> The purpose of spamc is to be as lightweight as possible. Ideally > spamc will not contain any features that aren't useful by most people.
I doubt that passing a couple of variables to spamd would increase the overhead of spamc by anything noticeable. But I get your point. I'm just trying to figure out a way to make this thing work properly with my setup and that seemed like the easiest solution short of hardcoding spamd to recognize my particular setup (which wouldn't be that hard for me to do, but would leave me with a nonstandard script). -Chris ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
