[SAtalk] Exit code

2002-02-10 Thread Mark
ull") / 256)); Funny thing is, I keep getting error code 74. I thought it would only exit with either 1 or 0? Any help would be appreciated. - Mark ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Re: [SAtalk] Exit code

2002-02-10 Thread Mark
Thanks for your reply; but no, that makes no differnce; I still get code: 18944 (divided by 256 = 74). - Mark - Original Message - From: "John Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 9:43 PM Subject: R

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Exit code

2002-02-10 Thread Mark
- Original Message - From: "Daniel Pittman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 10:35 PM Subject: [SAtalk] Re: Exit code > On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Mark wrote: > > > Dear people, > > > > Being rather inte

Re: [SAtalk] Exit code

2002-02-10 Thread Mark
ed connection from asarian-host.net [ 216.122.74.112 ] at port 2820" I am confused by that; should there be a place where I set who can check the daemon, outside the command-line? Much obliged, - Mark System Administrator Asarian-host.org --- "If you were supposed to unders

Re: [SAtalk] Exit code

2002-02-10 Thread Mark
Oops! :) I solved it. I did not add the -A class of allowed hosts. See, for some reason it would not bind to localhost, so I specified the server address itself; but -A still defaulted to localhost. It works now. Thanks for your suggestions, anyway. :) - Mark System Administrator

[SAtalk] Envelope from

2002-02-14 Thread Mark
from. Is there a way I can test for that too, so as to put it on the whitelist? Thanks! - Mark ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Re: [SAtalk] Envelope from

2002-02-14 Thread Mark
- Original Message - From: "dman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 4:22 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Envelope from > On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 12:17:56PM +0100, Mark wrote: > > But mail coming from those groups are s

Re: [SAtalk] Envelope from

2002-02-14 Thread Mark
- Original Message - From: "rODbegbie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Spam Assassin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 3:37 AM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Envelope from > > Yes, a header w

Re: [SAtalk] what is this

2002-02-25 Thread Mark
ke to > know what it is; i have the following > in .spamassassin/user_prefs > > > header FROM_foo From =~ [EMAIL PROTECTED]/i > describe FROM_foo I know her > scroe FROM_foo -10 Well, do what Perl asks of you: escape the @ sign. And the dot too, while you are at it: header

Re: [SAtalk] BSD rc.d script and HTML spam

2002-02-27 Thread Mark
uch difficulty. Yeah, killall would kill Perl, and all instances of it. Not what you want, really. How about this? kill -TERM `ps ax | grep spamd | egrep -v grep | awk '{print $1}'` That ought to do it. I use that on my FreeBSD 4.1 box. - Mark System Administrator Asarian-host.org --

[SAtalk] Re: procmail error when forwarding to a razor database

2002-03-03 Thread Mark
error that says "unknown user". I am > >doing "newaliases" in between each modification. Well, it wouldn't hurt restarting the sendmail daemon either. :) - Mark System Administrator Asarian-host.org --- "If you were supposed to understand it, we wouldn't call it code." - FedEx ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

[SAtalk] Whitelist revisited

2002-03-23 Thread Mark
results - What am I missing? Thanks in advance, - Mark ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Re: [SAtalk] Is there an HOWTO for SA and SendMail (errorenclosed)

2002-04-28 Thread Mark
Built-in Milter support in sendmail only exists in versions 8.12 and up. - Mark       System Administrator Asarian-host.org   ---"If you were supposed to understand it,we wouldn't call it code." - FedEx   - Original Message - From: Dave Strickler To: [

[SAtalk] Upgrading

2002-06-02 Thread Mark
I am still using SA 2.01. There was much talk here about version 2.2+ using excessive CPU loads. Have those problems been fixed by now? I really am thinking of upgrading, as I want the SQL interface. Thanks. - Mark System Administrator Asarian-host.org --- "If you were suppos

Re: [SAtalk] My rules don't work.

