ion, but ideally suited for use in test suites, and the like.
>> For example, commons dbcp might use this to verify configuration via
>> JNDI. The new implementation ought to be driven by property, XML, or
>> JSON files.
>> Possible starting points:
>>
>> - Import
Cool to have a patch come in via github. Bear in mind there's nothing
to suggest Olloth is on the mailing list.
Hen
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 6:16 PM, James Carman wrote:
> Can you submit a JIRA and attach a SVN patch please?
>
> On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 8:19 PM, Olloth wrote:
>> GitHub user Olloth
Github pull
> requests, since there's an implied license grant"?
>
> I agree that it's minor enough that any of us could just implement it
> "from scratch" and just not worry. Do any of us have a dev
> environment set up on a windows 8 machine (or VM I guess) ye
Looks like the CODEC-158 issue has already attracted requests for the patches :)
Hen
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Mirko Raner wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I recently added some minor requests for improvements to the Net and Codec
> subprojects (NET-481 and CODEC-158). I actually have solutions for
+1.
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 4:28 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> since we made first (good?) experiences with Commons Math using git as
> primary VCS, I'd like to call a vote to migrate Commons Lang to git.
>
> This vote by lazy consensus will close no sooner than 72 hours from now,
> i.
As one idea, I would (if I didn't have too many demands on my time):
1) Browse through the APIs/Code for a piece of code that intrigues you.
2) Read it, write a blog on it, tweet about your blog (or whatever other
social networks you're into).
3) Learn about Caliper (https://github.com/google/cali
Try this one:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1143
Sebb's already broken the back on it and I laid out the remaining work.
If you've not hit codepoints before, they're quite an interesting area to
dive into. You don't need to dive into it much, but reading up on them so
you understand
The currently active projects is a good question (and as I'm not that
active myself, let's see which are active).
When we were all using Subversion it was easier, but now some components
are on Git and some Subversion.
Looks like four are on Git (Math, Lang, Compress and SCXML). I would
assume, b
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 9/29/15 3:55 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Norman,
> >
> > Hello and welcome to Apache Commons.
> >
> > It's not clear to me why Naomi is better than regular expressions.
> Pointing
> > to Javadocs is not the best way to get traction.
> >
> >
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 10/31/15 3:35 AM, Uwe Barthel wrote:
> > Hi Siegfried,
> >
> > Thanks for your clarification.
> >
> > It's really commonly use to bypass the incubator for small projects to
> become Apache Commons subproject status?
>
> Apache Commons is on
My suggestion would be to add a link to teh Commons Lang website to Micha's
repo and see how successful it is (i.e. if successful, I'd expect to see
users contributing other Lang related fluent APIs to it).
I'd suggest renaming to fluengLang :)
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Benedikt Ritter
w
+1 (non-binding).
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Siegfried Göschl <
siegfried.goes...@it20one.com> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> +1 for going TLP (non-binding)
>
> And the luck for Luc :-)
>
> Siegfried Goeschl
>
>
>
> - Ursprüngliche Mail -
> Von: "Luc Maisonobe"
> An: "Commons Developers Li
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 7:18 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> The discussion has thus far been generally favorable. I would like
> therefore to put the proposal to split [math] out into a separate
> TLP to a VOTE. Assuming a favorable vote, we can discuss how to go
> about doing it. Votes, please. Al
Any reason why you're not going with Apache Math - math.apache.org?
No one is going to wince if you have other language implementations in the
same project, and if it needs to break up over time because there is Apache
Math GroupTheory, Apache Math Fluid Dynamics etc etc; then more power to
y'all.
Changing the subject so Jay's email gets noticed.
Hen
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Jay Vyas wrote:
> Hi guys : I wanted to add some features to CLI
>
> 1) Options iterators , make them generic
> 2) Add an option for setting ALL options to mandatory.
> 3) Add an option to add groups, using th
Heads up that I'm thinking that 3.3 is ready to be released. 10 issues
resolved in trunk.
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Of course, I mean 3.2. :)
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Heads up that I'm thinking that 3.3 is ready to be released. 10 issues
> resolved in trunk.
>
> Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-m
; Despite what Clirr reports, are the changes really binary compatible?
>
> Gary
>
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 2:48 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>> Of course, I mean 3.2. :)
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Henri Yandell
>> wrote:
>> > Heads up that
2012/1/11 Sébastien Brisard :
> Le 11 janvier 2012 07:42, Sébastien Brisard
> a écrit :
>> Hi,
>> Dennis recently contributed a patch for triangular distributions (see
>> MATH-731). One of the methods implemented is based on a third party
>> Python code, the license of which is reproduced below. M
Tell me why 1.6 is a problem again?
