Three changes of interest. Two are the removal of final on public methods. The other is the addition of Serializable to StrBuilder.
Which is the worry? And is it a big enough worry to not keep the change? Hen On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 6:07 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Fire it up! :) > > Despite what Clirr reports, are the changes really binary compatible? > > Gary > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 2:48 AM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Of course, I mean 3.2. :) >> >> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Heads up that I'm thinking that 3.3 is ready to be released. 10 issues >> > resolved in trunk. >> > >> > Hen >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > > -- > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org > JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0 > Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
