Thomas Boerger (tboer...@suse.de) wrote: > On Wednesday, March 12, 2014 11:03:21 AM Adam Spiers wrote: > > That's not true at all. There was plenty of interest in doing it, but > > the final deletion got postponed due to other activities and holidays. > > Sure it's true... They only said that there are multiple poeple are on > holiday... And that is months ago and nobody said anything on that.
Because it was agreed to postpone it. If you read the old thread you can see it was very clearly requested that no action be taken until a list of branches to delete was given. Without the list, it was not possible to take any safe action, and noone gave that list until you did just now. > > Don't work with? We are talking about github.com/crowbar repos, > > right? Last time I checked there were plenty of people still working > > on these ;-) > > Except a single hadoop branch and hydrogen we are the only one working on the > other branches! I assume by "we" you mean SUSE, but that does not change anything. I would still not be in favour of the deletion until I saw the list, and I doubt I am the only one in this position. Anyway, thanks for posting it. Now the real discussion can begin :) _______________________________________________ Crowbar mailing list Crowbar@dell.com https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/crowbar For more information: http://crowbar.github.com/