2008-10-30 21:24 UTC-0800 Pritpal Bedi ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* harbour/source/rtl/gtwvt/gtwvt.c
* harbour/source/rtl/gtwvt/gtwvt.h
+ Transfereed two static variables to HB_GTWVT structure.
Multi-thread/console protection.
Regards
Pritpal Bedi
--
View this message in context:
http://
Hello Przemek
<<<
I've just check it and some modifications in GTWVT broke
WinCE build. I took older GTWVT and updated it for recent
modifications in core code (MT) and it works correctly.
I cannot say now what is wrong because I haven't checked
recent extensions to GTWVT and I can make WinCE tes
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008, Abeb wrote:
Hi,
> >>How did you compile Harbour for WinCE?
> hbcemk ./wcecon
> >>Used platform, C compiler and build scripts.
> under msys mingw32
> Harbour 1.0.1 Intl. (Rev. 9429)
> Harbour itself was build with make_gnu_xmingwce.sh
I've just check it and some modification
On Thursday 30 October 2008 05:08:10 am Szakáts Viktor wrote:
> We have a mailing-list.
>
> [ which "happens" to be replicated in several newsgroups/web
> sites, making it much complicated (or even possible) to find
> anything via web search engines (Google), due to multiple matches
> from these di
2008-10-31 02:26 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* make_vc.mak
- Removed -GS- option for WinCE. MS recommends this to
be there for safety. If someone wants to disable, it
can be done with C_USR.
--
Brgds,
Viktor
___
Har
2008-10-31 02:14 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* source/vm/dlmalloc.c
! Fixed minor MinGW warning. This fix also exists
as part of the next dlmalloc version (2.8.4b).
--
Brgds,
Viktor
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour
2008-10-31 02:05 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* make_b32.mak
* contrib/mtpl_b32.mak
* config/w32/bcc32.cf
- Added -4 switch, which means Intel 386 CPUs are not
not supported by default.
* make_vc.mak
+ Added -GA switch to MSVC 32/64 which creates smaller
ch means the variable is a MUTEX per definition.
Or maybe just MUTEX s_mtx, but that may make things
more complicated to implement.
I do not find it more stranger then current:
static s1 := CTOD( "" )
static s2 := HB_STOD( "20081030" )
static s3 := UPPER( "abc" )
st
looks
> a bit strange as a syntax, so maybe we could
> rather consider using syntax like MUTEX STATIC s_mtx.
> Which means the variable is a MUTEX per definition.
> Or maybe just MUTEX s_mtx, but that may make things
> more complicated to implement.
I do not find it more
Hi all,
Is there any opinions on starting to optimize
our Windows C compiler switches?
I mean, what would be the oldest Intel CPU
Harbour should support in _default_ builds?
Minimum CPU requirements for different Windows
versions:
- Win95: 386DX, 486 recommended
- Win98/ME: 486, Pentium recomme
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008, Horodyski Marek (PZUZ) wrote:
Hi Marek,
> Przemek, how can I write this :
> Function appServer( appName) // for example appName is 'RAPORT_024'
> Static appStorage := {} // this variable can be ohne for all thread,
> like CLASS STATIC VARIABLE
Harbour supports also THREAD ST
2008-10-30 21:56 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* contrib/make_b32_all.bat
* contrib/make_vc_all.bat
* contrib/make_gcc_all.sh
+ Added support for GNU-make features HB_CONTRIBLIBS,
and HB_CONTRIB_ADDONS.
Not tested in make_gcc_all.sh.
* config/w32/msvc.cf
Hi Renato,
On 2008.10.30., at 20:49, Vailton Renato wrote:
I just can not commit to mount an example of each GUI because I am
busy with a few things about the company and the rest of the site
details ...
If someone wants to send me at least a few screens of sample I'll
create a page with infor
I just can not commit to mount an example of each GUI because I am
busy with a few things about the company and the rest of the site
details ...
If someone wants to send me at least a few screens of sample I'll
create a page with information about this.
This if all find something viable ... but I
What think about a staring page for win with all step for using
harbour with one from msvc and gcc?
