Brian,
I wrote an email about this a couple days ago. The rfnoc_modtool doesn’t
generate a yaml and a user can write one using the example at
uhd/host/examples/rfnoc-example/blocks/gain.yml
As a baseline. You may want to check that email for more info.
Thanks,
David
On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at
these options are listed and explained in detail in the RFNoC
spec, and these suggestions are purely a quality of life change that would
save me 15 minutes when I make a block.
Thanks,
David
On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 2:27 AM Martin Braun wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> and sorry for stumbling ov
dits
files from share and renames them, but I don't see the yaml created and it
doesn't exist in /share/uhd/rfnoc-newmod/
Thanks,
David
___
USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com
Hi Martin
If I run the command without changing the file parameters I get the error
ERROR: [ Synth 8-448] named port connection 'gtrefclk' does not exist for
instance 'core_support_i' of module 'one_gig_eth_pcs_pma_support'
ERROR: [ Synth 8-448] named port connection 'gtrefclk_bufg' does not exist
, and show the
delay between channels in samples.
2. *Vivado Waveform Viewer*: When the ILA cores are collecting DDC
channel data, I can see that the base image samples are available on the
same clock. My image does not have that behavior.
Thanks,
Hi Emre,
You can use UHD 4.6 with a USRP E320. However, the version on your host
computer and on the USRP must be the same. You will need to update the E320
filesystem to also be on UHD 4.6. There are instructions in the “E320 Getting
Started Guide”.
Hope this helps,
David
From: Emre YILDIZ
.
So not an SDR issue, but perhaps this thread may help a USRP user in the
future..
[1] https://www.usb.org/sites/default/files/327216.pdf
From: Marcus D. Leech
Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2024 7:59 PM
To: David Raeman ; usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] Re: GPS fix behavior on
change. I may try this on one radio and
see if it helps improve consistency..
-David
From: Marcus D. Leech
Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2024 8:56 AM
To: usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
Subject: [USRP-users] Re: GPS fix behavior on USRP E320
On 05/06/2024 08:43, David Raeman via USRP-users wrote:
Hello
don't mind
changing resistor populations if there is a reason to. Or any other suggestions
around this topic?
Thank you,
David Raeman
___
USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com
PSDO add-on module is installed, which doesn't seem to have
been an issue with your prior results.
I can try to follow-up with some measurements from our experiments, and I'd
appreciate any additional insights you might find as well since this is still
an active project for me
helps,
David
[1]
https://kb.ettus.com/USRP_N300/N310/N320/N321_Getting_Started_Guide#Enable_Auto_Booting
From: Brian Hay
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2023 6:58 PM
To: usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
Subject: [USRP-users] N320 Remote Power On
Hello,
Does anyone know if the N320 has a remote power on
hat helps.
For reference my working config is below, though it's from when UHD required
DPDK version 18.11 so things might be a little different in recent versions.
Best,
-David
[use_dpdk=1]
dpdk_mtu=9000
dpdk_driver=/usr/local/lib/dpdk-pmds
dpdk_corelist=24,26,28
dpdk_num_mbufs=8192
dpdk
o read and account for ACKs for each
burst.
My use case is different, but I have an application that reuses a tx_streamer
object for different transmissions, and this approach has worked for me to
ensure the sample tail isn’t stuck in a queue between uses.
Hope this helps,
David
From: Devin Kelly
blocks), and it’s unclear to me whether those pokes could get blocked in a
queue behind a timed command. Assuming so, I might be able to sequence
interactions to avoid that case.
Thanks again,
-David
From: Rob Kossler
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2023 4:26 PM
To: David Raeman
Cc: usrp-users
be overlooking some simpler approach, or any advice
on how to plumb this into a custom RFNoC block.
Thank you,
-David
___
USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com
but I
vaguely recall that MPM discovery for an E320 worked using one of those ports
but not the other. However, if you specify the address, it would work with
either port. Again, I'm working from fuzzy memory here..
Hope this helps,
David
From: Ofer
Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2023 1:47 A
?
