On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I've rolled the code back. Now I'm thinking the following are
>> candidates to roll back to String:
>>
>> public static String stripAccents(CharSequence input) {
>> public static String capitalize(CharSequence cs) {
>> public static String uncapitalize(CharSequence cs) {
>>
<snip>
>>
>> Basic rules being 'if String is returned, then String should be passed
>> in' and 'if other than String is returned, pass in CharSequence'.
>
> Like it. +1
I've rolled back capitalize and uncapitalize. I'm leaving stripAccents
as it sits on top of an underlying API that is CharSequence based -
ie) the JDK has already declared a CharSequence in; String out
behaviour.
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
