On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Warrigal wrote: >> I will not support this judgement, as I support AFFIRM only. CotC >> Murphy, assuming you also would only support AFFIRM, I suggest that >> you recuse this panel, as it clearly is not going to assign a >> judgement any time soon. > I intend, with 2 support, to a criminal case against Warrigal for > violating rule 2157 by acting in such a manner that the appeals panel > for CFJ 2273a does not meet all its obligations by deliberately > causing it not to deliver a judgement, in the above-quoted message.
I'd say UNIMPUGNED, as the appeals panel hasn't failed to meet its obligations yet. --Warrigal
