serviceability-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8343741: SA jstack --mixed should print information about VM locks [v6] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8343741: SA jstack --mixed should print information about VM locks [v6] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8343741: SA jstack --mixed should print information about VM locks [v6] Andrey Turbanov
  • Re: RFR: 8343741: SA jstack --mixed should print information about VM locks [v7] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8343741: SA jstack --mixed should print information about VM locks [v7] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8343741: SA jstack --mixed should print information about VM locks [v7] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8343741: SA jstack --mixed should print information about VM locks [v7] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8343741: SA jstack --mixed should print information about VM locks [v7] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8343741: SA jstack --mixed should print information about VM locks [v7] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8343741: SA jstack --mixed should print information about VM locks [v7] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8343741: SA jstack --mixed should print information about VM locks [v7] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8343741: SA jstack --mixed should print information about VM locks [v8] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8343741: SA jstack --mixed should print information about VM locks [v9] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8343741: SA jstack --mixed should print information about VM locks [v9] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8343741: SA jstack --mixed should print information about VM locks [v10] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8343741: SA jstack --mixed should print information about VM locks [v10] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8343741: SA jstack --mixed should print information about VM locks [v11] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8343741: SA jstack --mixed should print information about VM locks [v11] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8343741: SA jstack --mixed should print information about VM locks [v11] Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8343741: SA jstack --mixed should print information about VM locks [v12] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8343741: SA jstack --mixed should print information about VM locks [v13] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8343741: SA jstack --mixed should print information about VM locks [v13] Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8343741: SA jstack --mixed should print information about VM locks [v14] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8343741: SA jstack --mixed should print information about VM locks [v15] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8343741: SA jstack --mixed should print information about VM locks [v15] Chris Plummer
  • Integrated: 8343741: SA jstack --mixed should print information about VM locks Leonid Mesnik
  • RFR: 8343741: SA jstack --mixed should print information about VM locks Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8343741: SA jstack --mixed should print information about VM locks Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8343741: SA jstack --mixed should print information about VM locks Leonid Mesnik
  • Withdrawn: 8343741: SA jstack --mixed should print information about VM locks Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8343741: SA jstack --mixed should print information about VM locks [v2] Leonid Mesnik
• Integrated: 8331497: Implement JEP 483: Ahead-of-Time Class Loading & Linking Ioi Lam
• RFR: 8344262: Win32AttachOperationRequest objects are created by using global new Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8344262: Win32AttachOperationRequest objects are created by using global new Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8344262: Win32AttachOperationRequest objects are created by using global new David Holmes
  • Integrated: 8344262: Win32AttachOperationRequest objects are created by using global new Alex Menkov
• Re: RFR: 8331497: Implement JEP 483: Ahead-of-Time Class Loading & Linking [v14] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8331497: Implement JEP 483: Ahead-of-Time Class Loading & Linking [v14] John R Rose
  • Re: RFR: 8331497: Implement JEP 483: Ahead-of-Time Class Loading & Linking [v14] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8331497: Implement JEP 483: Ahead-of-Time Class Loading & Linking [v14] Magnus Ihse Bursie
• Re: RFR: 8331497: Implement JEP 483: Ahead-of-Time Class Loading & Linking [v13] Ioi Lam
• Withdrawn: 8335701: Make GrowableArray templated by an Index Johan Sjölen
• Re: RFR: 8331497: Implement JEP 483: Ahead-of-Time Class Loading & Linking [v12] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8331497: Implement JEP 483: Ahead-of-Time Class Loading & Linking [v12] John R Rose
• RFR: 8344247: Move objectWaiter field to VirtualThread instance Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8344247: Move objectWaiter field to VirtualThread instance David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8344247: Move objectWaiter field to VirtualThread instance Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8344247: Move objectWaiter field to VirtualThread instance Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Integrated: 8344247: Move objectWaiter field to VirtualThread instance Patricio Chilano Mateo
• RFR: 8343529: serviceability/sa/ClhsdbWhere.java fails AssertionFailure: Corrupted constant pool Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8343529: serviceability/sa/ClhsdbWhere.java fails AssertionFailure: Corrupted constant pool Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8343529: serviceability/sa/ClhsdbWhere.java fails AssertionFailure: Corrupted constant pool Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8343529: serviceability/sa/ClhsdbWhere.java fails AssertionFailure: Corrupted constant pool Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8343529: serviceability/sa/ClhsdbWhere.java fails AssertionFailure: Corrupted constant pool Chris Plummer