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
On 26/07/2023 16:47, David J Li wrote:
Hi all,
I’m currently using a USRP N310 for an application that requires coherent 4
channel RX w/ the ability to TX on 1 channel as well. In the past, I’ve used
USRP X310s to do 4 channel coherent RX and found the calibration
alues hold pretty true
for a long time as long as your gain/center freq don't change. Having the
requirement of being able to TX on at least 1 channel prevents me from using an
X310 w/ TwinRX cards.
Thanks,
-David
___
USRP-users mailing lis
Thanks for your answer Marcus. I am starting thinking that may be I am making
any mistake in my testing code, so I will post below the code I use in the **Rx
side** and don’t hesitate to tell me if you see anything suspicious :
`#define BURST_SIZE 2048 // Number of samples per Burst`
`s
Hi Marcus,
The value returned is 242
___
USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com
nutes = 2400
Msamples.
Thanks again for your support.
Regards,
David
___
USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com
this because
I performed some tests similar to those performed by Rob : I call recv(), I
sleep some time and call recv() again. I saw that even when I sleep several
minutes with a sample rate of 4Msps i still have no buffer overflow.
Thank you very much for your support.
David Fernandes
Hi Rob,
Thank you very much for your answer, it is really helpful. I’ve tried to create
several streamers as you suggested and it works. Thanks !
___
USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@
Hi everyone,
I need to develop a system which streams independent samples at different
moments to the differents channels (channel 0 and channel 1) of an USRP X310.
To achieve that, I use the example codes available in the documentation which
look like the following :
// 1. Create the stream
Hi Marcus,
Thank you very much for your response, it is very usefull.
I am using 2 WBX-120 daughterboard cards.
As you told (and according to the logs “*Actual sample rate: 0.390625 MSps”*),
512 seems to be the max decimation factor instead of 1024. I think this could
be related to the version
Hi everyone,
I would like to transmit and receive with a sample rate of 280KHz but when I
try it, I get the following messages :
\[WARNING\] \[MULTI_USRP\] The hardware does not support the requested TX
sample rate:\
Target sample rate: 0.28 MSps\
Actual sample rate: 0.390625 MSps
\[WARNI
Note that because you are running these commands via sudo, the results may be
in root’s home directory.
From: zhou via USRP-users
Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2023 12:53 PM
To: usrp-users@lists.ettus.com; Marcus D. Leech
Subject: [USRP-users] Re: Can't find calibration file for X310
Thanks for your
Hi Marcus,
Indeed, I tested so many things that I forgot to put the right frequencies. Now
it works smoothly. Thank you very much for your support.
___
USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le..
The cables I use are SMA.
___
USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com
Hi Marcus,
I performed some tests with a spectrum analyser and a signal generator as you
have suggested and the problem seems to be in the RX side. Here are the results
:
* If I do 1 way transmission \[RF0, TX/RX\] ==> \[RF1, RX2\] : OK, it works
everytime
* If I do 1 way transmission \[RF1,
Hi Marcus,
I have performed some tests physically looping TX/Rx to RX2 of the same
channel, and results are the same. I tried as well to turn off and turn on the
USRP between 2 consecutive tests, and It doesn’t seem to change anything.
___
USRP-users m
Yes, of course :
\[INFO\] \[UHD\] linux; GNU C++ version 11.3.0; Boost_107400;
UHD_4.1.0.6-0-g1a5b4fd2
\[INFO\] \[X300\] X300 initialization sequence...
\[INFO\] \[X300\] Maximum frame size: 1472 bytes.
\[INFO\] \[X300\] Radio 1x clock: 200 MHz
_
I tested with “No Sync” in both Sink and source and there is no difference. I
tested using the “Start Time” parameter in order to start first the Rx and then
some seconds later the Tx, but I have no luck..…
___
USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@list
Thanks for the information, I didn’t know it. Sadly, I performed tests with
1Msps and 0.5Msps and 20 db Gain in Rx and it doesn’t change.
I'm trying to figure out if there is any condition of when it works and when it
doesn't, but I can't, it seems quite random.
_
Hi Marcus,
I tried to wait 1 minute before starting a new test and it has no impact. Here
are the logs displayed by GNU Radio of 2 successive tests, the first was
successfull and the second launched 1 minute later failed.
