Weevils were just my 5-minute thinking for "we're doing something that's
based on farming, what's a good word to re-skin Blots to something bad
for a farmer?" I'd prefer not to re-use the term Blots, just because
names identify different past eras, but happy to find a term fitting
the "incen
On Tue, 27 Feb 2018, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> Comments inline
Comments on comments inline...
> > The voting strength of a player on an Agoran Decision is reduced
> > by 1 for every 3 weevils in eir possession.
>
> Voting strength is an integer, right? I kind of like the idea of this
Ok folks, what's a set of religious terms for Blots, punishment, temples, and
penance that won't be too culturally loaded for anyone? Keeping to the Agoran
theme, something ancient Greece and pleasing the gods? Or something else (a
little leery after the Karma/Eta thing annoyed some people).
I'll admit, I've been pretty much blipping over the details on
which parts of land failed to take effect. Is it safe to assume
I have a welcome package with paper to pend with? I don't want
the circularity of using non-existent currency to pend and fix
a problem with currency.
r)
>
> ~Corona
>
> On 00:12, Feb 26, 2018, at 00:12, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> >
> >Should Ienpw and proof technique be at 0?
> >
> >On Sun, 25 Feb 2018, Corona wrote:
> >> What happens next? Is G.'s dethronement by the "triple-A" ine
worth big acclaim. Genuinely wondering if
it's worth repealing or replacing with a different awarding process (I
meant submit a proposal of course, not repeal on a whim :) )
> On 20:40, Feb 28, 2018, at 20:40, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> >
> >1. If no one steps up, th
All the best for a good outcome, Alexis.
On Wed, 28 Feb 2018, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> I've just been hospitalized for an unknown amount of time; I will not be
> about to play in that time. Apologies. I deregister.
>
> Alexis
>
On Wed, 28 Feb 2018, Kenyon Prater wrote:
> 8023* G., Aris 2.0 Zombie Lots G. 3 sh.
> PRESENT. I'm concerned by the fact that nothing seems to require the
> Registrar to flip the master switch of a zombie? If somebody explains why
> or else proposes to amend this,
to.) I
> think we should call the process of removing them absolution. Maybe the
> methods could be prayer and sacrifice?
>
> -Aris
>
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 12:07 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Ok folks, what's a set of religious terms for Blot
milar name. In the last few years of the
> '90s, coins were the official currency of Agora. I just decided to ignore that
> because none of the players at that time are here today.
>
> On 2/28/2018 5:45 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> >
> > Yeah, Blots were the ha
Sure - I think the weekly report is 14+ days late so you can
deputize to publish it whenever (will still push ahead with the
changing cards to blots, so if that goes through it will be a
little more currency-tracking-like).
On Thu, 1 Mar 2018, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> I confused Referee with Arbito
Sorry, I was just catching the lack of that stuff in the top line
("recent events") which doesn't ratify. Was puzzled by the line
between "previous report" and "last report" not sure the difference
there? No biggie just the format fooled me.
On Thu, 1
Genuine correction: By UTC, I think my Pink Slip hit on Feb 28 not
March 1? Matters for payday.
On Thu, 1 Mar 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Sorry, I was just catching the lack of that stuff in the top line
> ("recent events") which doesn't ratify. Was puzzled by the lin
On Thu, 1 Mar 2018, Corona wrote:
> I award the (new) title of Reformist Bug to Trigon.
Was this voted on or part of a proposal? Otherwise need 2 Agoran Consent
(I'd support).
On Thu, 1 Mar 2018, Corona wrote:
> Should I award the Long Service Awards or do away with that section? They
> seem to have fallen into disuse.
You can't "do away" with them in the sense that they're awarded Patent Titles
and therefore tracked. You could re-categorize them I suppose.
But eve
We used to have more Patent Titles named in the rules, and different
officers were allowed to award them under certain conditions. We
dropped that on the grounds that the Herald could generically award
any of them when it seemed appropriate, but it meant the reasons for
some of the awards (e.g.
Thu, 1 Mar 2018, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> Probably want the criteria for each to be SHOULDs so that we don't have CFJs
> about just how brilliant a judgement was. I like the idea.
>
> Gaelan
>
> > On Mar 1, 2018, at 10:01 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> >
>
On Thu, 1 Mar 2018, Corona wrote:
> When I meant "do away", I meant by getting a report without them
> self-ratified, but it seems like at least you'd object, so nevermind.
Someone last year (I forget who, sorry!) made a lovely post about how the
fundamental product of Agora is its History, re
On Thu, 1 Mar 2018, Corona wrote:
> I intend to award the title of Champion by Politics to Aris with 2 Support.
> I intend to award the (new) title of Reformist Bug to Trigon with 2 Support.
