On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 8:26 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 9:33 PM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I CFJ on the statement 'As Rule 1023 defines the terms, a unit of text >> consisting entirely of the string "1993:" is enumerated.' and the >> statement 'As Rule 1023 defines the terms, a unit of text consisting >> entirely of the string "CHAPTER I" is enumerated.' Arguments: I ask >> for a judgement of TRUE on both of these simply because that would be >> more convenient. > > R1023(b) really has no effect whatsoever on the game, and there's > certainly no requirement for the Historian's report to care about it > at all. Both of these are trivially IRRELEVANT.
As it is, I can *maybe* refer to a certain unit of text in my proposed initial Book of History as something like "paragraph 1993:I[4]". If these CFJs come up FALSE, I suppose I could amend the Book so that the paragraphs are more clearly enumerated. --Warrigal
