Gaurav Goyal wrote:
> Dear Dell Team,
I don't believe there is anyone from Dell still involved with Crowbar.
Also, this list is obsolete; the new list is:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/crowbar
> I am going to use Dell Equallogic iSCSI LUNs with openstack environment.
> Can you pleas
Hi Siaolé,
Please can you run supportconfig on the Crowbar admin node and make it
available to us somewhere? e.g. you can probably upload to
ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/incoming
Are you an existing customer, or just evaluating?
Thanks!
Adam
Rob Hirschfeld (rob_hirschf...@dell.com) wrote:
> Siaolé
Hi Rob,
I'm now getting three copies of every mail to the list(s). I'm not
100% sure but I believe this is because a) mails are being
cross-posted and b) the old list is subscribed to the new list. If
so, in the interests of encouraging a clean migration with minimum
confusion, please can we avo
Hi Andrew,
Andrew Brimer (abri...@pearlnet.com) wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have created a crowbar iso named
> "crowbar-mesa-1.7_openstack-os-build.3502.dev-ubuntu-12.04"
>
> Once this iso installs the operating system I switch to root and run
> "./install admin.pearlstack.com"
>
> The install fails
Oğuz Yarımtepe (oguzyarimt...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems the directories under libraries are not uploaded to chef server:
>
> root@d00-1e-4f-3d-11-fb:/var/cache/chef/cookbooks/pacemaker/libraries# ll
> total 16
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Apr 28 10:55 ./
> drwxr-xr-x 8 root root 4096 Ap
Oğuz Yarımtepe (oguzyarimt...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I created a new ISO from roxy and realized the new pacemaker barclamp. It
> seems it should be installed first, because when i try skipping it and
> applying the database barclamp i got DRBD related errors.
It needs to be installed, but you
John-Paul Robinson (j...@uab.edu) wrote:
> Do I:
>
> * edit the api.rb in the barclamp-nova under
> /opt/dell/barclamps/nova/chef/cookbooks/nova/recipes/api.rb and then
> install this updated barclamp -- if so how do I install the new
> barclamp?
> * edit the api.rb in the chef conf
John-Paul Robinson (j...@uab.edu) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to enable nova client access to my controller deployed by
> crowbar from nodes that are not on the public/float network. In our
> environment the public/float network is a private address range that
> sits behind an additional firewall.
justin_bo...@dell.com (justin_bo...@dell.com) wrote:
> Is the IRC channel dead? I have been reaching out over IRC over the last
> week with no response.
Not quite ;-) But I guess all the Dell guys are busy with Crowbar 2.x
and certainly we (SUSE) are currently busy adding high availability to
th
John-Paul Robinson (j...@uab.edu) wrote:
> Rob, thanks for the insight on the future direction.
>
> What I really want is some clarification on how to best address these
> issues in the context of an existing Crowbar 1.5 install. I'm
> comfortable getting my hands dirty and retro-fitting capabili
j_t_willi...@dell.com (j_t_willi...@dell.com) wrote:
> Thomas,
> I have received word from our development teams. Here is the view our
> leadership team asserted that we need to address to ensure that we can
> quickly respond and support deployments in the field.
> We should not be taking chanc
John-Paul Robinson (j...@uab.edu) wrote:
> On 03/18/2014 09:34 PM, Keith Hudgins wrote:
> As a first step, I'm not as interested in add new packages to the nodes
> (that's coming) but more interested in how tune/update the behavior of
> an install service, eg. switch OpenStack to using HTTPS instea
ther branch,
> > then it can't be converted to a tag can it?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > Dell
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf
christopher_dearb...@dell.com (christopher_dearb...@dell.com) wrote:
> Disclaimer: I am not a github expert.
