Thanks, people; I really appreciate your replies here. :) Ok, here is how I
start it up:
/usr/bin/spamd -d -i 216.122.74.112
Then it daemonizes and stays in memory. I know the daemon is running, as I
see it with ps -ax, and it says so in syslog:
"Feb 11 01:12:03 asarian-host spamd[53936]: server started on port 783"
Then, when I run this, either from a system call within Perl, or in a shell,
I get the error code 74:
/usr/bin/spamc -c -f -d 216.122.74.112 < /tmp/testmail
Yields the I/O error. Syslog reports this:
"Feb 11 01:17:31 asarian-host spamd[53936]: unauthorized connection from
asarian-host.net [ 216.122.74.112 ] at port 2820"
I am confused by that; should there be a place where I set who can check the
daemon, outside the command-line?
Much obliged,
- Mark
System Administrator Asarian-host.org
---
"If you were supposed to understand it,
we wouldn't call it code." - FedEx
----- Original Message -----
From: "Craig R Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 12:34 AM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Re: Exit code
> Razor is optional. That is a "good" spamd startup. Did you run spamc
> there or not yet?
>
> C
>
> Mark wrote:
>
> > Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 23:39:09 +0100
> > From: Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Re: Exit code
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Daniel Pittman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 10:35 PM
> > Subject: [SAtalk] Re: Exit code
> > > On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Mark wrote:
> > >
> > > > Dear people,
> > > >
> > > > Being rather interested in running the spamd daemon, I tried to run
> > > > a test message in a small test Perl script, having the daemon
> > > > running, of course, on my FreeBSD 4.1 server; it looks as follows:
> > > >
> > > > $result = int ((system ("/usr/bin/spamc -c -f < /tmp/testmail
> > > > /dev/null") / 256));
> > > >
> > > > Funny thing is, I keep getting error code 74. I thought it would
> > > > only exit with either 1 or 0? Any help would be appreciated.
> > >
> > > Most MTAs will use the return codes from /usr/include/sysexit.h to
> > > determine what went wrong when they talk to a child process of some
> > > sort. spamc seems to use this convention to, with:
> > >
> > > #define EX_IOERR 74 /* input/output error */
> > >
> > > So, I guess that spamc can't get at either an input or output channel
> > > of some sort...
> > >
> > > Daniel
> >
> > Ok, I did a debug on it. Here is what is says; what is that Razor thing
> > it says is missing?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > asarian-host: {root} % /usr/bin/spamd -d -D -i 216.122.74.112
> >
> > debug: ignore: test message to precompile patterns and load modules
> > debug: using "/usr/share/spamassassin" for default rules dir
> > debug: using "/etc/mail/spamassassin" for site rules dir
> > debug: running header regexp tests; score so far=0
> > debug: running body-text per-line regexp tests; score so far=2.2
> > debug: running raw-body-text per-line regexp tests; score so far=2.2
> > debug: running full-text regexp tests; score so far=2.2
> > debug: spam-phrase score: 0: hits:
> > debug: Razor is not available
> > debug: is Net::DNS::Resolver unavailable? 0
> > debug: looking up MX for 'microsoft.com.'
> > debug: MX for 'microsoft.com.' exists? 1
> > debug: is DNS available? 1
> > debug: checking RBL orbs.dorkslayers.com., set relay
> > debug: checking RBL inputs.orbz.org., set relay
> > debug: checking RBL relays.osirusoft.com., set relay
> > debug: checking RBL relays.ordb.org., set relay
> > debug: checking RBL ipwhois.rfc-ignorant.org., set rfci
> > debug: checking RBL results in set relay for 127.0.0.6
> > debug: checking RBL results in set relay for 127.0.0.4
> > debug: is spam? score=2.9 required=5
- Mark
System Administrator Asarian-host.org
---
"If you were supposed to understand it,
we wouldn't call it code." - FedEx
----- Original Message -----
From: "Craig R Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 12:32 AM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Exit code
> Just out of curiosity, does that /tmp/testmail exist? 74 is an IO error.
>
> C
>
> Mark wrote:
>
> > Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 22:27:18 +0100
> > From: Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Exit code
> >
> > Thanks for your reply; but no, that makes no differnce; I still get
code:
> > 18944 (divided by 256 = 74).
> >
> > - Mark
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "John Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 9:43 PM
> > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Exit code
> >
> >
> > > On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Mark wrote:
> > >
> > > > $result = int ((system ("/usr/bin/spamc -c -f < /tmp/testmail
> > >/dev/null") /
> > > > 256));
> > > >
> > > > Funny thing is, I keep getting error code 74. I thought it would
only
> > exit
> > > > with either 1 or 0? Any help would be appreciated.
> > >
> > > not a perl expert, but it could be getting the code of the pipe
> > > command (?)
> > >
> > > how bout
> > >
> > > `/usr/bin/spamc -c -f < /tmp/testmail` ;
> > > $result = $? ;
> > >
> > > does that return a good value?
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
