FYI I added two missing change signals:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/17079
The patch is obvious so I commited it directly.
regards Uwe
I'm now workig with the new caption inset while writing a paper with many floats. In my opinion it
would be a bit better usable when it can be collapsed. Do others agree? If yes and if it's not too
much work, it would be an impovement if this is implemented for LyX 1.5.
regards Uwe
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 05:57:31PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> I also tested the attached patch with a native Windows python.
I applied the patch to trunk. JMarc, do you want it for 1.4.4, too?
--
Enrico
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 08:21:44PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> The tooltips are back.
> Does anybody know why?
Because Georg fixed it
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/16981
--
Enrico
Dear Sirs,
I’m a first time user, finishing my PhD and looking at alternatives to replace
Word. I ran the installer LyX-143-5 and managed to install LyX after a few
problems which I think related with a faulty MikTeX 2.5 installation. But I’m
still struggling to have it running smoothly. The
> Do you know why he had problems?
Yes, he didn't know that the packages are on CTAN and that the .sty-files are generated by LaTeX out
of the .ins/dtx files
> Or he as an experienced LyX user, but never needed to install latex packages
so far.
> Or he did not do it for a long time and forgot
Am Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007 22:43 schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
> Jürgen Spitzmüller schrieb:
> > Also, user friendliness is in the eye of the beholder. A LaTeX package
manager
> > is really nothing I miss on Linux.
Me neither.
> OK, but I think Harmut is an experienced LyXer on Linux and should
therefo
Am Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007 20:40 schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
> That's the same problematic as with the Solaris ImageMagick problem. I
don't understand why the
> Linux-distributions ship 5 years old stuff.
I don't know current distros that ship tetex 2, but at work I am forced to
use tetex 2 unless I
Jürgen Spitzmüller schrieb:
Nevertheless, please load it with the release date as optional argument
\usepackage[labelfont={bf,sf}, tableposition=top]{caption}[2004/07/16]
Done.
Also, user friendliness is in the eye of the beholder. A LaTeX package manager
is really nothing I miss on Linux.
Am Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007 20:47 schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
> Andre Poenitz schrieb:
>
> > In Vista there are seemingly already a few areas that need
certification
> > one way or the other. Drivers for instance. I would not be surprised if
> > in the next major release all software needs to have some k
Am Sonntag, 4. Februar 2007 16:57 schrieb Bo Peng:
> > No, I think like André here: Not using basic qt 4.0 functionality means
> > that 4.2.2 is required. I know why you do that, but I don't agree with
the
> > reasons.
>
> I do not understand what is the big fuss here. The problem is clearly
> ca
Am Sonntag, 4. Februar 2007 17:42 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> > "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Georg> I finally believe that we always should output the extension.
> Georg> See also http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2764.
>
> Georg> The original purpose of lea
Am Sonntag, 4. Februar 2007 19:25 schrieb Bo Peng:
> > We are supposed to manage a project, not just write code.
>
> For this particular problem, I have declared WONT FIX for qt < 4.2.2.
> There are a lot more severer bugs there and it would be a waste of
> time to work on a fixed bug. People who
Original-Nachricht
Betreff: Re: es_EmbeddedObjects
Datum: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 10:05:14 +0100
Von: Ignacio García <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Antwort an: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: lyx-docs@lists.lyx.org
Referenzen: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Since we are at it: What would be 'average'?
The 66th percentile for a "competent" new hire (meaning a certain company pays
a base salary that matches or exceeds 66% of other US companies for the same
kind of work) is about one and a half times that. M
Am Montag, 5. Februar 2007 20:26 schrieb Peter Kümmel:
> Are there really security updates of the distro versions of Qt?
Yes. A quick search for the last known one resulted in this one:
http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1200
> I was only a question :)
Sure, but I had the impression that
Am Sonntag, 4. Februar 2007 19:08 schrieb Michael Gerz:
> Hello,
>
> Jean-Marc recently raised the question whether an inset is really the
> proper solution for captions.
