Hello,
This is a very preliminary first draft of the Sage Days 4 design
document for the next version of notebook. The following people will
all be around at SD4 to work on the notebook: W Stein, Tom Boothby,
Dorian Ramier, Alex Clemesha, and Yi Qiang.
If you use the notebook, please comment o
On May 16, 2007, at 22:20 , William Stein wrote:
>
> On 5/16/07, Michel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Consider
>>
>> sage: x,y,z=QQ['x','y','z'].gens()
>> sage: u,v,w=W['u','v','w'].gens()
>
> Syntax error -- W is not defined. What is W?
Presumably a number field. Interesting that the loop
On 5/16/07, Michel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Rather than implementing subs/substitute in every class where it makes
> sense
> (polynomials/rational functions/non-commutative polynomials) I thought
> it makes
> more sense to move it up to sage/structure/element. Here is a patch
> illustrating
On 5/16/07, Michel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Consider
>
> sage: x,y,z=QQ['x','y','z'].gens()
> sage: u,v,w=W['u','v','w'].gens()
Syntax error -- W is not defined. What is W?
> sage: %timeit ((x+y+z)**3)(1/y,y,y**100)
> 10 loops, best of 3: 752 ms per loop<=== look here!
> sage: %timeit
Consider
sage: x,y,z=QQ['x','y','z'].gens()
sage: u,v,w=W['u','v','w'].gens()
sage: %timeit ((x+y+z)**3)(1/y,y,y**100)
10 loops, best of 3: 752 ms per loop<=== look here!
sage: %timeit ((u+v+w)**3)(1/v,v,v**100)
10 loops, best of 3: 48.2 ms per loop <=== look here!
Conclusion: rational func
Absolutely. I've been thinking about this a fair amount lately as I
would like to use sage in teaching undergrads (mostly multivariable
calc, ODEs, and linear algebra). At first I was thinking of them
installing it on their laptops, but most of them use Windows. Having
a notebook server for a c
I could volunteer some time at the joint meetings at a table. I hope
by then to be at least a small scale developer.
I am very interested in using sage in the courses I teach, but I
initially became interested for research reasons. It would be great
to have a special session at the 2009 joint m
On Wednesday 16 May 2007 21:26, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just rented a large 2-bedroom apartment for Gonzalo Tornaria which
> will be available the whole time during SD 4. He could have 1
> or 2 roommates stay there (we'll have to get an extra bed or pad
> though). So you could be one
Hi,
I just rented a large 2-bedroom apartment for Gonzalo Tornaria which
will be available the whole time during SD 4. He could have 1
or 2 roommates stay there (we'll have to get an extra bed or pad
though). So you could be one of those 1 or 2 people staying with
Gonzalo.
William
On 5/16/
Hi,
I'm wondering if anyone is still looking for a roommate or has an open slot I
could be in.
Thanks
Joel Mohler
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> I think the press release lacks the mention of the free, open-source software
> we ship with SAGE. Despite the fact that SAGE wouldn't be possible without
> them as they are a crucial part it could seriously piss their authors off
> (and I cou
http://sage.math.washington.edu:8100/doc_browser?/?index.html is a blank page
On 5/16/07, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm getting the same error (sitting right here on campus). I think
> it's probably something to do with how the virtual server is set up.
>
> On May 16, 2007, a
This changes the behavior of
sage: g = Graph()
sage: g.add_vertex()
sage: g.show(color_dict={'#FF':[]})
from throwing an IndexError to simply not plotting any nodes of color '#FF'.
--
Robert L. Miller
http://www.robertlmiller.com/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
T
I'm getting the same error (sitting right here on campus). I think
it's probably something to do with how the virtual server is set up.
On May 16, 2007, at 3:53 PM, David Harvey wrote:
>
> When I click on "view the tutorial" from sagenb.org, I get some funny
> error message about proxy servers
Hi,
Thanks for all the feedback about the potential of having a press release.
