On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Ian Douglas wrote: > I just got two pieces of Email, and they had these SA headers: > > (this one wasn't spam, it was a mailing list with advertisements throughout) > X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=5.1, required 6, > CLICK_BELOW 0.00, CONSOLIDATE_DEBT 1.10, LOW_INTEREST 2.29, > NO_FEE 0.51, WHILE_YOU_SLEEP 1.16)
First, this rule might actually score some value less than 0.01, but gets truncated here. Second, this test might score higher or lower in a ruleset other than the one you're using. Third, some rules may be given essentially zero scores because alone they don't indicate much, but when combined with some other rule in a meta-rule could be a stronger indicater. > (this one WAS spam, I've since trained and added rules for the content) > X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=5.1, required 6, > AWL 0.00, FROM_OFFERS 4.30, OFFERS_ETC 0.37) Here I suspect the average of emails from this address is nearly zero (or perhaps your AWL isn't working right?), though it should look a little higher on subsequent emails since this one score a 5.1. -- Public key #7BBC68D9 at | Shane Williams http://pgp.mit.edu/ | System Admin - UT iSchool =----------------------------------+------------------------------- All syllogisms contain three lines | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Therefore this is not a syllogism | www.ischool.utexas.edu/~shanew ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