2003-08-14 Thread Mark
ke the way global variables retain their value on startup, which can yield quite unexpected results. - Mark --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.

[SAtalk] Using MRTG to display highest connection counts

2003-10-30 Thread Mark
Hello, Is there someone who has used MRTG to display highest connection counts? Though not necessarily spam, I would like to get an overview of who has been trying to connect an inordinate amount of times during the day. Thanks, - Mark

Re: [SAtalk] Using MRTG to display highest connection counts

2003-10-31 Thread Mark
- Original Message - From: "Kelsey Cummings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 2:00 AM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Using MRTG to display highest connection counts > On Thu, Oct

Re: [SAtalk] Removing SpamAssassin

2003-02-18 Thread Mark
not have been trusted to install SA to begin with. Probably because if the sole purpose for de-installation is to not use SA any more, people usually just stop using it. :) - Mark System Administrator Asarian-host.org --- "If you were supposed to understand it, we w

[SAtalk] Re: Spamassassin 2.50 rewrites Received: headers, how to stop it?

2003-02-22 Thread Mark
- Original Message - From: "Dan Hollis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Shane Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Daniel Quinlan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, February 22,

[SAtalk] Maillog analysis

2003-05-29 Thread Mark
A dependent, but you really can learn a great deal about spammers based on "history" too, and not merely a per-message analysis. Anyway, just a thought. - Mark --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office eq

Re: [SAtalk] Worried about RBLs

2003-05-30 Thread Mark
etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf Nothing that a symlink could not solve, though. :) - Mark --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on eBay! http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 _

Re: [SAtalk] Best way to process the log?

2003-05-30 Thread Mark
rstand what he is saying, then you should simply not respond; let alone dispense sarcastic wise-cracks on language. P.S. Hmmm, I remember an earlier altercation with you. I do not think I liked you much then, either. I consider this a reminder why. - Mark ---

Re: [SAtalk] Maillog analysis

2003-05-30 Thread Mark
- Original Message - From: "Michael Sims" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 3:31 AM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Maillog analysis > Quoting Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >

Re: [SAtalk] Best way to process the log?

2003-05-30 Thread Mark
ID; like so: sendmail[27778]: h4ONSNPl027778: <-- HELO blabla.com Perhaps spamd could do this too? That would really solve it all. Groeten, :) - Mark --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on eBay! ht

[SAtalk] Non English Email

2003-06-11 Thread Mark
I am using Spamassassin to filter english and italian email but the false positive rate seems to be allot higher with the italian email, does anyone have any experience using SA with non english email ? Are there any options to help my situation ? Thanks, Mark

Re: [SAtalk] Razor help

2003-06-21 Thread Mark
ligiously and have previously had no problems with other installs. Thanks for the reply - I appreciate it. Any other ideas? Mark --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Pa

[SAtalk] Trying to compile 2.55

2003-07-05 Thread Mark
_DEPENDS+= ${SITE_PERL}/${PERL_ARCH}/MIME/Base64.pm:${PORTSDIR}/converters/p5-MIME-Base 64 .endif -- Has the world gone mad, or is this the post office? :) No, seriously, am I missing something obvious? I use Perl 5.8.0, btw. Thanks! - Mark --

[SAtalk] Trying to compile 2.55

2003-07-05 Thread Mark
_DEPENDS+= ${SITE_PERL}/${PERL_ARCH}/MIME/Base64.pm:${PORTSDIR}/converters/p5-MIME-Base 64 .endif -- Has the world gone mad, or is this the post office? :) No, seriously, am I missing something obvious? I use Perl 5.8.0, btw. Thanks! - Mark --

[SAtalk] Bayes and IMAP

2003-07-06 Thread Mark
ote machine) to read the mbox, and have it delete 'non-spam' messages (on the server), so I can use the rest to feed as spam. Thanks. - Mark --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-comm

