Re: Lyx 1.4.1 crashes on exit

2006-05-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Roger" == Roger Mc Murtrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Roger> I'm running the Apple OSX version (downloaded as Roger> LyX-1.4.1-Mac.dmg) on an Intel Mac under OSX 10.4.6. Lyx Roger> appears to close OK but generates a failure dialog on exit. Roger> Running from a Terminal window using " lyx

Re: Lyx 1.4.1 crashes on exit

2006-05-22 Thread Roger Mc Murtrie
Followup on previous message The full terminal command used was: /Applications/LyX.app/Contents/MacOS/lyx -dbg any Usually I start Lyx with LyX.app Regards Roger Mc Murtrie I'm running the Apple OSX version (downloaded as LyX-1.4.1-Mac.dmg) on an Intel Mac under OSX 10.4.6. Lyx appe

Re: LyX 1.4.1 doesn't work on Win98---and doesn't matter, anyway

2006-05-03 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 02:52:49PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > I don't think so, as it is a very particular switch. Here is the > pertinent comment in src/lyxfunc.C: > > void actOnUpdatedPrefs(LyXRC const & lyxrc_orig, LyXRC const & lyxrc_new) > { > // Why the switch you might ask. I

Re: LyX 1.4.1 doesn't work on Win98---and doesn't matter, anyway

2006-05-02 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bo> As I have said, this patch is strictly cygwin only, and JMarc is Bo> obviously not an active cygwin user, I (we) have to trust Enrico Bo> on his patches to move cygwin/lyx forward. >> I will review the patch tomorrow. And, yes, I prefer to hav

Re: LyX 1.4.1 doesn't work on Win98---and doesn't matter, anyway

2006-05-01 Thread Bo Peng
Bo> As I have said, this patch is strictly cygwin only, and JMarc is Bo> obviously not an active cygwin user, I (we) have to trust Enrico Bo> on his patches to move cygwin/lyx forward. I will review the patch tomorrow. And, yes, I prefer to have the time to have a look at everything that goes in

Re: LyX 1.4.1 doesn't work on Win98---and doesn't matter, anyway

2006-05-01 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bo> As I have said, this patch is strictly cygwin only, and JMarc is Bo> obviously not an active cygwin user, I (we) have to trust Enrico Bo> on his patches to move cygwin/lyx forward. I will review the patch tomorrow. And, yes, I prefer to have t

Re: LyX 1.4.1 deleting lists: bug or feature?

2006-05-01 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Jose' Matos wrote: This has happened to me as well, cutting or deleting leaves those ghosts behind. I have just tested 1.4.2svn and the problem is still there. And certainly this falls under the bugs section. :-) So much for my bugzilla-searching skills. I think this is actually bug

Re: LyX 1.4.1 doesn't work on Win98---and doesn't matter, anyway

2006-05-01 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 07:26:55PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 09:46:14PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 06:43:14PM +, Luis Rivera wrote: > > case RC_TEX_ALLOWS_SPACES: > > if (lexrc.next()) { > >

Re: LyX 1.4.1 doesn't work on Win98---and doesn't matter, anyway

2006-05-01 Thread Bo Peng
> > Since this patch is small enough, and it is strictly in your domain > > (cygwin), I have applied to both 1.4 and 1.5. > > Bo, please DO NOT apply ANYTHING to the 1.4 branch without Jean-Marc's agreement. I think I have to be blamed for this, not Bo. Do not feel bad, Enrico. At least I do n

Re: LyX 1.4.1 doesn't work on Win98---and doesn't matter, anyway

2006-05-01 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 09:46:14PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 06:43:14PM +, Luis Rivera wrote: > case RC_TEX_ALLOWS_SPACES: > if (lexrc.next()) { > tex_allows_spaces = lexrc.getBool(); > @@ -1342,6

Re: LyX 1.4.1 doesn't work on Win98---and doesn't matter, anyway

2006-05-01 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 09:09:51AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Please, can you see if the attached patch can be applied to both trunk > and branch? > > >>> It seems to touch Bo's and Jean-Marc's work so I'll let them comment that. > > > Since thi

Re: LyX 1.4.1 doesn't work on Win98---and doesn't matter, anyway

2006-05-01 Thread Angus Leeming
Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Please, can you see if the attached patch can be applied to both trunk and branch? >>> It seems to touch Bo's and Jean-Marc's work so I'll let them comment that. > Since this patch is small enough, and it is strictly in your domain > (cygwin), I have

Re: LyX 1.4.1 deleting lists: bug or feature?