1st TEST (successful) :
> Generating: '/home/davidfernandes/tests_gnurad
Hi Marcus,
* yes, I have two WBX cards in the X310. I have now added the value "A:0 B:0"
in the “Mb0: Subdev Spec” parameter on both source and sink.
* The Tx and Rx are connected directly with a cable with a 35dB attenuation.
* I have added a Gain value of 10dB in both Tx and Rx and I see nea
Hi Marcus,
Thank you for your quick response. I modified the flowgraph according to your
suggestions and now it seems to work sometimes. I don’t know why, but it can
work now if I run the test, but it probably won’t work in the following 10
tests… Do you have any idea of why it has this behavio
Hi Marcus,
Thank you for your quick response. I modified the flowgraph according to your
suggestions and now it seems to work sometimes. I don’t know why, but it can
work now if I run the test, but it probably won’t work in the following 10
tests … Do have any ide
options:
parameters:
aut
Hi everyone,
I am trying to perform full duplex communication with my X310 in the following
way using GNU Radio :\
\
\[RF0, TX/RX\] ==> \[RF1, RX2\]
\[RF1, TX/RX\] ==> \[RF0, RX2\]
But I see no signals in the reception sides. However, If I disable the
transmission in 1 channel, I can see the s
circle back
to it recently.
I found this to be a useful primer:
https://www.suse.com/c/cpu-isolation-introduction-part-1/
Hope this in some way helps,
David
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Schatzman
> Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2023 6:51 PM
> To: Marcus D. Leech
> Cc: usrp
You've seen the filters from Pole-Zero, right? Tunable, but very narrow BW.
I keep reading abstracts in IEEE journals but I haven't seen anything
interesting. Sub-octave band counts add up fast :-(
Dave
On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 9:36 PM Marcus D. Leech
wrote:
> On 16/04/2023
Yes, it's pretty typical that the output of an SDR needs additional
filtering and gain on the transmit side, and similarly filters and gain on
the receive side. I spent a substantial fraction of my time at a previous
job designing application specific front ends for Ettus SDR's.
Dave
On Wed, Apr
d be willing to pass down? It's much appreciated.
All the best,
David Greene
University of Florida
___
USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com
- Original Message --
From: "Marcus D. Leech"
To: "DAVID ABEL"
Sent: Wednesday, 1 Feb, 2023 At 5:33 AM
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] Re: B200mini spurs
On 31/01/2023 06:17, DAVID ABEL wrote:
Neither the spur amplitude (in dBc) nor the offset are affected by the
baseban
I have a B200mini. As a test of spectral purity, I generated a CW
signal at 175.0025 MHz using Gnuradio, I see spurs at +/- 132.5 kHz, at
-50 dBc; with offsets of 265 kHz at -60 dBc; and another at 702.5 Khzat
-60 dBc.
Is this expected behavior for the B200 mini, please?
Some further deta
this helps,
David
From: Yasir Özçalık
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2023 3:13 AM
To: usrp-users
Subject: [USRP-users] E320 Autoboot
Hi everyone,
I have an E320 which does not autoboot. I am trying to activate it. When I
searched documents for this, I found that there are flags on the
microcontroller
d I'm now seeing the stable phase relationship across receive windows
for separate radios with common clock.
Cheers,
-David
From: Marcus D. Leech
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2023 5:33 PM
On 11/01/2023 13:45, David Raeman wrote:
I’m working on a project that involves phase-coherent recept
.. Nevermind on the final point, and kudos to Ettus for providing a very easy
approach for rebuilding the on-radio MPM libraries here:
https://files.ettus.com/manual/page_usrp_e3xx.html#e3xx_software_dev_mpm_native
From: David Raeman
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2023 1:45 PM
To: usrp-users
in/procedure to rebuild the libraries on the radio?
Thanks,
--
David Raeman
Synoptic Engineering
___
USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com
erested in following any further
research/improvements that reduce phase noise on either radio architecture.