>
> Regarding branch lifecycle:
>
> 1. Work on the release being actively developed continues in a branch
>
> 2. When that release is shipped, another branch is made so that active
[BTW no need to send to both crowbar@dell.com and crow...@lists.us.dell.com]
Sascha Peilicke (sasc...@mailbox.org) wrote:
> On the other hand, seasoned developers with an eye for beauty are consistently
> annoyed by the continued over-use of Github.
I'd call it abuse or misuse of git rather than
age-
> From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Thomas Boerger
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 9:25 AM
> To: crowbar
> Subject: Re: [Crowbar] Removing branches fully merged into "master".
>
> On Wednesday, March 12, 2014 11:03:21 AM Adam Spiers wrote:
> > That&#x
Thomas Boerger (tboer...@suse.de) wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 12, 2014 11:03:21 AM Adam Spiers wrote:
> > That's not true at all. There was plenty of interest in doing it, but
> > the final deletion got postponed due to other activities and holidays.
>
> Sure it
Thomas Boerger (tboer...@suse.de) wrote:
> Guys, are you serious? we started this thread multiple months ago and nobody
> really cared about it.
That's not true at all. There was plenty of interest in doing it, but
the final deletion got postponed due to other activities and holidays.
> And now
roxy, stoney and hydrogen.
>
>
> Kind regards,
> Thomas Boerger
>
> On Wednesday, December 04, 2013 02:11:50 PM Sascha Peilicke wrote:
> > On Wednesday 04 December 2013 12:32:58 Adam Spiers wrote:
> > > Comments inline ...
> > >
> > > Sascha Pei
Rob Hirschfeld (rob_hirschf...@dell.com) wrote:
> John,
>
> My sense on this is that gems are more for Rails extensions (parts
> of apps) than a full application. While OpenCrowbar is mostly
> Rails, it is NOT only Rails. There's quite a bit of extra stuff
> (chef, erlang, scripts, docs, etc) th
John Terpstra (john_terps...@dell.com) wrote:
> [Uncle] How can we move this forwards? What is the next step and who should
> drive it? How can I help?
I think the next step is addressing any objections that anyone can
come up with ;-)
[snipped]
> Ensuring that all files get copied / moved / sy
As requested by Victor, I'd like to start a conversation about the
idea of packaging barclamps as gems (which are then optionally
automatically wrapped in .rpms / .debs). This was first proposed a
*long* time ago by James Tan, and has occasionally surfaced in
conversations since then, but other th
Victor Lowther (victor.lowt...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> > Victor Lowther (victor.lowt...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 5:33 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> > > > Victor Lowther (victor.lowt...@gmail.com) wro
Victor Lowther (victor.lowt...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 5:33 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> > Victor Lowther (victor.lowt...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > > This is intended to work as a starting point for a discussion of what tool
> > > we should use to us
Victor Lowther (victor.lowt...@gmail.com) wrote:
> This is intended to work as a starting point for a discussion of what tool
> we should use to use to track inter-repository dependencies for CB2.0 in
> the opencrowbar org.
Before evaluating the tools I think it would be worth trying to
clarify th
Rob Hirschfeld (rob_hirschf...@dell.com) wrote:
> You are correct. I have updated my import process to preserve history.
Fantastic, thanks Rob :)
> While repo histories are preserved (the merged repo has >7 barclamps
> history!), we may not be able to map directly back per file if/as
> they are
Resending this, since it appears to have been lost amongst the rest of
the discussion:
Adam Spiers (aspi...@suse.com) wrote:
> Even if people disagree with my concerns about a new organization[1],
> surely at very least it would make sense to preserve commit history in
> the transition
Rob Hirschfeld (rob_hirschf...@dell.com) wrote:
> Adam,
> As you know, we use a very different build process than your team. We have
> tried several times to duplicate your process using Kiwi and your tool chain
> without success. We are not going to put additional effort into that.
Sure - th
requirements in the CB1.x code base.
> Having CB2.0 code totally separate from CB1.x means that we all have a green
> field to work from.