This is DB-helper code, so much less worried about use cases like Android.
Hen
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 3:05 AM, sebb wrote:
> I did some experimenting with BeanProcessor to see what would be
> involved in providing Java 1.5 support.
>
> As part of this, I trie
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:19 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 10 January 2012 16:45, Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> the main reason for the failed vote of commons-email-1.3 is that the release
>> is only source but not binary compatible
>>
>> +) if you compile your application with the new vers
Couldn't we generate this?
It feels like a very simple svn script to see if a component has a
build.xml, pom.xml or project.xml.
Hen
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we have a nice wikipage mentioning what buildsystem is supported for
> which component:
>
2012/1/12 Sébastien Brisard :
> Hi Henri
>>
>> "Hi, about this Python code you wrote 14 years ago" :)
>>
> :))
>
>>
>> Highly unlikely he's jumping at the bit to code in Commons Math.
>> Still, sending a thanks is polite and I'd recommend you doing it as it
>> always sounds best coming from the
than pieces of Commons throwing a
ClassNotFound.
I'm tempted to go as far as to say it's irresponsible of us to support 1.5 :)
Hen
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 2:55 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 12 January 2012 08:20, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> Tell me why 1.6 is a problem again?
>
>
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 2:56 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 12 January 2012 08:28, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> Couldn't we generate this?
>>
>> It feels like a very simple svn script to see if a component has a
>> build.xml, pom.xml or project.xml.
>
> But that won'
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 2:52 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 12 January 2012 08:27, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:19 AM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 10 January 2012 16:45, Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>
>>>> the main reaso
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:09 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 13 January 2012 06:00, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 2:52 AM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 12 January 2012 08:27, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:19 AM, sebb wrote:
>>>>>
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:49 AM, Benedikt Ritter
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> looking at the different commons project pages, it occurs to me, that all
> pages use a slightly different layout. For example comparing Lang, BeanUtils
> and Collections with one another the first thing are the page titles:
>
> - H
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Benedikt Ritter
> wrote:
>>> But i found only discussions about duration& joda-time dated 2004.
>>>
>>> (http://markmail.org/thread/733yqv5zwzsngj3j)
>>> Now i really need in Duration functionality (es
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 6:36 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 11 February 2012 02:23, James Carman wrote:
>> I am +1 to allowing new major version releases to go to Java 6. Heck,
>> I'm +1 to them choosing to jump straight to Java 7. I don't think we
>> should require it or anything, though.
>
> The Common
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 7:45 PM, James Carman
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> I don't see why we would have to wait on major versions for updates.
>>
>
> Well, if we compile foo-1.1 with Java 5 and then compile foo-1.2 with
> Java 6
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 9:38 PM, James Carman
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>
>> I'd have thought they'd be fine.
>>
>> A Java6 user using 1.1 upgrading to 1.2 would be able to drop it in.
>>
>> A Java5 user
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 10:00 AM, James Carman
> wrote:
>
>> Gary,
>>
>> In this case, we're dealing with a veto to a code modification, which
>> is allowed. Here's the information with respect to code modification
>> vetoes (http://www.apach
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Sébastien Brisard
wrote:
> 2012/4/30 Sébastien Brisard :
>> Hi,
>>
>>>
>>> Just add a comment with a copy of the SVN commit mail header?
>>>
>> Thanks.
>> I did that already. I take it there is no way to include this commit
>> in the "Subversion commits" tab?
>>
>>
Though depends on what you're submitting. JIRA issues, no worries.
Just hit the checkbox each time you add a patch.
If you become a committer, or if you're submitting something large,
then we will ask you to sign an ICLA.
When signing an ICLA, your company may want to sign a CCLA - it's
entirely
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 5:33 AM, wrote:
>
> - "Henri Yandell" a écrit :
>
>> Though depends on what you're submitting. JIRA issues, no worries.
>> Just hit the checkbox each time you add a patch.
>>
>> If you become a committer, or if you&#x
Pointing this email out.
JIRA for Sanselan is a bit confusing; it needs a new version created
for the next release and the changes that are going in that version
should have a fix version set of that new version.
Ideally the 'what's in the next version?' question can be answered
with a link to JI
I find myself wondering if Net should move to the Attic - is anyone
active on it and likely to do a release?
-- Forwarded message --
From: sebb
Date: Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 4:28 PM
Subject: Re: How can I get Commons-net-2.1 Source and Binaries
To: Commons Users List
On 14 Octobe
Something else to consider is Stephen Colebourne's Joda Primitives:
http://joda-primitives.sourceforge.net/
Commons Primitives hasn't been touched since 2005 when Stephen was
active on the component. I think it's an Attic component (ie not being
worked on and no future releases expected).