Best,
David
From: Jim Palladino
Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2022 1:33 PM
To: David Raeman ; Marcus D. Leech
; USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] Re: N320 LO stability proble
try on your end if upgrading UHD is onerous..
Cheers,
David
From: Jim Palladino
Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2022 8:38 AM
To: Marcus D. Leech ; usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
Subject: [USRP-users] Re: N320 LO stability problem
Hello,
Thanks for the responses. Yes, I have the same issue with tones
but is not documented for the E320.
-David
[1] https://files.ettus.com/manual/page_usrp_b200.html#b200_known_issues
___
USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com
r the suggestion!
Cheers,
David
> -Original Message-
> From: Piotr Krysik
> Sent: Wednesday, September 7, 2022 9:31 AM
> To: usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
> Subject: [USRP-users] Re: E320: Periodic phase jumps w/ any external clock?
>
> Hi David,
>
> I've seen so
F4002 PLL. The internal clock
runs at 20MHz, but I was able to try an external clock at that rate (required a
2-line patch to UHD) and it didn't make a difference. The only other USRP I
have on hand is an N320, and this issue does not seem to happen on that radio
model when I use the same
10Msps
upper-bound seems like it'd limit the applications that could be developed in
embedded mode for the E-series..
-David
___
USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com
he E320 doesn't seem to support this, but I think it's just a
matter of missing bits in the software.
Best,
-David
> -Original Message-
> From: Jon Beniston
> Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022 6:46 PM
> To: 'Marcus D. Leech' ; usrp-
> us...@lists.ettus.com
it's wrapping..
Best,
David
> -Original Message-
> From: Jon Beniston
> Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022 1:33 PM
> To: 'Marcus D. Leech' ; usrp-
> us...@lists.ettus.com
> Subject: [USRP-users] Re: E320 Automatic master clock
>
> Hi Marcus,
>
&
.. Sorry, just realized the GPSDO apparently does use SCPI-99 commands. :)
From: David Raeman
Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 12:51 PM
To: Marcus D. Leech ; usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
Subject: RE: [USRP-users] Re: GPS invalid reply
The error string is also suspicious.. *IDN? is a command used to
The error string is also suspicious.. *IDN? is a command used to identify lab
instruments that implement SCPI protocols, and I’m not familiar with any GPS
receiver that interfaces using SCPI. Is it possible you have some kind of
instrument-control service on your computer (LabView, Keysight IO,
clock is later reapplied while running.
I can’t specifically speak to the B200 or UHD 3.15.
Hope this helps,
David
From: Marcin Puchlik
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2022 10:38 AM
To: Marcus D. Leech
Cc: usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
Subject: [USRP-users] Re: Why do we need 1 PPS and 10 MHz signal to
e the B2xx models also use the AD9361 and already
support this, my inclination is to copy similar logic for E3xx. Just wanted to
make sure I'm not missing any hiccups that might explain why support was
excluded for these radios.
Thanks,
David
--
David Raeman
Synop
Thanks Wade and Marcus – I appreciate the insights and will make some tweaks on
my end as a workaround.
Best,
David
From: Wade Fife
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2022 1:21 PM
To: Marcus D. Leech
Cc: usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
Subject: [USRP-users] Re: Programmatic determine rfnoc_chdr_clk from
p it into a register within my
RFNoC block, but I wanted to make sure I'm not missing something in the
existing framework. Calling get_tick_rate() on the block control object just
returns 0.
Thanks!
David
[1]
https://kb.ettus.com/RFNoC_Frequently_Asked_Question
Thanks Wade – I can confirm these worked.
Best,
David
From: Wade Fife
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2022 3:29 PM
To: David Raeman
Cc: USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] Substitute power plug part for USRP E320?
Hi David,
I think the Kycon KPPX-4P is compatible, but I've
t I'd appreciate feedback on
any known-good solutions here.
Thanks!
--
David Raeman
Synoptic Engineering
___
USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com
uild the kernel bits, not the
full filesystem. I'd appreciate any thoughts on whether this type of
customization is generally done, and any pointers on the quickest/easiest
approach. :)
Thanks,
David
--
David Raeman
Synoptic Engineering
___
USRP-u
Hi All!
