----- Original Message ----- From: "Lukreme" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 7:17 PM Subject: [SAtalk] Re: Comments on CBL DNSBL (cbl.abuseat.org)
> On 11 Nov 2003, at 10:09, Robert James Kaes wrote: > > Hi, > > Does anyone have any comments on the quality of the > > cbl.abuseat.org DNSBL? I noticed that it isn't used in > > SpamAssassin, but it is one of the black lists checked by > > spamcop. Is anyone else using this list? > > I use it a the postfix level to reject email at the MTA. > It works brilliantly. (That is, spamd never has a shot at mail > that hits cbl since I use it as a REJECT list). I dunno; why is everyone so enthusiastic about cbl.abuseat.org? I added it today, in my Milter, right after bl.spamcop.net and dynablock.easynet.nl. But, so far, I only got 1 (!) hit on it. Seems a bit lame. Unless the former two cover pretty much everything the latter does too. - Mark ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