2006-05-01 Thread Jose' Matos
On Monday 01 May 2006 08:21, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Does this bug also exist in 1.4.0? I only remember seeing it after 1.4.1, but I could be wrong. > -- > Lgb -- José Abílio

Re: LyX 1.4.1 deleting lists: bug or feature?

2006-05-01 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Sunday 30 April 2006 22:04, Paul A. Rubin wrote: | > Hi all, | > | > Before submitting this to bugzilla, I wanted to verify it was a bug and | > not a feature (i.e., not deliberate). | | This has happened to me as well, cutting or deleting leaves tho

Re: LyX 1.4.1 deleting lists: bug or feature?

2006-04-30 Thread Jose' Matos
On Sunday 30 April 2006 22:04, Paul A. Rubin wrote: > Hi all, > > Before submitting this to bugzilla, I wanted to verify it was a bug and > not a feature (i.e., not deliberate). This has happened to me as well, cutting or deleting leaves those ghosts behind. I have just tested 1.4.2svn and the

Re: LyX 1.4.1 doesn't work on Win98---and doesn't matter, anyway

2006-04-29 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 08:50:29AM -0500, Bo Peng wrote: > On 4/29/06, Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Please, can you see if the attached patch can be applied to both trunk > > > > and branch? > > > > > > It seems to touch Bo's and Jean-Marc's work so I'll let them comment that. > > S

Re: LyX 1.4.1 doesn't work on Win98---and doesn't matter, anyway

2006-04-29 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 03:32:06PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > And does your patch to configure.py solve the crash of the "open file" > button? No, sorry. It is an unrelated problem, only showing up because I used a cmd.exe to launch your LyX/Qt4. I did so because from a rxvt terminal I go

Re: LyX 1.4.1 doesn't work on Win98---and doesn't matter, anyway

2006-04-29 Thread Bo Peng
On 4/29/06, Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Please, can you see if the attached patch can be applied to both trunk > > and branch? > > It seems to touch Bo's and Jean-Marc's work so I'll let them comment that. Since this patch is small enough, and it is strictly in your domain (cygwin),

Re: LyX 1.4.1 doesn't work on Win98---and doesn't matter, anyway

2006-04-29 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Enrico Forestieri a écrit : On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 02:24:21PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Enrico Forestieri a écrit : If you just copied the exe inside a 1.4.1 directory, I think there is a mismatch between configure.sh and configure.py. Please try the full package. Nope, it was the full

Re: LyX 1.4.1 doesn't work on Win98---and doesn't matter, anyway

2006-04-29 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 02:24:21PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Enrico Forestieri a écrit : > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 10:24:09PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > > > >> I have put another package which contains the exe and the needed > >> runtimes dll: > >> http://younes.a.free.fr/Lyx-15

Re: LyX 1.4.1 doesn't work on Win98---and doesn't matter, anyway

2006-04-29 Thread Bo Peng
> Please, can you see if the attached patch can be applied to both trunk > and branch? It seems to touch Bo's and Jean-Marc's work so I'll let them comment that. That is a good detective work! I will apply if JMarc does not object. I have to trust Enrico on this though, since I can not test the

Re: LyX 1.4.1 doesn't work on Win98---and doesn't matter, anyway

2006-04-29 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Enrico Forestieri a écrit : On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 10:24:09PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: I have put another package which contains the exe and the needed runtimes dll: http://younes.a.free.fr/Lyx-15-experimental/lyx-qt4-exe-and-dlls.zip Abdel, I tried your LyX/Qt4 and got a bug report

Re: LyX 1.4.1 doesn't work on Win98---and doesn't matter, anyway

2006-04-28 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 10:24:09PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > I have put another package which contains the exe and the needed > runtimes dll: > http://younes.a.free.fr/Lyx-15-experimental/lyx-qt4-exe-and-dlls.zip Abdel, I tried your LyX/Qt4 and got a bug report for you. After launching