2 Consent, not 2 Support I'm afraid. Need to re-announce intent with the
correction (R1728).
(Champion
On Thu, 1 Mar 2018, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-03-01 at 15:19 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > (Champion needing consent is a bug btw. Should be by announcement I
> > think).
>
> I guess it's a simple way to handle disputed wins.
I thought about that, but it seems
10:18 AM, Corona
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Oh well.
> >>>
> >>> I intend to award the title of Champion by Politics to Aris with 2 Agoran
> >>> Consent.
> >>>
> >>> I intend to award the (new) title of Reformist Bug to
On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> Accepted, with apologies. I knew I was missing something, but couldn't
> figure out what it was. A revision is imminent.
>
> -Aris
Thanks! :)
On Wed, 7 Mar 2018, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 16:15 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > All of the below proposals met the quorum of 3.0.
>
> How did the ".0" get into quorum? I've seen it be used here for quite a
> while, but we didn't use it hi
On Wed, 7 Mar 2018, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2018, Cuddle Beam wrote:
>
> > Welp: https://i.gyazo.com/e6839dd6c86561d96c1c2f1cfe22eb61.png
>
> You're not using a monospace font.
>
> Greetings,
> Ørjan.
I'm using a monospace font (and using Alpine, if you're using pine) and
it's n
On Wed, 7 Mar 2018, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > The Registrar CAN flip the master switch of a zombie lot from Agora
> > to that lot's winner after the winner has paid for the lot; for the
> > purposes of the auction, to transf
So I'm moving the CFJ case archive to a repo on the Agoranomic github site
(AgoraNomic/CFJ
exists now).
The repo itself is already there. It will have the complete set of pages
(including index)
that's currently on https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/.
How do I make that actu
On Thu, 8 Mar 2018, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> "In a conflict between clauses of the same Rule, if exactly one claims
> precedence over the other, then it takes precedence; otherwise, the
> later clause takes precedence."
Um, in R2549, the "later" clause for the purposes of R2240 is the CANNOT,
right
On Thu, 8 Mar 2018, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> Anyways, alternative argument: He can give it away, via successful
> proposal. It's not limited to him being able to give it away via
> announcement.
That would not be the person giving it away. That would be the Proposal
doing so (the instrument with th
While I agree it's a random and silly thing to strive for (and I'm not that
sold on it), it's not as easy at all as you're making it sound. There's no
way to transfer zombies directly, so it requires two parties to zombify and
then win each others' respective auctions, which would be quite a cha
It was a unanimous decision.
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, Madeline wrote:
> Wait how did you of all people end up as Referee
> Geeze this game
>
> On 2018-03-14 08:13, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> > Hello. I submit the following Referee report. Nothing has happened
> > since the last one. Cheers.
> >
> >
> >
rsion #.
On Fri, 16 Mar 2018, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 6:28 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> >
> > Proposal, 'Blots v1.0', AI-3, co-author = Aris:
> >
>
> Technical nitpick. Might this be Blots v2, v3, or whatever incarnation it
What's the deal with the big fix for the Map rules? (Payday
and whatnot). Did we decide not to do that or what.
On Sun, 11 Mar 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> //
> ID: pp1
> Title: PAoaM Patch
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: Gaelan
> Co-authors:
>
>
> In Rule 105 “Rule Changes,” replace
>
> "If the reenacting proposal provides new text
Personally I'd rather limp along imperfectly than wait for the perfect
and miss the April payday. So absolutely have a go but I'm fine voting
for the current one if there's not a better in the next distribution.
On Fri, 16 Mar 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> It wasn't pended because there were sub
All it takes is one CoE to stop that.
On Sat, 17 Mar 2018, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> FYI, I’m pretending everything (including paydays) is working.
>
> Gaelan
>
> > On Mar 17, 2018, at 9:39 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Personally I'd
> Prime Minister*(vacant) 2018-02-28[2] (ongoing)
Can the prime minister election be resolved please?
On Sun, 18 Mar 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> In Rule 105 “Rule Changes,” replace
For absolute safety please change this to: "Amend R105 by replacing"
Did already...
On Sun, 18 Mar 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> Looks good. Want to pend it?
>
> -Aris
>
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Proposa
Corona
>
>
> On 09:18, Mar 2, 2018, at 09:18, Corona wrote:
> >Oh well.
> >
> >I intend to award the title of Champion by Politics to Aris with 2
> >Agoran Consent.
> >
> >I intend to award the (new) title of Reformist Bug to Trigon with 2
nditions authorizing em to do so are
announced, unless there is an open judicial case contesting the
validity of those conditions.
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 4:40 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > I submit the following Proposal, AI-3, "Fixing Champion&qu
epy. Why is this a general rule, rather than a
> case-by-case thing like everything else? Is there some history to this?
