Debian installed razor2, so I was surprised when it came up. I did
spamassassin -r -D and I got a message saying no such file or
directory razor2 needs authentication Mail/Spamassassin/Reporter.pm
line 77.
So then I tried to register, but it said my Email was already
registered, so I tried a new
> Personally, I think the AWL is in general a fundamentally broken concept,
> however there are people out there who think otherwise. I will
> likely never use the AWL feature of SA in any form of production
environment.
> I see very minimal benefit from it's use, and a very long history of
severe
> The purpose of spamc is to be as lightweight as possible. Ideally
> spamc will not contain any features that aren't useful by most people.
I doubt that passing a couple of variables to spamd would increase the
overhead of spamc by anything noticeable. But I get your point. I'm
just trying to f
I remember somebody posted an archive of collected
spam emails a couple of weeks ago. URL? Is there a web interface to
test rules with?
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 09:05:15PM -0500, John covici wrote:
> I have spamassasin 2.41 but razor2 still is not working. How do I
> get the authentication working, the message it gave was not very
> helpful. I tried to register, but that didn't solve the problem.
For checking or for reporting? W
I have spamassasin 2.41 but razor2 still is not working. How do I
get the authentication working, the message it gave was not very
helpful. I tried to register, but that didn't solve the problem.
on Monday 10/28/2002 Theo Van Dinter([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 05:52:43PM
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 05:52:43PM -0500, John Covici wrote:
> Hi. I am not sure, does spamassassin work with the new version of
> razor (2.x versions)? On my last Debian upgrade I had razor2
SpamAssassin 2.4 and later works with Razor2. Earlier versions only
supported Razor1.
> installed, but
I figured you guys might enjoy this strip in the Sunday funnies.
http://www.doonesbury.com/strip/dailydose/index.cfm?uc_full_date=20021027&uc_comic=db&uc_daction=X
He needs to install Spamassassin! :)
(If you can't access it, go to Doonesbury.com, select Daily Dose, then
select October 27th).
E
Hi,
The MySQL (in this case, it's what I use) allows users to change or set
specific options for spamd, in the usual case the report_score, mime_defang,
report_body and white and black lists.
There is nothing to maintain, if the users aren't listed in the DB, then the
defaults are used.
This all
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 02:48:51PM -0800, Chris Petersen wrote:
> why not just let spamc handle more of the normal spamassassin commands,
> anyway?
The purpose of spamc is to be as lightweight as possible. Ideally
spamc will not contain any features that aren't useful by most people.
--
Duncan F
> Why not use an SQL database instead? That's what we do with vpopmail
> (although I'd love for qmail-scanner to have support for virtual users, oh
> well) and it works just dandy.
sql database for what? authentication? Or everything? The only reason
these users are "virtual" is because they'
> From: "Rose, Bobby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I think it's also a matter of perception. In the case of a milter, you
> still have only one sendmail process handling incoming mail so a the
> backed up queues are still happening just on someone elses system while
> the milter returns back to sendmai
Hi,
Why not use an SQL database instead? That's what we do with vpopmail
(although I'd love for qmail-scanner to have support for virtual users, oh
well) and it works just dandy.
Regards,
Rick
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Petersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent:
Hi. I am not sure, does spamassassin work with the new version of
razor (2.x versions)? On my last Debian upgrade I had razor2
installed, but it wanted some kind of authentication -- I tried to
fool with it, but sa was not happy, so my only recourse was to find
razor1 at sourceforge and download
I haven't heard a reply about this, and think it's a rather serious issue.
Has anyone else ever bothered to use spamd with virtual users? I'd fix
this myself, but there's obviously some confusion as to what spamd is
SUPPOSED to be doing.
This is different than the virtual-config in that my vi
I remember somebody posted an archive of collected
spam emails a couple of weeks ago. URL?
hello,
i have most of it working.
i only have this one small problem.
ill paste it from the email i sent the amavisd list...
--
hello,
there is a new problem.
running amavisd-new20020630 with the sql lookups, it gets
most of the way through and i get this error message.
amavisd[2117]: (0211
Does anyone have a procmail snippet that auto-replies to sender of spam
notifying them that their email was filtered?
Thanks,
Chadwick L. Sorrell
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/
If you're using procmail, you'd use a recipe like one of these:
# to catch everything above your default threshhold
:0
* ^x-spam-status: yes
/dev/null
# to catch everything over a specified threshhold
# (number of stars to indicate the minimum score
# you want thrown out. this example would dump
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 12:48:31PM -0800, Vincent A. Palmieri wrote:
> Now after running SpamAssassin for a period of time, I would like for
> the spam to be directed straight to /dev/null what is the method to do
> so?
I wouldn't do that (no way to retrieve false positives), but you can tell
proc
Now after running SpamAssassin for a period of time, I would
like for the spam to be directed straight to /dev/null what is the method to do
so?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Tony Hoyle wrote:
> > Besides, do you
> > guys consider those "news[letters]" or "promotions" or "special offer"
> > mailings sent by companies selling via the net spam. I'm
> > thinking of the
> > emails from promotion?@amazon.co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ted Cabeen writes:
>In message <007e01c27e9e$67ae6490$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "dogface" writes:
>>im using the php-sa-mysql as an interface
>>for the users to set their prefrences.
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 13:56, Skip Frizzell wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just did a new install of SpamAssassin and several of the optional modules. I
> also upgraded from Perl 5.6.1 to 5.8.0 in order to keep current.