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Trying to compile 2.55

2003-07-07 Thread Mark
- Original Message - From: "Dan Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 8:23 PM Subject: [SAtalk] Re: Trying to compile 2.55 > Mark wrote: > > > I am still using SA 2.44. But after recent reports how much better de

Re: [SAtalk] Bayes Error

2003-07-08 Thread Mark
d you, by any chance, set "bayes_path" to "/home/richard/.spamassassin/bayes"? It seems Bayes, in your setup, already exists in: /home/richard/.spamassassin/ So, I would say, either create a "bayes" dir underneath /home/richard/.sp

[SAtalk] Lock & sa-learn

2003-07-08 Thread Mark
ate to see the database become corrupted. :) Thanks, - Mark --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX

Re: [SAtalk] Lock & sa-learn

2003-07-08 Thread Mark
- Original Message - From: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 5:00 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Lock & sa-learn > > On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 02:39:46PM +000

[SAtalk] X-Spam-Level header

2003-07-08 Thread Mark
d-body, so that the space after the colon could be interpreted as a valid field-body. But is that not stretching things a bit? I bet you 999 to 1 that most software will split header lines along the following scheme: ($field_name, $field_body) = split (/: */, $line, 2); And thus potentially ma

[SAtalk] Razor results

2003-07-09 Thread Mark
: Using results from Razor v2.22 You would think it would find a spam, now and then. SA says Razor is available, and is using it; but still, it always returns "spam? 0". Anyone have any ideas? - Mark --- This SF.Net email sponsored by

Re: [SAtalk] Increasing bayes_msgcount and db

2003-07-10 Thread Mark
he whitelist entries I put in that local.cf ARE working, > it would appear that file is being read, but why aren't the > bayes lines working? Good question. I'd like to have the answer too. - Mark --- This SF.Net email sponsor

[SAtalk] Backing up the Bayes databases

2003-07-13 Thread Mark
ar? I mean, so as not to backup the database 'mid-write', so to speak. Thanks! - Mark --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. Download & eval WebKing and get a

[SAtalk] Why wil "sa-learn" not learn?

2003-07-13 Thread Mark
sage you specifically tell it to be spam? - Mark --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. Download & eval WebKing and get a free book. www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1 _

Re: [SAtalk] Why wil "sa-learn" not learn?

2003-07-13 Thread Mark
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 09:38:53PM +0000, Mark wrote: > > > What does it mean, "Learned from 0 messages"?? Should not > > sa-learn learn from EVERY message you specifically tell it > > to be spam? > > Not if you've already learned it as spam. The m

Re: [SAtalk] Why wil "sa-learn" not learn?

2003-07-13 Thread Mark
- Original Message - From: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 1:57 AM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Why wil "sa-learn" not learn? > On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 10:

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Why wil "sa-learn" not learn?

2003-07-14 Thread Mark
r/home/spamd/.spamassassin/ Instead of: /root/.spamassassin/ Which is used for "sa-learn" (as I type the latter from the shell-prompt, of course). But that path difference does not really exist, as both /usr/home/spamd/.spamassassin/ and /root/

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Why wil "sa-learn" not learn?

2003-07-14 Thread Mark
cal/sa/bin/sa-learn --spam --mbox -D /tmp/spam.txt ... debug: Initialising learner Learned from 0 messages. Message NOT learned. Error. {root} % /usr/local/sa/bin/sa-learn --spam --mbox /tmp/spam.txt Learned from 1 messages. And, ran without -D, back to l

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Why wil "sa-learn" not learn?

2003-07-14 Thread Mark
- Original Message - From: "Martin Bene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Fuzzy Fox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 1:08 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Re: Why wil "sa-learn"

Re: [SAtalk] Configure Bayes Path

2003-07-18 Thread Mark
vileged user? 2): Does the user spam runs as have sufficient access to "/this/"? Again, if you created "/this/" as root (or another "high" privileged user), spamd may not have (write) access to it. A simple output of "ls -la" on dir and files should clari

[SAtalk] Is spamc unbuffered?

