It's the Bat, Chirping Bat .Com
! Edirol R-09: $359.00, includes delivery within the USA, add $30 o
without a lot more work, and a whole lot less flexability.
>> And, the Goldwave noise reduction that is built-in is no place as good as
>> the noise reduction in SoundForge.
>>
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Gary Schindler" <[E
uction that is built-in is no place as good as
> the noise reduction in SoundForge.
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Gary Schindler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "PC audio discussion list. "
> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 9:12 AM
> S
2006 10:39 AM
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
> Hi Folks:
>
> Well! This has indeed been an interesting thread. Perhaps it would be a
> good idea if someone, who is well versed in sound editing, could give a
> side-bi-side comparison, emphasizing the strengths similarities,
the noise reduction in
SoundForge.
- Original Message -
From: "Gary Schindler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 9:12 AM
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
:I think you can get good broadcast quality from go
Jonathan: Don't you find it easier to engage scrubbing when editing,
especialy, on tight deadlines? I find that without scrubbing it is far
more difficult to guage the distance I move or how much of the material I
want to select. Just as sighted folks look at the waveform, I feel
scrubbing g
x27;"
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 4:14 PM
Subject: RE: gold wave vs sound forge
> Hi all, just in case this thread has created any false impression for
> anyone, Sound Forge is not dependent on screen reader configuration. Just
> as
> there are benefits in running the scripts for
By going to for-the-people.com!
- Original Message -
From: "HF" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 1:24 PM
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
> That sounds like an interesting tutorial. Where can you ge
Yeah,
I have those tapes; they are golden to me, no pun intended! I will look
forward to your evaluations!
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Mosen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'PC audio discussion list. '"
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:33 PM
Subjec
/SMS +1-806-252-6671
-Original Message-
From: Mac Norins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 26 May 2006 2:25 p.m.
To: PC audio discussion list.
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
You mean, you might "update" the famous Soundforge tutorials, with a Gold
wave comparison? Ho
'"
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:14 PM
Subject: RE: gold wave vs sound forge
Hi all, just in case this thread has created any false impression for
anyone, Sound Forge is not dependent on screen reader configuration. Just as
there are benefits in running the scripts for Goldwave, there a
From: "dennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 3:03 PM
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
cool. i'll check it out.
- Original Message -
From: "Rick Harmon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "P
Hi all, just in case this thread has created any false impression for
anyone, Sound Forge is not dependent on screen reader configuration. Just as
there are benefits in running the scripts for Goldwave, there are also
benefits in running the scripts or set files for Sound Forge. However I
personall
cool. i'll check it out.
- Original Message -
From: "Rick Harmon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 1:46 PM
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
> Hi not really except I go over the scripts a bit on part 2
essage -
From: "Rick Harmon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:44 PM
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
> That is a great tutorial. I learned a lot from it.
>
> I have a 3 part soon to be 4 partgoldwav
ROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:44 PM
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
> That is a great tutorial. I learned a lot from it.
>
> I have a 3 part soon to be 4 partgoldwave tutorial at:
>
> www.blindcooltech.com
>
> R
sion list. "
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 1:35 PM
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
for the people. in the galaxy of stars. a guy who calls himself startbutton
did it. its in 10 parts.
- Original Message -
From: "HF" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion
for the people. in the galaxy of stars. a guy who calls himself startbutton
did it. its in 10 parts.
- Original Message -
From: "HF" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:24 PM
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound for
That sounds like an interesting tutorial. Where can you get it?
HF
- Original Message -
From: "dennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 10:33 AM
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
>i get exilent braudcast q
GREAT. THANKS.
- Original Message -
From: "Larry N" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 10:15 AM
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
> Hi Dennis. You can read about DC6 and access its demo from here.
> http:
. all the programs
> have
> good and bad points respectively.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Larry N" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "PC audio discussion list. "
> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 10:49 AM
> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
>
>
Hi Dennis. You can read about DC6 and access its demo from here.
http://www.diamondcut.com/Catalog/DC6.htm
Larry
- Original Message -
From: "dennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 11:07 AM
Subject: Re: gold wav
al Message -
From: "Larry N" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 10:49 AM
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
>I have to agree with Bruce here. If you're comfortable with it, then it's
> the best software for
whare can i get dc6. i would like to take a look at it.
- Original Message -
From: "Larry N" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 9:49 AM
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
>I have to agree with Bruce here.
al Message -
From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 6:16 PM
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
> No artument there. My argument isn't about the lack of merit of Sound
> Forge. Jonathan was sayin
Hi Folks:
Well! This has indeed been an interesting thread. Perhaps it would be a
good idea if someone, who is well versed in sound editing, could give a
side-bi-side comparison, emphasizing the strengths similarities, and
weaknesses of both editors. This is especially important for those who
audio discussion list. "
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 9:12 AM
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
>I think you can get good broadcast quality from goldwave, but the program
>is
> awkward to work with when you are in a hurry.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "
with
>getting broadcast quality for every file they edit.
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "PC audio discussion list. "
> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 12:59 PM
> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
>
&g
Hi Jonathan! That's exactly the reason I decided to go with Soundforge!