>
> I didn't come to a final conclusion on my own but I think we should come
> to an agreement and stick with it. I think th
Am Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007 12:12 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
> OK, I quit the discussion. Revert the change if you want.
I don't want that. After all, it might be the right solution for the
moment, or I might be the only one who considers that a hack. What I did
not like was that it went in wi
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > You probably have caption.sty v1 and v2 (a.k.a. caption2.sty) on your
> > box, but Uwe's manual requires a (fairly recent) version of caption.sty
> > v. 3 (which is again called caption.sty for some odd reason).
>
> The version 3 of caption.sty was not published as caption3.
Andre Poenitz schrieb:
In Vista there are seemingly already a few areas that need certification
one way or the other. Drivers for instance. I would not be surprised if
in the next major release all software needs to have some kind of MS
approval stamp on it - at least that's clearly the directio
> You probably have caption.sty v1 and v2 (a.k.a. caption2.sty) on your box, but
> Uwe's manual requires a (fairly recent) version of caption.sty v. 3 (which is
> again called caption.sty for some odd reason).
The version 3 of caption.sty was not published as caption3.sty but again as caption.sty
The tooltips are back.
Does anybody know why?
Peter
> It sounds very low to me.
Since we are at it: What would be 'average'?
I think I am 'above average'. :-)
Bo
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 11:11:12PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Andre> Have you had the chance of having a look at the requirements
> Andre> for an installer on Windows Vista?
>
> Andre> At least for Vista certification this m
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 01:51:36AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > Now Andre mentioned that Vista certification would require an
^ ^ !
> > .msi-installer. Although I'm not sure we'd ever try for that, it
> > probably would make sense to check out Vista req
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 09:07:41AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Is it too early to talk about a LyX 2007 meeting?
Certainly not.
Andre'
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 11:02:07PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >>And how many full-time people do you have to provide these 15
> >>versions for linux?
> >
> >Took me about two weeks full-time to set up all the virtual machines
> >(i.e. install OS, install required deve
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 05:07:48PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/17058
> Log:
> * Fix bug 3202 (http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3202)
> * Augment a bit the space between nested insets.
>
> Modified:
> lyx-devel/trunk/src/insets/insetcollapsabl
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 11:13:40AM -0800, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > Why this? The installer we currently have works also under Vista. We have
> > a user who tested this:
> >
> http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg53432.html
> > (The problem he described there was
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 12:49:43AM +, John Levon wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 11:26:56PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>
> > Personally I would be interested to do some paid work for LyX. I am
> > running out of contract in 6 month... maybe I'll do a reconversion in
> > the software en
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 11:20:20PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Feb 2007, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>
> >And could you do that for LyX? That would be very nice...
>
> Somewhat related (as we're already off-topic), it'd probably be a good
> idea testing the Windows installers in vir
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 04:36:01PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >
> >+
> >+// Mac specific stuff goes here...
> >+#ifdef Q_WS_MACX
> >+
> >+class MenuTranslator : public QTranslator {
> >+
But the text I read did not have much information that was special to
floats. Do you plan to repeat the same text over and over?
In this manual are two contruct types that can bereferenced: Floats and Longtables. Reference
handling for Longtable is quite different and decribed in the correspond
Should we disable the context menu (right mouse click)
of the scrollbar? Currently the functionality is not
bug free?
Peter
Index: src/frontends/qt4/GuiWorkArea.C
===
--- src/frontends/qt4/GuiWorkArea.C (revision 17071)
+++ src/fr
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> You expressed it very well, Georg. And I'll just reiterate that
>>> this is how linux works. So please be nice guys for poor old linux
>>> users.
>
> Peter> Are #ifdefs ok then?
>
> Let me give you an e
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Peter> What about the rule to use on Windows the latest and greatest
> Peter> Qt release and on Linux "only" an old one?
>
> It depends. If there is a _windows_ _only_ thing that cannot be done
> with qt 4.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Peter> I assume because much has changed in the last year, more than
> Peter> the years before, so some LyX-"Veterans" are a bit astonished.
>
> You know, we did not wait for young blood to go coding wildly
John Levon wrote:
> > What is your problem with the current approach?