2003-07-21 Thread Mark
anyone have any idea why it would hang altogether?   Thanks,   - Mark

Re: [SAtalk] Is spamc unbuffered?

2003-07-21 Thread Mark
- Original Message - From: "Dallas L. Engelken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 6:02 PM Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Is spamc unbuffered? > > This works flawlessly on not all that la

[SAtalk] Persistent MySQL connections

2003-07-24 Thread Mark
en upon forking. So, has anyone any experience with this? If people are interested, I'm sure I could write a special module for this. - Mark --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-com

Re: [SAtalk] Errors in PerMsgStatus.pm

2003-07-24 Thread Mark
ila, in its own namespace, all UTF-8 problems have now disappeared. :) P.S. It may not be the official solution, but it works. - Mark --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portal

Re: [SAtalk] SA Custom Rule Emporium is alive :)

2003-07-28 Thread Mark
a great new addition to SA. :) - Mark       System Administrator Asarian-host.org   ---"If you were supposed to understand it,we wouldn't call it code." - FedEx   - Original Message - From: Chris Santerre To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) Sent: Wednesday,

Re: [SAtalk] Bayesian Filter is rather CPU Hungry

2003-07-29 Thread Mark
So marginally even, that I would never have noticed it even, had people not mentioned it here. Loadaverages remain well below 1. The hardest hits I take on rbl timeouts. So, I would say this is not normal; either that, or I have been very lucky. :) - Mark

[SAtalk] Bug in basic body rule parsing?

2003-07-29 Thread Mark
changed the rule to say "rawbody" instead of body, and voila, I get a match: M_K_N0N0_WORDS_BODY (9.0 points) BODY: The body contains n0n0 words A bug? If not, I would like someone to explain this to me, please. - Mark --- This SF.Ne

Re: [SAtalk] [RD] rule discussion

2003-07-30 Thread Mark
only looks for the subs in, say, UserEval.pm (initialized like EvalTests.pm, but essentially empty at distribution). Or is there already a way to "localize" eval tests? - Mark --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET site

Re: [SAtalk] those pesky small v*agra ads

2003-08-01 Thread Mark
colors, etc. Not to mention that white, stretched gif used for background color. And that is just 'old' style HTML. :) Hence I gave my rules a low score. But still, you might find them useful. - Mark full MASKED_HTML_TEXT /\<[^>]*?body +?[^>]*?bgcolor[^>]*?(\04

Re: [SAtalk] how to stop mails with from=<>

2003-08-01 Thread Mark
der from=<> . That is not a good idea. :) Read with me from RFC 1123, section 5.2.9: 5.2.9 Command Syntax: RFC-821 Section 4.1.2 The syntax shown in RFC-821 for the MAIL FROM: command omits the case of an empty path: "MAIL FROM: <>" (see RFC-821 Page

Re: [SAtalk] those pesky small v*agra ads

2003-08-01 Thread Mark
- Original Message - From: "Gary Funck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Spamassassin List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:18 PM Subject: RE: [SAtalk] those pesky small v*agra ads > > -----Original Message- > > From: Ma

Re: [SAtalk] those pesky small v*agra ads

2003-08-04 Thread Mark
- Original Message - From: "Chris Santerre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Mark'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Gary Funck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Spamassassin List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 7:41 PM Sub

Re: [SAtalk] FORGED From: myself? use of unwhitelist_from ??

