On 010725, at 15:28:36, Chris Fuchs wrote
> The 'C' command in the index copies files to a mailbox and prompts
> if it doesn't exist ...
>
> It would be nice to create a macro to do this... what do you guys do?
unset confirmcreate
(unset confirmappend also)
--
David Ellement
On 2001.07.25, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Jens Paulus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 10:44:11AM -0700, Dominique Pelle wrote:
> > How about attaching another mail to the email you want
> > to send?
>
> I know about this attach-message function. The disadvantage is tha
On 2001.07.29, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Simon Collyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm trying to do something not so simple here it appears.
>
> What I am trying to do is load the external editor
> in a new window, eg trying to be able to reply to multiple
> seperate message
On 2001.07.30, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Andrey R. Urazov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, it's not hard to write it. And it's what was supposed while writing mutt
>manual.
> it could look something like:
> ps -e|grep -q netscape
Not if you left netscape running on your console w
On 2001.08.01, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Michael P. Soulier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey people.
>
> When a thread is collapsed, is there a way to tell that there are replies
> beneath the top-level message? I've been playing with collapsing threads, but
> after it's collapse
d your message cleartext, but ASCII armor it
before saving it. The way I do this is when using VIM to edit the
email I then use this commandline:
:%!gpg -esa
This will then prompt you for a key userid and return with an ASCII
armored version of your message. Then all you have to do is send it
as a normal clear message.
--
David Rock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2001.08.03, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"John Wright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just talking to someone about mutt flagging mail with + when it's to
> you and T when it's to you and other, etc, and we were just wondering if
> mutt either does or could have a flag for emails which are fro
On 2001.08.06, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Ailbhe Leamy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've been reformatting text using par, before editing it in vi.
> Basically, I've changed my editor to a script that pipes the message
> through par and then opens it in vi. The only trouble with thi
On 2001.08.06, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Mike Erickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> All that would be necessary is a maillist_file setting in my .muttrc
> just like alias_file, and add a command to add addresses to it. Although
> it'd be a nice bonus, it's not even necessary to autopars
On 2001.08.07, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Brian Salter-Duke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > macro index \Co "addlist ~/.mutt/lists" "Scan a message for
>mailing lists to add"
> > macro pager \Co "addlist ~/.mutt/lists" "Scan a message for
>mailing lists to add"
>
> To get these to wo
On 2001.08.08, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Ken Weingold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now sure if I should be worried about it, but I get this on the last
> line from running make on 1.3.20i:
>
> muttlib.c:73: warning: mktemp() possibly used unsafely; consider using mkstemp()
It's just gcc
aps 'save-hook . =people/%u' or 'save-hook !~l =people/%u' will
do what you want.
--
David Ellement
ok ~Lphp-dev +OpenSource/PHP
Since mutt uses the first matching save-hook, a default save-hook
needs to be appear last.
--
David Ellement
efore specifying
a set of fcc/save/fcc-save hooks with a "special" pattern:
set default_hook="~t %s | ~f %s"
fcc-save-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] =".Clients.CompanyX.People.joe bob"
...
--
David Ellement
an page, the option is '-E' (--pretty-print)
and the modifier is 'mail' which is a language filter for how
enscript should preprocess the print object.
--
David Rock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ce 8 August, have I been dropped
--> again? I was droppped in June due to a server problem on this end, but
--> this time I am not aware of any such problem.
-->
--> Is it just me?
Could be! What kind of deodorant are you using?
--
David
-
en
> receiving a message from him, but then get an error like this:
You should be able to remove his key from your keyring. I would
think that would fix it.
--
David Rock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When I answer a mail mutt always put "> " as quote on the last mail
according to the indent_string in my .muttrc.
I want "> " only when no other has replyed, but if there already is a
"> " then i want it to become just ">"
How do I fix this?
/d
--
Bob Barker: "Which one of these lovely woma
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 07:04:31PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> David Rock wrote:
> > You should be able to remove his key from your keyring. I would
> > think that would fix it.
>
> yes that's what i would think too. but it doesn't appear to be there as
>
On 010820, at 09:16:48, Joe Rice wrote
>I have a designer who works on a mac and always sends me
> layout images in this format:
>
> [applica/mac-binhex, 7bit, 911K]
The conversion filter 'emil' will translate binhex to MIME.
