> > 3. Just like Mathworld has a bunch of Mathematica code interspersed, I > > think it would be interesting to have a bunch of sage code interspersed > > throughout Wikipedia or PlanetMath. > > There might be massive amounts of politics involved in doing that, which we'll > have to figure out how to negotiate. > I don't contribute much to Wikipedia or PlanetMath, so maybe somebody who is > involved could make some comments. Remember that MathWorld is owned > by Mathematica, so they don't have to worry about such politics since they're > in their own little world.
I think the best bet would be to create a web site that had the SAGE code for a given article and ask on the discussion pages to have a link made to the particular page, because I think it would look kind of messy and there are links to many sites that go into more detail. Special web sites like a say a SAGE Mathematics Explorer attract a lot of attention. I know of Cut-the-Knot (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cut-the-knot) site, which is often linked from Wikipedia. Note: I would not link to anything on the public notebooks. You might be able to get away with mentioning say on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partition_%28number_theory%29 that SAGE supports the partition function and give an example. I use SAGE just to play around so this is right down my ally. I just wrote some code that produces the numbered lists with the partitions of a given positive integer n just like the two examples in that Wikipedia article. http://sagenb.com/partition_examples --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
