Yes, it's pretty typical that the output of an SDR needs additional
filtering and gain on the transmit side, and similarly filters and gain on
the receive side. I spent a substantial fraction of my time at a previous
job designing application specific front ends for Ettus SDR's.

Dave


On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 8:39 PM Marcus D. Leech <patchvonbr...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 12/04/2023 20:28, Ron Economos wrote:
>
> This is what I see with a B210 at 145 MHz fundamental. I had the analyzer
> on a large RBW, so the even order harmonic are buried in the analyzer noise.
>
> I don't think there's any remedy except for external filters.
>
> Ron
> [image: B210 harmonics]
>
> Thanks Ron.  That looks like what my TinySA produced for 250Mhz carrier.
> I need to learn more about it so that I can
>   record spectra with it.  There's a Linux app for it that I need to
> explore....
>
>
> Anyway, the basic issue, having consulted some older Analog Devices forum
> posts is that the LO produces a square-wave
>   signal, which means that all the odd-order harmonics will be present in
> it, and naturally, mix with the baseband.
>   There's nothing that can be done other than, as you point out, filter.
> As you move up in frequency, this becomes
>   very much easier of course, and at 2GHz, the 3rd harmonic is outside the
> supported passband of the AD9361, and
>   you won't see it.
>
> I didn't realize this about the AD9361 chip, and other Ettus devices have
> automatically switchable filters that can
>   (often, not always) remediate this issue.  The E3xx series, the N3xx
> series, the TwinRX cards for the X310 and friends.
>
> But I'll point out again that "built for purpose" radios nearly-always
> have output (input) filtering to reduce or eliminate
>   unintended consequences of architecture choices deeper within the
> radio.   Since SDRs in general don't get to be
>   "built for purpose" either ever, or until some specific application is
> using them as their "radio bits", it's hard to come up
>   with a universal RF filtering scheme that is suitable for all
> applications.
>
> I'd never noticed this issue because I don't really ever TX in my "day
> job" use of these devices (radio astronomy), and on
>   the RX side, I always pre-filter anyway, usually rather aggressively.
>
>
> On 4/12/23 16:20, Shenk, Trey E via USRP-users wrote:
>
> The original signal that I showed was an unmodulated carrier.
>
> I tried a 10kHz complex exponential (plots included for several
> harmonics). The carrier is clearly visible at all frequencies. I can see
> copies of the 10kHz tone on odd multiples of the carrier, but not on the
> even multiples.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Marcus D. Leech <patchvonbr...@gmail.com>
> <patchvonbr...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, April 10, 2023 10:22 PM
> *To:* Shenk, Trey E <trey.sh...@pnnl.gov> <trey.sh...@pnnl.gov>
> *Cc:* USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
> *Subject:* Re: [USRP-users] Harmonic Distortion with B205mini
>
>
>
> On 10/04/2023 14:28, Shenk, Trey E wrote:
>
> I first tried turning the gain down. What I saw was that the even
> harmonics (2*fundamental, …) did not change power, and the odd harmonics
> decreased by the same amount as the fundamental. This means that the dBc
> for the odd harmonics stayed the same with decreasing gain.
>
>
>
> Decreasing the baseband amplitude had the exact same effect. Even
> harmonics stayed at the same power level, odd harmonics decreased while
> maintaining dBc.
>
> What is the nature of the modulating signal?
>
> If you use an example app like "tx_waveforms" with, let's say, 10kHz SIN
> signal, what are the harmonic results?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Marcus D Leech <patchvonbr...@gmail.com> <patchvonbr...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, April 10, 2023 8:39 AM
> *To:* Shenk, Trey E <trey.sh...@pnnl.gov> <trey.sh...@pnnl.gov>
> *Cc:* USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
> *Subject:* Re: [USRP-users] Harmonic Distortion with B205mini
>
>
>
> Check twice before you click! This email originated from outside PNNL.
>
>
>
> Turn down the RF gain a bit as well as the baseband amplitude. Does this
> make any difference?
>
>
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
>
>
> On Apr 10, 2023, at 9:41 AM, Shenk, Trey E via USRP-users <
> usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:
>
> 
>
> I'm using a B205mini to transmit signals. When transmitting, I can see
> copies of the SOI at harmonics of the center frequency. I ran some
> measurements of total harmonic distortion, and found it to range from 39%
> with a 100MHz to 23% with a 1GHz carrier. The second harmonic is <-50dBc,
> but the third harmonic is usually around -10dBc.
>
> My main concern is for the lower frequency carriers, like 100MHz, because
> multiple harmonics will show up on a spectrum analyzer set to a wideband.
> I've looked at putting an RF filter at the output, but I need the system to
> be able to switch transmit center frequencies in a range from 100MHz to
> 5GHz.
>
> Is it possible to reduce the harmonics by some hardware setting (driving
> with gnruadio)?
>
> Thanks,
> Trey
>
>
>
> <carrier_freqsweep_fc0200M_gain55.png>
>
> _______________________________________________
> USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
> To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
> To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
> To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
> To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com
>
_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com

Reply via email to