Bcc to
IF standard?
>
> I haven't had a chance to look at this at all.
>
> Matthew
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> Pointing this email out.
>>
>> JIRA for Sanselan is a bit confusing; it needs a new version created
>> for
+1 to make a change; it really irritates on OS X when AWT takes over
control of the focus.
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm pretty sure lang3 isn't the only project that is affected, it's just
> the first one we've seen it. "we" ist the Gump project.
>
> Sande
Two options spring to mind; the first is to dig through the Apache
Incubator and look for a project that piques your interest. You can
quite quickly have a strong impact on a project there. "Your interest"
can be fairly vague; it might be that the language is one you want to
learn, it might be that
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 3:51 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 24 November 2010 11:02, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> On 2010-11-24, sebb wrote:
>>
>>> On 24 November 2010 09:46, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2010-11-22, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>>
> Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>>
>> The commons-lang3 builds fail[2]
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 3:51 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 24 November 2010 11:02, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>>> On 2010-11-24, sebb wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 24 November 2010 09:46, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
&
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
>
> On Dec 1, 2010, at 2:45 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
>> On 2010-12-01, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>
>>> I've fixed this in r1040879.
>>
>> I can confirm it is fixed for Gump as well. I removed all aw
+1.
Just like to point out that duplication of featureset is not an issue
in Commons.
Hen
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Lukasz Lenart
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I want to ask you all, is it possible to include OGNL
> (https://github.com/jkuhnert/ognl , http://www.opensymphony.com/ognl/
> ) into C
Or kick it off at apache-extras.org :)
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> Frank,
>
> why not propose this as another project?
> It requires more maintenance, that is true.
> Sandbox is designed for that, including to evaluate if there are user bases.
>
> I tend to feel your
-1 on enhancements in LANG 2.x; by which I mean that I personally am
not interested in spending effort on 2.x being anything other than a
critical bugfix legacy version.
Hen
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 8:21 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 12 January 2011 15:31, Ted Dunning wrote:
>> Why aren't the comparison
See JIRA :)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310481&fixfor=12311714&resolution=-1&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> See title.
>
> -Matt
>
> ---
Submitting the patch as a JIRA issue is also good:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> Bonjour Nicolas,
>
> The best way to do that is to contribute a patch including a battery of unit
> tests. You should do a local build to make s
.
Also need to look for TODO statements in the code; I think I have a
few in the translator stuff that I need to tidy up.
Hen
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> See JIRA :)
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=1
7;m thinking it should be punted to 3.1 and if the
solution involves incompatibility, it can wait for 4.0.
So mostly we need to look at LANG-462, and resolve the debate on LANG-624.
Hen
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> I took care of a few issues. 9 left to go; or they n
3 issues now, by punting the three non-blockers up to 3.1.
Mostly it means that we need to decide what to do on LANG-624 and then
get releasing.
Hen
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> And now down to 6 issues.
>
> 1 of them is a non-issue for release (JDK 1.7 has
The enum is less to do with Android and more to do with the float and
int APIs being bizarre. The enum is to have something more useable.
We could drop the enum and just go with String values.
Hen
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Stephen Colebourne
wrote:
> I have no philosophical problem with
Our own Gary Gregory being interviewed by Feathercast.org:
http://feathercast.org/?p=97
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Just beat me; 2 hours before I got my script running again! :)
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/lang-clirr/lang-clirr-report.html
I'll keep that going for the moment as it might be useful to keep that
as a 2.x to 3.x diff once we're using the main one for a 3.x to 3.0
diff.
When releasing 3.
To define a bar on exceptions; they need to be used by Commons Lang.
In 3.0 we've dropped the "this would be a better name for an
exception" exceptions as it's too easy for that to grow and grow.
Hen
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
> can you describe please in
Seeing this bug reported for the Nth time:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-371
I wonder if collections should be declared dead. It's a dumb bug,
(removeAll calling retainAll), and users have had to put up with it
for years now.
Hen
-
; project have been somewhat short of time for the past couple of years now.
> I just hate to see us retire it when we're *so* close to having 4.0
> ready aren't we?
>
> Matt
>
> On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 4:45 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
> wrote:
>
>> Release, th
Both the committer and PMC addition process happens on the private PMC
list so we can be candid, yet polite (knowing full well that people
can read the archives later on :) ).
The kick off for a vote is organic; either an existing member flags
that it should happen, or the individual in question h
The http://commons.apache.org/releases/prepare.html site seems to
imply that the latest way to build the zip/tar.gzs is with:
mvn -Prc -DcreateChecksum=true install
Running that, I don't get what I'd expect.
