[Clamav-users] Clamd was NOT notified

2010-04-26 Thread Mark
notified." What changed that could cause this? Thanks, - Mark ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamd was NOT notified

2010-04-26 Thread Mark
-Original Message- From: clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net [mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf Of Dennis Peterson Sent: dinsdag 27 april 2010 3:12 To: ClamAV users ML Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Clamd was NOT notified On 4/26/10 6:01 PM, Mark wrote: > >

Re: [Clamav-users] No debian woody support anymore?

2010-05-03 Thread Mark
d anti-virus product? Probably. Is it any of your business? No. The sensible thing would have simply been for freshclam to stop pulling in new updates from set date, and log a warning each day or some such. Yet wilfully sabotaging services on another person's system was inc

Re: [clamav-users] daily database broken again

2011-03-09 Thread Mark
I'm still running 0.96. No errors, but I did notice my clamd process shot up in memory to about 5x its normal size (it has "Loaded 915868 signatures.") What's up with that? Did a whole lot of new sigs get added overnight? Or is something else the matter? - Mark -Origin

RE: [Clamav-users] Upgrade to .90? - Update

2007-03-12 Thread Mark
functionality level = 13, recommended = 14" Probably because the clamav distro (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/security/clamav/) is 11 days old. That's not clamav's fault, of course, but leaves FreeBSD users exactly nowhere at the moment. - Mark _

RE: [Clamav-users] clamav log file mystery on 0.90.1

2007-03-14 Thread Mark
log file. > > > When I change the permissions on /var/log/clam-update.log to > 0666 it works OK. > This error has only occurred since I updated from 0.88.7 to 0.90.1 > Any ideas on what I have got wrong? Did you put this in its new format? (with booleans). "AllowSupplementa

[Clamav-users] ClamAV hanging under medium-high load

2007-10-11 Thread mark
doesn't seem to prod it back into life. Does anyone have any experiences similar to this or ideas as to how to go about debugging the problem? It didn't appear in the lab with 40 simultaneous connections, and only appears during the peak hours, so it's a bit difficult to reproduce but I&#

Re: [Clamav-users] Phishing feature defaults, naming, and 0.92

2007-11-27 Thread Mark
Hmm, i'm just in the process of upgrading from 0.88.7 to 0.91.2 (FreeBSD). "The difference in accuracy between what we were used to and the newer version was so large that it fundamentally changed the nature of the product," do you mean that in a bad way? I've been postponing an upgrade a bit, as t

Re: [Clamav-users] Phishing feature defaults, naming, and 0.92

2007-11-27 Thread Mark
Thanks. Just doing a major stress test for it, and it's doing fine so far. :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of P A Marshall - Unix/Network administrator Sent: dinsdag 27 november 2007 13:19 To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net Subject: Re: [C

Re: [Clamav-users] Phishing feature defaults, naming, and 0.92

2007-11-27 Thread Mark
er than staying with 0.88. Thanks. Yes, I've been reading up on the potential "PhishingScanURLs" issues. Well, I can always turn that feature on again if I need to. For now I'm mainly testing its stability in terms of thread safety, possib

Re: [Clamav-users] Phishing feature defaults, naming, and 0.92

2007-11-27 Thread Mark
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jef moskot Sent: dinsdag 27 november 2007 13:59 To: ClamAV users ML Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Phishing feature defaults, naming, and 0.92 On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Mark wrote: > Hmm, i'm just in the pr

Re: [Clamav-users] Phishing feature defaults, naming, and 0.92

2007-11-27 Thread Mark
here in such a way that clamscan is called in case the clamd socket should have disappeared for some reason, or clamd should otherwise be unresponsive (I know, that failsafe measure is perhaps a bit far-fetched, but still). I'll make the necessary changes to add the override flag

[Clamav-users] No stats for Database check - forcing reload

2007-11-27 Thread Mark
oo; it was 43.168 MB, and now, after half an hour, it's already at 45.280. - Mark ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Re: [Clamav-users] Documentation patch.