>
> - John T.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Adam Spiers
> Sent: Wednesday, Decem
John Terpstra (john_terps...@dell.com) wrote:
> Unfortunately, our internal infrastructure makes use of DevTool to
> build and test CB1.x - if we make the changes Adam suggests will
> take only 60 sec, it will take several engineers from our team to
> update/change/fix the DevTool
No it won't. Th
Judd Maltin (j...@newgoliath.com) wrote:
> Dear Vincent,
>
> I for one do not believe that CB1 is end of life. I think there is still
> good value in the product, strong commit-stream or not. Just the way it is
> it is still far ahead of our nearest competition. It was two years ahead of
> the p
Victor Lowther (victor.lowt...@gmail.com) wrote:
> I do not want to go back to having branches in the top-level repo -- I
> strongly prefer that it only hold release-independent (and therefore
> non-branch-needing) things, and pull in other repos that are branched based
> on release.
We agree (as
*sigh*
How does duplicating confusion reduce it?
So basically every single one of my unanswered concerns were ignored:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cloud.crowbar/1233/focus=1299
and this was done without any consensus or heads up on this list.
And worse, the new repos have been done wi
Hi all,
We have a bit of a confusing situation currently with the docs.
Hopefully this mail will help clarify it.
12 days ago, two pull requests were opened which proposed to move a
bunch of documentation from the main (i.e. top-level) crowbar
repository into the barclamp-crowbar repository:
h
Iben Rodriguez (iben.rodrig...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi Judd,
>
> Most of the larger organizations are using a red hat RHEL or RHEL
> derivative such as CentOS or SuSE, Oracle, Cern, etc.
Just to clarify here:
openSUSE: community distro *not* based on Fedora or RHEL
SLES: SUSE Linux Enter
Sébastien Braun (sebbr...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> It's not an Array when bootstrapping the admin node from the Crowbar 2.0
> Web UI, but a string.
>
> When you run the installer with --wizard, you get the opportunity to setup
> things before installing the admin node, when you give a NTP
Adam Spiers (aspi...@suse.com) wrote:
> Having said that, in this case, isn't @ntp_servers supposed to be an
> Array of Strings, not a String? Maybe you are editing the proposal
> JSON incorrectly?
Oh, you're talking about Crowbar 2.0. Well, my point still stands:
https:/
Hi Sébastien,
Sébastien Braun (sebbr...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Ruby 1.9 removed each method for strings.
>
> But when we provision an admin node, if we edit the ntp-server role
> template to add an NTP server, it will break provisionning. Because when
> trying to use ntp.conf.erb template, it will c
Vincent Untz (vu...@suse.com) wrote:
> I initially wanted to summarize where we stand with pull requests, and
> list those that should be okay to go in, and those that need further
> review. But we reached a point where even doing this is just too
> painful: there are 114 pull requests opened right
Victor Lowther (victor.lowt...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
>
> > Victor Lowther (victor.lowt...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> > > > [Porting conversation from
> >
Victor Lowther (victor.lowt...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> > [Porting conversation from https://github.com/crowbar/crowbar/pull/1959]
> >
> > gitify-meta breakage follows in case it's of use (BTW this was run
> > immed
[Porting conversation from https://github.com/crowbar/crowbar/pull/1959]
Victor Lowther wrote:
> Adam Spiers wrote:
> > On a related note, if we all agree that keeping release-specific stuff
> > in a non-branched repo is highly confusing, then I hope we can also
> > g
Simon Jakesch (simon_jake...@dell.com) wrote:
> All,
>
> unfortunately I will not be available for today's meeting. Meeting
> details are available via http://bit.ly/1bgeFoh
That link doesn't work - based on a bit of guesswork I think you meant
http://bit.ly/1bgeF0h ?
___
Comments inline ...