Thought I'd report that. For now I'm going to use assembly:assembly.
Hen
---
Thanks Martin and Gary - sorry for my screwup.
Very happy that you found the Caverphone code however Martin :)
Hen
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> The fix is in SVN and scheduled for inclusion in the upcoming Codec 1.5
> release.
>
> Thank you,
> Gary
>
> On Tue, Mar 1, 20
Looking to release 3.0; there's not been a lot of JIRA activity and
it's 9 months or so since we released the beta.
Downloads:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-RC1/
Maven repo entry:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-RC1/maven/
Website:
http://people.apache.or
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 4:01 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 3 March 2011 07:39, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> Looking to release 3.0; there's not been a lot of JIRA activity and
>> it's 9 months or so since we released the beta.
>>
>> Downloads:
>>
>> h
safe if the objects held inside are thread safe
> (javadoc).
>
> Range.containsRange() might be better named containsAll()
> Range.overlapsRange might be better named overlaps()
>
> Public constants on StringEscapeUtils do not have javadoc.
>
> The StringUtils.concat methods dup
Going through each.
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:59 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> I'm not overly enthused about some of the changes, but since I've not
> been paying attention its difficult for me to vote/block. Anyway here
> is my review:
>
> ArrayUtils.hashCode() has been removed, but it had diff
Is there a need for 1.0?
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 4:38 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Any though on splitting the class into two subclasses. One for cav
> 1.0, the other for 2.0?
>
> Gary
>
> On Mar 3, 2011, at 1:52, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>> Thanks Martin and Gary - sorry
seen a couple of papers that
> produce all sorts of stats for different codecs. Reading papers
> recently on cologne and cavedphone while looking for test data is
> where I found such stats for example.
>
> Gary
>
> On Mar 4, 2011, at 1:18, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 3:41 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> I now have authoristion from OpenGamma to discuss adding a Pair class
> to [lang] based on our internal classes. If necessary a CCLA can be
> signed, although since we are not necessarily importing the OpenGamma
> classes as is and I'd be
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> On 4 March 2011 17:15, sebb wrote:
>> On 4 March 2011 13:30, wrote:
>>> Log:
>>> Document mutability of UTC constant, which isn't ideal
>
>> AFAICT, it's not used within Lang3 - so why don't we just delete it ?
>>
>> Does it really off
+1 for you to go ahead and put something in. We can pull if it feels
that everything else is ready and Pair et al are not there yet.
Hen
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Stephen Colebourne
wrote:
> On 4 March 2011 18:35, Matt Benson wrote:
>> I agree that it would be nice to do whatever we're g
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Oliver Heger
wrote:
> Two minor points from my side:
>
> - There are still many checkstyle errors in the current code base.
Can be improved but nothing felt hugely critical. A large amount are
lines greater than 120 chars. Looks like SystemUtils has been
formatted
Should we be claiming trademark on 'Commons'?
Like Incubator & Attic it seems like something we want to continue
encouraging as a de facto standard instead of subjecting to trademark
protection.
Hen
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 12:47 PM, sebb wrote:
> I think the time has come to formally vote on the
+1.
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 5:17 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> +1
>
> If the project is indeed used by Struts and Tapestry (as claimed in
> the proposal), then I see no reason for objecting.
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Simone Tripodi
> wrote:
>> Hi all PMCs,
>> I prepared the OGNL[1] pr
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 3/12/11 10:41 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 12/03/2011 15:52, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 3/12/11 8:45 AM, sebb wrote:
On 12 March 2011 04:20, Phil Steitz wrote:
> I thought we had agreed that we are not going to do this, i.e.,
>
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 3/13/11 10:28 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 13/03/2011 16:45, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On Mar 13, 2011, at 1:24 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 12/03/2011 18:03, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 3/12/11 10:41 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 12/03/
Here's the remaining list that I know of for 3.0:
1) The thread on Pair appears to have quietened down and there's code
in svn. Considering this [DONE].
2) Oliver proposed the translators be modified to accept a Range as
the API. Might be possible.
3) Stephen pointed out there were methods with
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> 4) Stephen urged that we revisit StringUtils to see what else can move
> to CharSequence.
>
> 5) Stephen recommended that CharSequenceUtils move into StringUtils.
> This seems fair, CharSequenceUtils is never going to get a l
a String? How does that even
> compile?
>
> Gary
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 3:08 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>
>> > 4) Stephen urged that we revisit StringUtils to see what else can move
>>
t; String toString(CharSequence cs)
>
> because the we do not need to add the method arg type to the method name. If
> we did, we should use:
>
> String charSequenceToString(CharSequence cs)
>
> which I do not like.