2007-12-13 Thread Mark
, mail which is sent to EMAILADDRESS is by definition accepted for delivery; hence, per definition not rejected; hence, no documentation change required. :) - Mark ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.92

2007-12-17 Thread Mark
Anyone done this on FreeBSD yet? http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/security/clamav/ Is a no-show. - Mark ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.92

2007-12-17 Thread Mark
.so && ln -s libclamav.so.3.0.3 libclamav.so; }; }) Hmm, maybe because milter is looking for libclamav.so.3, whereas symlinks seems to be made for libclamav.so.3.0.3 only? - Mark ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.92

2007-12-18 Thread Mark
Thanks, Matthias Usually, via the ports system, I see a lot of FreeBSD specific patches under ./files -- are you sure I can ignore those? I will give it a try, though. - Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthias Häker Sent: dinsdag

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.92

2007-12-18 Thread Mark
e code? Precisely because 0.92 isn't in de ports yet. :) - Mark ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.92

2007-12-18 Thread Mark
h is available as of just now: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=118814 Thank you very much! :) Now I can safely deal with this before the holidays. - Mark ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net h

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.92

2007-12-18 Thread Mark
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gerard Sent: dinsdag 18 december 2007 14:32 To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.92 > On December 18, 2007 at 07:52AM Mark wrote: > > > Precisely wh

[Clamav-users] ScanRAR?

2007-12-18 Thread Mark
b/libclamunrar.so.3 (0x2823b000) So, how do I re-enable ScanRAR then? Thanks - Mark ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Re: [Clamav-users] ScanRAR?

2007-12-19 Thread Mark
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tomasz Kojm Sent: woensdag 19 december 2007 11:40 To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] ScanRAR? On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 06:55:59 GMT Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hmm

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.92 and memory usage

2007-12-20 Thread Mark
arely are), this is the sort of thing that makes me think I wouldn't have minded if 0.92 had been released early January instead. :) But thanks for the patch anyway. - Mark ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.

Re: [Clamav-users] Clam bugs/vulns (was Re: Tomasz, you're an id iot, and you don't even know it)

2008-01-03 Thread Mark
r bug -- especially since the TS initially failed to realize there was randomness, after all (though it could be improved upon). I see no realistic possibilities for exploits. But I'm of course open to hearing how someone thinks a realistic attack could be mounted with it. - Mark _

Re: [Clamav-users] Clam bugs/vulns (was Re: Tomasz, you're an id iot, and you don't even know it)

2008-01-03 Thread Mark
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David F. Skoll Sent: donderdag 3 januari 2008 19:28 To: ClamAV users ML Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Clam bugs/vulns (was Re: Tomasz, you're an id iot, and you don't even know it) > Mark wrote:

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd eating too much cpu resource

2008-03-03 Thread Mark
Try kill -9 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Par Sent: dinsdag 4 maart 2008 8:31 To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net Subject: [Clamav-users] clamd eating too much cpu resource hi, i'm having high cpu usage from clamd:

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd eating too much cpu resource

2008-03-03 Thread Mark
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Par Sent: dinsdag 4 maart 2008 8:31 To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net Subject: [Clamav-users] clamd eating too much cpu resource > /usr/local/etc/rc.d/clamav-clamd) Besides, that hardly looks lik

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav 0.93 on FreeBSD 4

2008-05-03 Thread Mark
rsion found at the cvs? http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/security/clamav/ Thanks, - Mark ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav 0.93 on FreeBSD 4

2008-05-03 Thread Mark
-Original Message- From: Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: zondag 4 mei 2008 6:18 To: 'ClamAV users ML' Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] clamav 0.93 on FreeBSD 4 > > I tries and it works here, too. However I wasn't able to find it > > before you answered me.

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav 0.93 on FreeBSD 4

2008-05-03 Thread Mark
xt version will compile/work again. It's always a gamble. But, then again, it STILL works on my FreeBSD 4.11, so I guess I shouldn't complain. :) - Mark ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurk

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav 0.93 on FreeBSD 4

2008-05-04 Thread Mark
y of the clamav makers to try and not break things too radically, or change around unnecessarily. I, for one, would be thoroughly screwed without clamav, as there's nothing, in the UNIX market at least, that comes even come close to clamav. So, yes, I consider myself lucky. :) - Mark

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav 0.94.1 not working under FreeBSD 5.5

2008-11-22 Thread Mark
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Odhiambo Washington Sent: vrijdag 14 november 2008 13:59 To: ClamAV users ML Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav 0.94.1 not working under FreeBSD 5.5 > Bah. Upgrade your ports and edit the port Makefile. Del

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav 0.94.1 not working under FreeBSD 5.5

2008-11-22 Thread Mark
-Original Message- From: Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: zondag 23 november 2008 7:31 To: 'ClamAV users ML' Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav 0.94.1 not working under FreeBSD 5.5 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf O

Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?