It's just setting up the compiler (as per respective compiler's
docs), and running make_vc.bat for MSVC (exactly the same as for
BCC, except the name of the batch file). For MinGW+msys it's just
I Agree
I notice that Also Pritpal sample of element of gui inside-outside GT is
intresting (gtwvg)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vailton Renato
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 6:59 PM
To: Harbour Project Main Developer List.
Subject: R
Hi!
>> We are launching our new web site where we say "Terminal/GUI" but we
>> miss the ( full ) GUI part.
>> We can add a list of the several h*, x* and v* guis created so far for
>> Harbour but then we need to find answers to questions like "which is
>> the best?", "which one to choose?".
>> Cle
Hi All,
I'm developing an application right now, but, since the application must
be accessible to the general public via the web, I've decided to use
HTML+PHP+MYSQL.
As an xBase programmer I feel very bad.
I could use Harbour CGI but, run binaries on web servers are not always
possible and n
>>How did you compile Harbour for WinCE?
hbcemk ./wcecon
>>Used platform, C compiler and build scripts.
under msys mingw32
Harbour 1.0.1 Intl. (Rev. 9429)
Harbour itself was build with make_gnu_xmingwce.sh
wcecon will not run under windows ( it will say ... not a valid w32
application )
Th
What think about a staring page for win with all step for using harbour with
one from msvc and gcc?
Have somebody here distributed application on win32 with msvc/gcc with a high
number of user?
There is no way for interchange lib between bcc,msvc,gcc?
GCC target processors as of version 4.3 inc
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Alex Strickland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> rpc? Do you mind saying a little on how you are using this, and using which
> tools?
We use only Harbour, hbtip, hbxml and FireFox+Ajax+Javascript.
The idea is not revolutionary.
The "exactly" same exe that uses gtwvt
That would be very nice.
Brgds,
Viktor
On 2008.10.30., at 17:14, Lorenzo Fiorini wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Szakáts Viktor [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tell us if there is an open demo, I'm sure some of us
would be interested to see your solution in real life.
Unfortunately there
Not bcc?
BCC is off of my table. [ It has only two advantages:
compilation speed, and small footprint of the devel
tools. ]
Will with the next release change Harbour default c compiler to MSVC
on win32 platform?
Well, there is no such thing as "default" C compiler,
since both BCC and MSVC w
Vnc2swf is a cross-platform screen recording tool for ShockWave Flash (swf)
format.
Vnc2swf comes with two different implementations:
Python version (pyvnc2swf): [Linux, FreeBSD, Solaris, Mac OS X, and Windows. ]
C version (vnc2swf): [Unix, Linux ,Mac OS X]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Szakáts Viktor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tell us if there is an open demo, I'm sure some of us
> would be interested to see your solution in real life.
Unfortunately there are no demos.
We mainly create custom apps for few "big" customers so we don't advertise
xHarbour bindings for wxWidgets
Yes I know not recognized as GTWXW
IS xHarbour bindings for wxWidgets
Best of multiplaform
And wxWidgets is also based on GTK+, so GTK+ seems
like a trend as far as fat desktop goes.
paradigm (with all its faults) inside a web-browser
Sorry but afaik is not co
Lorenzo Fiorini wrote:
We've moved 60% of the apps to browser using only Harbour, rpc, xml
and Javascript.
rpc? Do you mind saying a little on how you are using this, and using
which tools?
TIA
Alex
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-projec
Not bcc?
Will with the next release change Harbour default c compiler to MSVC on win32
platform?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Szakáts Viktor
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 3:32 PM
To: Harbour Project Main Developer List.
Subject: Re:
> What I meant was:
> what we'll answer when a user will ask
> "Which is the Harbour's GUI lib?"
>
> Also in Java there are Swing, SWT and many others but if you buy a
> book about Java you'll find that Swing IS the Java GUI for desktop
> apps.
>
Just this i was meaning. None of existing GUI can
>Message: 3
>Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:49:35 +0100
>From: Szak?ts Viktor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [Harbour] RE: Harbour Digest, Vol 24, Issue 138
[...]
>BTW, what's not working for you with SVN download?
