stion Don
Greer asked. Will the 2.0 code continue to get bug fixes with the 2.1
series focusing on enhancements, or should I follow the 2.1 code to
get the latest fixes?
--
Public key #7BBC68D9 at| Shane Williams
http://pgp.mi
amAssassin 2.0 (devel $Id: SpamAssassin.pm,v
1.54 2002
/01/14 01:56:34 jmason Exp $)
X-Spam-Prev-Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
--
Public key #7BBC68D9 at| Shane Williams
http://pgp.mit.edu/|
=--+
is a >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... line.
I'm not sure if this is the new version of SA doing it, some
misconfiguration on my part, or something about his setup.
--
Public key #7BBC68D9 at| Shane Williams
http:
t rename it so it could be
easily put back when the code handles short messages better?
--
Public key #7BBC68D9 at| Shane Williams
http://pgp.mit.edu/|
=--+---
All syllogisms contain
strings
in proximity would score slightly lower than 3 in proximity.
--
Public key #7BBC68D9 at| Shane Williams
http://pgp.mit.edu/|
=--+---
All syllogisms contain three lines |
know a very few individuals who use this sort of system and
I've never responded to them.
--
Public key #7BBC68D9 at| Shane Williams
http://pgp.mit.edu/|
=--+---
All syllogisms conta
gt; Using sendmail BTW
>
> Ugh...its just one thing after another!
If the process is failing when you run newaliases, then this is a
sendmail problem, not an SA problem. You might take alook at
http://www.sendmail.org/~ca/email/lfaq.html#NONLOCAL
- --
Public key #7BBC68D9 at |
7;s spam and
non-spam may be vastly different. Obviously, the more sources the
corpus is drawn from the less this will be an issue, but until then
the GA will be craeting scores tuned more accurately for the types of
users who submit to the corpus.
- --
Public key #7BBC68D9 at |
t;From: Craig Hughes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >
> >Is procmail actually looking for its rc file in /usr/local/etc?
- --
Public key #7BBC68D9 at| Shane Williams
http://pgp.mit.edu/|
=--+
n caps because they don't
> know any better?
I hate to jump on the bandwagon, but since switching to 2.1, I've had
three mails marked as spam, two of them falsely, and both the falses
were pushed over the 5 limit by LINE_OF_YELLING alone.
- --
Public key #7BBC68D9 at |
ow if they forged headers like Jones'
campaign). And, unlike Jones, Sanchez is running neck and neck with
his opponent in the primaries.
--
Public key #7BBC68D9 at | Shane Williams
http://pgp.mit.edu/|
=--+---
e as two-point-eleven which begs the question of where
point-two through point-ten went).
- --
Public key #7BBC68D9 at| Shane Williams
http://pgp.mit.edu/|
=--+---
All syllogisms contain thr
| Shane Williams
http://pgp.mit.edu/|
=--+---
All syllogisms contain three lines | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Therefore this is not a syllogism | www.gslis.utexas.edu/~shanew
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
C68D9 at| Shane Williams
http://pgp.mit.edu/|
=--+---
All syllogisms contain three lines | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Therefore this is not a syllogism | www.gslis.utexas.edu/~s
5.0, which again may allow mor real spam
to slip through.
- --
Public key #7BBC68D9 at| Shane Williams
http://pgp.mit.edu/|
=--+---
All syllogisms contain three lines |
rase goes on to
contain a variety of other spammy words and phrases, where the message
I got didn't.
--
Public key #7BBC68D9 at | Shane Williams
http://pgp.mit.edu/|
=--+---
t; >>
> >> Perl 5.6.0 appears to be not entirely backward compatible. Perl
> >> 5.005_03 has been out for a while, is reliable and good, and is
> >> known to work with our software. We recommend that customers who
> >> are having trouble an
ist and blacklist entries do not accept regular expression,
only simple wildcards. Try *@simplex.net.au instead.
--
Public key #7BBC68D9 at | Shane Williams
http://pgp.mit.edu/|
=--+--
.
Is anyone working on code that would properly reassemble the "main"
text in such an email?
- --
Public key #7BBC68D9 at| Shane Williams
htt
epc.com
The multiple line version is easier when your whitelist gets longer,
but
whitelist_from *@my-cast.com *@elitepc.com
will work as well.
Black and white-list entries shouldn't have commas or quotes, though.
--
Public key #7BBC68D9 at |
kes sense as well, but if this is the only person whose email causes
problems, that's what the whitelist is for.
--
Public key #7BBC68D9 at | Shane Williams
http://pgp.mit.edu/|
=--+-
re's a
Received header in 100% of spam doesn't mean it's a good rule to
filter spam on.
--
Public key #7BBC68D9 at | Shane Williams
http://pgp.mit.edu/|
=--+-
the SirCam signature
:0 B
* daeLRCQEM9KJEIN8JAwAdBmLRCQEi1QkCIkQi0QkDCtEJAiLVCQEiUIEg8QUXV9eW8NTVldV
$VIRUSTRAP
-----
--
Public key #7BBC68D9 at| Shane Williams
http://pgp.mit.edu/|
re available to you before "it
gets downloaded," but I posted a procmail recipe on May 17 that is
very effective against Klez.
--
Public key #7BBC68D9 at | Shan
different Spam
dish (Spam a L'orange, Spam Fettucine Primavera, Spam Cheese Torte,
etc.) Hormel provides a recipe index at http://www.spam.com/es.htm so
we'd never run out of new version names.