2009-03-28 Thread Mark
http://www.stopbadware.org/home/topsites, but I can't get any URL to match. :( You'd think someone at Google had the foresight to provide a test-URL. - Mark ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clama

Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?

2009-03-30 Thread Mark
cal Thanks. Yeah, I tried within a=href as well. Problem just is I can't find any URL that will match. Even tried numerous sites against: http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site= But so far I can't come up with any 'known' bad URL that will match. - Mark ___

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 compile problem on FreeBSD 4.8

2009-04-01 Thread Mark
at you're doing,) as the ports usually contain specific, local FreeBSD patches. I'm still using a FreeBSD 4.11 system myself, and so far so good. :) For stuff that won't compile any more, what's to stop you from going to /usr/po

Re: [Clamav-users] zlib 1.2.2 released

2004-11-15 Thread mark
y for virii? Or scan your Windows files over an SMB mount from your Linux box? Or ... Cheers, mark -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ . .

[Clamav-users] Libraries or binaries?

2005-03-01 Thread Mark
hem all. I just hope clamd is not shelling out to these executables for archives tests. Ick. That would be mighty expensive calls. Or is it just using their libraries? Thanks, - Mark ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

RE: [Clamav-users] Tool to upgrade

2005-03-02 Thread Mark
/local/lib/libgmp.so.6 And curl libraries, and such. But, as far as I can tell, really only libclamav.so.1 would have to be updated on a new engine. Is this route advisable? Maybe not; but doable? I think so. - Mark ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

RE: [Clamav-users] Tool to upgrade

2005-03-02 Thread Mark
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Matt Fretwell > Sent: woensdag 2 maart 2005 11:43 > To: ClamAV users ML > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Tool to upgrade > > > Mark wrote: > > > MySQL distribu

RE: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.83 - Stream scanning timeout

2005-03-04 Thread Mark
many times - "its fixed in the CVS"! Maybe its time for a new release? :) - Mark ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

RE: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.83 - Stream scanning timeout

2005-03-07 Thread Mark
anMail option to avoid future recurrences > but am aware this may be letting some viruses in > (eg in bounce messages). I wrap the ClamAV check in an "alarm" breakout eval call. I give it 5 minutes. If it is not done by then, then I figure something is wrong. Trust is good; b

RE: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.83 - Stream scanning timeout

2005-03-07 Thread Mark
close to nothing about SESSION/END, and certainly does not speak of a "pause". In fact, if "pause" is really meant, in the manner you quote, then this would be a horridly silly programming implementation. :) Unless it is to mean something like "Wait for it to return OK". Otherwise, I can do nothing with "pause". - Mark ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

RE: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.83 - Stream scanning timeout

2005-03-08 Thread Mark
imeout\n" }; alarm 2; die "Oops!\n"; }; } clam_test (); print "Back!\n"; sleep 4; print "Made it past the signal!\n"; exit 0; --- - Mark ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

RE: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.83 - Stream scanning timeout

2005-03-08 Thread Mark
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd Lyons > Sent: dinsdag 8 maart 2005 0:23 > To: 'ClamAV users ML' > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.83 - Stream scanning timeout > > > Mark wanted us

RE: [Clamav-users] Two persistent problems with clamav

2005-03-09 Thread Mark
27; or something. > /usr/local/lib//usr/local/lib/libclamav.so.1. That path looks odd. Are you sure there is not some symlink at work here? - Mark ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

RE: [Clamav-users] Re: Two persistent problems with clamav

2005-03-09 Thread Mark
account, as > a cronjob. That sounds very plausible to me. :) Clever thinking. It might also account for his permission problems (as the cron environment for that user may differ). Trying "crontab -u clamav -l" might prove quite revealing. :) The plot thickens. - Mark _

RE: [Clamav-users] Re: Two persistent problems with clamav

2005-03-09 Thread Mark
e with this, the log shows two different processes > running, both as daemon. > > Could the start script run freshclam twice? Or could /usr/local/etc/rc.d/ contain two differently named startup scripts? That would do it, too. :) - Mark _

RE: [Clamav-users] clamAV 0.83 milter discard infected message...

