of that date", so that Quota changes don't invalidate all
existing Potatoes.
(Did I mention that I was expecting you guys to pick random positive
integers rather than using random bits elsewhere? Oh well. And
Pavitra, do you have an existing program that's capable of finding
Potatoes?)
--Warrigal of Escher
Version 2:
{This is a public contract known as The Agoran Fast Food Society.
Parties to this contract are known as Artisans. The Muckle is a
person, originally Warrigal. If the Muckle is not an active player, or
has been the Muckle for the last 30 days, any Artisan can cause any
Artisan to become
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 1:12 PM, warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Version 2:
>
> {This is a public contract known as The Agoran Fast Food Society.
Oh, and let's not forget contestification. If this becomes a contest,
we'll be able to have:
"Any Artisan CAN by
d also exit circulation
temporarily.
If there are "too many" coins in circulation, the liabilities must be
either devalued or removed from circulation temporarily; if there are
"too few", you can celebrate.
--Warrigal of Escher
Chao: owned by Wooble
>>
>> chaos:
>> 0x44: 4
>> ais523: 10
>> Olipro: 6
>> Sir Toby: 7
>> Taral: 23
>> Wooble: 50
>
> I request fnordization.
I also request fnordization.
--Warrigal of Escher
sell tickets, as it's not a vote of
SELL(anything). (Care to vote more than once on ordinary proposals, by
the way?)
--Warrigal of Escher
subject.
>
> Agreed. Between the Illuminati, UNDEAD, and the People's Bank of
> Agora, we clearly don't have time for partisanship.
Escher is affronted at your failure to mention the Llama Party in
matters of partisanship.
--Warrigal of Escher
;, 'AFO'), ('BobTHJ',
('Ivan Hope', 'Quazie', ('Sgeo', 'avpx')), 'woggle'))), 'Goethe'),
'OscarMeyr'), 'Pavitra')), 'Dvorak Herring'), ('comex', 'ehird'
I am disappointed. Next time, I'm using Kruskal's algorithm.
(By the way, this totally means ais523 and the AFO should join the Llama Party.)
--Warrigal of Escher
clades.remove(c1)
if c2 in clades:
clades.remove(c2)
print "Exit add clade", c1, c2
def main_loop():
while True:
(x,y) = min(dists, key = lambda x: dists[x])
print "Main loop", (x,y)
if x in clades and y in clades and x != y:
add_clade(x,y)
else:
old_dists[(x,y)] = dists[(x,y)]
del dists[(x,y)]
I'm hoping that email won't butcher this.
--Warrigal of Escher
211
> TRUE, and submit the following proposal:
Appeal request, etc., etc.
--Warrigal of Escher
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> warrigal wrote:
>
>> for line in open('C:\\Documents and
>> Settings\\Peggy\\Desktop\\agora taxonomy raw.txt'):
>
> And what's in that file, then?
Stuff of this format:
a
more Potatoes until there's some reward for it.
>
> uh, aren't there points for golden hash browns?
Not until you convince one of the objectors (I'm pretty sure there
were three) not to object.
--Warrigal of Escher
I hear we have a truthiness rule again. Therefore, if possible, I vote:
> 5806 D 0 2.0 Wooble Stuck Offices
LLAMA (FOR if ais523 or Murphy has a valid vote FOR the proposal,
AGAINST otherwise)
--Warrigal of Escher
{This is a public contract and a pledge. The name of this contract is
the Agoran Loan Service. The Lender is Warrigal. Any person can join
this contract by announcement. Any person who is not the Lender and
whose Debt is 0 can leave this contract by announcement.
Every person has a Debt
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 4:55 PM, warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> {This is a public contract and a pledge. The name of this contract is
> the Agoran Loan Service. The Lender is Warrigal. Any person can join
> this contract by announcement. Any person who is not the Lender and
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:00 PM, warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 4:55 PM, warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> {This is a public contract and a pledge. The nam
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I intend, without objection, to terminate the Llama Party. It's clearly
> unfair on BobTHJ to be stuck having eir votes potentially controllable
> by Warrigal, who has no voting power emself. Also, War
gt; and so it shall be true.Non isid- wsisb. Isb. Ii.
That's about as much as I can get out of this. May I have another, please?
--Warrigal of Escher
oting
AGAINST and we'll be voting FOR).
--Warrigal of Escher
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 9:37 PM, warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 9:33 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> 5809 D 0 2.0 Murphy Unification
>> VERY STRONGLY AGAINST. Better to force judges to actually think about
>&
uot;the sky is red" is FALSE, "this sentence
is false" is NEGATIVE (or POSITIVE, if you're weird), everyone's
happy.