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Mosen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'PC audio discussion list. '"
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 5:07 PM
Subject: RE: gold wave vs sound for
gt;
>- Original Message -
>From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "PC audio discussion list. "
>Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 5:17 PM
>Subject: RE: gold wave vs sound forge
>
>
>I disagree strongly with your contention that Gold Wave can'
I think you can probably get Soundforge at a lower price from Chirpingbatt!
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck Adkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 5:30 AM
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
>I agree.
with the
review that Jonathan Mosen did on it for a review on Main Menu!
- Original Message -
From: "Samuel Wilkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 2:55 AM
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
>I also have a
my
remote I use with Winamp and use rocksteady on it.
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Mosen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'PC audio discussion list. '"
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 11:11 PM
Subject: RE: gold wave vs sound forge
> Brent, the tw
.
Mobile/SMS +1-806-252-6671
-Original Message-
From: Brent Harding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 25 May 2006 10:56 p.m.
To: PC audio discussion list.
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
I would get forge before spending almost the same on Studio Recorder. Yeah,
Studio
al Message -
From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 12:59 PM
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
: With GW you can edit to within a thousandth of a second or finer. How much
: finer do you want than th
-
From: "David Tanner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 10:50 PM
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
> Well, I would say that it probably is too high for the average individual.
> But, my guess is that the price and
professional recording
studio.
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck Adkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 4:30 AM
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
:I agree. I don't know where that price was obtained but
Jonathan:
And just what are these tasks?
s
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Mosen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'PC audio discussion list. '"
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 6:28 PM
Subject: RE: gold wave vs sound forge
> Hi Dennis, this is all
show: http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Ph: +1-925-566-9265.
Mobile/SMS +1-806-252-6671
-Original Message-
From: Brian Olesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 25 May 2006 5:21 p.m.
To: PC audio discussion list.
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
Hi Jonathan,
Have you ran all the optimizations Son
ot;
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 11:48 PM
Subject: RE: gold wave vs sound forge
> Hi Doc, I would absolutely agree with this. Sound Forge does require more
> grunt. Studio Recorder is extremely snappy, even on quite slow machines,
> and
> Goldwave is better than Sound Forge in terms
. "
> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 2:17 PM
> Subject: RE: gold wave vs sound forge
>
>
> I disagree strongly with your contention that Gold Wave can't be
> considered for serious sound editing. It has beenby many, and still is by
> many. I do all my audio editing wi
Norins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 6:07 PM
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
But, if we are not comfortable with Goldwave and we are comfortable with
Soundforge, then exploring another new way to go, such as Gold Wave
Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 2:17 PM
Subject: RE: gold wave vs sound forge
I disagree strongly with your contention that Gold Wave can't be
considered for serious sound editing. It has beenby many, and still is by
list.
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
John what is your opinion that some feel that SF is more memory intensive
than Goldwave?
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Mosen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'PC audio discussion list. '"
Sent: Thursday, Ma
John what is your opinion that some feel that SF is more memory intensive
than Goldwave?
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Mosen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'PC audio discussion list. '"
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 3:28 PM
Subject: RE: gold wave vs
WHAT KIND OF COMMEN TASKS.
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Mosen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'PC audio discussion list. '"
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 4:28 PM
Subject: RE: gold wave vs sound forge
> Hi Dennis, this is all fine and not dis
SAME HERE.
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 4:30 PM
Subject: RE: gold wave vs sound forge
>I would accept your challenge, Jonathan.
>
> Bruce
>
> --
&g
: Thursday, 25 May 2006 4:22 p.m.
> To: PC audio discussion list.
> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
>
>
> I AGREE WITH THAT. I DO A LOT OF WORK FOR ESPN HERE AND USE GOLDWAVE FOR
> EVERYTHING. ALSO DO A LOT OF RECORDING AND EDITTING FOR A COUPLE BANDS THAT
> I'M IN AND ALSO US
om: dennis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 25 May 2006 4:22 p.m.
To: PC audio discussion list.
Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
I AGREE WITH THAT. I DO A LOT OF WORK FOR ESPN HERE AND USE GOLDWAVE FOR
EVERYTHING. ALSO DO A LOT OF RECORDING AND EDITTING FOR A COUPLE BANDS THAT
_geek_zone
"The chief handicap of the blind is not blindness, but the attitude of
seeing people towards them."
- Helen Keller, 1925
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Thursday, May 25
"Jonathan Mosen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'PC audio discussion list. '"
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 5:07 PM
Subject: RE: gold wave vs sound forge
> Hi all, some interesting points in this thread. From my point of view, if
> you're willing to inv
AT ALL TO WORK
WITH IT.
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 4:17 PM
Subject: RE: gold wave vs sound forge
>I disagree strongly with your contention that Gold Wave can'
I disagree strongly with your contention that Gold Wave can't be
considered for serious sound editing. It has beenby many, and still is by
many. I do all my audio editing with Gold Wave, and while I'm no
professional recording studio, I'm no slouch at the concept either, and
there are people wh
also you can change the amount of movement by presssing shift+up arrow to
decrease and shift+down arrow to increase
- Original Message -
From: "Rick Harmon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 2:18 PM
Subject: Re
Hi all, some interesting points in this thread. From my point of view, if
you're willing to invest in the tool that gets the job done most
efficiently, Sound Forge is so far ahead that Goldwave isn't even worth your
consideration. I say this because the reason Sound Forge became the leading
single
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
