If only the original article had anything to do with spam. The study focused not on commercial or bulk mail, but how likely respondents were to answer a simple question, and whether that likelihood changed if there were only one or multiple recipients.
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote: > > <URL: http://slashdot.org/articles/02/07/22/1516234.shtml?tid=111 > > > Discussing the article/page at: > > <URL: http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99992557 > > > > /Tony > -- Public key #7BBC68D9 at | Shane Williams http://pgp.mit.edu/ | =----------------------------------+------------------------------- All syllogisms contain three lines | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Therefore this is not a syllogism | www.gslis.utexas.edu/~shanew ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk