Judd Maltin (j...@newgoliath.com) wrote: > Dear Vincent, > > I for one do not believe that CB1 is end of life. I think there is still > good value in the product, strong commit-stream or not. Just the way it is > it is still far ahead of our nearest competition. It was two years ahead of > the pack two years ago, and it still remains still far ahead. It is not > dead.
Correct. > Again, speaking only for myself, it seems to me that with the design of > Crowbar 2, we aim to take another leap two years ahead. Most folks on the > team do not speak the way I do because they are far less dreamy and far > more practical. :) > It is urgent for us to put as many resources as possible towards the solid > release of Crowbar 2. I totally understand that. > We do not have the resources to accomplish a > tear-down and rebuild of the Crowbar 1 infrastructure without getting in > the way of the amazing stream of PRs and products that can be created from > Crowbar 1. We do not have the resources to spend 60 seconds running the commands I just proposed in my other mail??? I am totally baffled why you think a "tear-down and rebuild of the Crowbar 1 infrastructure" is required. And I have heard others in your team assert this requirement, but I cannot understand it at all. Please, PLEASE can someone explain this! _______________________________________________ Crowbar mailing list Crowbar@dell.com https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/crowbar For more information: http://crowbar.github.com/