2003-08-11 Thread Mark
tgoing mail, sent through my smtp server, signed with a PGP signature. That is why mail from my domain cannot be forged. And I call, within SA, an eval function to check for a valid signature on incoming mail. That requires, of course, that you tinker a bit with your smtp server, to ma

Re: [SAtalk] setting up message body filtering

2003-08-14 Thread Mark
write: "score VIAGRA" (instead of "score SEX"). Copy & Paste can be a real b... ;) - Mark --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are availab

[SAtalk] Help making spamassassin on HPUX

2002-07-02 Thread Mark
reviously declared here make: *** [spamd/spamc] Error 1 $mark-home> I looked at the archives but didn't come up with much... anyone have a guess at where I should start? BTW, I got the same error trying to build 2.30 Thanks in advance, Mark --

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Help making spamassassin on HPUX

2002-07-02 Thread mark
pamassassin. thanks again, Mark On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: > On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 08:48:25PM -0400, Mark wrote: > | Hi all, > | > | I'm trying to build Spamassassin 2.31 on my HPUX 11.00 systems. I'm using > | gcc 3.02 and gnu make

[SAtalk] How to tell if dcc tests are working?

2002-07-12 Thread mark
ne line of it should contain something like "dcc.rhyolite.com,- anon". ==== end of SpamAssassin help file info Thanks to those who can kindly respond. - mark --- This

Re: [SAtalk] Gotcha! IP, date and time - you gave me all I need :o)

2002-07-18 Thread Mark
addresses for your domain. They may all go to the same controlling user, but it will eat up your resources. The more serious consequence of dropping the valid user requirement, is that you deprived your server of a decent method of informing a connecting server that a user account no longer exists

[SAtalk] Upgrade

2002-12-11 Thread Mark
Hello, How easy is it to upgrade from 2.01 to 2.43? Do I need to make substantion config-changes? Is an upgrade even needed? Thanks! - Mark System Administrator Asarian-host.org --- "If you were supposed to understand it, we wouldn't call it code

Re: [SAtalk] Upgrade

2002-12-12 Thread Mark
- Original Message - From: "Jonathan Nichols" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 9:33 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Upgrade > > > > How easy is it to upgrade from 2.01

SOLVED (Re: [SAtalk] Upgrade)

2002-12-13 Thread Mark
Perhaps useful to know for others: Perl 5.005_03 needs "Errno.pm" in spamd 2.43. This does not show up on needed dependencies, nor in the "make test" run. The test just fails to start spamd (and you do not get to see why, cuz it redirects STDERR to /dev/null). - Mark

Re: [SAtalk] spamd only forking single child

2003-01-06 Thread Mark
Does this bug exist in 2.43 too? If so, I have to recompile. :( - Mark - Original Message - From: "Neulinger, Nathan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 5:17 PM Subject: RE: [SAtalk] spamd only forking single child Thi

Re: [SAtalk] Deersoft acquisition (thumbs down)

2003-01-07 Thread Mark
ral courtesy to inform them that you plan to cash in on the project, subsequently, have the decency to consult them on it. That leaves them the choice to divert their time and energy to true Open Source projects. - Mark System Administrator

Re: [SAtalk] My posting

2003-01-13 Thread Mark
ew boo-boo's. Not a big deal, really. You got frustrated, and spewed some unwarranted stuff. Been there, done that. :) But only a fool persists in his folly. - Mark System Administrator Asarian-host.org --- "If you were supposed to understand it, we wouldn't call it code.&

Re: [SAtalk] My posting

2003-01-13 Thread Mark
y." Depending on how old your version of MIME::Base64 is, herein may lie your problem. - Mark System Administrator Asarian-host.org --- "If you were supposed to understand it, we wouldn't call it code." - FedEx ---

Re: [SAtalk] A new(?) way to fight spam, blocking their DNS

2003-02-11 Thread Mark
g name server, of course. But the problem is, there are more email servers than there are ISPs, of course. Take hotmail, for instance; likely millions of people have a hotmail account; but none of them uses hotmail as their ISP; read: uses their name servers to lookup domains. So, this would on

Re: [SAtalk] SA burning CPU

2003-02-14 Thread Mark
h sets its own alarm, > > then does alarm 0, thereby killing ours. > > This workaround was only recently pulled up to Dns.pm and > Reporter.pm in the b2_4_0 branch, after the release of 2.44. > We still have 2 patches for this in the NetBSD pkgsrc repository: Thanks. :) I a

Re: [SAtalk] Anti-SA article: "ISP Assassin"