Sascha Peilicke (speili...@suse.com) wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> here's a slightly edited per repository list of branches merged into their
> master branch. All of those are behind master. In other words, those are
> fully
> merged branches waiting to be cleaned up. So if nobody
Sascha Peilicke (speili...@suse.com) wrote:
> On Sunday 24 November 2013 18:28:18 Victor Lowther wrote:
> > CB 2.0 on opensuse 12.3 with all core Chef roles using the chef-solo jig:
>
> Nice, though we'll likely get bug reports such as "my neck hurts" :-) Any
> chance to render the barclamp names
I think the discussion from last week on this list answers your question:
http://lists.us.dell.com/pipermail/crowbar/2013-November/004135.html
Judd Maltin (j...@newgoliath.com) wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> The github repo is more up-to-date than the website. How can we refresh?
>
> This:
> https://g
Darrel O'Pry (darrel.o...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> > Darrel O'Pry (darrel.o...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > > I hear a lot of knee jerk throw everything out and start over undertones.
> > > I
> > > don't
--Original Message-
> From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Adam Spiers
> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 10:03 AM
> To: crowbar
> Subject: Re: [Crowbar] Barclamp-ceph announcement
>
> We already fully understand the problem and know exactly what the resolution
> is - I hav
John
>
> -Original Message-
> From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Adam Spiers
> Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 4:50 PM
> To: crowbar
> Subject: Re: [Crowbar] Barclamp-ceph announcement
>
> Sorry, but that won't help. It's not a question of making the refs
o, we need to know what version of ceph is this barclamp based on so that
> we can update the crowbar.yml file for our build.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Adam Spiers
> Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 9:33 AM
> To: crowbar
>
gave up chasing down the real issue since I actually wanted to push
> an update. I can take another stab at it.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Adam Spiers
> Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 12:01 PM
> To: crowbar
> Subject: Re: [Crowba
Ah, I see. Is the generation automated? If so, how and where?
There should be a Gemfile to handle the gems required. And we should
really get this working on Ruby 2.0.0 or 1.9.3 at least, since 1.8.7
is absolutely ancient now.
Simon Jakesch (simon_jake...@dell.com) wrote:
> The procedure to up
As some of you may already know, Symantec evaluated Crowbar 1.6
against Fuel, JuJu/Maas, Foreman, and Rackspace Private Cloud, and
Crowbar won the shoot-out.
They presented their findings at the Hong Kong summit:
http://www.openstack.org/summit/openstack-summit-hong-kong-2013/session-videos/pr
This should help to explain WHY
> someone might want to use Crowbar.
>
> From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Judd Maltin
> Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 11:08 AM
> To: Adam Spiers
> Cc: crowbar
> Subject: Re: [Crowbar] What is Crowbar exactly?
>
> Might want to say,
Victor Lowther (victor_lowt...@dell.com) wrote:
> Michal,
>
> What is broken for you? I pushed the CB2.0 Ceph stuff I have been
> working on into the mater branch of the ceph repository, is that
> what is causing problems for you?
No, it's that https://github.com/crowbar/barclamp-ceph was not cr
I think the problem here is that "move" is a confusing choice of verb,
because Crowbar doesn't really move anything: rather it transforms the
state of those servers. I've fixed the wording.
Simon Jakesch (simon_jake...@dell.com) wrote:
> Matthew,
>
> let me try and answer your questions. In the
Steve Snow (ss...@blackducksoftware.com) wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I am assigned to administrative duties at ohloh.net
>
> You will notice some changes at https://www.ohloh.net/p/CrowbarProject
> since we are working through some issues we have been having with
> failures to update our analysis. Withi
tion. The below is entirely
separate and relates to the Crowbar project on Ohloh.
- Forwarded message from Steve Snow -
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 11:30:16 -0500
From: Steve Snow
To: Adam Spiers
Subject: Re: Crowbar Project failures
Adam,
I was thinking something just like that. Would real
Sascha Peilicke (speili...@suse.com) wrote:
> On Thursday 21 November 2013 08:41:51 Victor Lowther wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 6:33 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> > > Sascha Peilicke (speili...@suse.com) wrote:
> > > > I would also wonder why we append
> > >
Sascha Peilicke (speili...@suse.com) wrote:
> On the other hand, we could probably kill some branches across
> repos.