Re: LyX 1.4.1 doesn't work on Win98---and doesn't matter, anyway

2006-04-28 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 11:15:53PM +, Luis Rivera wrote: > Having that definition in mind, then none of your exes is a "true native" > windows app. Sorry! ;-) I have never claimed they are :-) > However, I tested both on Win98, and both work pretty much as expected: > > 1/ LyX "native" (Qt

Re: LyX 1.4.1 doesn't work on Win98---and doesn't matter, anyway

2006-04-28 Thread Luis Rivera
Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 08:30:18PM +, Luis Rivera wrote: > > Enrico Forestieri ...> writes: > > > I think it "looks" native because the interface to the user doesn't go through > > the command prompt; however, it is may not a native applic

Re: LyX 1.4.1 doesn't work on Win98---and doesn't matter, anyway

2006-04-28 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 08:30:18PM +, Luis Rivera wrote: > Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think it "looks" native because the interface to the user doesn't go > through > the command prompt; however, it is may not a native application. To be > a "native" application it h

Re: LyX 1.4.1 doesn't work on Win98---and doesn't matter, anyway

2006-04-28 Thread Luis Rivera
Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Cygwin runs on top of Windows. It works because it is developed by > competent people **who** know how to deal with various Windows flavors. > Agree... > The path handling is not a mess in my copy of LyX, perhaps it is > in the official sources

Re: LyX 1.4.1 doesn't work on Win98---and doesn't matter, anyway

2006-04-28 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Luis Rivera a écrit : Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Luis Rivera a écrit : > Where did you get this file? From the gnuwin32 project. I've put it in my web site (younes.a.free,fr) I could not post it to the list even after having changed the extension so it can pass the filt

Re: LyX 1.4.1 doesn't work on Win98---and doesn't matter, anyway

2006-04-28 Thread Luis Rivera
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Luis Rivera a écrit : > > > Where did you get this file? > > From the gnuwin32 project. I've put it in my web site > (younes.a.free,fr) I could not post it to the list even after having > changed the extension so it can pass the filters. >

Re: LyX 1.4.1 doesn't work on Win98---and doesn't matter, anyway

2006-04-28 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 06:43:14PM +, Luis Rivera wrote: > AFAIK, LyX still works on Win95/Cygwin (on an Intel486!). Slow as anything > can > be, but works. On Win98 it greatly improves, thanks to the hardware. The > real > mess seems to be the path handling. On Cygwin everything is nor

Re: LyX 1.4.1 doesn't work on Win98---and doesn't matter, anyway

2006-04-28 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Luis Rivera a écrit : > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> >> Louis, could you please try the experimental lyx for windows described in http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX150Experimental ? >> > > I downloaded the exe only zip file. Apparently, LyX 15x needs the library zlib1.dll be

Re: LyX 1.4.1 doesn't work on Win98---and doesn't matter, anyway

2006-04-28 Thread Luis Rivera
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Louis, could you please try the experimental lyx for windows described > in http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX150Experimental ? > I downloaded the exe only zip file. Apparently, LyX 15x needs the library zlib1.dll besides the files distribute

Re: LyX 1.4.1 doesn't work on Win98---and doesn't matter, anyway

2006-04-28 Thread Luis Rivera
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Louis, could you please try the experimental lyx for windows described > in http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX150Experimental ? > Sure enough! Give me half an hour. > > So, if I understand you correctly, all the special code in this boost >

Re: LyX 1.4.1 doesn't work on Win98---and doesn't matter, anyway

2006-04-28 Thread Angus Leeming
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Given that Win95 is dead as a dodo, it may well be that you don't need the >> NewAPIs.h. The only way to check, however, is to compile (on a WinXP machine, >> presumably) and then see if it'll run on Win98. That's what the stub magic in >> NewAPIs.h

Re: LyX 1.4.1 doesn't work on Win98---and doesn't matter, anyway

2006-04-28 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Angus Leeming a écrit : Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Here are the relevant logs and the diff against current svn, please tell me what I should do You should drop the stuff that's needed for Win95. LyX on Win95 is broken for other reasons. That may well mean that all you need i

Re: LyX 1.4.1 doesn't work on Win98---and doesn't matter, anyway

2006-04-28 Thread Angus Leeming
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Here are the relevant logs and the diff against current svn, please tell > me what I should do You should drop the stuff that's needed for Win95. LyX on Win95 is broken for other reasons. That may well mean that all you need is the ERROR_ACCESS_DENI