My name's David, and I am the MarCom Manager at Digilent. We sell Ettus
projects on our site (we're also part of NI), but we don't have a ton of
experience with SDR on our Applications team. I am wondering if you all
wouldn't mind sending me your favorite Ettus
p
-manager installed (like e.g. Ubuntu). I have modified
/etc/init.d/interfaces but it seems to ignore this file completely, not even
using it to set IP on system boot.
Any ideas?
Kind regards,
David
[1641888664830]<https://gmvnsl.com/> David Scott
Junior Software Developer
T. +44 (0)1
Thanks all – I think that all makes sense. So the input clock is AC coupled,
which strips the DC component, then the level is clamped by the diodes. Thus
the TI chip always gets a clipped sinewave regardless of what the input signal
looked like..
___
onfirm?
Thanks!
--
David Raeman
Synoptic Engineering
___
USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com
,
David
___
USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com
places (e.g.
DEFAULT_FRAME_SIZE in dpdk_common.cpp). In the meantime, my temporary solution
is to locally revert commit a629ce3a46 until it can be confirmed with DPDK with
10GbE.
Cheers,
--
David Raeman
Synoptic Engineering
___
USRP-users mailing list --
.. Now that I look closely at test_timed_commands, I'm more confused. My
understand of set_command_time is that it sets an FPGA register of the future
time at which to process subsequent commands, but none of the calls will block.
If the application wants to wait for the timed command to occur,
Seeing the same behavior using UHD 4.1.0.1 on my N320 and E320, using internal
clock and time sources:
$ ./lib/uhd/examples/test_timed_commands --args addr=192.168.10.2
Creating the usrp device with: addr=192.168.10.2...
[INFO] [UHD] linux; GNU C++ version 9.3.0; Boost_107100;
UHD_4.1.0.HEAD-0-
o hear why this constraint exists.
David
___
USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com
ond call is silently coercing the ref clock
to be gpsdo, without any indication even a debug print statement (in the MPM
periph_manager code).
Thanks & Cheers,
--
David Raeman
Synoptic Engineering
___
USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.e
;Rev.5" version, along with the latest schematic, has "X2" in that position and
L31 is gone. There are various other component changes that I want to make sure
I'm replacing with the correct values. Thanks!
All the best,
eLists.txt:338 (include)
-- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
See also "/home/dscc/gnuradio/build-arm/CMakeFiles/CMakeOutput.log"
Is there a more up to date version of the sdk with python version 3.6.5 minimum?
Or am I missing some other step?
Thanks,
David
P Please consider the enviro
Hi all,
I am not an expert on this, but recently speaking to someone a little
more in the know than I...
Marcus is right, also it is apparently possible to pre-calibrate in
advance and save the calibration settings to registers on the AD9361,
thus making the tune time constant.
Just a thought,
than 24 hours so I am
wondering if it is possible to run the device with the battery disconnected?
Will the E312 function without the battery connected internally? And are their
any snags I should be aware of?
Many Thanks,
David
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
n the boards and sometimes all boards are in sync.
Is this a known issue?
Thanks,
David
//
// Copyright 2011 Ettus Research LLC
// Copyright 2018 Ettus Research, a National Instruments Company
//
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0-or-later
//
#include
#include
#include
#include
#in
Hi.
We have developed a project using the USRP 2945 and UHD libraries to estimate a
signal's direction of arrival.
In this project, the four channels of the USRP 2945 are connected through a
power splitter to a function generator, and the local oscillators in the back
are connected following
I too was able to sustain around 12Msps on an XU4+B200mini, and was also
able to get OpenBTS to work.
Marcus, hope it's OK to ask, but did you use a USB3 hub? When I tried it
the XU4 was unable to supply enough current, causing the SDcard to get
corrupted (I had a lot of fun with this!), the sol
I had a similar issue to this with 4.0.0 a couple of months ago, posted
on this group and told I would have to wait for the next release where
it would hopefully be fixed.
So maybe it's still there, I had to revert to 3.9.7.
The issue was with high rates (20M+ on my hardware) causing
rx_samples
I would wish to do again in
a hurry..!!