2003-11-05 Thread Mark
ers of SpamAssassin, since it violates these laws." Yeah, you know what? Let us sue the Sendmail Consortium too; because, after all, sendmail "examines" private email too, and not just the headers. :) And all without a Court order! :) What a loser. - Mark -

[SAtalk] Could not complete sender verify callout

2003-11-05 Thread Mark
accidentally blocked something. But it makes no difference. Can anyone please tell me why this occurs? Much obliged, - Mark P.S. I had to subscribe with a different address, just to get this post out. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net

[SAtalk] Is bl.spamcop.net gone?

2003-11-08 Thread Mark
Is it just me, or is bl.spamcop.net gone? I am no longer able to get a DNS resolution for it. - Mark --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest developments in Apache, PHP

DynaBlock strategy (was: Re: [SAtalk] Looking for Rules)

2003-11-11 Thread Mark
the same policy. Is there anyone here who has some answers on this matter? Thanks! - Mark --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest development

Re: [SAtalk] What Dynamic IPs rbl list?

2003-11-11 Thread Mark
DNSBL has been so effective in blocking spam as this dynamic block list. I kid you not when I say spam has been reduced by 90% and up! I'm loving it so much even, that this morning I added the entire dynablock zone to my DNS. BIND rose to a whopping

[SAtalk] Pyzor trouble

2003-11-19 Thread Mark
Has anyone else problems with Pyzor? I am getting these, all throughout the day, Pyzor: couldn't grok response "66.250.40.33:24441 TimeoutError: " I did a "/usr/local/bin/pyzor discover", but to no avail. And I do not have them blocked on the firewall

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Comments on CBL DNSBL (cbl.abuseat.org)

2003-11-20 Thread Mark
only got 1 (!) hit on it. Seems a bit lame. Unless the former two cover pretty much everything the latter does too. - Mark --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it he

Re: [SAtalk] *.easynet.nl DNSBL's ceasing on Dec 1, 2003

2003-11-21 Thread Mark
course. Well, I better be real quick and do a huge rsync today, and grab me the whole dynalist before it is too late. Good thing I run my own DNS. Others may not be so fortunate. - Mark --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback

Re: [SAtalk] perl question

2003-11-22 Thread Mark
g character > can be a space or a carriage return (newline?) ? / badtext\s+goodtext / Takes care of a TAB too. :) - Mark --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does

[SAtalk] Running rbldnsd

2003-11-23 Thread Mark
It manages load load the whole dynablock zone in less than 8MB (!), so it is worth trying to get to work, I'd say. Thanks, - Mark --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more producti

Re: [SAtalk] An Open Letter to the SA-talk forum

2003-11-24 Thread Mark
ind that you cannot change anything at all. Is, conversely, such an unalterable program then a pre? I think not. I eagerly await your new article. - Mark System Administrator Asarian-host.org --- "If you were supposed t

Re: [SAtalk] Re: An Open Letter to the SA-talk forum

2003-11-25 Thread Mark
re we? I agree, though, that Logan, being attacked here as he was, handled himself with class, in the lion's den. That is rare; probably as rare as the mistake he made. - Mark --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Pro

Re: [SAtalk] bayes database size

2003-11-26 Thread Mark
:58 bayes_toks It also seems excessively world readable/writeable. :) - Mark --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE

Re: [SAtalk] bayes database size

2003-11-26 Thread Mark
:58 bayes_toks It also seems excessively world readable/writeable. :) - Mark --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE

[SAtalk] Cache poisoning on relays.osirusoft.com??

2003-11-29 Thread Mark
checks altogether; something sure is fishy! - Mark System Administrator Asarian-host.org --- "If you were supposed to understand it, we wouldn't call it code." - FedEx --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net G

Re: [SAtalk] Cache poisoning on relays.osirusoft.com??