>
>As another option, you may get the daily source from our
>homepage, it's now worki
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Szakáts Viktor [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I better like lighter and naturally web-like apps.
We've moved 60% of the apps to browser using only Harbour, rpc, xml
and Javascript.
The results are great so far ( not said by me ) but as usual it's the
last 20% that
Any update regarding project of re-routing all the Windows API code with
calls to an Ajax Web clien?
Any Comment about This idea?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Randy Portnoff
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 5:32 PM
To: Harbour Project Mai
Looking at the source / samples, xhgtk looks very nice.
I agree I also find it very clean and well coded ( at least at prg
level ).
And if you try to use glade with it it seems even more interesting.
It gives the ( wrong ) idea that in few days you can rewrite
everything :)
:) I'll take a
Hi Przemek, David and Maurilio,
Hi Viktor,
Also, I'm afraid I could have created problems for
other versions / brands of OS/2 C compilers, since
these seem to be new warnings. Can't really judge
this from here.
It's OK. The older GCC version do not report warning
when unsigned char/signed
>Message: 2
>Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:45:18 +0100
>From: Szak?ts Viktor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [Harbour] RE: Harbour Digest, Vol 24, Issue 138
[...]
>Hi Marek,
>
>> Viktor, when can You create binary version with new functional ?
>> I don't know how read from svn.
>
>I can create a bi
I try:
http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtk/unstable/gtk-building.html
-Original Message-
>I wonder if it's possible to static link all GTK+
>related stuff to a Windows executable? I simply detest
>.dlls.
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Szakáts Viktor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I better like lighter and naturally web-like apps.
We've moved 60% of the apps to browser using only Harbour, rpc, xml
and Javascript.
The results are great so far ( not said by me ) but as usual it's the
last 20% that
2008-10-30 15:03 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
* harbour/include/hbvmpub.h
+ added HB_VM_ISFUNC(), HB_VM_FUNCUNREF() and HB_VM_EXECUTE()
macros to operate on HB_SYMB structure
* harbour/source/vm/hvm.c
* harbour/source/vm/classes.c
* use HB_VM_ISFUNC()/H
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008, Szak�ts Viktor wrote:
Hi Viktor,
> Also, I'm afraid I could have created problems for
> other versions / brands of OS/2 C compilers, since
> these seem to be new warnings. Can't really judge
> this from here.
It's OK. The older GCC version do not report warning
when unsigned
>All information I have is from the homepage
>of the project, Google for HbWxW. There are
>some nice screenshots there.
>Win / Linux are supported. Syntax is OOP.
xHarbour bindings for wxWidgets
Yes I know not recognized as GTWXW
IS xHarbour bindings for wxWidgets
Best of multiplaform
>
http://ww
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Szakáts Viktor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looking at the source / samples, xhgtk looks very nice.
I agree I also find it very clean and well coded ( at least at prg level ).
And if you try to use glade with it it seems even more interesting.
It gives the ( wrong
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008, David Arturo Macias Corona wrote:
Hi David,
> Now we have a new error in two places:
> -
> ../../harbour.c:56:22: error: hbverbld.h: No such file or directory
It looks like a problem with your local environment setting.
hbverbld.h is created dynamically i
Thanks Viktor
That warnings are fixed, rest of warnings remain
Okay I just saw the rest. Since the fix is very
easy in I guess in almost all of these places
(I've added '( PSZ )' casts to certain OS/2 API
calls, where signedness was not matching), I'd
kindly ask you to finish the remaining plac
>2008-10-30 00:10 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
> * source/common/hbgete.c
> * source/common/hbfsapi.c
>! Blind fix for OS/2 compiler warnings. David, please test.
Thanks Viktor
That warnings are fixed, rest of warnings remain
Now we have a new error in two places:
-
BTW, what's not working for you with SVN download?
As another option, you may get the daily source
from our homepage, it's now working fine:
http://harbour-project.org/harbour-nightly.zip
Brgds,
Viktor
On 2008.10.30., at 13:45, Szakáts Viktor wrote:
Hi Marek,
Viktor, when can You create
Hi Marek,
Viktor, when can You create binary version with new functional ?