--
David Ellement <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ministrative decision
> on the part of the sysadmin, and not a postfix failing. My
> solution was: a) install procmail in $HOME (including formail)
> and b) run this shell script to start mutt:
It's definitely not a failing of Postfix, I'm using it right now. ;-)
--
David Rock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 01:49:15PM -0400, darren chamberlain wrote:
> David Rock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said something to this effect on 08/20/2001:
> >
> > It's definitely not a failing of Postfix, I'm using it right now. ;-)
>
> David,
>
> My solu
On 2001.08.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"peter horst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to be able to flag an entire thread with "!": is this possible?
> When I tried esc-t'ing a thread, then using ;w, it didn't work--it gave
> me the "Set flag? (D/N/O/r/*/!):" message that I expected,
On 2001.08.29, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Eric Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How can I configure mutt to implicitly prepend the '=' or '+' to a
> user specified mailbox like in .
> I can remap the 'c' command for example to print the '=' for me so
> then I only need enter the folder na
On 2001.09.02, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Eric Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to apply all that comprise lists in the `lists' or
> `subscribe' command to regex such as this
>
> send-hook "~C mutt-users" 'set signature="echo Eric Smith|"'
>
> So instead of explicitly spe
, how?
It should be possible with a pair of folder hooks and macros: for
the special folder(s), create a macro to replace the normal binding
for with .
--
David Ellement
On 2001.09.06, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Denis Perelyubskiy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> the problem with outlook is that it also sends a plain text
> copy along with html one. so i DO NOT WANT to start any kind
> of browser, dump some output, then look at it in my pager if
> i can some
On 2001.09.06, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Denis Perelyubskiy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> also, neither do i know if this is an *official* bash way,
> but things like these work in my startup files, even though
> maybe they disgust people who really know bash :)
What bothers me about th
On 2001.09.06, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Thomas Dickey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> or better yet, it's a popup entry in XFree86 xterm.
I don't use XFree86. I think that its xterm was the same as the one on
your web site, though, which I do use (on Solaris).
I see the "Show Alternate
On 2001.09.06, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Thomas Dickey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There's also "Enable Alternate Screen Switching". Just glancing at the
> changelog, it appears I added that around patch #90.
Hmm, I'm using patch 150, but I don't see that in my menu. I did find
the t
On 2001.09.09, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Cliff Sarginson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - What is the purpose/use of "scoring" of mail messages?
I'm sure that people use it in different ways, but fundamentally, it's
just a ratings system. You can value/devalue messages according to the
resu
On 2001.09.16, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"David T-G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> % Quoting FreeBSD's "man sh" [from the listing of special parameters]:
> % | @ Expands to the positional parameters, starting from one.
> % |
On 2001.09.17, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Cliff Sarginson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
> I like to have threads collapsed by default.
> However I would like some indication in the index display
> that a message is the first in a thread.
> Anyone know how I can do this ?
Use %M, or %?
On 2001.09.19, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Miguel Farah F." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jura ernqvat arjf jvgu gva, vs bar cerffrf gur 'q' xrl, gur pbagrag bs
> gur negvpyr orvat ernq jvyy or ebg13-rq.
>
> V guvax zhgg pbhyq unir guvf pncnovyvgl, gbb. Jung V qb pheeragyl vf
> cvcr gur znvy
On 2001.09.19, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"David T-G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> % $ grep rot-13 ~/.mailcap
> % text/rot-13; tr '[A-Z][a-z]' '[N-Z][A-M][n-z][a-m]' <%s; copiousoutput
>
> Hey, that's slick. I just might
On 2001.09.19, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"David T-G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Actually, I don't think so; that's what's so interesting. I'd love to
> see the results of same experiment under 2.6 and 8;
Weird: I find that 7 beh
can work with stdin and
stdout. To be fair, I don't know how much of the same kind of thing
Emacs is capable of. I still think it's a great editor, but it's
awfully hard to go back ;-)
--
David Rock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP signature
mutt # This sets the folder mutt
# to be the destination of
# the read mail when you leave
# the spool folder.
--
David Rock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP signature
hanged to GnuPG. I guess it doesn't include my
> > key in the encryption by default. What's the prefered way of configuring
> > this with mutt?
I use this in my ~/.gnupg/options file:
encrypt-to
--
David Rock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2001.09.22, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Vincent Lefevre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I've seen spaces appended to the end of lines in mutt when cutting and
> > pasting, but it went away when I switched to vt100, I think.
