Le Sat 06/02/1999, David DeSimone disait
> Daniel Eisenbud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Did you _read_ the beginning of my post that you quoted above? I give
> > another really good reason or two for at least mutt-dev to be open.
>
> Because it's listed in the "mutt -v" output, right? Sounds reasonable
> to me, but I usually assume that people who post on a list are actually
> subscribed to the list; I always use list-reply when writing back. If
> the user isn't subscribed, they won't see my reply, and I'll have no
> idea that they didn't see it.
mutt -v output does not say it is a list. It could be a simple
alias to contact the developpers.
--
Erwan DAVID | Domaine de Voluceau
Trusted Logic | BP 105, 78153 Le Chesnay CEDEX France
----------------------------------------------------------------
Je ne parle qu'en mon nom propre, et encore pas toujours.
