>From my perspective the most compelling reason is that the high number of obsolete branches clutters several views in various git tools. So yes, there is definitely a need for doing this. Other people may have additional reasons.
christopher_dearb...@dell.com (christopher_dearb...@dell.com) wrote: > Hey guys, > > Unless there is a compelling reason for doing this (and I haven't heard one), > I would propose that we leave everything as-is. I don't see a need for doing > this. > > > Thanks, > > Chris > Dell > > -----Original Message----- > From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Thomas Boerger > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 9:25 AM > To: crowbar > Subject: Re: [Crowbar] Removing branches fully merged into "master". > > On Wednesday, March 12, 2014 11:03:21 AM Adam Spiers wrote: > > That's not true at all. There was plenty of interest in doing it, but > > the final deletion got postponed due to other activities and holidays. > > Sure it's true... They only said that there are multiple poeple are on > holiday... And that is months ago and nobody said anything on that. > > > Don't work with? We are talking about github.com/crowbar repos, > > right? Last time I checked there were plenty of people still working > > on these ;-) > > Except a single hadoop branch and hydrogen we are the only one working on the > other branches! > > -- > Thomas Boerger <tboer...@suse.de> > Research & Development > > SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany HRB 16746 > (AG Nürnberg), GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer > _______________________________________________ > Crowbar mailing list > Crowbar@dell.com > https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/crowbar > For more information: http://crowbar.github.com/ _______________________________________________ Crowbar mailing list Crowbar@dell.com https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/crowbar For more information: http://crowbar.github.com/