>
> I don't want to use vt100 because
> * I want to know (by
ack is you
need to know when it's necessary to do it ;-)
--
David Rock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ot;!}par" to format until the end of the
paragraph) or set 'formatprg' to "par".
This would suggest that full justification is also not possible within
vim natively. I don't have par installed, so I can't test to see if it
would do it.
--
David Rock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP signature
On 2001.10.01, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Frederik Vanrenterghem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying out some ways to clear text sign a message in mutt, using
> :%!gpg -eas
>
> Unfortunately, all headers (including "to") are signed, effectively
> making these headers useless. Is there
On 2001.10.03, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"René Clerc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I thinkt the problem lies with the "$"; I think it needs to be
> escaped.
I think $EDITOR is not defined. To be fully traditional, you should have
${VISUAL:-${EDITOR:-vi}}, or something like that -- it es
On 2001.10.03, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Benjamin Michotte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi,
>
> if I look in the mutt manual, I can find the definition of index_format
> but not hdr_format.
>
> They seems to do the same but what's the difference between them ?
They're synonymous. From i
t 'g' only send the message to person A and cc: it
to person B. That is, I don't want to receive a copy of the mail that
I've sent. Is there a way to configure mutt to do this? I saw
`metoo', but that appears to only apply to regular `r'eplies, and it
is also o
> i am pretty sure that metoo works for group reply as well. my guess is
> that you don't have 'alternates' set correctly or set at all... what is
> your 'alternates' line?
that was it! thanks!
> w
david
On 2001.10.05, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Tim Whitehead" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have emails that I want to resend from ~/Mail/sent. Is there a key binding for
> this?
, esc-e.
--
-D.[EMAIL PROTECTED]NSITUniversity of Chicago
On 2001.10.18, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Manuel Hendel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to use the compressed folders patch with maildir. What
> happens than. Does every mail gets compressed, or how does this work
> with maildir?
This patch really isn't particular to compressio
On 2001.10.24, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"R . Leponce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all mutt-users !!
>
> Is there a way to limit the size of CC and To field when receiving an email also
>sent to
> many users ?
I had this problem with mail forwarded from my VMS account; its mail
fac
On 2001.10.25, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Rob 'Feztaa' Park" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 10:21:30AM -0400, David T-G (dis)graced my inbox with:
> > Note that I have found, from recent discussion, that gkrellm (and perhap
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 01:18:32PM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> %
> % First of all, I'd like to see the hostname portion of the Message-ID in
> ...
> % way to do this. I guess I could set up a procmail recipe to put it in
> % the subject or something, but that seems rather ugl
... ;-)
You can use "Q" to query an external program for addresses. I do this
at work with a perl script that calls ldapsearch.
--
David Rock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
Swap jobs without having to swap email addresses at www.mail-x-change.com
Ah, mutt -- making the world smaller again.
On 2001.10.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Jeremy Hankins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> First of all, I'd like to see the hostname portion of the Message-ID in
> the index (assuming there is one, of course). I find that quite useful
> on occa
d like they would if you
pull the info down using pop3. Is there a way, using mutt, to respond
to meeting requests?
--
David Rock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
Forward your email to your WAP phone at www.mail-x-change.com
On 2001.11.02, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Will Yardley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hit whatever key you have bound to (i think g by
> default?)... however you should generally avoid doing this. if people
> want to be cc'd or replied to privately, they will probably have
> 'set-followu
to get mutt to send emails so they look like they're from yahoo.
I use "my_hdr From: David Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" and "set
envelope_from" to make it so that my emails appear to be from yahoo.
--
Don't tell me I'm burning the candle at both ends -- t
On 2001.11.13, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Will Yardley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> mutt doesn't have an editor, so this is a function of your editor. in
> vim you can use :set tw=74 or :set textwidth=74
>
> nvi and other vi clones should be the same, but you can't use 'gqip' or
> 'gqa
On 2001.11.13, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Rob 'Feztaa' Park" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hmmm, I tried that with vim... it kinda screws up the quoting. It
> works great for my own writing, though. Example:
Yes, that's one of the ways that par's abilities exceed fmt's. Par is
fairly tole
g on this.
If you know that it's going to an Exchange user AND you are using vim,
you can call gpg through vim to ascii armor the text and send it as
plain text instead of encrypted. Then the Exchange server won't mangle
it.
(in vim)
:%!gpg -eas
--
David Rock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
msg20473/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
where to
get more wax!!