Re: LyX 1.4.1 doesn't work on Win98---and doesn't matter, anyway

2006-04-28 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit : Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Angus Leeming a écrit : | > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | >>> Yes. One of the files in boost/libs/filesystem/src (Sorry, no viewsvn...) | >>> #includes and uses NewAPIs.h. I can dig out the details if

Re: LyX 1.4.1 doesn't work on Win98---and doesn't matter, anyway

2006-04-28 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Angus Leeming a écrit : | > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | >>> Yes. One of the files in boost/libs/filesystem/src (Sorry, no viewsvn...) | >>> #includes and uses NewAPIs.h. I can dig out the details if you can't track the | >>> chan

Re: LyX 1.4.1 doesn't work on Win98---and doesn't matter, anyway

2006-04-28 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Angus Leeming a écrit : Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Yes. One of the files in boost/libs/filesystem/src (Sorry, no viewsvn...) #includes and uses NewAPIs.h. I can dig out the details if you can't track the change down. Well, I don't have enough disk space to get the 1.4 tree.

Re: LyX 1.4.1 doesn't work on Win98---and doesn't matter, anyway

2006-04-28 Thread Angus Leeming
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Yes. One of the files in boost/libs/filesystem/src (Sorry, no viewsvn...) >> #includes and uses NewAPIs.h. I can dig out the details if you can't track >> the >> change down. > Well, I don't have enough disk space to get the 1.4 tree. Bo, Enrico,

Re: LyX 1.4.1 doesn't work on Win98---and doesn't matter, anyway

2006-04-28 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Angus Leeming a écrit : | > Angus> The improvement comes, of course, from the switch to Qt4. | > Angus> Note, however, that your hard work to get LyX working on | > Angus> Win98 would need a little tweaking because the changes we made | > Angus> to B

Re: LyX 1.4.1 doesn't work on Win98---and doesn't matter, anyway

2006-04-28 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Angus Leeming a écrit : Angus> The improvement comes, of course, from the switch to Qt4. Angus> Note, however, that your hard work to get LyX working on Angus> Win98 would need a little tweaking because the changes we made Angus> to Boost.Filesystem haven't been propogated formward into Angus> t

Re: LyX 1.4.1 doesn't work on Win98---and doesn't matter, anyway

2006-04-28 Thread Angus Leeming
Angus> The improvement comes, of course, from the switch to Qt4. Angus> Note, however, that your hard work to get LyX working on Angus> Win98 would need a little tweaking because the changes we made Angus> to Boost.Filesystem haven't been propogated formward into Angus> the version of Boost.Filesy

Re: LyX 1.4.1 doesn't work on Win98---and doesn't matter, anyway

2006-04-28 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Angus Leeming a écrit : Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: We had information that lyx-15svn/qt4 works on Win98, maybe also on Win98. There some info to try it on the Wiki. I think that Abdel meant to say, "We had information that lyx-15svn/qt4 works on WinME, ..." Yep, sorry. T

Re: LyX 1.4.1 doesn't work on Win98---and doesn't matter, anyway

2006-04-28 Thread Angus Leeming
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > We had information that lyx-15svn/qt4 works on Win98, maybe also on > Win98. There some info to try it on the Wiki. I think that Abdel meant to say, "We had information that lyx-15svn/qt4 works on WinME, ..." The improvement comes, of course, from

Re: LyX 1.4.1 doesn't work on Win98---and doesn't matter, anyway

2006-04-28 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Luis Rivera a écrit : Luis Rivera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Consequently, and taking the opportunity open by the switch to the 1.4.x series, I recommend to sign the death certificate for LyX's support on Win95/98. Following another thread made me realize that I failed to mention that Cygw

Re: LyX 1.4.1 doesn't work on Win98---and doesn't matter, anyway

2006-04-27 Thread Luis Rivera
Luis Rivera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Consequently, and taking the opportunity open by the switch to the > 1.4.x series, > I recommend to sign the death certificate for LyX's support on Win95/98. > Following another thread made me realize that I failed to mention that Cygwin (Qt|xforms)

