If only the original article had anything to do with spam.  The study
focused not on commercial or bulk mail, but how likely respondents were
to answer a simple question, and whether that likelihood changed if
there were only one or multiple recipients.

On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:

> 
>  <URL: http://slashdot.org/articles/02/07/22/1516234.shtml?tid=111 >
> 
>  Discussing the article/page at:
> 
>  <URL: http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99992557 >
> 
> 
>       /Tony
> 

-- 
Public key #7BBC68D9 at            |                 Shane Williams
http://pgp.mit.edu/                |                               
=----------------------------------+-------------------------------
All syllogisms contain three lines |              [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Therefore this is not a syllogism  |   www.gslis.utexas.edu/~shanew



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to