-
David Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | David Clarke
GPG Fingerprint : 869B 53DD 5E80 E1F0 93F6 9871 0508 0296 5957 F723
On 2001.11.16, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Thorsten Haude" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this one bothers me for some time:
> I use
> macro index d "=admin/trash\n" "Move mail to trashcan"
> to get mail out of the way. If I change the mailbox after that, the
> first entry in the
em all
> together.
>
> If you bounce a message that has a .doc attachment, the recipient gets a
> message with a .doc attachment.
This is the same result I get. I actually used bounce before I
discovered the mime_forward et al settings to pass along attachments.
--
David Rock
[EMAIL PROTEC
dicate that it is a multi-part message? If
so, there should be a Content-Type header for the attachment.
You'll need a mailcap entry to tell it how you want that type
decoded.
If the headers don't indicate a multi-part message, the "attachment"
hasn't been sent as an attachment and mutt won't recognize it as
such.
--
David Ellement
On 2001.11.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Patrik Modesto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There is no Content-Type header. There is:
> ...
> then few empty lines and then the encoded file above. I can get to the
> PC that sends this "attachments" so I will check it's MSOE setup.
It's not na
On Sat, 24 Nov 2001, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> is there any way to check "normal" pgp-signatures on demand like with
Theres "esc P" note the capitol P, that should verify cleartext sigs.
--
Don't tell me I'm burning the candle at both ends -- tell me where
On 2001.11.27, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Thomas Roessler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This probably depends on the particular uudecode implementation you
> are using... I've seen uudecode only decode the _first_ attachment.
Some uudecodes even choke if there's any material in the inp
erform poorer than mbox. I
have had a mix of both, and tend to keep my more active NFS
mailboxes as mbox because it *seems* faster.
--
David Ellement
ng the current message as a template, or if
your mailbox file isn't too large, you could use :r within vim to read a
file into the current file.
--
David Rock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pmargin is set to a value that causes the
text to be wrapped, the markers remain visible after wrapmargin is
set to a value such that the text is no longer wrapped.
--
David Ellement
m Thomas Roessler explains why that method
doesn't work.
--
David Ellement
--- Begin Message ---
On 2000-10-03 01:45:02 +0300, Eugene Paskevich wrote:
> Can you explain what do you mean? app/pgp is Content-Type;
> but what is PGP/MIME? And is it the way decide my problem?
PGP
On 2001.12.09, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Matej Cepl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> However, emails in this list have mungled Reply-To: directing to
> the list. Could it be possible to ask procmail (or how to ask
> procmail) that before moving the message to the listy folder, it
> would ru
On 2001.12.06, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Prahlad Vaidyanathan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 06 Dec 2001 Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed into the ether:
> > Well I am not sure what you call that information bar above the
> > pager. But would it not be useful if the names of
;m burning the candle at both ends -- tell me where to
get more wax!!
-
David Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | David Clarke
Key Fingerprint : 869B 53DD 5E80 E1F0 93F6 9871 0508 0296 5957 F723
Erwan David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You must quote the '!', so your line should be
> mailboxes '!' =mutt-users =mgetty =bannedndamned
That's not true; I'm not quoting it, and it works for me.
The more likely problem is that some sort
Clint Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You need to specify "-Aa -D_HPUX_SOURCE" to cc on HP-UX (or -Ae if you have
> the performance C compiler option installed).
Mutt already detects the need for this option. At least, it does for
me. :)
--
David DeSimone
sending mail through their server instead of mine???
Any help you could give me would be very much appreciated.
--
David Allen
http://members.xoom.com/uruk/index.html
When I say the magic word to all these people, they will vanish forever.
I will then say the
that...i.e. forked a copy of itself to send the mail while presentin
g the UI back to the user as the mail just sent was being mailed, etc.
Just a suggestion. :)
--
David Allen
http://members.xoom.com/uruk/index.html
When I say the magic word to all these pe
David Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> When something;s up with your mailer, it can hang for 4-5 secs. It
> would be cool if Mutt did something about that...i.e. forked a copy
> of itself to send the mail while presenting the UI back to the user as
> the mail just sent
er and
> reconfigure the tty to disable that character.
I simply disable those characters before running Mutt, using my shell
script approach. This doesn't /need/ to be in Mutt.
--
David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | that there is
-ASCII or ISO-8859-1.
Doesn't the new character-set-handling code in 0.95 make this sort of
thing obsolete? Or rather, isn't that what it's supposed to be for?
