OK, I fixed things, but I'm not really sure what was wrong to begin with, but it was clearly a razor problem. Short story, I placed IP addresses from a known-working razor install .razor.lst into place on the busted razor and everything works now. Rerun make test and everything is OK.
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Shane Williams wrote: > I finally grabbed 2.31 (since it looked from the list like it had > settled down), and I'm having some problems. From what I can tell > it's either something wrong with Razor (I'm using v1.20) or the Dns.pm > in SpamAssassin. Just to lay down some basics, this is a RH 7.2 > system where I'm making from source. SA 2.20 works just fine and > performs DNS based tests correctly. Razor checks bail out now (the > last razor-positive mail I had was about a week ago). > > perl Makefile.PL and make go just fine. When I run make test, I get > the following errors (other tests pass just fine): > > t/razor.................Problem while trying to load Razor: Bad file > descriptor at ../lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm line 270. > Not found: spam = Listed in Razor > t/razor.................NOK 1Problem while trying to load Razor: Bad > file descriptor at ../lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm line 270. > t/razor.................FAILED test 1 > Failed 1/2 tests, 50.00% okay > > AND, at the bottom of make test I get this error: > > make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 11 > > Every failed test seems to relate to razor and I saw on the razor > mailing list that people were having trouble with servers, and indeed, > when I run razor-check -d it shows that razor can't find any servers. > Of course, I also saw on the razor list that everyone should move to > the latest rev. of v2, but that's not supported except in the CVS > version of SA. > > What's going on here? Should I just remake SA and turn off razor > checking for the time being? Is anyone else running v1.xx of razor > successfully right now? > > -- Public key #7BBC68D9 at | Shane Williams http://pgp.mit.edu/ | =----------------------------------+------------------------------- All syllogisms contain three lines | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Therefore this is not a syllogism | www.gslis.utexas.edu/~shanew ------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