Great idea - very low-hanging fruit ... if we are scared about losing
important stuff for ever, we can always take a backup first.
> This is what I currently have just for the "cr
Chux Uzoeto (chuxuzo...@gmail.com) wrote:
> I am fairly new to crowbar .. Thanks to the team for such a great
> concept ..
Welcome :-)
> My question is:
> -- Is there a wiki somewhere about troubleshooting/debugging steps for a
> deployed crowban admin ?
>
> I mean basic information like:
> --
Darrel O'Pry (darrel.o...@gmail.com) wrote:
> The project has come along way since I first started following it a few
> years ago. What is there now is a vast improvement over what I first found
> which were the links to Rob's blog. It has been steady forward
> progress.
Agreed.
> I hear a lot of
Simon Jakesch (simon_jake...@dell.com) wrote:
> I've gone through the entire thread and I am going to make an
> attempt at summarizing this conversation to flush out the most
> burning and critical issues around this discussion. I've summarized
> what I believe the high-level argument to be. Please
Rob Hirschfeld (rob_hirschf...@dell.com) wrote:
> We want to solve those exact problems in CB2 but that creates a huge
> cleanup lift for CB1 that risks CB1 stability.
Sorry - we must have a major disconnect here because I can't
understand this at all. Please can you explain what you mean in more
Rob Hirschfeld (rob_hirschf...@dell.com) wrote:
> How do we address that CB1 and 2 are so different that the docs can't cover
> both? This seems very confusing to me.
It shouldn't be at all confusing - this is precisely why we started
moving the docs into the code repo, so that whichever branch
John Terpstra (john_terps...@dell.com) wrote:
> The fact that Crowbar has a high barrier to new participants is
> undeniable. It is of utmost importance to the future of the project
> that the obstacles to entry of new developers must be removed.
Agreed!
> The positive steps to remove barriers s
Judd Maltin (j...@newgoliath.com) wrote:
> Furthermore, since every administrator I talk to asks me "Isn't Crowbar a
> Dell-only project," I think it's a good idea to embrace the OpenCrowbar
> project name.. much as SUSE is recognized by OpenSUSE, even in the press
> http://linux.slashdot.org/story
Sorry, I don't understand your logic.
Newbie *users* are confused because the website does not contain a
quickly and easily digestible introduction explaining the architecture
and how to get started.
If you need convincing that the website is inadequate, compare it to
https://juju.ubuntu.com/
christopher_dearb...@dell.com (christopher_dearb...@dell.com) wrote:
> Rob,
>
> I think you misunderstood my recommendation below. What I'm
> proposing is that we branch everything, including the main Crowbar
> repo.
I think I'm on the same page as you here Chris, although the above
statement mak
ot;
> Anyone have objections or issues?
I wouldn't be keen on seeing a new org until I'm clear about the
answers to the above questions.
> -Original Message-
> From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Adam Spiers
> Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2013 11:16 PM
> To: crowba
Restructuring the repositories is long overdue, so thank you for
getting behind this. Victor and I discussed it at some length during
my Austin visit, and we documented some of our ideas here:
http://crowbar.sync.in/crowbar-repos
You will see that in addition to restructuring, we mention a
t;
> Judd Maltin
> 1-917-882-1270
> I have suffering to learn compassion once and once again.
> On Nov 15, 2013 8:38 PM, "Adam Spiers" wrote:
>
> > Judd Maltin (j...@newgoliath.com) wrote:
> > > When looking at 'git log' commit messages should hav
Judd Maltin (j...@newgoliath.com) wrote:
> When looking at 'git log' commit messages should have more than a PR #.