2003-11-29 Thread Mark
- Original Message - From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 7:01 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Cache poisoning on relays.osirusoft.com?? > > WTF?? So, I ran ov

Re: [SAtalk] Re: How to config Spam Assassin to reject spam > x.xx

2003-12-01 Thread Mark
is can be done with SpamAssassin. But you need a different implementation of SpamAssassin for that, integrated into a Milter. Have a look at this list: http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/spamass-milt-list Perhaps they have what you are looking for. Kind regards, - Mark

[SAtalk] (no subject)

2004-01-18 Thread Mark Squire
. I am wondering if it is possible to make Postfix only call amavis, and SA for certain users, and just pass along the rest of the emails (for now while I am testing). Any ideas? Thanks! Mark --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon

[SAtalk] Filtering per-recipient

2004-01-18 Thread Mark Squire
up to put a ***SPAM*** tag on every email that is suspicios to every email that passes through it. I am wondering if it is possible to make Postfix only call amavis, and SA for certain users, and just pass along the rest of the emails (for now while I am testing). Any ideas? Thanks! Mark

[SAtalk] Configuration question

2004-01-19 Thread Mark Squire
n one place, and and not the other. What is the point of specifying settings in the local.cf, if the amavisd.conf works just as well if not better? Or maybe it doesn't? What do you think? Thanks, Mark --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by

[SAtalk] Webmin and amavis

2004-01-19 Thread Mark Squire
Has anyone managed to get the amavisd webmin module to work? I could not, and just wondered if what other people's experience was. Hope this wasn't too far off topic. Thanks, Mark --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 200

[SAtalk] Auto-learn SA after having trained it

2004-01-23 Thread Mark Squire
the whole company. I think that SA needs to "get out more" and learn from a broader range of emails (if that makes sense). I wanted to be sure that it is okay to put it into auto-learn mode, even after I have been manually teaching it for a while. What do you good folks think? Th

Re: [SAtalk] auto whitelist questions

2004-01-27 Thread Mark Merchant
i can get AWL working with regular spamassassin, but NOT with spamc/d. is there tip/trick i'm missing ? > I've been using auto whitelist for a while now, but today while doing some > experimentation I'm wondering if the explicit (auto) white listing feature > is working at all (version 2.61)? I'

Re: [SAtalk] auto whitelist questions

2004-01-27 Thread Mark Merchant
from /var/log/messages Jan 26 09:40:46 deimos spamd: The -a option has been removed Jan 26 09:40:46 deimos spamd: spamd startup succeeded On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 11:41, Michael Parker wrote: > On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 10:55:17AM -0500, Mark Merchant wrote: > > i can get AWL working wit

RE: [SAtalk] stats

2004-01-27 Thread Mark Emerle
Hi- Sort of the same line of this subject, but has anyone written a script to pull stats for setups not using spamd. My setup consists of spamassassin, mime-defang and sendmail, I am not using spamc/spamd. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Beha

RE: [SAtalk] Auto-learn SA after having trained it

2004-01-28 Thread Mark Squire
Great, just wanted to be sure. Thanks! Mark > -Original Message- > From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 9:38 AM > To: Mark Squire; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Auto-learn SA after having trained it > > > At

Re: [SAtalk] MyParty

2002-01-29 Thread Mark Radabaugh
wonderfully. One vote for not developing this into SA... Mark ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

[SAtalk] crosspost from spam-l, free webmail filter ideas ....

2002-01-31 Thread Mark Reynolds
m people using SMTP service at any of these providers; all my customers have email addresses at their own domains. :) -- Paul Chvostek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Operations / Development / Abuse / Whatever vox: +1 416 598- it.canada

RE: [SAtalk] Sendmail + spamassassin == hang?

2002-02-12 Thread Mark Roedel
I've been using spamassassin on FreeBSD with MIMEDefang (another milter-based project) since Christmas with great results. (And MIMEDefang also allows me to strip out dangerous attachments, which has been a major benefit...) --- Mark Roedel | "Blessed is he who has learne

  1   2   3   >