Re: LyX 1.4.1 is released

2006-04-18 Thread Jean-Pierre Chrétien
Paul A. Rubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > One cannot argue against the virtue of fixing the installer, but there > are other times when running it manually might be necessary. Sometimes > a working copy of LyX stops working because some malign external force > deleted/damaged the configurat

Re: Lyx 1.4.1 & windows - still no go

2006-04-17 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 11:20:43AM -0400, Paul A. Rubin wrote: > Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 05:33:35PM -0400, Paul A. Rubin wrote: > > > >> I wonder if this is a matter of how you filled in the preferences > >> dialog. What works for me is this: > >> > >> 1. Install E

Re: Lyx 1.4.1 & windows - still no go

2006-04-17 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Enrico Forestieri wrote: On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 05:33:35PM -0400, Paul A. Rubin wrote: I wonder if this is a matter of how you filled in the preferences dialog. What works for me is this: 1. Install Enrico's lp.exe binary in the LyX bin directory. 2. In Tools->Preferences...->Outputs->Pr

Re: Lyx 1.4.1 & windows - still no go

2006-04-17 Thread Georg Baum
Am Samstag, 15. April 2006 23:55 schrieb Bo Peng: > BTW, what is the real difficulty in making the all-in-one installer > official? If only one or two of the bundled programs have license > issue, we can exclude them. Otherwise, all-in-one is the way to go! Read the list archives, there have been

Re: Lyx 1.4.1 & windows - still no go

2006-04-16 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 05:33:35PM -0400, Paul A. Rubin wrote: > I wonder if this is a matter of how you filled in the preferences > dialog. What works for me is this: > > 1. Install Enrico's lp.exe binary in the LyX bin directory. > > 2. In Tools->Preferences...->Outputs->Printer, set the p

Re: Lyx 1.4.1 & windows - still no go

2006-04-16 Thread Paul A. Rubin
lyxuser wrote: Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Now it should work even when gsprint lives in a path with spaces. If not, please report it back to me, as this time I will use an axe to convince the command interpreter to do what it should do The space error when I call lp direc

Re: Lyx 1.4.1 & windows - still no go

2006-04-16 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 06:45:39PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 03:58:10PM +, lyxuser wrote: > > > Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Now it should work even when gsprint lives in a path with spaces. > > > If not, please report it back to me,

Re: Lyx 1.4.1 & windows - still no go

2006-04-16 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 03:58:10PM +, lyxuser wrote: > Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Now it should work even when gsprint lives in a path with spaces. > > If not, please report it back to me, as this time I will use an axe > > to convince the command interpreter to do wh

Re: Lyx 1.4.1 & windows - still no go

2006-04-16 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 06:29:54PM -0400, Paul A. Rubin wrote: > Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 05:36:35PM -0400, Paul A. Rubin wrote: > > > >> No printing is also typical. Printing under Windows is apparently a bit > >> of an adventure. (I always print from either Yap or

Re: Lyx 1.4.1 & windows - still no go

2006-04-16 Thread lyxuser
Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Now it should work even when gsprint lives in a path with spaces. > If not, please report it back to me, as this time I will use an axe > to convince the command interpreter to do what it should do > The space error when I call lp directly from th

Re: Lyx 1.4.1 & windows - still no go

2006-04-16 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 06:29:54PM -0400, Paul A. Rubin wrote: > Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 05:36:35PM -0400, Paul A. Rubin wrote: > > > >> No printing is also typical. Printing under Windows is apparently a bit > >> of an adventure. (I always print from either Yap or

Re: Lyx 1.4.1 & windows - still no go

2006-04-16 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 04:42:38AM +, lyxuser wrote: > Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > please attached find an archive containing both source and > > executable of lp.exe. Put it in the LyX\bin directory, reconfigure > > LyX and then try printing from within LyX. You simpl

Re: Lyx 1.4.1 & windows - still no go

2006-04-16 Thread Stephen Harris
Printing worked for me with Enrico's batfile. I named the printer LP, and reconfigured. I have gs* in the Windows Path. Older versions of gs* had problems with spaces but that should be fixed if you are using 8.51. I use no spaces, anyway. Regards, Stephen

