Lorenzo wrote:
>
> I'll try to create a screencast.
>
> BTW who knows simple and free screencast apps for Windows and Mac OS
> X?
http://www.jingproject.com/
Regards,
Ernad
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-proj
Lorenzo wrote:
>
> I'll try to create a screencast.
>
> BTW who knows simple and free screencast apps for Windows and Mac OS
> X?
http://www.jingproject.com/
Regards,
Ernad
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-proj
>>
>> GTWVG IMO still needs heavy development to be used
>> in production environments, as I can make it crash and
>> behave strangely in just a few seconds of regular clicking.
>>
>
I am using gtwvg in some of my applications, was a works written for
XHARBOUR+GTWVW
I am only without the editbo
S
I am interested in your findings.
GTWVG is in use with my production applns well over few years
and I have not heard anything "crashing with clicks" so far.
Can you please enlighten me how it can be reproduced?
I would like it to be perfect in all senses.
--
I'm very happy with GTWVG, the
Hi Pritpal,
GTWVG IMO still needs heavy development to be used
in production environments, as I can make it crash and
behave strangely in just a few seconds of regular clicking.
I am interested in your findings.
GTWVG is in use with my production applns well over few years
and I have not h
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Alex Strickland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kind of like a cut down version of SOAP?
Yes but much simples.
We have done only the necessary to exchange the equivalent of a
GetList, a record and a tbrowse ( reports are already pdfs ).
The real work is done by Ajax
Hello Viktor
Szakáts Viktor wrote:
>
> GTWVG IMO still needs heavy development to be used
> in production environments, as I can make it crash and
> behave strangely in just a few seconds of regular clicking.
>
I am interested in your findings.
GTWVG is in use with my production applns well o
Lorenzo Fiorini wrote:
The "server" evaluates the call and returns:
- an xml file like
that is parsed by the standard DOM functions that in turn populate the
UI
Kind of like a cut down version of SOAP?
- a pdf, xls, rtf, csv from a report function that the browser opens
I hope I was clear en
Lorenzo wrote:
>
> I'll try to create a screencast.
>
> BTW who knows simple and free screencast apps for Windows and Mac OS
> X?
http://www.jingproject.com/
Regards,
Ernad
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-proj
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
] On Behalf Of Szakáts Viktor
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 9:24 PM
To: Harbour Project Main Developer List.
Subject: Re: [Harbour] Which "standard" GUI for Harbour
Hi Renato,
On 2008.10.30., at 20:49, Vailton Renato wrote:
I just can not commit
GTWVT and GTWVG Are fist and second step of GUI
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Szakáts Viktor
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 9:24 PM
To: Harbour Project Main Developer List.
Subject: Re: [Harbour] Which "standard" GUI for H
Hi Renato,
On 2008.10.30., at 20:49, Vailton Renato wrote:
I just can not commit to mount an example of each GUI because I am
busy with a few things about the company and the rest of the site
details ...
If someone wants to send me at least a few screens of sample I'll
create a page with infor
I just can not commit to mount an example of each GUI because I am
busy with a few things about the company and the rest of the site
details ...
If someone wants to send me at least a few screens of sample I'll
create a page with information about this.
This if all find something viable ... but I
What think about a staring page for win with all step for using
harbour with one from msvc and gcc?
It's just setting up the compiler (as per respective compiler's
docs), and running make_vc.bat for MSVC (exactly the same as for
BCC, except the name of the batch file). For MinGW+msys it's just
: Re: [Harbour] Which "standard" GUI for Harbour
Hi!
>> We are launching our new web site where we say "Terminal/GUI" but we
>> miss the ( full ) GUI part.
>> We can add a list of the several h*, x* and v* guis created so far
for
>> Harbour but then we n
Hi!
>> We are launching our new web site where we say "Terminal/GUI" but we
>> miss the ( full ) GUI part.
>> We can add a list of the several h*, x* and v* guis created so far for
>> Harbour but then we need to find answers to questions like "which is
>> the best?", "which one to choose?".
>> Cle
Viktor
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 5:24 PM
To: Harbour Project Main Developer List.
Subject: Re: R: [Harbour] Which "standard" GUI for Harbour
> Not bcc?
BCC is off of my table. [ It has only two advantages:
compilation speed, and small footprint of the devel
tools. ]
> Wi
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Alex Strickland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> rpc? Do you mind saying a little on how you are using this, and using which
> tools?
We use only Harbour, hbtip, hbxml and FireFox+Ajax+Javascript.
The idea is not revolutionary.
The "exactly" same exe that uses gtwvt
That would be very nice.
Brgds,
Viktor
On 2008.10.30., at 17:14, Lorenzo Fiorini wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Szakáts Viktor [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tell us if there is an open demo, I'm sure some of us
would be interested to see your solution in real life.
Unfortunately there
Not bcc?
BCC is off of my table. [ It has only two advantages:
compilation speed, and small footprint of the devel
tools. ]
Will with the next release change Harbour default c compiler to MSVC
on win32 platform?
Well, there is no such thing as "default" C compiler,
since both BCC and MSVC w
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lorenzo Fiorini
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 5:14 PM
To: Harbour Project Main Developer List.
Subject: Re: [Harbour] Which "standard" GUI for Harbour
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Szakáts Viktor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Szakáts Viktor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tell us if there is an open demo, I'm sure some of us
> would be interested to see your solution in real life.