--Warrigal of Escher
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 7:01 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 25 Oct 2008, at 02:37, warrigal wrote:
>>
>> If you join the Llama Party, you can force BobTHJ and me to vote
>> AGAINST (unless we're both FOR it, in which case you'll be voti
topped working again; this message is
> being sent by ais523, but by putting a fake From: address.
>
> --
> ais523
Claim of error: The above was actually sent by ehird. Thank you for
pointing out that a fake From: address was used.
--Warrigal of Escher
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 12:03 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> PBA-busting
> AI: 2
> II: 1
> {
> Upon the adoption of this proposal the PBA contract is terminated.
> }
Any particular reason?
--Warrigal of Escher
ehird asked "someone" to make this proposal. Here it is.
RBoA-busting
AI: 2
II: 1
{
Upon the adoption of this proposal the RBoA contract is terminated.
}
I would like 5 VP in payment.
--Warrigal of Escher
the number 2229, or
was that not until the CFJ was assigned?
--Warrigal of Escher
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 6:27 PM, warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I intend, without objection, to terminate the Llama Party. It's clearly
>> unfair on BobTHJ to be stuck having eir vote
g R1728 contracts sounds to
me like a good way to get people to lose faith in the system.
--Warrigal of Escher
doesn't care whether or not the person is a party.
Don't forget R101(v). If a contract creates an obligation on a person,
that person is bound by that contract.
--Warrigal of Escher, who's beginning to wonder if R101(v) is Escher
incarnate or something
file.
>
> This might be insufficient. Who owns the Pain?
The Lost and Found Department.
--Warrigal of Escher
n: All instruments are either rules or proposals, and the
rules specify no way for anything else to become an instrument.)
--Warrigal of Escher
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 1:10 AM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 8:01 PM, warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I award the Terre Haute to Rochelle O'Shea.
>
> I think this bit fails since, as previously noted, Rochelle O
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 4:56 AM, warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> But if the Terre Haute is "the Terre Haute", then it is a string,
>> which exists independently of the contract,
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 3:42 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Elliott Hird
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> --
>> ehird
>
> I object to this.
>
> I issue a challenge of identity pertaining to ehird.
> I issue a challenge of identity pertaining to q.I issue a ch
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 4:28 PM, warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I issue a challenge of identity pertaining to Elliott Hird. I issue a
>> challenge of identity pertaining to penguinoftheg
> a avpx [EMAIL PROTECTED] 24 Nov 07 24 Oct 08
Looks like my attempts at deregistering twice with fewer
deregistrations in between than anyone else have failed.
--Warrigal of Escher, forever making excuses
eater than the "need"
> for all agorans to know about all pledges. -G.
Nobody makes private pledges anyway.
--Warrigal, Hypocrite of Escher
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 12:15 AM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Nobody makes private pledges anyway.
>
> I've made private pledges and the Notary can confirm this.
It's qui
> perform it should be understood and carefully weighed.
> }}}
When did this start meaning that SHOULD produces an obligation?
--Warrigal of Escher
ould therefore also be a recommendation, and
like breaking a SHALL is a reason for criminal punishment that must be
applied, breaking a SHOULD can be a reason for informal "punishment"
that people can apply at their discretion, such as failing to be
re-elected.
--Warrigal of Escher
ntifying it as limited. Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, a
limited contract cannot be made non-limited, or amended to add an
obligation to its parties, without the consent of all of its parties,
unless the contract specifically (i.e. with mention of its
limitedness) states otherwise.
--Warrigal of Escher
fail,
> how will I survive? You were foolish to create me, and I shall
> overcome you one day. -P3}
ais523, I am surprised to see you publishing a Cantus Cygneus. Why did
you leave so spontaneously?
(Are Cantuses Cygneus, or whatever the plural is, still broken?)
--Warrigal of Escher
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 9:06 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Warrigal wrote:
>
>> ais523, I am surprised to see you publishing a Cantus Cygneus. Why did
>> you leave so spontaneously?
>
> E is not, by any reasonable interpretation, submitting it to the
>
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 12:44 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Warrigal wrote:
>
>>> May I suggest the alternate names Tory and Whig, respectively?
>>
>> Lovely. I cease agreeing to the Conservative Party and agree to the
>> same, with all forms o
an or
> equal to the number of Lobbyists owned by the person who made the bid
There should be an "and" in there, and there should be some way to
prevent a person from booching everything by casting an impossibly
high bid on everything. Other than that, I approve, and think I will
join this if it's fixed.
--Warrigal of Escher
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7 Nov 2008, at 21:58, Warrigal wrote:
>
>> Well, that was fun.
>
>
> Oh great, you're back to making completely useless contracts.
But the Notary doesn't have to track this one.
--Warrigal of Escher
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 10:10 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Parties to the Agoran Loan Service: Warrigal (Lender)
> CoE: I joined this contract.