2005-03-17 Thread Mark
quarantining, stop forwarding > to someone? I think he means SMFIS_DISCARD, as defined in the Milter protocol. Simply put: accepting the message (250 2.0.0), but silently throwing it away anyway. - Mark System Administrator Asarian-host.org

RE: [Clamav-users] Virus not identified in /var/spool/mqueue

2005-03-17 Thread Mark
+ body format). You should scan in /var/mail/ or something. But better, of course, to scan prior to delivery (scanning in /var/mail/ could create a race condition, where a pop client reads from the mbox file before you could scan it). - Mark System Administrator Asarian-host.org ---

RE: [Clamav-users] Can't unlink the pid file /var/run/clamd.pid

2005-03-22 Thread Mark
sions in /var/run/. And no, you should not give clamav those permissions; instead, create a sub-dir, if you will, underneath, like /var/run/clamav/, chmod 700 this dir, and chown clamav:clamav, and put the pid and socket in there. - Mark ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

RE: [Clamav-users] "Mirrors are not fully synchronized."

2005-04-06 Thread Mark
pr 7 01:38:59 2005 main.cvd is up to date (version: 30, sigs: 31086, f-level: 4, builder: tkojm) daily.cvd updated (version: 810, sigs: 1455, f-level: 4, builder: ccordes) Database updated (32541 signatures) from db.nl.clamav.net (IP: 195.85.130.84) Clamd successfully notified about the update. As

RE: [Clamav-users] Bagle-BB.rar

2005-04-14 Thread Mark
upgrade again. As a rule, I do not bother with 'devel' versions (an anti-virus program should, because of its often deeply ingrained use in the mail system, always be stable, IMHO). So I must say I am a bit distressed to hear that the current stable version (still 0.83) does not do the job an

RE: [Clamav-users] clamd segfaulting as of about thursday

2005-05-03 Thread Mark
the last few days were favorable). And it was a breeze. Took a grand total of less than 5 minutes. ;) In that regard, of course, there is really no valid excuse to still be running 0.80, methinks. - Mark System Administrator Asarian-host.org

[Clamav-users] Can't Compile Clam on OPENBSD 3.3 STABLE

2003-08-23 Thread Mark
e 184 of Makefile). So what's wrong? mfg. Mark --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine. WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the

[Clamav-users] Proxy and Scanning?

2003-08-26 Thread Mark
Is it possible to scan the traffic (via plug in or so) with SQUID or an SOCKS-Proxy (like Dante)? If not: Feature Request -> TrafficScan via PlugIN, own mod or Daemon :) Mark p.s. How to install UNRAR 3.xx on OpenBSD 3.3 STABLE? I can't use the Antivirus because the prcompilered

[Clamav-users] A lot of Virii-Stuff

2003-09-24 Thread Mark
me all virii who're not include into my archive. Is that acceptable? Sorry for my bad english ;) Mark --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf

[Clamav-users] A lot of Virii-Stuff

2003-09-26 Thread Mark
chive back from some people I know (hope they remember me after all the time *g*). Mark p.s. Please make ClamAV compilable under openBSD 3.3/3.4 (1. nov.) --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek We

Re: [Clamav-users] A lot of Virii-Stuff

2003-09-27 Thread Mark
e happy if you're intrested in. Mark-- Scan started: Sun Sep 28 09:43:31 2003 /var/FTP/ftpuser/upload/test/f/fbvir.obj: DropBoot FOUND /var/FTP/ftpuser/upload/test/g/gollum.asm: W32/GriYo FOUND /var/FTP/ftpuser/upload/test/g/gpb.txt: BAT.Gpb FOUND /var/FTP

Re: [Clamav-users] A lot of Virii-Stuff

2003-09-27 Thread Mark
lot of other people which (or is it "who"? pls. correct me) use OpenBSD. :) Mark > Compile the unofficial port, it has all necessary patches to compile > under OpenBSD. > > http://www.activeintra.net/projects/clamav/ > > The port will use whatever version of unrar yo

[Clamav-users] Wrong Declaration & other querstion

2003-10-13 Thread Mark
What should I do if I know that a declaration in ClamAV is wrong? So like this: /var/FTP/ftpuser/upload/test/c/CHAOS.COM: Spyer #2 FOUND /var/FTP/ftpuser/upload/test/c/CHAOS1~1.COM: Spyer #2 FOUND /var/FTP/ftpuser/upload/test/c/CHAOS1~1.EXE: Spyer #2 FOUND /var/FTP/ftpuser/upload/test/c/CHAOS1~2.