I don't know how read from svn.
I can create a binary build for current trunk.
Which C compiler do you use?
Brgds,
Viktor
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.
Looking at the source / samples, xhgtk looks very nice.
Looks like GTK+ can also run on OS X. There seem to
exist some immature and parallel efforts to make this
happen, some requiring X11, some running natively.
Overall, it's promising.
I wonder if it's possible to static link all GTK+
related
>Message: 2
>Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:37:52 +0100
>From: Przemyslaw Czerpak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [Harbour] MT extensions
>To: "Harbour Project Main Developer List."
>
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
>Hi All,
[...]
>2. CRITICAL FUNCTION|
I like GTWXW the best (work of Marek Paliwoda,
BTW how is he these days?). Purely based on
source code and downloadable package I've seen
(I didn't use any of these yet). Unfortunately
this is no more made available to the public.
Big loss IMO.
Can you giv e more information regarding GTWXW (intr
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Maurizio la Cecilia
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> None of the existing GUI can be elected to a "standard".
What I meant was:
what we'll answer when a user will ask
"Which is the Harbour's GUI lib?"
Also in Java there are Swing, SWT and many others but if you buy
-Original Message-
>That's not really our job, plus who will tell
>which is the best? I provision a huge debate.
>The debate itself BTW, would be very nice to
>see, as I also cannot see the strengths/weaknesses
>of various implementations in full detail,
>especially when they are used in pr
Hi Lorenzo,
> We are launching our new web site where we say "Terminal/GUI" but we
> miss the ( full ) GUI part.
> We can add a list of the several h*, x* and v* guis created so far for
> Harbour but then we need to find answers to questions like "which is
> the best?", "which one to choose?".
> C
In this case we should choose carefully what's in the list.
Some of them are in IMHO not in line with the quality standard of
Harbour.
It would be a pity that a bad experience with one of these GUIs will
"translate" to Harbour.
Yes, I completely agree. But since this may also
start debates, a
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 8:36 AM, Szakáts Viktor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unless there is a clear and agreed direction on
> which free product is the "best", maybe we
> should just present an alphabetically sorted
> list of all known products, one list for free
> and one list for commercial sol
We have a mailing-list.
[ which "happens" to be replicated in several newsgroups/web
sites, making it much complicated (or even possible) to find
anything via web search engines (Google), due to multiple matches
from these different places pointing to the _same_ original
mails. Just try. Big big
Newsletters?
Mailing List?
I read is as newsgruop witt gmane
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Szakáts Viktor
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 9:04 AM
To: Harbour Project Main Developer List.
Subject: Re: [Harbour] Harbour Web site - Preview
newsgroup??
On 2008.10.28., at 16:43, Massimo Belgrano wrote:
If possible please include also me
Massimo Belgrano
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fleet Admiral of Newsgroup, Lieutenant of application tester, and Half
soldier developer.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
Hi Lorenzo,
We are launching our new web site where we say "Terminal/GUI" but we
miss the ( full ) GUI part.
We can add a list of the several h*, x* and v* guis created so far for
Harbour but then we need to find answers to questions like "which is
the best?", "which one to choose?".
Clearly h
We are launching our new web site where we say "Terminal/GUI" but we
miss the ( full ) GUI part.
We can add a list of the several h*, x* and v* guis created so far for
Harbour but then we need to find answers to questions like "which is
the best?", "which one to choose?".
Clearly here the things be
Hi Przemek,
I think Pritpal is trying to get into the scheme of "inherits from
GTWVT
to avoid duplicated code".
IMO this way it's done the wrong way.
For one, GTWVG has - from the beginning -
lots of duplicated GTWVT code, which is
still there.
And Pritpal wants to remove it and simply in
Hi Przemek,
This looks good to me, but the name CRITICAL
to me doesn't really seem to imply the underlying
functionality, it also sounds a bit Windows-like,
so if possible, I'd suggest some other name.
Like MUTEX FUNC|PROC.
As for making hb_mutexCreate() a special function
exception allowed in S
61 matches
Mail list logo
