> The `GetThreadSnapshotHandshakeClosure` was added to support virtual threads 
> in thread dumps. It is very similar to the logic used in the old 
> safepoint-based thread dump.  
> `GetThreadSnapshotHandshakeClosure::detect_locks` uses the raw 
> `javaVFrame::monitors()` method rather than using the `locked_monitors()` 
> method which already filters out some monitors including those for which 
> `wait()` has been called. It uses the raw `monitors()` list because it wants 
> to process eliminated compiled monitors itself, and they are already removed 
> from `locked_monitors()`. But that means it should be doing its own filtering 
> of monitors that are being waited-on so they are not reported as locked. This 
> seems to have been an oversight with the original implementation.
> 
> The logic is somewhat more complicated, particularly in the virtual thread 
> case, because there are a number of points where we can dump the stack 
> between `wait0` appearing as the top frame, and the point where we actually 
> release the monitor. It would be wrong to hide the monitor from the "locked" 
> section in that case. So we can still report that a thread is waiting-on a 
> particular object and that it has locked that object, as that is the actual 
> state of things. But the code no longer reports a released monitor as locked 
> by the waiting thread.
> 
> Note that `javaVFrame::locked_monitors` is also potentially imprecise in its 
> reporting. It will report the monitor as locked until 
> `current_waiting_monitor()` is set, and then elide it. However, as this code 
> is only used when reporting platform threads this imprecision is not 
> observable as a platform thread will not respond to a stack dump request in 
> between the transition to in-VM (for the native call) and the release of the 
> monitor.
> 
> I also fixed a pre-existing typo whilst in this code.
> 
> Testing
>  - tiers 1-3
>  - tier 5-svc
>  - updated tests in the PR
> 
> Thanks
> 
> ---------
> - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the [OpenJDK 
> Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai).

David Holmes has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
commit since the last revision:

  Adjust test per Alan's request

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/32977/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/32977/files/eab068b5..1fd8e19e

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=32977&range=02
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=32977&range=01-02

  Stats: 18 lines in 1 file changed: 1 ins; 16 del; 1 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/32977.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/32977/head:pull/32977

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/32977

Reply via email to