[Clamav-users] Requesting another declaration

2003-10-13 Thread Mark
Is it possible to SORT the clam-av-db? /var/FTP/ftpuser/upload/test/e/EAREAR~1.COM: Ear FOUND /var/FTP/ftpuser/upload/test/e/EAREAR~1.EXE: PS-MPC.Ear.1024.c FOUND /var/FTP/ftpuser/upload/test/e/EAREAR~2.COM: Ear #1 FOUND /var/FTP/ftpuser/upload/test/e/EARHOM~1.COM: Homecoming FOUND /var/FTP/ftpuse

Re: [Clamav-users] Clean Viruses?

2003-11-03 Thread Mark
"school boys" (which codes for C64, Apple2 and so on) are coding without a mass-destruction-instruction into the virus/worm ... So it was... long time ago, here in my country. mfg. Mark (aka Rembrandt..) --- This SF.net email is sp

Re: [Clamav-users] Clean Viruses?

2003-11-03 Thread Mark
>While Kaspersky is a wise choice you'll be doing many people a favour if >you would submit samples to other av-products (including ClamAV). Yes but it's not the way I like to go... >> Just an idiot..sorry... >Please keep the discussion on a civil level. My fault, I'm sorry.. >> In my archive

Re: [Clamav-users] Clean Viruses?

2003-11-03 Thread Mark
> Hello Mark, > > M> Ok heremy 2 cents: > > M> The sourcemashine is a LINUX which is infected and the target mashine is an > M> oBSD with compat_linux in the kernel. > M> So let's think about this situation.. > > yes, let´s start to think for a change &g

Re: [Clamav-users] Clean Viruses?

2003-11-03 Thread Mark
> On Monday 03 November 2003 10:42 pm, Mark wrote: > > > Cleaning is one of the most needed functions I think. > > Please can you explain why you think this? > > I agree that ten years ago it was worthwhile removing the bootsector viruses > from floppies, or some of t

Re: [Clamav-users] Clean Viruses?

2003-11-05 Thread Mark
> On Wed, 05 Nov 2003 at 23:40:09 +0800, Lars Hansson wrote: > > On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 18:59, Tomasz Papszun wrote: > > > > > Well, not exactly. We (the database developers) do _not_ give viruses > > > to anyone who would want them. It's just too dangerous contents. > > > > Hmm..I thought he was ta

Re: [Clamav-users] Clean Viruses?

2003-11-06 Thread Mark
>> > > Hmm..I thought he was talking about the signatures not the actual >> > > viruses themselves. >> > >> > No, he was talking about real viruses! :-) That's the problem. >> >> Yes I was and I've no problem with this fact. >> And I told Tomasz that I'm ready to upload the archive via a secure >>

[Clamav-users] (no subject)

2003-11-12 Thread Mark
I scaned my archive with the new CLAMAV (Thanks to the man who wrote the Script for the installation under OpenBSD 3.4) and I saw "some" FALSE-Positives. So please write me a mail Tomasz Kojm couse my smtp told me that your server wont accept my adress. :o)

Re: [Clamav-users] Building ClamAV 0.65 on OpenBSD 3.4 -- HOWTO

2003-11-13 Thread Mark
m aqui capaz de falar é língua nativa? So I hope you understand my point of view Next time I will ask a friend (also a guy from poland) for a translation... mfg. Mark --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, 16-19 November in L

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

2003-11-13 Thread Mark
r 500MB via a CGI-Script.. I'm not crazy So I'm sorry :o) [..] >Best regards, >Tomasz Kojm mfg. Mark --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest developments i

Re: [Clamav-users] Building ClamAV 0.65 on OpenBSD 3.4 -- HOWTO

2003-11-13 Thread Mark
> On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 at 12:25:08 +0100, Mark wrote: > > [snip] > > > > >Pozdrawiam, > > >Tomasz Kojm > > > > Nothing personal but is it possible to speak/write ONLY english... > [...] > > In case someone else isn't sure: that mes