I don't quite follow this. Certainly non-merge commits should have
useful commit messages, and following OpenStack's lead in this regard
would be best practice:
https://wiki.open
Rob Hirschfeld (rob_hirschf...@dell.com) wrote:
> I believe this was added by Adam a while back to help generate
> coverage stats.
Nope, you're confusing https://github.com/crowbar/ci-tracking with
https://github.com/crowbar/travis-ci-crowbar which was created by
James to allow running of unit tes
Thanks, fine now.
Rob Hirschfeld (rob_hirschf...@dell.com) wrote:
> Sorry -fixed.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Adam Spiers
> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 5:10 PM
> To: crowbar
> Subject: Re: [Crowbar] On the matter of upstream
Judd Maltin (j...@newgoliath.com) wrote:
> http://crowbar.sync.in/upstream-cookbooks-planning
>
> I've started with the very basics. I've called out the upstreams, and issues
> I see in both crowbar and upstreams.
>
> This to be filled out much more as the summit commences.
That page is not pu
Ralf Haferkamp (rha...@suse.de) wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 01:18:43PM +0100, Adam Spiers wrote:
> > Crowbar has one or two JSON-parsing wheels, e.g.
> >
> >
> > https://github.com/crowbar/barclamp-provisioner/blob/master/updates/parse_node_data
> >
Shane Gibson (shane_gib...@symantec.com) wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > Subject: Re: [Crowbar] New Server for Crowbar Lists
> >
> > > > In my experience, users often prefer a forum style interface over a
> > > > mailing list. If we investigate alternatives, I think we should
> > > > con
Crowbar has one or two JSON-parsing wheels, e.g.
https://github.com/crowbar/barclamp-provisioner/blob/master/updates/parse_node_data
https://github.com/crowbar/crowbar/blob/master/releases/pebbles/master/extra/json-edit
which were already invented elsewhere several times. Take a look at
Judd Maltin (j...@newgoliath.com) wrote:
> FWIW, I like googlegroups, because I can get it via email only, and it
> strips out the _pretty_ *formatting*.
AFAICS it also has the significant disadvantage of only allowing
sending of rich-text messages via the web UI.
Simon Jakesch (simon_jake...@dell.com) wrote:
> On the forum front: Mike is correct, there is a large populous
> preferring forums over mailing lists.
But why? That's what I don't understand. There are countless highly
successful public projects (the Linux kernel, git, and OpenStack to
name just
Pittaro, Michael (michael_pitt...@dell.com) wrote:
> On 10/10/2013 12:09 PM, Judd Maltin wrote:
> > It's come to light that the current manager of the mailing list
> > software is no longer available, and that the process of changing the
> > list to suit our needs (and any needs that may arise) wou
Judd Maltin (j...@newgoliath.com) wrote:
> It's come to light that the current manager of the mailing list
> software is no longer available, and that the process of changing the
> list to suit our needs (and any needs that may arise) would take
> months of work.
>
> I'd like to open the discussio
Dirk Müller (d...@dmllr.de) wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> > Although the volume is quite low I think that there are users who are 1)
> > Not comfortable asking basic questions on this list given the technical
> > nature of the discussions the devs are having. 2) When they do ask a
> > question get
Dirk Müller (d...@dmllr.de) wrote:
> Hi Judd,
>
> > There's been some rumblings on our team to split this list into Dev and
> > Users.
> >
> > Have we reached that threshold?
>
> -1. 4 mails a day is not too much.
-1 from me too. Higher traffic on this list is to be encouraged
though :)
_
Mike Pittaro (notificati...@github.com) wrote:
> This commit re-organizes the Crowbar Developers Guide.
>
> - Updates to the directory structure.
> - Consolidates a lot of existing documentation from the wiki and
> other locationsin the source tree.
> - Some existing documentation has been conv
Vincent Untz (vu...@suse.com) wrote:
> What I'm not happy with is the merge process. I think our current
> process is broken because it's not able to handle the flow of incoming
> pull requests, and when we're trying to compensate this by pushing hard
> we do mistakes like this one.