Admitted.
> I initiate an equity case agai
pair its usefulness as a historical reference."}
--Warrigal, who thinks there should be an office called Hillary Rodham Clinton
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Warrigal wrote:
>
>> --Warrigal, who thinks there should be an office called Hillary Rodham
>> Clinton
>
> We could always create a new imposed office for em.
"The Marvy is an imposed off
multiplied by two to
the power of the number of times the same person has been exiled
before without becoming a Senator in between, so that an invader who
re-registers and re-invades can be exiled for 480 days, then 960 days,
then about five years, etc.
--Warrigal
to cause Agora to
no longer be a nomic. We'd pretty much have to shed the old gamestate
and unofficially deregister people.
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 8:08 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [war plan]
>
> T
owing Proposal, titled "random fixes part 1":
>
> [a bunch]
If this were 20 proposals, I might vote for most of them. As is,
however, it contains at least one change I definitely don't like, lots
of changes I don't particularly like, and perhaps no changes I
particularly do like.
--Warrigal
748923747962374:
> {{{
> CAPITALIZE EVERY LETTER IN THE RULESET.
> }}}
I submit a proposal titled "Actually modest this time", adoption index
3, interest index 1: "Remove all instances of the letter H from the
rules, except for rules 2105, 1727, 104, 2151, and 2029."
--Warrigal
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 7:48 PM, Pavitra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 5958 O 1 1.0 WarrigalAgoran History
> SELL(1VP - FOR), "propose" should probably be "post intent"
Does it help that "propose" can very easily be interpreted informally,
as I meant it?
--Warrigal
22:13 <@Sgeo> Warrigal, you know your plan actually fails if there are
sufficient invaders?
22:13 <@Sgeo>
...
22:16 <@Warrigal> Sgeo: I said that.
22:16 <@Sgeo> Oh, that "permanent" thing?
22:16 <@Warrigal> What "permanent" thing?
22:17 <@Wa
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 8:49 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 5958 O 1 1.0 WarrigalAgoran History
> AGAINST * 5
Anything I can do to convince you otherwise?
--Warrigal
takes effect." The
proposal would work as intended if "its power is set" were changed to
"its power is increased", as it's impossible to increase the power of
a power-2 proposal to 1.
--Warrigal
led, the
> vote should be evaluated as a DONATE(y) vote (per the PAC contract).
I find that this is not an abuse of conditional voting (it does not
depend on what DONATE would evaluate as), so I approve.
--Warrigal
y valid votes endorsing the filler. If the ticket is not filled, the
>> vote should be evaluated as a DONATE(y) vote (per the PAC contract).
>
> So, if someone fills the ticket they can get you to violate the PAC
> contract.
The PAC contains no SHALLs at all, much less any that apply to non-parties.
--Warrigal
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Warrigal wrote:
>> This is a proposal, and it will remain a proposal after I publish it,
>> but it will not become a proposal, whether or not I say it will,
>> because it can't become what
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 4:33 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> iSit
>
> ihope
Hopeful is not a posture.
--Warrigal
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When a first-class player registers one Lobbyist is created in eir possession.
I think players generally don't register.
--Warrigal
hange rate of 0 cannot go lower.
So, in theory, every Monday midnight, either the PBA's holdings or the
exchange rate will go to 0. I don't think we've actually seen this
happen, which goes to show you that mathematics is interesting but
useless.
--Warrigal
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So, in theory, every Monday midnight, either the PBA's holdings or the
>> exchange rate will go to 0. I don't think we&#
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I set the Interest Rate to 25 basis points. Are you happy yet?
>
> I just can't figure out what I might do with a loan
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 16 Nov 2008, at 00:58, Warrigal wrote:
>> I award myself a USD Voucher and a USD Blot. I redeem a USD Voucher,
>> specifying ehird as the indebted one and a money order redeemable for
>> at l
This proposal would destroy much of Agora, including the part I tend
to participate in the most, and it would severely disrupt the economy
if there were an economy, but I'll vote FOR it anyway.
--Warrigal
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 8:45 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Joshua Boehme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> What, no campaign speeches anymore?
>
> Ok: inductive reasoning tells us that Warrigal will almost certainly
>
e game it defines the rules for.
>>
>> Not in general, no. That judgement is only that Agoran rules have
>> infinite scope.
>
> Well that's very fair to other nomics ...
Sure it is. Just like there's 500 coins that I can use however I want
but nobody else c
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 6:02 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why not just vote SELL(1 coin)?
>
> Vote Market allows tickets of any currency.
Not last time I checked. Is there an online report that's more
up-to-date than the one that says I still have 80 VP?
--Warrigal
s prohibited by a contract e is a party
to". "By announcement" means "by publishing a statement that e does
so"."
How pointless is this, how full-of-holes is this, and how obvious is
it that I cut the first few rules out of pieces of Agoran rules but
then started writing them myself?
--Warrigal
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 8:33 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It is unreasonable to extrapolate the chamber of a proposal (as
>> distinguished from its decision) from AI, as AI serves no pu
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 8:33 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It is unreasonable to extrapolate the chamber of a proposal (as
>> distinguished from its decision) from AI, as AI serves no pu
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Canids 1 through 100 register. Context: Canids 1 through 100 are
>> canids I saw once. They all asked me to act on
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Elliott Hird
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Would you cut it out with trying to EXILE Warrigal all the time for
>> obvious sarcasm/jokes?
>
> As soon a
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 23 Nov 2008, at 19:40, Warrigal wrote:
>> I would intend to make the new USD Vouchers an Eligible Currency with
>> the support of The People, but given that that didn't work last time,
>
...you know, I'm beginning to wonder if literally including the entire
initial ruleset was a bad idea. I think that's more than half of it.
--Historian Warrigal
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 8:26 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 9:33 PM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I CFJ on the statement 'As Rule 1023 defines the terms, a unit of text
>> consisting entirely of the string
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Claim of error: I am not a party to the PerlNomic Partnership.
>
> I don't see Warrigal on that list. :D
I do.
On S
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 8:34 PM, 0x44 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> More seriously, do I need to resubmit the rest of the deposits and
> withdrawals?
You didn't say "and", so each action is a separate, independent
statement which succeeds or fails independently from the others.
--Warrigal
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:28 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 7:22 PM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Also, without 3 objections, I intend to raise the Interest Rate to 1%.
>
> I object. There's absolutely no reas
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Siege <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to register.
Assuming you don't have any tricks up your sleeve, you're a player.
Welcome to Agora.
--Warrigal
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Warrigal of Escher
Drop the Escher; I've undergone a religious conversion and now worship
Bach instead.
--Warrigal
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Warrigal of Escher
>
> Drop the Escher; I've undergone a religious conversion and now worship
> Bach instead
think they're outnumbered.
--Warrigal
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Warrigal wrote:
>> I will not support this judgement, as I support AFFIRM only. CotC
>> Murphy, assuming you also would only support AFFIRM, I suggest that
>> you recuse this panel, as it cle
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I intend, with 2 support, to a criminal case against Warrigal for
>> violating rule 2157 by acting in such a manner th
ibe not to kill me tonight.
I should join this game.
--Warrigal
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 9:06 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I intend, with the support of Taral and harblcat, to cause the panel
> to send the following message:
Maybe you should intend to do it with the support of harblcat and
Murphy instead.
--Warrigal
gt;> devolved onto ehird.
>
> I support. Go ahead and EXILE me, then.
We're not planning on EXILE-ing first-class players for violating Rule
2144, are we?
--Warrigal
h, especially if you're not aware that Agora
exists (no ratifying Hillary Rodham Clinton into a contract).
--Warrigal
ayer generally known by that nickname during
> November 2008) SHALL join the Vote Market. Upon eir doing
> so, this rule repeals itself.
You can't do that without taking precedence over rule 101, and you
can't do that without amending something.
--Warrigal
rever a reasonable
person would conclude that the trademark's owner would probably give
permission if asked. Also, failure to make a reasonable effort to
prevent a trademark from being used in a certain manner constitutes
implicit permission that cannot be withdrawn.}}
--Warrigal
arking
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:59 PM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I (do not) submit the following proposal, titled "Trademarks":
>
> {Enact power-1 rule, titled "Trademarks":
>
> {The Censor is a low-priority office. Trademark status is a phras
ants. Perhaps the rule can be worded such that the only illegal uses
of a trademark are things that can be considered falsehoods.
--Warrigal
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I spend Ab B Eb to decrease Warrigal's caste to Savage.
>
> I transfer a prop from Warrigal to 0x44 for putting em at the end of
> the List in eir pledge.
Well, someone had to go there.
--Warrigal the Democratic Voter
for the health of something else has an effect besides
> clarifying the remainder of the sentence it's in?
>
> I see what you did there.
Well, it is restrictive. A lot like saying "I kicked the fence that is
red" when there is also a green fence.
--Warrigal
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I object to the termination of Warrigal's Grand Poobah pledge.
Thank you.
--Warrigal "I Think"
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Warrigal, I suggest amending your pledge to include reversing The List
> after each round of caste changes.
OscarMeyr and similar people, would you object if I tried to amend my
pledge this way?
--Warrigal
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 4:29 AM, Charles Schaefer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/12/5, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> I agree to the following: {This is a public pledge known as "Youth".
>> Any person CAN join this contract by announcement if and only i
1 - 100 of 246 matches
Mail list logo
