I have to agree with Bruce here. If you're comfortable with it, then it's the best software for you. I own both GoldWave and DC6, both of which work well with screen readers. I use both professionally and together,they work fine for what I need at a lower cost than Sound Forge. . Sound Forge is also an excellent program. No argument here. But the thing is that it performs tasks that I'll never need, which give it a price tag that does not interst me. . I would not suggest a contest between GoldWave and Sound Forge, as I respect the merrits of both. Rather I would suggest that consumers approach the process as they would any other purchase. Determine your needs, decide which software package would best meet them and buy it. Personally, I don't purchase any software that I can't try before buying. I've been burned before and won't be again. My last suggestion would be that anyone considering an audio editor might want to think about giving DC6 a try. They have a demo that let's you try all aspects of the program before purchasing it. You just can't save anything in demo mode. Jus my 2 cents.
Larry ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " <pc-audio@pc-audio.org> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 6:16 PM Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > No artument there. My argument isn't about the lack of merit of Sound > Forge. Jonathan was saying that anyone who is at all semi-serious about > audio editing shouldn't even give Gold Wave a second though, and it is > with this point that I respectuflly disagree. I've said all along go with > what you're most comfortable witha dn what works for you. > > Bruce > > -- > Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name, he > gave the right to become children of God. John 1:12 NIV > > Bruce Toews > E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Radio Show and Podcast: http://www.totw.net > Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net > Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com > > On Thu, 25 May 2006, Mac Norins wrote: > >> But, if we are not comfortable with Goldwave and we are comfortable with >> Soundforge, then exploring another new way to go, such as Gold >> Wave,seems, >> frankly, like an exercise in futility! Not to extend this thread, by any >> means (groan)! >> >> -Mac- >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " <pc-audio@pc-audio.org> >> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 2:17 PM >> Subject: RE: gold wave vs sound forge >> >> >> I disagree strongly with your contention that Gold Wave can't be >> considered for serious sound editing. It has beenby many, and still is by >> many. I do all my audio editing with Gold Wave, and while I'm no >> professional recording studio, I'm no slouch at the concept either, and >> there are people who are much more professional than I with recording who >> will agree. I'm not denying the superiority of Sound Forge as a sound >> editor, but if you're comfortable with Gold Wave's interface, as I am, >> then the power is there. >> >> bruce >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we > offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com _______________________________________________ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