Agreed! The c
I just blogged about the tools I wrote for when we forward-ported
stuff from essex-hack-suse to pebbles:
http://blog.adamspiers.org/2013/09/19/easier-upstreaming-with-git/
They could help with roxy and 2.0 too.
___
Crowbar mailing list
Crowbar@dell.c
Arkady Kanevsky (arkady_kanev...@dell.com) wrote:
> Dell - Internal Use - Confidential
>
> Dell - Internal Use - Confidential
> To help with discussion on branching strategy, enclosed, please, find a
> proposed branching diagram showing currently active and proposed branches
> with their relatio
Simon Jakesch (simon_jake...@dell.com) wrote:
> I know it's fun to come up with branch names, however, I don't think they're
> very helpful to people that aren't involved on a day to day basis. Maybe I am
> missing something, but why can't we just stick to version numbers. Pebbles
> would be 1.x
Rob Hirschfeld (rob_hirschf...@dell.com) wrote:
>
> Yes and no. All the noderoles together make up the noderole graph, which by
> itself does not care about deployments. However, when a noderole is created
> (and gets its initial configuration) and bound to the noderole graph, it is
> always
Adam Spiers (aspi...@suse.com) wrote:
> *** PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY ANNOUNCEMENT ***
>
> I notice Crowbar has a lot of
>
> rescue Exception => e
>
> clauses. AFAIK, this is widely considered to be a bad idea:
>
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/question
*** PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY ANNOUNCEMENT ***
I notice Crowbar has a lot of
rescue Exception => e
clauses. AFAIK, this is widely considered to be a bad idea:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10048173/why-is-it-bad-style-to-rescue-exception-e-in-ruby
Next time you encounter this, please
he build instructions, I intend on tackling the Getting Started
> Guide next.
>
> Simon
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Adam Spiers
> Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 12:13 PM
> To: crowbar
> Subject: Re: [Crowbar] Trello for Res
Rob Hirschfeld (rob_hirschf...@dell.com) wrote:
> > Why? We already have
> > https://github.com/crowbar/crowbar/wiki/Videos
> > https://github.com/crowbar/crowbar/wiki/Introductory-Videos
> > https://github.com/crowbar/crowbar/wiki/Developer-Videos (strangely empty)
> > and IMHO the wiki is a
Rob Hirschfeld (rob_hirschf...@dell.com) wrote:
> All,
>
> John Terpstra and I spent a while going over how to use the Crowbar 2 test
> server with the simulator to exercise the Test Jig. These tools allow you
> to play with Crowbar2 directly from your dev/build environment without having
> t
michael_pitt...@dell.com (michael_pitt...@dell.com) wrote:
> I'm currently working on the devguide, and will merge this content end.
> I expect to have a pull request for some significant doc updates within a
> week.
Awesome, thanks a lot Mike!
___
Cro
Rob Hirschfeld (rob_hirschf...@dell.com) wrote:
> All,
>
> I’m sorry to report that Join.Me did not manage to record the audio :/
> If you’d like to review the screen cast, it’s available
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPWTI6EC-AE
Thanks. Sorry to sound negative, but it seems to me that pret
Victor Lowther (victor.lowt...@gmail.com) wrote:
> As of the latest set of pushes to development release, Crowbar 2.0 is now
> able to deploy an admin node that can then boot other nodes into
> Sledgehammer. Unlike the last time CB2.0 was able to do this, the Crowbar
> framework is performing all
Rob Hirschfeld (rob_hirschf...@dell.com) wrote:
> Crowbar Community,
>
> In the last week, Dell IT added a "data protection feature" to our email
> system that labels all emails as "Internal Use - Confidential" by default.
>
> While we make every effort to remove this header before we send to th
1 - 100 of 189 matches
Mail list logo