--
Public key #7BBC68D9 at
ves, you might consider
upping your required threshold. The default is 5 so cranking it down
to 3 is likely to net you a good number of false positives.
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=3.2 required=3.0
--
Public key #7BBC68D9 at| Shane Williams
http://pgp.mit.edu/
rest of the SA community, what can we do to make
SpamAssassin more understood? Perhaps something on the very first
page of the website? Something else? I'm just tired of so many
people I meet thinking this wonderful piece of software does things
that it doesn't do.
--
Public key #7BBC
r message.
>
>
>
> ---
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> ___
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
n spam getting in below the
> threshold. To help me track this down, I would like to add the
> scores to the X-Spam-Status header. I have seen examples online in
> the dev archives that show:
--
Public key #7BBC68D9 at| Shane Williams
htt
e Linux Forum Conference & Expo
> The Event For Linux Datacenter Solutions & Strategies in The Enterprise
> Linux in the Boardroom; in the Front Office; & in the Server Room
> http://www.enterpriselinuxforum.com
ntribution, and help us add new
> features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
> ___
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
>
--
Public key #7B
sin.
Perhaps you should consider Amavisd or Procmail Sanitizer for these
uses.
That said, I believe there is agreement from others that the FAQ needs
updating.
--
Public key #7BBC68D9 at| Shane Williams
http://pgp.mit.edu/| System Admin - UT iSchoo
Well, I did a little more searching and found bug #1578, which
includes a patch.
BUT, the patch didn't apply cleanly on CmdLearn.pm in 2.50. Once I
made the edits by hand, it works as advertised, at least through a
pipe.
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, David McNett wrote:
> On 02-Mar-2003, Shane
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> just wondering--
>
> does anyone know what virus causes that one?
Sobig.c, and it seems like you'd be better off putting a rule in your
MTA so SA doesn't have to waste any cycles.
--
Public key #7BBC68D9 at|
e this one score a 5.1.
--
Public key #7BBC68D9 at| Shane Williams
http://pgp.mit.edu/| System Admin - UT iSchool
=--+---
All syllogisms contain three lines | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Therefore this
ally calculated average of a
sender's subsequent scores. It's more complicated than that, but
that's the jist of it.
--
Public key #7BBC68D9 at| Shane Williams
http://pgp.mit.edu/| System Admin - UT iSchool
=---
"|/usr/bin/spamassassin -r -w spamtrap"
>
> The result was an error that spamassassin dosn't work with Sendmail.
- --
Public key #7BBC68D9 at| Shane Williams
http://pgp.mit.edu/|
=---
? Should I just remake SA and turn off razor
checking for the time being? Is anyone else running v1.xx of razor
successfully right now?
--
Public key #7BBC68D9 at |
n Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Shane Williams wrote:
> I finally grabbed 2.31 (since it looked from the list like it had
> settled down), and I'm having some problems. From what I can tell
> it's either something wrong with Razor (I'm using v1.20) or the Dns.pm
> in SpamAssassin. Ju
s normal
TESTBOX=/var/log/SA-test
:0c:
| spamc -f >> $TESTBOX
#--
- --
Public key #7BBC68D9 at | Shane Williams
http://pgp.mit.edu/|
=--+---
just round
it off to 0 and not have the test run at all?
--
Public key #7BBC68D9 at| Shane Williams
http://pgp.mit.edu/|
=--+---
All syllogisms contain three lines
wrote:
>
> http://slashdot.org/articles/02/07/22/1516234.shtml?tid=111 >
>
> Discussing the article/page at:
>
> http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns2557 >
>
>
> /Tony
>
--
Public key #7BBC68D9 at|
ppens again. Any
other ideas on why spamd might be skipping messages under the size
limit?
- --
Public key #7BBC68D9 at| Shane Williams
http://pgp.mit.edu/|
=--+
ever, that this failure is not logged even with the -D option
to spamd. Further, it looks like spamd bails on such a failure and
returns the email unchanged. Maybe something to look at for the
current CVS code?
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Shane Williams wrote:
> I know we've discussed spamc/sp
the user receiving the e-mail.
>
> And when I change my /etc/procmailrc file to use "spamassassin -P" instead
> of spamc, then it works fine and uses my user_prefs file. I guess
> something is strange with spamc/spamd.
--
Public key #7BBC68D9 at|
ght trip some people up.
--
Public key #7BBC68D9 at | Shane Williams
http://pgp.mit.edu/|
=--+---
All syllogisms contain three lines | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
retz wrote:
> On Saturday 05 October 2002 18:39 CET Shane Williams wrote:
> > Trying to test 2.42 since I'm still at 2.31.
> >
> > I run perl Makefile.PL and everything looks good.
>
> This step should have been told you:
> "Warning: prerequisite HTML::Parser
someone already invented this
wheel?
--
Public key #7BBC68D9 at| Shane Williams
http://pgp.mit.edu/|
=--+---
All syllogisms contain three lines | [
-
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> ___
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
mail is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> ___
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
>
--
Public key #7BBC68D9 at
particularly given that if the site is removed,
the spam that are already out there lose their value.
--
Public key #7BBC68D9 at| Shane Williams
http://pgp.mit.edu/| System Admin - UT iSchool
=--+---
51 matches
Mail list logo