  • Integrated: 8343529: serviceability/sa/ClhsdbWhere.java fails AssertionFailure: Corrupted constant pool Chris Plummer
• RFR: 8253440: serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackLineNumbers.java failed with "Didn't find enough line numbers" Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8253440: serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackLineNumbers.java failed with "Didn't find enough line numbers" Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8253440: serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackLineNumbers.java failed with "Didn't find enough line numbers" Leonid Mesnik
  • Integrated: 8253440: serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackLineNumbers.java failed with "Didn't find enough line numbers" Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8253440: serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackLineNumbers.java failed with "Didn't find enough line numbers" Chris Plummer
• RFR: 8330606: Redefinition doesn't but should verify the new klass Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8330606: Redefinition doesn't but should verify the new klass Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8330606: Redefinition doesn't but should verify the new klass [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8330606: Redefinition doesn't but should verify the new klass [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8330606: Redefinition doesn't but should verify the new klass [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8330606: Redefinition doesn't but should verify the new klass [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8330606: Redefinition doesn't but should verify the new klass [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8330606: Redefinition doesn't but should verify the new klass [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8330606: Redefinition doesn't but should verify the new klass [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8330606: Redefinition doesn't but should verify the new klass [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8330606: Redefinition doesn't but should verify the new klass [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8330606: Redefinition doesn't but should verify the new klass [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8330606: Redefinition doesn't but should verify the new klass [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8330606: Redefinition doesn't but should verify the new klass [v2] Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8330606: Redefinition doesn't but should verify the new klass [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8330606: Redefinition doesn't but should verify the new klass [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8330606: Redefinition doesn't but should verify the new klass [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8330606: Redefinition doesn't but should verify the new klass [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8330606: Redefinition doesn't but should verify the new klass [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8330606: Redefinition doesn't but should verify the new klass [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8330606: Redefinition doesn't but should verify the new klass [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8330606: Redefinition doesn't but should verify the new klass [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8330606: Redefinition doesn't but should verify the new klass [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8330606: Redefinition doesn't but should verify the new klass [v3] Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8330606: Redefinition doesn't but should verify the new klass [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8330606: Redefinition doesn't but should verify the new klass [v3] Amit Kumar
  • Re: RFR: 8330606: Redefinition doesn't but should verify the new klass [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8330606: Redefinition doesn't but should verify the new klass [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • Integrated: 8330606: Redefinition doesn't but should verify the new klass Coleen Phillimore
• RFR: 8344191: Build code should not have classpath exception Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8344191: Build code should not have classpath exception Abdelhak Zaaim
  • Re: RFR: 8344191: Build code should not have classpath exception Jonathan Gibbons
  • Re: RFR: 8344191: Build code should not have classpath exception Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8344191: Build code should not have classpath exception David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8344191: Build code should not have classpath exception [v2] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8344191: Build code should not have classpath exception [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Withdrawn: 8344191: Build code should not have classpath exception duke
• Re: Win32AttachOperationRequest seems to be using global new? David Holmes
  • Re: Win32AttachOperationRequest seems to be using global new? Alexey Menkov
• Re: RFR: 8331497: Implement JEP 483: Ahead-of-Time Class Loading & Linking [v11] Ioi Lam
• Re: RFR: 8337511: Implement JEP 404: Generational Shenandoah (Experimental) [v7] William Kemper
  • Re: RFR: 8337511: Implement JEP 404: Generational Shenandoah (Experimental) [v7] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8337511: Implement JEP 404: Generational Shenandoah (Experimental) [v7] William Kemper
  • Re: RFR: 8337511: Implement JEP 404: Generational Shenandoah (Experimental) [v7] Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8337511: Implement JEP 404: Generational Shenandoah (Experimental) [v7] William Kemper
  • Re: RFR: 8337511: Implement JEP 404: Generational Shenandoah (Experimental) [v7] Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8337511: Implement JEP 404: Generational Shenandoah (Experimental) [v7] William Kemper
