Gold wave takes  about 4 times the time to noise reduce than the NR 
plug-in for Sound Forge, the interface takes getting use too with 
regard to cursoring around in the program, interface is a little like 
a cassette machine with rewind and fast forward though in sf8 you can 
do that also; the batch converting is a little more friendly in GW 
than SF; handling large files is a lot easier with SF than GW going 
to a finding a place by cursoring in SF after jumping to a time is a 
good bit easier because the jumps can be changed in either forward or 
backward direction with the up or down arrow; handling splitting 
files between channels in SF is easier because you can tell which 
channel is monitored by what you hear, rather than hearing both at 
once all the time, (same as SR which does that), reversing takes a 
good bit longer in GW than SF if you're converting an NLS cassette 
and need to reverse the right channel, etc.' some others but those 
are what I can think of right now.



Curtis Delzer



At 04:09 AM 5/23/2006, you wrote:
>Just to throw in another variable: Soundforge has a much longer  history of
>folks creating script and set files.
>
>One benifit of GoldWave over SoundForge is that Goldwave is much less
>processor intensive.
>
>Cheers.
>
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Chuck Adkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "PC audio discussion list. " <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
>Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 5:06 AM
>Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
>
>
> > Hello. I prefer Sound Forge because of the scrubbing features it has. I
> > also
> > like the effects but don't get me wrong, Gold Wave is a very good program.
> > For me Sound forge is a little bit more accessible. Of course, Sound Forge
> > was the first editor I had experience with and that I think does color an
> > oppion sometimes. It's like finding a car though. You can find 6 people
> > who
> > like Fords and 6 people who like shevys. The best way is first, can you
> > afford both programs in question and then second, download and try out
> > each
> > demo.
> >
> > Just my thoughts,
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> > P.S. I think some of the audio I've produced using the Noise Reduction
> > plugins with Sound Forge seem to have better quality then some of the NR
> > effects I've used with Sound Forge.
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Gary Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 2:15 AM
> > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge
> >
> >
> >> Hi Denny!  I like Soundforge because of all the effects that it has, as
> >> well
> >> as really enjoy the noisereduction plug-in, and I also like the ability
> >> to
> >> pitch shift with it!
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Denny Daughters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " <Pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
> >> Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 1:40 PM
> >> Subject: gold wave vs sound forge
> >>
> >>
> >>> Hi guys,
> >>>    Right now I use a basic sound editor called Fast Edit.  I find it
> >>> useful for doing what I need to get done.  When I bought it about 3
> >>> years
> >>> ago, I wanted something I'd used before and I didn't want to learn a
> >>> whole
> >>> new program.
> >>>    I've looked at goldwave and sure it's much more powerful with
> >>> effects,
> >>> de-popping records, batch conversion to any formats, that kind of thing.
> >>> I don't like the editing interface, how you can't hear right where that
> >>> final bracket drops.  I suppose I can get used to it.  The price of gold
> >>> wave is tempting, sound forge on the other hand costs more and that's
> >>> really all I know about it.  What do you all like and or dislike about
> >>> goldwave and soundforge? Thanks.
> >>> Denny
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
> >>> http://www.pc-audio.org
> >>>
> >>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>> This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we
> >>> offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
> >> http://www.pc-audio.org
> >>
> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >> This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we
> >> offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
> > http://www.pc-audio.org
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we
> > offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
>http://www.pc-audio.org
>
>To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other 
>lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com


_______________________________________________
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, 
visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com

Reply via email to