>
> You've confused me. My problem is that it's on the RHS ... was there a
> commit I missed?
No. However, I proposed to put it on top initially. Uwe put it on the RHS
because until recently, every toolbar got its own row on to
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 05:22:42PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > Then have we considered making this small toolbar just added onto the
> > first toolbar?
>
> You mean: include it in the main toolbar? Yes. But this has the disadvantage
> that it cannot be switched on/off in toto.
>
> What
John Levon wrote:
> Then have we considered making this small toolbar just added onto the
> first toolbar?
You mean: include it in the main toolbar? Yes. But this has the disadvantage
that it cannot be switched on/off in toto.
What is your problem with the current approach?
Jürgen
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 04:46:59PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > Well, I was thinking of how we make the dvi toolbar default to not using
> > an entire new line...
>
> It's not possible. Initially, all toolbars get their own line. However, once
> you moved the dvi toolbar, say, bhing the
Georg Baum wrote:
oddity. With qt42.2.2 fixing it I see no reason to spend more time
on it - qt4.2.2 will come to debian too.
But not very soon. Etch (the next stable release) is frozen and will be
released with 4.2.1. Therefore many people (including me) will use 4.2.1
for a long time.
John Levon wrote:
> Well, I was thinking of how we make the dvi toolbar default to not using
> an entire new line...
It's not possible. Initially, all toolbars get their own line. However, once
you moved the dvi toolbar, say, bhing the main toolbar, it will be restored
in that line by session.
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 04:32:45PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > Is there some way to tell lyx to put it on the same line as another
> > toolbar?
>
> No. But session restores the toolbars on the line you dragged them to.
Well, I was thinking of how we make the dvi toolbar default to not u
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Jürgen" == Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jürgen> You probably have caption.sty v1 and v2 (a.k.a. caption2.sty)
> Jürgen> on your box, but Uwe's manual requires a (fairly recent)
> Jürgen> version of caption.sty v. 3 (which is again called ca
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
John Levon wrote:
Is there some way to tell lyx to put it on the same line as another
toolbar?
No. But session restores the toolbars on the line you dragged them to.
Well, in a way, if he drags the line there he's telling LyX to put it
there, isn't he?
;-)
Abdel.
John Levon wrote:
> Is there some way to tell lyx to put it on the same line as another
> toolbar?
No. But session restores the toolbars on the line you dragged them to.
Jürgen
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 02:15:19PM +0100, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> >What do others think?
>
> on top. if people want a toolbar elsewhere they can always drag it there
> i guess.
Is there some way to tell lyx to put it on the same line as another
toolbar?
john
> "Jürgen" == Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jürgen> You probably have caption.sty v1 and v2 (a.k.a. caption2.sty)
Jürgen> on your box, but Uwe's manual requires a (fairly recent)
Jürgen> version of caption.sty v. 3 (which is again called caption.sty
Jürgen> for some odd reason
> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bennett> This second version creates a new "special" menu between the
Bennett> LyX and (in French) Fichier menus, and contains only one
Bennett> item: "Préférences" (which has no keybinding, but properly
Bennett> brings up the preferences
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I tried to work around prettyref problems to see how far I could get
> and the result is not very nice on my teTeX 2 setup.
>
> - caption.sty does not load (I do not know why). It is probably
> related to some package interaction.
You probably have caption.sty v1 an
> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bennett> I should also add: upon closing LyX (after sending the
Bennett> message), I noticed the following output in the Terminal
Bennett> window from which I had launched it. (I don't get this
Bennett> without the patch.)
Bennett> Menu
> "Jürgen" == Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jürgen> Agreed. I think the only thing we can do now is to describe
Jürgen> prettyref without actually using it in the docs, like
Jürgen> "Formatted reference: prints a self defined cross-reference
Jürgen> format including a prefix
한창길 wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I have played around the current lyx-1.5.0svn for some time to test for
> the support of CJK languages, and here is my small report .