Regards,
David Taylor GD4FMB / University Researcher.
From: Sam Reiter
Sent: Saturday, October 10, 2020 2:41 PM
To: David Taylor (manx.net)
Cc: Marcus D. Leech ; usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] B210 USRP object creation
Actually, I
response
[ERROR [USB] USB open failed: insufficient permissions.
See the application notes for your device.
Perhaps a very cautious patch to the programmer code might help as a workaround?
I will take a look.
Best regards,
David Taylor
From: Sam Reiter
Sent: Friday, October 9, 2020 10:01 PM
tried carefully editing the
uhd-usrp.rules file to comply with the new pid value, but without success.
Perhaps a cautionary warning should be added to the EEPROM on USRP devices note!
Regards,
David
From: Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
Sent: Thursday, October 8, 2020 8:42 PM
To: usrp-users
)”
The aim is to be able to manipulate some GPIO bits in the block work function
and to align events using the 1PPS input.
Regards,
David GD4FMB
From: Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
Sent: Thursday, October 8, 2020 7:53 PM
To: usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] B210 USRP object
usual ‘block’ attribute
error message. There are no USRP source or sink blocks in the flow-graph that
could possibly conflict.
Regards,
David
From: Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2020 6:20 PM
To: usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] B210 USRP
Hi.
I am trying to exercise the GPIO bits on my B210 and to run other UHD member
functions in a C++ OOT block.
Can anyone provide me with a suitable make (object) statement for use with this
transceiver.
Many thanks,
David Taylor___
USRP-users mailing
Hi, This seems to be a bug in Capturing timed samples.. Can anyone suggest ways
around this?
Im thinking of adding another 'set-time' before subsequent stream_cmds , or
maybe theres something else I can put in a stream cmd? can the meta-data
structure sent to recv() do anything useful to resolve
git tag
Ron
On 9/11/20 10:38, Marcus D Leech via USRP-users wrote:
That should be fine.
GIT is arcane. Others have more facility with it than I.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 11, 2020, at 12:07 PM, David Evans via USRP-users
wrote:
Thanks Marcus,
Sorry,, I know this isn't the
0/09/2020 16:43, Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users wrote:
On 09/10/2020 08:55 AM, David Evans via USRP-users wrote:
Hi,
I have just installed the latest "master" branch of UHD (4.0.0.0).
If an overrun occurs during sampling, sampling does not continue
thereafter.
I noticed this with uhd_ff
Hi,
I have just installed the latest "master" branch of UHD (4.0.0.0).
If an overrun occurs during sampling, sampling does not continue thereafter.
I noticed this with uhd_fft, which hangs with rates over 8MHz, and also
rx_samples_to_file:
./rx_samples_to_file --freq 9 --rate 4000
Ok understood.
Many thanks again.
David
Le mer. 26 août 2020 à 22:15, Julian Arnold a
écrit :
> David,
>
> unfortunately not. The filter API does only export the filters internal
> to the AD9361 on B2xx series devices.
> However, if you let MCR = sample rate you should basi
Ok thanks a lotJulian, this is very helpful.
Does your example allow to list FPGA filters also ?
Le mar. 25 août 2020 à 21:57, Julian Arnold a
écrit :
> David,
>
> take a look at the ad9361 user guide [1]. It has all the information you
> are looking for.
>
> If you want to
tions : Can I address and change
filters behaviours that are part only on FPGA or also the AD9361 filters ?
Many thanks
David
___
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
aforementioned script is auto generated without modification from
gr_modtool add <..> ?
There are some excellent reference .yml examples to be found in
/usr/share/gnuradio/grc/blocks.
2). PYTHONPATH – I have checked the basics with out success.
Thanks in advance for any assistance.
David
Fro
ferent states/counter
values). This would result in offsets in the 200MHz domain of the
baseband samples.
Thanks,
David
___
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
modified for
shared_ptr use.
David.
From: Ron Economos via USRP-users
Sent: Monday, August 3, 2020 3:36 AM
To: usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] GRC up-grade - installation issues
You don't need to supply a Findpybind11.cmake file. That is already provided by
the pyb
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo
