Hmm, i'm just in the process of upgrading from 0.88.7 to 0.91.2 (FreeBSD). "The difference in accuracy between what we were used to and the newer version was so large that it fundamentally changed the nature of the product," do you mean that in a bad way? I've been postponing an upgrade a bit, as the early 0.9x versions reported not entirely stable. But I had hoped that by now the problems would have been solved. Is that impression incorrect?
Thanks -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jef moskot Sent: dinsdag 20 november 2007 10:37 To: ClamAV users ML Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Phishing feature defaults, naming, and 0.92 On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Dennis Peterson wrote: > Perhaps they should issue a warning or advisory against re-using the > config files from previous versions as this has the potential to > introduce surprises. The surprise would still exist if you use clamscan and not clamdscan. This config file talk is a distraction from the basic point that the software changed in an extremely significant way, without appropriate warning. It wasn't a COMPLETE surprise, if you read the docs, but the difference in accuracy between what we were used to and the newer version was so large that it fundamentally changed the nature of the product, and that wasn't made sufficiently clear. _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