RE: [Clamav-users] Upgrade to 0.85 or wait for 0.86

2005-05-12 Thread Mark
to do more thorough pre-release testing themselves, but this is just an excuse for not doing their own homework." It sure were nice if we could assume the absence of laziness on either side of the fence. - Mark System Administrator Asarian-host.org --- "If you were su

RE: [Clamav-users] Re: Follow-up on clamav-milter not mailing noticeto postmaster

2005-05-14 Thread Mark
. That is your prerogative. I, on the other hand, would never configure sendmail in that fashion. Clamav-scans are a critical part of mail delivery. I would never allow mail to be delivered when the virus scanner is down, and would indeed TempFail delivery until I restarted the daemon (via a watchd

Re: [Clamav-users] Arrogance toward well-meaning participants (was: undetected malwares)

2005-06-06 Thread mark
eal world, though, most people are lucky to have one of the four attributes listed above. If you get two. Excellent. Three? Wow. Everybody should lower their drama setting. :-) Cheers, mark -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter seems unstable with 0.87

2005-09-23 Thread Mark
cesses that have been *idle* for over 10 minutes. > I figure if someone can't get a message to me in 2 hours of connect > time, I almost certainly don't want said message. But with this blanket kill, you also kill connections that may have just been there for a few seconds,

[Clamav-users] OnOutdatedExecute

2005-10-04 Thread Mark
unction of some sort were part of the standard package. Thanks, - Mark System Administrator Asarian-host.org --- "If you were supposed to understand it, we wouldn't call it code." - FedEx ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

RE: [Clamav-users] OnOutdatedExecute

2005-10-04 Thread Mark
age. > > http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=356974 Short and sweet. :) Thank you! - Mark System Administrator Asarian-host.org --- "If you were supposed to understand it, we wouldn't call it code." - FedEx ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

RE: [Clamav-users] OnOutdatedExecute

2005-10-06 Thread Mark
> -Original Message- > From: Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: dinsdag 4 oktober 2005 11:48 > To: 'ClamAV users ML' > Subject: RE: [Clamav-users] OnOutdatedExecute > > > > Hello, > > > > > > Is there any word/progress

RE: [Clamav-users] OnOutdatedExecute

2005-10-07 Thread Mark
> > -Original Message- > > From: Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: dinsdag 4 oktober 2005 11:48 > > To: 'ClamAV users ML' > > Subject: RE: [Clamav-users] OnOutdatedExecute > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > &

RE: [Clamav-users] Performance problem with 0.87

2005-10-25 Thread Mark
c library into a different directory, so that the newly compiled clamd tries to use the old one. At any rate, if it were me, I'd like to get to the bottom of this first, before I went 'static'. YMMV, though. - Mark ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

RE: [Clamav-users] Problem: clamd dead but subsys locked

2005-11-09 Thread Mark
e . > > Stop the xinetd - and the restart all again - it > will WORK :) What has CLAM got to do with xinetd? I can for the life of me not imagine why CLAM, milter or stand-alone daemon, would depend for anything on xinetd. And what has sendmail got to do with xinetd, for that mat

Re: [Clamav-users] [OT] Top posting is harmful. (Was: Clamd Problem.)

2005-12-18 Thread mark
things, such as the length of my signature. I think the phrase "get a life" applies. :-) The poster who caused this thread might have responded to the wrong post. Big deal. Get over it. Cheers, mark -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL

Re: [Clamav-users] [OT] Top posting is harmful. (Was: Clamd Problem.)

2005-12-18 Thread mark
ers of 'top posting' rants has been significant enough to annoy me more than the people who actually top post. Users shouldn't be so abused. Members of the community shouldn't be abused. It's highly offensive, and discouraging. If you find this post of mine

Re: [Clamav-users] [OT] Top posting is harmful. (Was: Clamd Problem.)

2005-12-18 Thread mark
d into a volcano. Great job. The world is a better place now, with all the education being passed around in an encouraging and constructive fashion. Cheers, mark -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ . . _ ._ . . .__.

[Clamav-users] extra-patch-libclamav__unrarlib.h not found?