>
>
>
> 1. As I reported some time ago, lyx crashes whenever I try to input
> characters with "text_size" larger than "1" as
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 10:57:23AM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
It is this simple (I think).
(The inset API has its nice sides)
Thanks for helping me at this.
Abdel.
OK. Could you commit it?
I'll do it.
Abdel.
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 10:57:23AM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >It is this simple (I think).
> >
> >(The inset API has its nice sides)
>
> Thanks for helping me at this.
>
> Abdel.
OK. Could you commit it?
- Martin
pgpVeQfsUwWXL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
한창길 wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I have played around the current lyx-1.5.0svn for some time to test for
> the support of CJK languages, and here is my small report .
>
>
>
> 1. As I reported some time ago, lyx crashes whenever I try to input
> characters with "text_size" larger than "1" as
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Uwe> I don't know, I only decribed what LyX supports, so when I should
> Uwe> remove it in the doc, it should also be removed in LyX or better
> Uwe> replaced by another command from a similar package to prettyref.
>
> The problem is that there is no drop-in replacemen
> "Uwe" == Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> So your EmbeddedObjects help file cannot be typeset. This is a
>> blocker for 1.4.4. As a temporary measure, shall we remove
>> reference to prettyref in the 1.4 version of the manual at least?
Uwe> I don't know, I only decribed what LyX sup
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
What do others think?
on top. if people want a toolbar elsewhere they can always drag it there
i guess.
talking about toolbars: i suggest to put the spellcheck button on the
main toolbar
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Yes this was the original reason. But now that I used it for a while in
> this position I like it there. Other programs also have toolbars on the
> left and/or right (Photoshop, AutoCAD, Illustrator, etc.).
> I cannot see why the position makes it difficult to access the scrollba
A worse problem is that prettyref is not in teTeX 2 (at least) because
of unknown license:
http://www.mail-archive.com/tetex@dbs.uni-hannover.de/msg00342.html
So your EmbeddedObjects help file cannot be typeset. This is a blocker
for 1.4.4. As a temporary measure, shall we remove reference to
pre
> If you're talking about the view/upgrade toolbar: I think Uwe just put it on
> the right because of a toolbar/session bug that is now fixed. I think that
> toolbar can go now where Uwe initially intended it to be.
Yes this was the original reason. But now that I used it for a while in this posi
Bo Peng schrieb:
We need someone who says "no!" or "stop that!".
I did something like this but I am not at a position to do that. I had
hoped that Michael can show some management skills but he chose to be
silent. As far as I am concerned, there is no good or bad decision
because any decision i
> "Uwe" == Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Uwe> - when using a prettyref inset \usepackage{prettyref} is set to
Uwe> the preamble. What when the user needs to load this package with
Uwe> an option?
A worse problem is that prettyref is not in teTeX 2 (at least) because
of unknown licens
Georg Baum wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I agree with Jose that we should not ignore history but you should also
see that the situation is not the same at all right now. I am all for
being cautious but please don't blame newcomers for past faults.
I think you completely misunderstood what J
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> I agree with Jose that we should not ignore history but you should also
> see that the situation is not the same at all right now. I am all for
> being cautious but please don't blame newcomers for past faults.
I think you completely misunderstood what Jean-Marc wrote.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Sorry but I really don't understand why you complain. If
Abdelrazak> anything, I would expect acknowledgement of my hard work
Abdelrazak> instead of complaint.
Abdelrazak> It's my turn to feel
On Thursday 01 February 2007 9:55:09 pm Michael Gerz wrote:
> José,
>
> for your enjoyment:
>
> I think I fixed all major change tracking bugs today. Hopefully, there
> should no crashes anymore. All open CT issues are documented in bugzilla
> and, personally, I can live with all of them ATM.
>
> I
On Tuesday 06 February 2007 10:36:43 am Edwin Leuven wrote:
> and what about a beta?
There is one last step I want to take before that.
That is related with the way we treated whitespaces in combination with font
changes. This change is minimal but very subtle, the potential problem is
that
> "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
José> PS: I don't know why people get annoyed with me when I say that
José> to be depressed for more than 5 minutes is not an option. ;-)
Maybe because they find it depressing?