The main conclusion is that we won't do it right now -- maybe in 6 months
or a year we will do something. In any case, next time I'm contacted
by a reporter, all the discussion and comments today will be very helpful
He should already know about this since I have sent him several
messages about this:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Timothy Clemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: May 8, 2007 10:29 PM
Subject: sagenb.org up but documentation down
To: William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://sagenb.org
When I click on "view the tutorial" from sagenb.org, I get some funny
error message about proxy servers. Is the problem with my ISP, or is
it at the notebook server end?
david
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.
I'm also a bit put off by the tone. The way I see it, the non-free
packages can be very useful, and I don't hesitate to use them when I
think it will get my job done more easily. For example, I still find
Microsoft Excel is by far the easiest way to whip together certain
kinds of graphs, a
I have to agree with Martin here. And I'm worried that if we get a
journalist involved, they won't be willing to include exactly what we want.
The general readership of a newspaper is not going to be very interested
that SAGE includes Python, GP/Pari, Maxima, Singular,
I also think that the t
> > 3. Just like Mathworld has a bunch of Mathematica code interspersed, I
> > think it would be interesting to have a bunch of sage code interspersed
> > throughout Wikipedia or PlanetMath.
>
> There might be massive amounts of politics involved in doing that, which we'll
> have to figure out ho
I think the press release lacks the mention of the free, open-source software
we ship with SAGE. Despite the fact that SAGE wouldn't be possible without
them as they are a crucial part it could seriously piss their authors off
(and I couldn't blame them, to be honest) . They put years into ma
Sheesh...
On May 16, 2007, at 1:24 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
> On May 16, 2007, at 12:04 PM, Nathan Ryan wrote:
[snip]
>> 1. Once we have a feature-frozen version of the calculus package
>> up and
>> running, it might be nice to get a table at the joint meetings. I
>> think
>> it's pretty exp
On May 16, 2007, at 12:04 PM, Nathan Ryan wrote:
>
>
>> Is anyone actively using this, daily, as part of their course work,
>> as would be done with Matlab, Mathematica, and the like? Perhaps at
>> Sage Days 4, there could be some discussion of how well it works in
>> practice, both for full-ti
> Isn't that when the AIM workshop on modular forms takes place?
>
> Justin
Oops. i meant October 13-14, 2007.
William
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://www.williamstein.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to thi
On May 16, 2007, at 12:17 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> I agree with Justin Walker that this seems a bit to confrontational
> for my tastes. Maybe that's what the business world likes?
I think it's less what the business world likes, and more what the
media likes. Controversy sells.
I think
On May 16, 2007, at 12:13 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On 5/16/07, Nathan Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Is anyone actively using this, daily, as part of their course work,
>>> as would be done with Matlab, Mathematica, and the like? Perhaps at
>>> Sage Days 4, there could be some discussion
I would first try to interest a Seattle Times reporter in the
David vs Goliath slant. They will know when the sauce is being
poured on too thick.I agree this is a bit confontational in tone but I
also agree with Dennis' sentiments (if I understand them) which is to
try to create a "god angle" for
On 5/16/07, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I agree with Justin Walker that this seems a bit to confrontational
> for my tastes. Maybe that's what the business world likes?
>
> I think we should wait at least until the calculus package has been
> given some serious hammering by non-
I agree with Justin Walker that this seems a bit to confrontational
for my tastes. Maybe that's what the business world likes?
I think we should wait at least until the calculus package has been
given some serious hammering by non-experts.
- Robert
On May 16, 2007, at 10:39 AM, William Ste
On 5/16/07, Nathan Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is anyone actively using this, daily, as part of their course work,
> > as would be done with Matlab, Mathematica, and the like? Perhaps at
> > Sage Days 4, there could be some discussion of how well it works in
> > practice, both for full-ti
> Is anyone actively using this, daily, as part of their course work,
> as would be done with Matlab, Mathematica, and the like? Perhaps at
> Sage Days 4, there could be some discussion of how well it works in
> practice, both for full-time classroom use (i.e., not as an "off to
> the si
Rather than implementing subs/substitute in every class where it makes
sense
(polynomials/rational functions/non-commutative polynomials) I thought
it makes
more sense to move it up to sage/structure/element. Here is a patch
illustrating the concept.