2006-04-13 Thread Mark
for clamav-0.88.1 ===> Applying extra patch /temp/clamav/files/extra-patch-libclamav__unrarlib.h ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for clamav-0.88.1 -e: not found *** Error code 127 Stop in /temp/clamav. Now, what is going on? The extra-patch-libclamav__unrarlib.h ce

SOLVED (was: RE: [Clamav-users] extra-patch-libclamav__unrarlib.h not found?)

2006-04-13 Thread Mark
; Yeah; I'm building from the CVS tarball you indicated. But I have the full ports distribution, of course. That has always worked. At any rate, I downloaded the entire ports again, and now everything work again. Pfew. :) Thanks anyway! - Mark ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

RE: [Clamav-users] Cherishing my ignorance - An appeal to package rs

2006-11-11 Thread Mark
;point-and-click". Not that I never asked a question here; but I think there's a difference between asking a normal question, and cherishing one's ignorance. - Mark ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

RE: [Clamav-users] How to run clamscan for a list of files from afile?

2006-11-29 Thread Mark
cal POP server to retrieve mail. It has the advantage that you don't need to have clamd running as root (and I use the same POP protocol to then delete individually infected messages, too). - Mark ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: vi

[Clamav-users] Curl-trouble on for clamav-0.88.7_1

2006-12-15 Thread Mark
have the very latest ports version. Thanks, - Mark ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

RE: [Clamav-users] Re: Curl-trouble on for clamav-0.88.7_1

2006-12-15 Thread Mark
cember 15, 2006 at 06:49:42 (AM) Mark wrote: > > > I'm having trouble with curl on FreeBSD 4.11 and clamav-0.88.7_1: > > > > ===> Compressing manual pages for curl-7.15.5_1 > > ===> Running ldconfig > > /sbin/ldconfig -m /usr/local/lib > &

RE: [Clamav-users] Re: Curl-trouble on for clamav-0.88.7_1

2006-12-15 Thread Mark
th: > > % pkg_which /usr/local/lib/libcurl.so.4 > curl-7.16.0 > > you should update all of the ports which clamav depends upon by > using portupgrade, portmaster, or a similar utility. Which was my point: yesterday I grabbed and untarred the ENTIRE ports collection, and it

RE: [Clamav-users] Re: Curl-trouble on for clamav-0.88.7_1

2006-12-16 Thread Mark
y updated your ports tree. I get my ports directly from: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/ports/ports.tar.gz That is the official URL (not cvs). And today it is STILL at curl-7.15.5. Seriously; just redownloaded the whole thing. - Mark __

RE: [Clamav-users] Re: Curl-trouble on for clamav-0.88.7_1

2006-12-16 Thread Mark
> -Original Message- > From: Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: zaterdag 16 december 2006 10:37 > To: 'ClamAV users ML' > Subject: RE: [Clamav-users] Re: Curl-trouble on for clamav-0.88.7_1 > > > > The curl port (/usr/ports/ftp/curl) was update

RE: [Clamav-users] Re: Curl-trouble on for clamav-0.88.7_1

2006-12-16 Thread Mark
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Rob MacGregor > Sent: zaterdag 16 december 2006 20:21 > To: ClamAV users ML > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Re: Curl-trouble on for clamav-0.88.7_1 > > > On 12/16/06,

RE: [Clamav-users] DB Update email before actual update available?

2006-12-21 Thread Mark
ated startup/initialization cost). Just running a small daemonized freshclam (about 5M), which periodically does an extremely light-weight DNS query, is unbeatable in efficiency. - Mark ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.c

RE: [Clamav-users] Memory leak on x86_64!?

2006-12-23 Thread Mark
ime/smarts to process vmdk files, sorry. The real "smarts" are in running clamav within the virtual machine. :) - Mark ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

RE: [Clamav-users] DB Update email before actual update available?

2006-12-23 Thread Mark
). > At some point you just have to step back and take a simple approach, > especially when it's a simple problem. Exactly. :) - Mark ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

RE: [Clamav-users] Error compiling 0.90_2 on FreeBSD

2007-02-21 Thread Mark
e, please, please, I ask, try not and break things gratuitously. - Mark ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Re: [clamav-users] Introducing OpenSSL as a dependency to ClamAV

2014-02-28 Thread Mark Allan
As this is first time ClamAV has had an external dependency, would it be worth making it an opt-out configure option for people who can't get it to compile or who have to rely on an older/incompatible version of OpenSSL? Mark ___ Help us bu

  1   2   3   4   5   >