On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 3:51 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 24 November 2010 11:02, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote: >> On 2010-11-24, sebb wrote: >> >>> On 24 November 2010 09:46, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> On 2010-11-22, Jörg Schaible wrote: >> >>>>> Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> >>>>>> The commons-lang3 builds fail[2] and too me it looks as if this was >>>>>> because AWT is not running in headless mode, >> >>>> confirmed by passing -DargLine=-Djava.awt.headless=true to mvn - the >>>> builds now pass. >> >>>>>> I am suprised the problem doesn't show up in the other CI builds. >> >>>> Still surprised 8-) >> >>>> It doesn't show up inside Gump on Linux or FreeBSD running OpenJDK or >>>> the FreeBSD port of Sun's VM either - maybe this codebase's AWT detects >>>> there is no X-Server and switches to headless mode without any help. >> >>> Or are those nodes running a frame buffer (I think that is the correct >>> name)? >> >> I don't recall installing Xvfb (the X server running in a virtual frame >> buffer) but it could have been pulled in as a dependency - and I'm >> pretty sure we don't start it even if it is installed. No, I don't >> think the builds have any X server to connect to. >> >>> Since there are headless hosts, maybe code which is supposed to be >>> able to run anywhere (e.g. LANG) needs to take this into account? >> >>> I.e. Perhaps MacGump has found a bug in Lang? >> >> The tests that failed are the ones for the event package. I don't see >> any uses of AWT in the main code but the tests use AWT classes >> (ActionEvent and ActionListener). It seems as if the static initializer >> of either class already requires a working window system on a Mac - it >> may not be required on OpenJDK's AWT. >> >> I don't think the lang3 code requires a window system - so no bug in the >> main code - but its tests do. > > IMO the tests should then be fixed (I may have time to look later). > > If there is a suitable alternative to the AWT events then use that, > otherwise allow for the test failure when running headless. > > Seems to me it's more useful for Gump to point out these problems than > to try and hide them.
+1. Perhaps: javax.naming.event.ObjectChangeListener javax.naming.event.NamingEvent Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