Re: Lyx 1.4.1 & windows - still no go

2006-04-15 Thread lyxuser
Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > please attached find an archive containing both source and > executable of lp.exe. Put it in the LyX\bin directory, reconfigure > LyX and then try printing from within LyX. You simply need gsview > and ghostscript. > It doesn't work for me. LyX gi

Re: Lyx 1.4.1 & windows - still no go

2006-04-15 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Enrico Forestieri wrote: On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 05:36:35PM -0400, Paul A. Rubin wrote: No printing is also typical. Printing under Windows is apparently a bit of an adventure. (I always print from either Yap or AR, so I've never bothered to set it up.) There have been some posts on the use

Re: Lyx 1.4.1 & windows - still no go

2006-04-15 Thread Bo Peng
> First, the lyx installer looked up the websites of all these > other necessary things (gostscript, pythong,...) > Unfortunately, none were actually installed, I just got > the correct download page in explorer. But that's > ok, I new what to do although it'd be ice if it was automatic. Uwe, peo

Re: Lyx 1.4.1 & windows - still no go

2006-04-15 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 05:36:35PM -0400, Paul A. Rubin wrote: > No printing is also typical. Printing under Windows is apparently a bit > of an adventure. (I always print from either Yap or AR, so I've never > bothered to set it up.) There have been some posts on the user list > about it.

Re: Lyx 1.4.1 & windows - still no go

2006-04-15 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Helge Hafting wrote: And again - no path to the msys stuff. Added that temporarily, ran "sh configure" and a lot of things happened. So lyx starts, but no view->dvi, no view->pdf, no printing. And no time to figure it out. No View->DVI is odd. I assume your sister uses MiKTeX (?). If so, is

Re: LyX 1.4.1 is released

2006-04-14 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Georg Baum wrote: Am Freitag, 14. April 2006 18:41 schrieb Enrico Forestieri: On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 06:29:40PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: It simply should never be invoked by hand. This is unsupported. But the installer suggests doing that when it fails to run configure. I know. I still thin

Re: LyX 1.4.1 is released

2006-04-14 Thread Georg Baum
Am Freitag, 14. April 2006 18:41 schrieb Enrico Forestieri: > On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 06:29:40PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > > It simply should never be invoked by hand. This is unsupported. > > But the installer suggests doing that when it fails to run configure. I know. I still think it would be

Re: LyX 1.4.1 is released

2006-04-14 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 06:29:40PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > Am Freitag, 14. April 2006 18:08 schrieb Enrico Forestieri: > > I already suggested to Paul a couple of fixes but he said they didn't > > worked. I think there is another problem here. Your fix to bug 2285 > > will not work on Windows w

Re: LyX 1.4.1 is released

2006-04-14 Thread Georg Baum
Am Freitag, 14. April 2006 18:08 schrieb Enrico Forestieri: > I already suggested to Paul a couple of fixes but he said they didn't > worked. I think there is another problem here. Your fix to bug 2285 > will not work on Windows when the configure script is invoked by hand > form the libdir locatio

Re: LyX 1.4.1 is released

2006-04-14 Thread Georg Baum
Am Freitag, 14. April 2006 17:26 schrieb Paul A. Rubin: > I read the bug report but might not have understood some of the comments > correctly. Shouldn't running configure with the switch > --with-version-suffix=1.4.x, as Enrico suggested, fix this? (It didn't.) Yes, it should, and it does so

Re: LyX 1.4.1 is released

2006-04-14 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Georg Baum wrote: Am Donnerstag, 13. April 2006 21:34 schrieb Paul A. Rubin: Well, the good news is that it no longer trips over a space. The bad news is that I get the following output: checking for a LaTeX -> LyX converter... +checking for "tex2lyx"... no +checking for "tex2lyx"... no I h

Re: LyX 1.4.1 is released

2006-04-14 Thread Georg Baum
Am Donnerstag, 13. April 2006 21:34 schrieb Paul A. Rubin: > Well, the good news is that it no longer trips over a space. The bad > news is that I get the following output: > > > checking for a LaTeX -> LyX converter... > > +checking for "tex2lyx"... no > > +checking for "tex2lyx"... no > > I

Re: LyX 1.4.1 is released

2006-04-13 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Enrico Forestieri wrote: On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 03:34:12PM -0400, Paul A. Rubin wrote: Well, the good news is that it no longer trips over a space. The bad news is that I get the following output: checking for a LaTeX -> LyX converter... +checking for "tex2lyx"... no +checking for "tex2ly