JMarc
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Sorry but I really don't understand why you complain. If
Abdelrazak> anything, I would expect acknowledgement of my hard work
Abdelrazak> instead of complaint.
Abdelrazak> It's my turn to feel depressed now :-(
This
José Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 06 February 2007 9:48:38 am Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> I assume because much has changed in the last year, more than
Peter> the years before, so some LyX-"Veterans" are a bit aston
José Matos wrote:
Is it broken now?
It could be better or else we would already have 1.5 out of door. ;-)
and what about a beta?
On Tuesday 06 February 2007 9:48:38 am Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >> "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Peter> I assume because much has changed in the last year, more than
> > Peter> the years before, so some LyX-"Veterans" are a bit aston
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I don't think so. I don't wanted all my text to be completely
>> re-organized when I enter the inset.
Martin> True! I didn't even consider that. And the cost of
Martin> re-rendering all that text (if there's a lot). It would kill
Mar
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 10:56:26AM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>"Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >Martin> Jean-Marc, should this go into branch too? - Martin
> >
> >Well, it does not fit with the definition of Wide() in 1.4.x.
>
Martin Vermeer wrote:
It is this simple (I think).
(The inset API has its nice sides)
Thanks for helping me at this.
Abdel.
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 10:32:11AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Martin> Jean-Marc, should this go into branch too? - Martin
>
> Well, it does not fit with the definition of Wide() in 1.4.x.
>
> Conerning the need for the f
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> Jean-Marc, should this go into branch too? - Martin
Well, it does not fit with the definition of Wide() in 1.4.x.
Conerning the need for the fix, I think it just hides the bug in a
particular case. Th
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> I assume because much has changed in the last year, more than
Peter> the years before, so some LyX-"Veterans" are a bit astonished.
You know, we did not wait for young blood to go coding wildly and
implement
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 08:59:19PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote:
José Matos wrote:
On Monday 05 February 2007 7:34:43 pm Peter Kümmel wrote:
I assume because much has changed in the last year, more than the
years before, so some LyX-"Veterans" are a bit astonished.
Come o
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> Whilst I appreciate the reasoning behind the new sidebar, it has
John> an unfortunate side-effect: the scroll bar is now much harder to
John> hit. Especially in full-screen mode, the scroll bar was of
John> infinite width previously.
Jo
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> Jean-Marc, should this go into branch too? - Martin
Well, it does not fit with the definition of Wide() in 1.4.x.
Conerning the need for the fix, I think it just hides the bug in a
particular case. The real fix would be to man
It is this simple (I think).
(The inset API has its nice sides)
- Martin
Index: insetcaption.C
===
--- insetcaption.C (revision 17041)
+++ insetcaption.C (working copy)
@@ -167,6 +167,12 @@
}
+void InsetCaption::draw
> "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> I assume because much has changed in the last year, more than
Peter> the years before, so some LyX-"Veterans" are a bit astonished.
You know, we did not wait for young blood to go coding wildly and
implement multi-windows and window
John Levon wrote:
> Whilst I appreciate the reasoning behind the new sidebar, it has an
> unfortunate side-effect: the scroll bar is now much harder to hit.
> Especially in full-screen mode, the scroll bar was of infinite width
> previously.
If you're talking about the view/upgrade toolbar: I thin
> "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> Seems some peolple currently suffer a depression, but don't
Peter> forget: LyX is NOT the meaning of life ;-)
I can live very well without LyX, thank you. The LyX developers'
community has been a very nice place to stick around for
> "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> You expressed it very well, Georg. And I'll just reiterate that
>> this is how linux works. So please be nice guys for poor old linux
>> users.
Peter> Are #ifdefs ok then?
Let me give you an example that is OK: currently there is some
> "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> What about the rule to use on Windows the latest and greatest
Peter> Qt release and on Linux "only" an old one?
It depends. If there is a _windows_ _only_ thing that cannot be done
with qt 4.1 it is OK. If it just that you'd love to
90 matches
Mail list logo
