On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 6:27 PM, warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I intend, without objection, to terminate the Llama Party. It's clearly >> unfair on BobTHJ to be stuck having eir votes potentially controllable >> by Warrigal, who has no voting power emself. Also, Warrigal can't >> object, due to not being a player. > > "A valid vote cast by a Llama of LLAMA (X), where X resolves to FOR or > AGAINST, is a party vote toward FOR or AGAINST, respectively." > Non-players can't cast valid votes, so non-players can't influence the > Llama vote. Besides, BobTHJ can leave at any time.
BobTHJ, your opinion? I don't want to think that the Llama Party was terminated by accident. --Warrigal of Escher