  • Re: RFR: 8337511: Implement JEP 404: Generational Shenandoah (Experimental) [v7] William Kemper
  • Re: RFR: 8337511: Implement JEP 404: Generational Shenandoah (Experimental) [v7] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8337511: Implement JEP 404: Generational Shenandoah (Experimental) [v7] William Kemper
  • Re: RFR: 8337511: Implement JEP 404: Generational Shenandoah (Experimental) [v7] William Kemper
  • Re: RFR: 8337511: Implement JEP 404: Generational Shenandoah (Experimental) [v7] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8337511: Implement JEP 404: Generational Shenandoah (Experimental) [v7] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8337511: Implement JEP 404: Generational Shenandoah (Experimental) [v7] William Kemper
  • Re: RFR: 8337511: Implement JEP 404: Generational Shenandoah (Experimental) [v7] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8337511: Implement JEP 404: Generational Shenandoah (Experimental) [v7] William Kemper
  • Re: RFR: 8337511: Implement JEP 404: Generational Shenandoah (Experimental) [v7] William Kemper
  • Re: RFR: 8337511: Implement JEP 404: Generational Shenandoah (Experimental) [v7] William Kemper
  • Re: RFR: 8337511: Implement JEP 404: Generational Shenandoah (Experimental) [v7] William Kemper
  • Re: RFR: 8337511: Implement JEP 404: Generational Shenandoah (Experimental) [v7] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8337511: Implement JEP 404: Generational Shenandoah (Experimental) [v7] William Kemper
  • Re: RFR: 8337511: Implement JEP 404: Generational Shenandoah (Experimental) [v7] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8337511: Implement JEP 404: Generational Shenandoah (Experimental) [v7] William Kemper
  • Re: RFR: 8337511: Implement JEP 404: Generational Shenandoah (Experimental) [v7] William Kemper
  • Re: RFR: 8337511: Implement JEP 404: Generational Shenandoah (Experimental) [v7] William Kemper
  • Re: RFR: 8337511: Implement JEP 404: Generational Shenandoah (Experimental) [v7] William Kemper
  • Re: RFR: 8337511: Implement JEP 404: Generational Shenandoah (Experimental) [v7] William Kemper
  • Re: RFR: 8337511: Implement JEP 404: Generational Shenandoah (Experimental) [v7] William Kemper
  • Re: RFR: 8337511: Implement JEP 404: Generational Shenandoah (Experimental) [v7] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8337511: Implement JEP 404: Generational Shenandoah (Experimental) [v7] William Kemper
  • Re: RFR: 8337511: Implement JEP 404: Generational Shenandoah (Experimental) [v7] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8337511: Implement JEP 404: Generational Shenandoah (Experimental) [v7] William Kemper
  • Re: RFR: 8337511: Implement JEP 404: Generational Shenandoah (Experimental) [v7] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8337511: Implement JEP 404: Generational Shenandoah (Experimental) [v7] William Kemper
• RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages Jonathan Gibbons
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages Jonathan Gibbons
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages Christian Stein
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages Iris Clark
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages [v2] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages Christian Stein
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages [v2] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages [v2] Christian Stein
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages [v2] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages [v2] Iris Clark
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages [v2] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages [v2] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages [v3] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages [v3] Christian Stein
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages [v3] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages [v4] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages [v4] Christian Stein
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages [v4] Iris Clark
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages [v4] Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages [v4] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Integrated: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages Magnus Ihse Bursie
• RFR: 8344105: Remove SecurityManager and related calls from jdk.attach and jdk.hotspot.agent Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8344105: Remove SecurityManager and related calls from jdk.attach and jdk.hotspot.agent Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8344105: Remove SecurityManager and related calls from jdk.attach and jdk.hotspot.agent Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8344105: Remove SecurityManager and related calls from jdk.attach and jdk.hotspot.agent Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8344105: Remove SecurityManager and related calls from jdk.attach and jdk.hotspot.agent [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Integrated: 8344105: Remove SecurityManager and related calls from jdk.attach and jdk.hotspot.agent Kevin Walls
• RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v5] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v5] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v5] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v5] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v5] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v4] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v4] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v4] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v4] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v5] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v5] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v6] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v6] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v6] John R Rose
  • Re: RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v6] John R Rose

• Earlier messages
• Later messages