Re: LyX 1.4.1 is released

2006-04-13 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 03:34:12PM -0400, Paul A. Rubin wrote: > Well, the good news is that it no longer trips over a space. The bad > news is that I get the following output: > > >checking for a LaTeX -> LyX converter... > >+checking for "tex2lyx"... no > >+checking for "tex2lyx"... no > >

Re: LyX 1.4.1 is released

2006-04-13 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Angus Leeming wrote: Guys, the test will need to be rewritten as: PATHORIG="$PATH" PATH="$PWD/../src/tex2lyx:$PATH" export PATH for ac_prog in 'tex2lyx -f $$i $$o' \ 'tex2lyx'"$version_suffix"' -f $$i $$o' do ... done PATH="$PATHORIG" export PATH unset PATHORIG Paul, could y

Re: LyX 1.4.1 is released

2006-04-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Enrico> I have uploaded it at Enrico> ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/incoming/lyx-1.4.1-cygwin.tar.gz Thanks, I put it online. JMarc

Re: LyX 1.4.1 is released

2006-04-13 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 09:58:56AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Enrico> I have placed a cygwin binary at > Enrico> ftp.lyx.org/incoming/lyx-1.4.1-cygwin.tar.gz > > We cannot read there, sorry. Could you upload to ftp.deve

Re: LyX 1.4.1 is released

2006-04-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Richard" == Richard Kleeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Richard> Georg and Jean-Marc, I uploaded ubuntu breezy packages for Richard> 1.4.1 to pub/incoming plus a README file. Thanks, it is on the ftp site now. JMarc

Re: LyX 1.4.1 is released

2006-04-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Enrico> I have placed a cygwin binary at Enrico> ftp.lyx.org/incoming/lyx-1.4.1-cygwin.tar.gz We cannot read there, sorry. Could you upload to ftp.devel.lyx.org or provide an url? JMarc

Re: LyX 1.4.1 is released

2006-04-12 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 11:57:16AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Public release of LyX version 1.4.1 > === > > We are pleased to announce the release of LyX 1.4.1. This is a bug fix > release, but some of the bugs were big. In particular: I have placed a

Re: LyX 1.4.1 is released

2006-04-12 Thread Angus Leeming
Paul A. Rubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Paul> Tracked down the glitch I previously saw in the Paul> configuration output (which may well be harmless). Paul> It comes from line 482 in the configure Paul> script, which leads off the hunt for tex2lyx (I think): Paul> for ac_prog in "$PWD/../src/te

Re: LyX 1.4.1 is released

2006-04-12 Thread Georg Baum
Richard Kleeman wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Public release of LyX version 1.4.1 > > Any chance of an update by Georg to the Debian script? I will do it tonight, and the update will also fix the wrong package type of the common package (all instead of binary). Georg

Re: LyX 1.4.1 is released

2006-04-11 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Angus Leeming wrote: The Windows installer can be found at http://wiki.lyx.org/uploads/Windows/LyX14x/lyx-1.4.1_win32_setup_v1.exe Tracked down the glitch I previously saw in the configuration output (which may well be harmless). It comes from line 482 in the configure script, which leads

Re: LyX 1.4.1

2006-04-11 Thread Helge Hafting
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 04:32:04PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > > Also, \include has > > some odd limitations like always starting on a new page. > > Those limitations can also be regarded as features. > Anyway, please do not generalize your personal preferences. > Nothing wrong in keepi

Re: LyX 1.4.1 is released

2006-04-11 Thread Angus Leeming
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Angus> Unfortunately, the installed po files are called lyx14x.mo. > Angus> Moreover, the lyx executable finds these files by interogating > Angus> its own name. > Where does this happen? The code in message.C uses > textdomain(PACKAGE); > and

Re: LyX 1.4.1 is released

2006-04-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bennett> I've placed the Mac binary at Bennett> ftp.lyx.org/incoming/LyX-1.4.1-Mac.dmg; please move it to the Bennett> correct binaries folder. This is unfortunately a place where I cannot read. Do you have another URL? Anyway, ftp.lyx.