Unfortunately there are no demos.
We mainly create custom apps for few "big" customers so we don't advertise
xHarbour bindings for wxWidgets
Yes I know not recognized as GTWXW
IS xHarbour bindings for wxWidgets
Best of multiplaform
And wxWidgets is also based on GTK+, so GTK+ seems
like a trend as far as fat desktop goes.
paradigm (with all its faults) inside a web-browser
Sorry but afaik is not co
Lorenzo Fiorini wrote:
We've moved 60% of the apps to browser using only Harbour, rpc, xml
and Javascript.
rpc? Do you mind saying a little on how you are using this, and using
which tools?
TIA
Alex
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-projec
: R: [Harbour] Which "standard" GUI for Harbour
>> Looking at the source / samples, xhgtk looks very nice.
>
> I agree I also find it very clean and well coded ( at least at prg
> level ).
> And if you try to use glade with it it seems even more interesting.
> It g
> What I meant was:
> what we'll answer when a user will ask
> "Which is the Harbour's GUI lib?"
>
> Also in Java there are Swing, SWT and many others but if you buy a
> book about Java you'll find that Swing IS the Java GUI for desktop
> apps.
>
Just this i was meaning. None of existing GUI can
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Szakáts Viktor [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I better like lighter and naturally web-like apps.
We've moved 60% of the apps to browser using only Harbour, rpc, xml
and Javascript.
The results are great so far ( not said by me ) but as usual it's the
last 20% that
Any update regarding project of re-routing all the Windows API code with
calls to an Ajax Web clien?
Any Comment about This idea?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Randy Portnoff
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 5:32 PM
To: Harbour Project Mai
Looking at the source / samples, xhgtk looks very nice.
I agree I also find it very clean and well coded ( at least at prg
level ).
And if you try to use glade with it it seems even more interesting.
It gives the ( wrong ) idea that in few days you can rewrite
everything :)
:) I'll take a
I try:
http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtk/unstable/gtk-building.html
-Original Message-
>I wonder if it's possible to static link all GTK+
>related stuff to a Windows executable? I simply detest
>.dlls.
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Szakáts Viktor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I better like lighter and naturally web-like apps.
We've moved 60% of the apps to browser using only Harbour, rpc, xml
and Javascript.
The results are great so far ( not said by me ) but as usual it's the
last 20% that
>All information I have is from the homepage
>of the project, Google for HbWxW. There are
>some nice screenshots there.
>Win / Linux are supported. Syntax is OOP.
xHarbour bindings for wxWidgets
Yes I know not recognized as GTWXW
IS xHarbour bindings for wxWidgets
Best of multiplaform
>
http://ww
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Szakáts Viktor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looking at the source / samples, xhgtk looks very nice.
I agree I also find it very clean and well coded ( at least at prg level ).
And if you try to use glade with it it seems even more interesting.
It gives the ( wrong
Looking at the source / samples, xhgtk looks very nice.
Looks like GTK+ can also run on OS X. There seem to
exist some immature and parallel efforts to make this
happen, some requiring X11, some running natively.
Overall, it's promising.
I wonder if it's possible to static link all GTK+
related
I like GTWXW the best (work of Marek Paliwoda,
BTW how is he these days?). Purely based on
source code and downloadable package I've seen
(I didn't use any of these yet). Unfortunately
this is no more made available to the public.
Big loss IMO.
Can you giv e more information regarding GTWXW (intr
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Maurizio la Cecilia
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> None of the existing GUI can be elected to a "standard".
What I meant was:
what we'll answer when a user will ask
"Which is the Harbour's GUI lib?"
Also in Java there are Swing, SWT and many others but if you buy
-Original Message-
>That's not really our job, plus who will tell
>which is the best? I provision a huge debate.
>The debate itself BTW, would be very nice to
>see, as I also cannot see the strengths/weaknesses
>of various implementations in full detail,
>especially when they are used in pr
Hi Lorenzo,
> We are launching our new web site where we say "Terminal/GUI" but we
> miss the ( full ) GUI part.
> We can add a list of the several h*, x* and v* guis created so far for
> Harbour but then we need to find answers to questions like "which is
> the best?", "which one to choose?".
> C
In this case we should choose carefully what's in the list.
Some of them are in IMHO not in line with the quality standard of
Harbour.
It would be a pity that a bad experience with one of these GUIs will
"translate" to Harbour.
Yes, I completely agree. But since this may also
start debates, a
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 8:36 AM, Szakáts Viktor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unless there is a clear and agreed direction on
> which free product is the "best", maybe we
> should just present an alphabetically sorted
> list of all known products, one list for free
> and one list for commercial sol
Hi Lorenzo,
We are launching our new web site where we say "Terminal/GUI" but we
miss the ( full ) GUI part.
We can add a list of the several h*, x* and v* guis created so far for
Harbour but then we need to find answers to questions like "which is
the best?", "which one to choose?".
Clearly h
We are launching our new web site where we say "Terminal/GUI" but we
miss the ( full ) GUI part.
We can add a list of the several h*, x* and v* guis created so far for
Harbour but then we need to find answers to questions like "which is
the best?", "which one to choose?".
Clearly here the things be
42 matches
Mail list logo
