On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I intend, with 2 support, to a criminal case against Warrigal for >> violating rule 2157 by acting in such a manner that the appeals panel >> for CFJ 2273a does not meet all its obligations by deliberately >> causing it not to deliver a judgement, in the above-quoted message. > > I'd say UNIMPUGNED, as the appeals panel hasn't failed to meet its > obligations yet.
INNOCENT, rather. I love this game. --Warrigal