Re: LyX 1.4.1 is released

2006-04-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> The installer creates a lyx.bat file that points at "lyx.exe". Angus> (This .bat file is little more than LANG=fr_FR lyx.exe $* in Angus> sh-speak.) OK. Angus> Unfortunately, the installed po files are called lyx14x.mo. Angus> Mor

Re: LyX 1.4.1 is released

2006-04-11 Thread Angus Leeming
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Angus> I managed to fix the problems that people were having running > Angus> this with localized menus; it turned out that my renaming of > Angus> lyx14x.exe to lyx.exe broke everything, so I no longer do that > Angus> > Could you expand on that

Re: LyX 1.4.1 is released

2006-04-11 Thread Bennett Helm
I've placed the Mac binary at ftp.lyx.org/incoming/LyX-1.4.1-Mac.dmg; please move it to the correct binaries folder. Thanks. Bennett On Apr 11, 2006, at 5:57 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Public release of LyX version 1.4.1 === We are pleased to announce

Re: LyX 1.4.1 is released

2006-04-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Jean-Marc, could you move it to the ftp site and fix the link Angus> at http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX14x to point to its new home? Done. Angus> I managed to fix the problems that people were having running Angus> this with local

Re: LyX 1.4.1 is released

2006-04-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Jean-Pierre" == Jean-Pierre Chrétien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jean-Pierre> I had to use the GNU tar to retrieve the full lyx-1.4.1 Jean-Pierre> directory. THis is something we are aware of. The depth of our directories (especially the mac bundle) mean that we enforce the use of GNU tar.

Re: LyX 1.4.1 is released

2006-04-11 Thread Angus Leeming
G. Reading the patch on gmane again, I notice a slight oversight. Nothing to worry about, but for completeness, the "search_handle" below should be closed. Could you change return bin_dir + '\\' + file_data.cFileName; to std::string const result = bin_dir + '\\' + file_data.c

Re: LyX 1.4.1 is released

2006-04-11 Thread Jean-Pierre Chrétien
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Public release of LyX version 1.4.1 On Solaris 8, use of the native tar program bunzip2 -c lyx-1.4.1.tar.bz2|tar xof - retrieves only the two directories config and development. I had to use the GNU tar to retrieve the full lyx-1.4.1 direc

Re: LyX 1.4.1 is released

2006-04-11 Thread Angus Leeming
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Public release of LyX version 1.4.1 === We are pleased to announce the release of LyX 1.4.1. This is a bug fix release, but some of the bugs were big. In particular: Congratulations to you all! The Windows installer can be found at

Re: LyX 1.4.1

2006-04-11 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Helge Hafting wrote: > Perhaps \include should be removed from the GUI? Please not. This is what I always use. IMHO \include is the right way for included documents, not \input. > When I needed > to use this for chapters in a book, I had to look up which one was > the most useful.  \include se

Re: Re: LyX 1.4.1

2006-04-06 Thread Hartmut Haase
> > So \input is the useful one, and \include could be hidden but > perhaps supported in order to minimize latex->lyx->latex > roundtrip damage. If latex users find \include useful . . . > I agree on that. I even doubt that latex users know the difference without looking into a latex-book. -- Vi

Re: LyX 1.4.1

2006-04-04 Thread Helge Hafting
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Michael" == Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Michael> Hartmut H. and me think that users will not understand the Michael> difference "include" and "input". We should mention the term Michael> "LaTeX" so that users know where the terms come from

Re: LyX 1.4.1

2006-04-03 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Michael" == Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Michael> Hartmut H. and me think that users will not understand the Michael> difference "include" and "input". We should mention the term Michael> "LaTeX" so that users know where the terms come from at Michael> least. It would be even b

Re: LyX 1.4.1

2006-04-02 Thread Michael Gerz
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: These look OK, Text changes applied. except the one with \input and \include: (1) I am not sure it is clearer to everybody and (2) I am not sure our po machnery like backslashes in strings. So please remove this part for now. The backslashes may be problem, in

Re: LyX 1.4.1

2006-03-31 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Michael" == Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Michael> Jean-Marc, I have a few trivial text changes in my queue. For Michael> instance, I don't like buttons with a period. And "Cols" Michael> sounds a bit too colloquial, doesn't it? These look OK, except the one with \input and \inc

  1   2   >