Martin/William: do you think this is a good app
On 5/16/07, Michel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Besides VMware there might be other options such as Qemu or VirtualBox
> (if VMware becomes non-free-as-in-beer again).
I very much agree with this. In the rest of this discussion, let's
view "vmware"
to mean "vmware or some other virtualization
Besides VMware there might be other options such as Qemu or VirtualBox
(if
VMware becomes non-free-as-in-beer again).
Michel
On May 16, 6:50 pm, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wednesday 16 May 2007 16:07, William Stein wrote:
> >> H
Uh-oh...time to shift to marketing speak...
On May 16, 2007, at 10:39 , William Stein wrote:
> My brother, who is businessman and is neither a mathematician nor a
> serious programmer, just
> sent me a draft of a "press release" for SAGE that he wrote. I wonder
> what you think of it? We could
Hi Sage-devel,
My brother, who is businessman and is neither a mathematician nor a
serious programmer, just
sent me a draft of a "press release" for SAGE that he wrote. I wonder
what you think of it? We could polish it up and send it to some media
outlets at the appropriate moment (another ques
Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wednesday 16 May 2007 16:07, William Stein wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here is some fan mail from a new user of SAGE on Windows (via VMware)
>> -- see below.
>> I think we're going to have to make a hard choice about whether to continue
>> to support Cygwi
On Wednesday 16 May 2007 10:07, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is some fan mail from a new user of SAGE on Windows (via VMware)
> -- see below.
> I think we're going to have to make a hard choice about whether to continue
> to support Cygwin or just distribute SAGE on Windows via VMware, sinc
On May 16, 4:30 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> These are the combined download stats for SAGE on the two
> computerswww.sagemath.organd sage.math.washington.edu since Sunday at 7am,
> i.e., over the last three days:
>
[cut]
> Source
> 31
>
I'm really one of the "only" 31
On May 16, 4:30 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> These are the combined download stats for SAGE on the two
> computerswww.sagemath.organd sage.math.washington.edu since Sunday at 7am,
> i.e., over the last three days:
>
> Windows Binary
> 21
> VMware (=Windows)
> 31
> Li
On May 16, 4:35 pm, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 May 2007 16:07, William Stein wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > Here is some fan mail from a new user of SAGE on Windows (via VMware)
> > -- see below.
> > I think we're going to have to make a hard choice about whether to con
On Wednesday 16 May 2007 16:07, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is some fan mail from a new user of SAGE on Windows (via VMware)
> -- see below.
> I think we're going to have to make a hard choice about whether to continue
> to support Cygwin or just distribute SAGE on Windows via VMware, sinc
Hi,
These are the combined download stats for SAGE on the two computers
www.sagemath.org and sage.math.washington.edu since Sunday at 7am,
i.e., over the last three days:
Windows Binary
21
VMware (=Windows)
31
Linux Binary
20
OS X Binary
7
OS X Dmg (OS X alternative) -- we need to fix the jumpi
On 5/16/07, Staffan Liljegren > wrote:
> I finally got around to install VMware on my home Windows machine and walk
> tru the interactive tutorial and the shell. It is impressive! I will never
> ever go back to Mathematica and i just threw away the infamous Wolfram
> "tomes" in my bookshelf.
Grea
Hi,
Here is some fan mail from a new user of SAGE on Windows (via VMware)
-- see below.
I think we're going to have to make a hard choice about whether to continue
to support Cygwin or just distribute SAGE on Windows via VMware, since it
is so frickin' hard to get everything to work on Cygwin, an
45 matches
Mail list logo