>
> Gary
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 3:08 A
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:08 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>> 4) Stephen urged that we revisit StringUtils to see what else can move
>> to CharSequence.
>>
>> 5) Stephen recommended that CharSequenceUtils move i
I'm happy to go with the 'fails "is a kind of"'. The real answer is
because Range.java was coded before Pair.java iirc :)
Range is quite possibly going to also have ranges that are unbound on
one of the sides. It also might need to supported negated Ranges, i.e.
the range is from -inf->lower-bound
if no one else gets to it - with a new baby
in the house that's going to depend very much on how calm she is.
Hen
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Stephen Colebourne
wrote:
> On 18 March 2011 03:56, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> Something occurred to me today. We're moving from Str
ring is returned, pass in CharSequence'.
Hen
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Agreed (apologies for the delay; life got, and is going to remain, very busy).
>
> We should remove the CharSequence code I added. We should also review
> the first batch of Char
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 6:44 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 1 April 2011 02:53, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 3/31/11 6:30 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> Just discovered that Clirr does not complain if the throws clause of a
>>> method or constructor is changed to add a new Exception.
>>> Seemed like a bug at first, but it
Warnings :)
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Any thoughts on fixing the 300+ checkstyle errors?
>
> Gary
>
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Simone Tripodi
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all guys!
>> we haven't released a new version of Apache Commons Discovery since
>> 2008 (!!!), since
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>
>> I've rolled the code back. Now I'm thinking the following are
>> candidates to roll back to String:
>>
>> public static String stri
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 4/4/11 2:18 PM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
I thought we had settled on '@author Apache Software Foundation',
>>> Did we? TBH I find that pretty pointless and nothing more than noi
+1 to all of the below.
The lesson from Lang imo is to charge in and just do it. It'll
generate ideas once people are free to consider backwards incompatible
changes. Rolling back is always possible if we decide we didn't really
justify a 2.0.
Look at what else is out there. Is the scope of Codec
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 4/4/11 2:18 PM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
>>>>> I thought we had settled on
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 5:13 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Apr 4, 2011, at 1:45, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>
>> Hi Gary!
>> I honestly even thought about it, so sorry! :( Since Discovery
>> activity has not been hight since 2008, I just thought adding the
>> missing generics support and nothing more :(
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:40 AM, wrote:
>
> - "Henri Yandell" a écrit :
>
>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 5:13 AM, Gary Gregory
>> wrote:
>> > On Apr 4, 2011, at 1:45, Simone Tripodi
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Gary!
&
Very late, but I've been a tad busy in the new-parent department.
Generally I agree with Phil's email. I don't really care though - I
recognize that my main pain with Nexus is a) the experience to know
not to trust magical systems & b) not being full of energy to follow
yet another build system ch
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 2:37 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 5 April 2011 09:32, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>
>>> [Side note; this is insane:
>>> http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-encryption.html - I vomit
>
If anyone wants their @author tag put back into Lang, then please feel
free to do so; or if you don't have commit access send me an email and
I'll gladly do it.
Hen
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> I guess I'll never understand the hate for this tag. If you don't like it,
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 05/04/2011 11:59, Simone Tripodi a écrit :
>>
>> Hi all guys!
>> I think we all should agree on adopting a common policy, it shouldn't
>> be dependent by who takes care of a component.
>> I see different opinion about @version tag usage,
Sorry - this is/was me being opinionated that Checkstyle doesn't
report errors, it reports warnings.
Hen
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 4:57 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Gary
>> Warnings :)
>
> Hm. The top of the report says 0 warnings and 329 errors.
> Gary
>
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Gary Gre
StringUtils is ready now I believe.
The 7 methods on the end have now been moved to the resurrected
CharSequenceUtils class. It only has 1 public class, but I think the
other methods can be added over time. Not something to block 3.0 on,
but they seem useful [in that they've been useful for String
I've been pondering the tension between stability and innovation.
Once 3.0 is out I'd like to add an alpha subpackage:
org.apache.commons.lang-alpha
It's specifically a location of code that is:
a) Not linked to a version. When we move to 4.0 it does not change.
b) Does not offer backward
Deja Vu time.
Collections is dead. I hereby give notice that there are a few basic
classes in Collections that I want to copy into Lang and genericize
(ComparableComparator, ReverseComparator etc - dull stuff instead of
serious data structures).
Vision-wise I'm seeing that as Lang 3.1 (i.e. JIRA'
1 - 100 of 1072 matches
Mail list logo
