On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 02:48:51PM -0800, Chris Petersen wrote: > why not just let spamc handle more of the normal spamassassin commands, > anyway?
The purpose of spamc is to be as lightweight as possible. Ideally spamc will not contain any features that aren't useful by most people. -- Duncan Findlay ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