--
David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | that there is no man re
it
fails. If it doesn't work at all, something really wrong with your
regexp library.
--
David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | that there is no man really clever who has not
Hewlett-Packard | found that he is stupid." -- Gilbert K. Chesterson
Convex Division |PGP: 5B 47 34 9F 3B 9A B0 0D AB A6 15 F1 BB BE 8C 44
could send a multipart/alternative message
with a text/enriched part, and a text/plain representation of the same
message? Then anyone should be able to read it, in theory.
Of course, Mutt has no ability to create multipart/alternative messages,
as far as I can tell.
--
David DeSimone | "Th
main screen for each of those headers and have
all of the mail coming from the addresses in "lists" go to their
respective folders...
Am I missing a section in the manual? Can anybody help out with this?
Thanks for your time
--
David Allen
http://members
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'd like to be able to see different colours for my headers,
> signatures,...whenever I open a message to read it. The pager I use
> is less
You must use the internal pager to see colors.
--
David DeSimone | "The doctrine of hu
David Thorburn-Gundlach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> % > [ character "´" ]
> %
> % I'm not sure why you're using the character above (value 0xB4).
>
> however, it looks pretty much like an apostrophe for me. So is it
> him or you?
Thanks
mail filtered into the correct spot.
People have been talking about adding it into the FAQ and all that stuff, and
I had been wondering about it, but why wait? There you go. It's easier
than you might think if you're familiar with regular expressions.
--
David Allen
http://members.xoo
Encoding: 8bit
Your message claims that the characters are in charset "iso-8859-1", but
that's the character set I use, and it doesn't match up. You may wish
to take steps to set your "charset" variable in Mutt so that it properly
reflects the character set in which you
David Thorburn-Gundlach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Right... The '^From ' header (there's a real name for it, but I can
> never remember it :-) is the actual bit of useful data; the '^From:'
> header is essentially just additional information, and
y
message except the one you don't want to see.
folder-hook . 'push "l!~s ignore"'
or something like that...
--
David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | that there is no man really clever who has not
Hewlett-Pack
minal, and in neither case does it say anything
Any suggestions? The syntax of my .muttrc file is fine because it doesn't
complain about it at all unless I introduce an error on purpose to see
if it's checking it. :)
--
David Allen
http://members.xoom.com/
ck the mailbox, but that fact is being
hidden from you, for some reason. Is dot-locking even required on your
system? What are the permissions of /var/mail?
If dot-locking is required, you will need a system administrator to
install the dotlock program with the appropriate privileges in order to
at all times, but that gives the
old dupe-message problem, solved only if the remote users uses Mutt (or
some sort of de-duping agent; most don't).
Well, whatever. I'll keep list-replying for now.
--
David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this:
[EMAIL PROTE
27; is expanded by the system call
``strftime''; a leading bang disables locales
>From the strftime(3) man page:
%bLocale's abbreviated month name.
%dDay of the month as a decimal number [01,31].
Now it should all start to come
methods, then why does %d exist?
If I remember rightly, it's a matter of history. "%d" was implemented
first, then the "%{...}" stuff was added later, to give people more
control over the formatting.
If you feel that having "%d" in Mutt is bloating the pr
Le Sat 06/02/1999, David DeSimone disait
> Daniel Eisenbud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Did you _read_ the beginning of my post that you quoted above? I give
> > another really good reason or two for at least mutt-dev to be open.
>
> Because it's
Stefan `Sec` Zehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Feb 06, 1999 at 09:55:23PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
Maybe I should start using group-reply at all times, but that gives the old dupe-message problem, solved only if the remote users uses Mutt (or some sort of de-duping agent; most
person (listserv) that sent the mail to me.
In that case, you should probably use the append ">>" operator instead
of ">" (overwrite).
If you "set abort_unmodified=no", you won't get the timestamp error,
anyway.
--
David DeSimone | "The doctrine
fig.h.
If you run a ./configure, you will see it in config.h and can modify it
there. Actually, I don't think it is modified in configure anywhere, so
you can probably change it in config.h.in and run configure.
David
--
David Shaw | [EMAIL PROTECTE
> mailbox.)
Possibly silly question - why "^" ? I would think that "." would make
more sense for something that means "this current mailbox" (a la the
filesystem).
Oh, wait a second. Never mind.
I'm going back to bed.
David
--
David Shaw | [EMAI
401 - 500 of 2921 matches
Mail list logo
