-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

I've been using SA personally for 8 months, but I've just about
convinced the powers-that-be to scan all our email via SA, but I want
to make sure of a few things first.

If I put a spamc (or spamassasin) call in /etc/procmailrc (and
procmail is my MDA in sendmail), will SA look for user confs based on
the intended recipient?  I think the answer is no, but I want to be
sure.

In order to test that things are working OK without munging anyone's
mail, I decided to create a procmail recipe for my /etc/procmailrc.
Tell me if this looks OK, or if I'm making some horrible mistake.  I
tested it briefly on a low-usage system and it seems OK, but I'm
particularly conerned about the locking aspect on a higher volume
system.

#----------------------------------
# Create a clone we can run through SA and inspect later, then
# deliever as normal
TESTBOX=/var/log/SA-test
:0c:
| spamc -f >> $TESTBOX
#----------------------------------

- -- 
Public key #7BBC68D9 at            |                 Shane Williams
http://pgp.mit.edu/                |                               
=----------------------------------+-------------------------------
All syllogisms contain three lines |              [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Therefore this is not a syllogism  |   www.gslis.utexas.edu/~shanew



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBPTNDPGa83yV7vGjZAQFHoQQAo5YJx606AoGVOAXzm3bk5Bvs/clxpuJr
PrGnRrEWNX9Nc1y4sIuPrauKF7VG6lxxcvwVbkZCt/H4/LQkYCkY/k17p8o212rQ
dBs7/R+hQi5mjwqLy33pMR15rsMGFGTh435UadHx46wt2aFR6YC+QyQiJI/gp3pd
/BuJORXQZZs=
=WLdt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to