*sigh* How does duplicating confusion reduce it?
So basically every single one of my unanswered concerns were ignored: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cloud.crowbar/1233/focus=1299 and this was done without any consensus or heads up on this list. And worse, the new repos have been done with a straight import, so opencrowbar is completely devoid of history. BIG mistake :-( Even if people disagree with my concerns about a new organization[1], surely at very least it would make sense to preserve commit history in the transition?? [1] I still didn't see any valid explanation for that - "risk of destabilization" is a completely bogus argument, as I have explained several times. Judd Maltin (j...@newgoliath.com) wrote: > Just somewhere a bit less confusing for me. I'm fairly lost in all this > talk about versioned main repos and stuff. > > Judd Maltin > 1-917-882-1270 > I have suffering to learn compassion once and once again. > On Dec 17, 2013 3:04 AM, "Vincent Untz" <vu...@suse.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Le lundi 16 décembre 2013, à 23:30 -0500, Judd Maltin a écrit : > > > http://github.com/opencrowbar/crowbar-utils/ > > > > What is the opencrowbar github organization? > > > > Vincent _______________________________________________ Crowbar mailing list Crowbar@dell.com https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/crowbar For more information: http://crowbar.github.com/
