On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1 Dec 2008, at 13:14, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> That reminds me.  I intend, with 2 support, to initiate a criminal
>> case alleging that ehird violated R1742 by taking actions e knew would
>> lead to P99 violating R2144 by registering with the same basis as
>> another player, specifically, agreeing to be a party to such a
>> contract with no other purpose than to register with the same basis as
>> 99 other contracts.  P99's obligation to follow the rules must be
>> devolved onto ehird.
>
> I support. Go ahead and EXILE me, then.

We're not planning on EXILE-ing first-class players for violating Rule
2144, are we?

--Warrigal

Reply via email to