>
> the install went successfully, but when I run the tests at the end I get the
> foll
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 12:56, Skip Frizzell wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just did a new install of SpamAssassin and several of the optional modules. I
> also upgraded from Perl 5.6.1 to 5.8.0 in order to keep current.
>
> the install went successfully, but when I run the tests at the end I get the
> foll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In message <007e01c27e9e$67ae6490$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "dogface" writes:
>im using the php-sa-mysql as an interface
>for the users to set their prefrences. so, i need
>the amavisd-new to either not send the ma
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 01:56:38PM -0500, Skip Frizzell wrote:
> # spamassassin -t < sample-nonspam.txt > nonspam.out
> /usr/local/bin/perl: relocation error:
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/i686-linux/auto/Digest/SHA1/SHA1.so: undefined
> symbol: Perl_safemalloc
>
> Does anyone know what I
I have set up SA on a RedHat 7.3 server running spamc/spamd via Postfix
using a hacked up version of the Anomy filter.sh script at:
http://www.advosys.ca/papers/postfix-filtering.html
Basically I didn't like the Anomy defanger, so I stripped that part out the
the filter.sh and changed it so it wou
Hello,
I just did a new install of SpamAssassin and several of the optional modules. I
also upgraded from Perl 5.6.1 to 5.8.0 in order to keep current.
the install went successfully, but when I run the tests at the end I get the
following error:
# spamassassin -t < sample-nonspam.txt > nonspam.o
Well, this sounds reasonable, unfortunately I suspect it would be rather
difficult and kludgey for the AWL to be able to tell the difference. The
AWL operates as a score averager, nothing more, nothing less.
Personally, I think the AWL is in general a fundamentally broken concept,
however there
Just upgraded to SA 2.43 from 1.6 (I knowreally out of date).
Noticed a couple of odd things. We're running spamd and calling spamc
(with -f) from qmail-scanner version 1.12.. Looking through the logs it
appears that everything is working perfectly. Here's the first oddity.
Mail from out
Eric,
| im using the php-sa-mysql as an interface
| for the users to set their prefrences. so, i need
| the amavisd-new to either not send the mail to
| SA so i can set the SA to use the sql lookup or
| have the amavisd-new to send the mail to SA
| With the sql lookups enabled.
...
| ok. i reread
Thanks Theo. I'm looking to do it at the sendmail server for all users, is
there something that would go in the sa-mimedefang.cf file?
Thanks again.
-Original Message-
From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:felicity@;kluge.net]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 11:25 AM
To: John Hally
Cc: '[EMAIL PR
Daniel Quinlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-28 07:53:14 -0800]:
> Tony Hoyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > 'Biff'?
>
> "biff" is the Unix program that does the equivalant of "you've got
> mail" (see google for more information like why "biff" is the name).
> I just thought it was a nice touch
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 08:10:47AM -0500, John Hally wrote:
> I am very new to spamassassin and have what's probably a simple question.
> How do I drop mail based on the subject title? It looks like th white/black
> lists are only for to/from, but is there a way to add a subject to the lists
> as
im using the php-sa-mysql as an interface
for the users to set their prefrences. so, i need
the amavisd-new to either not send the mail to
SA so i can set the SA to use the sql lookup or
have the amavisd-new to send the mail to SA
With the sql lookups enabled.
ahhh, i looked at the logs again. th
Do you monitor the mailscanner lists? V4 was released which was
rewritten from the ground up and you can multiple processes of
Mailscanner running. It is much faster.
I think it's also a matter of perception. In the case of a milter, you
still have only one sendmail process handling incoming ma
Tony Hoyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 'Biff'?
"biff" is the Unix program that does the equivalant of "you've got
mail" (see google for more information like why "biff" is the name).
I just thought it was a nice touch.
Dan
---
This sf.net e
Eric,
| ok. i thought that would be the right
| route to go with. ill recompile the amavisd-new
| without the SA option. then ill have amavisd-new
| send it to procmail then have the procmail send it to
| the spamassassin with the mysql option.
|
| i was already using the amavisd-new-20020517
| s
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Korger [mailto:jan@;korger.de]
> Sent: 27 October 2002 21:15
> To: SpamAssassin ML
> Subject: [SAtalk] What should I report to Razor[2] or similar
>
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> I wonder what messages are supposed to be
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Quinlan [mailto:quinlan@;pathname.com]
> Sent: 28 October 2002 08:02
> To: Daniel Rogers
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Spam in the (sort of) news
>
> Note the small word in the upper right corner of the bottom left
> frame. :-)
>
'Biff
Hello,
I am very new to spamassassin and have what's probably a simple question.
How do I drop mail based on the subject title? It looks like th white/black
lists are only for to/from, but is there a way to add a subject to the lists
as well?
Thanks in advance.
John Hally
--
Over the last week I've started receiving more and more spam with negative
scores
due to the AWL. About half an hour ago I reset the AWL be sure (I also did
this
when installing 2.43). check_whitelist is already showing the AWL
whitelisting
spam:
tmh@betty:~/spamassassin-2.41/tools$ ./check_whit
"Pal Computer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Howdo I change the Body message as I want to direct our users to our
> own antispam home page and not http://www.spamassasin.org/tag?
>
> We will post our anti-spam policy and such at our own link, to avoid
> phone calls to explain the * SPAM ***
Daniel Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Today's Doonesbury...
>
> http://images.ucomics.com/comics/db/2002/db021027.gif
Note the small word in the upper right corner of the bottom left
frame. :-)
Dan
--
Daniel Quinlan Linux, open source, and
http://www.pathname.com/~
45 matches
Mail list logo