>
> -Aris
>
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 5:08 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 19 Mar 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > > A
On Fri, 23 Mar 2018, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 1:20 PM, Aris Merchant <
> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > We really need a Rulekeepor. It's probably the most important office on
> > that list. Gaelan, are you interested in taking that on again?
> >
> >
>
the proposal "Nomicbots Minigame" again and pend it with
> a paper, again.
>
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 10:12 PM, Kerim Aydin
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 23 Mar 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > > 8024 [1] 2.0 Nomicbots M
t the clock, or someone could re-announce
the conditions after the case was closed, but you're right it could
be clearer.
On Mon, 26 Mar 2018, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
&
On Sun, 25 Mar 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> While this is well outside the scope of the present proposal, what
> would everyone think of making the ongoing CFJ exception apply to all
> obligations? For reports an officer can just mark the relevant detail
> as provisional, but other types of dutie
entially it makes it 'with 3 support'. Fewer than that and I don't think
it has critical mass of interest. In retrospect I should have voted this
way with my dumb zombie game, too.
On Mon, 26 Mar 2018, Kenyon Prater wrote:
> Does that conditional vote include PRESENT votes?
>
&g
Note to Murphy on the Courts: Alexis is deregistered, o is a zombie, and
Publius is zombifiable.
On Tue, 27 Mar 2018, ATMunn wrote:
> I am interested in judging CFJs again. I would like to be placed on the
> Weekend court.
>
> On 3/26/2018 9:02 PM, Edward Murphy wrote:
> > COURT GAZETTE (Arbi
Proto: Sequential conditionality
Replace:
A conditional vote is evaluated
at the end of the voting period and, rules to the contrary
notwithstanding, is clearly specified if and only if the value of
the condition(s) is/are determinate at the end of the voting
On Thu, 29 Mar 2018, Ãrjan Johansen wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> > I change my vote on 8031 to:
> > If there are 4 or more valid unconditional FOR ballots cast on 8031 at
> > the end of the voting period, FOR. Otherwise AGAINST.
> >
&
On Fri, 30 Mar 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> 8029 Blots v1.0 by {G., Aris}, AI=3.0
With punishment quantifiable and meaningful even at green card levels,
I plan to start to use finger-pointing on weekly reports that miss 2 in
a row or any missing monthly reports (of course anyone else can dec
Crud, I reminded myself a couple days ago to resolve these in reverse order
and then completely forgot. The problem is that with the "if" clause in 8030,
we have to resolve whether the "if" was true or false to figure out what
the "paydays" rule says now...
>From 8029:
> Amend the Rule entitl
On Sun, 1 Apr 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> The following players have made no public posts in 30 days. Therefore I
> announce my intent (separate intent announcements for each player) to
> deregister em with 3 Agoran Consent:
Minor clarification: the trigger is "past month"
On Sun, 1 Apr 2018, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> I retract the proposal “Cross-Polination". (Side note: I have five ribbons,
> so if I did
> have a scam against the proposal process, the festival wouldn’t have helped).
Yeah I counted Ribbons - it was mainly in case your listed BlogNomic coauthors
we
On Mon, 2 Apr 2018, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Apr 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> > I object to every one of the below intents.
>
> I'm wondering what is needed for you to be considered to have fulfilled the
> monthly requirement and whether your objections viol
On Mon, 2 Apr 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> Also, how often do you say "Bring me two papers"? It's
> usually pieces or sheets, but not papers. The main time you'd hear a number
> of papers is when talking about papers submitted to a conference or
> journal, not for mere physical sheets.
What if e
information or
proposals on an issue.
On Mon, 2 Apr 2018, Corona wrote:
> I prefer my uncountable paper, thank you very much.
>
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 2 Apr 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > >
Welcome Ouri!
You can change your name/nickname any time just by saying so, as Registrar
I'll record your latest preference. It's generally helpful to sign your
messages with your chosen name if it doesn't match the name in your email
address (though I suspect we'll quickly come to associate th
; I bid one coin in this auction.
>
> Based on my reading of the rules, I'm allowed to do that?
>
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 6:03 AM, ATMunn wrote:
>
> > I bid 2 coins in this auction.
> >
> >
> > On 4/2/2018 1:46 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> >&
On Wed, 4 Apr 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> I might favor some
> carefully implemented system of injunctions or judicial orders that
> allowed judges to remedy the short term harm caused by a
> misunderstanding or rule violation...
It took an incredibly complex (read: "very carefully implemented"
To include repeal dates, this big file referenced on agoranomic.org:
http://www.fysh.org/~zefram/agora/rules_text.txt
has rule histories including repeals through the year ~2008.
That problem you mention is indeed an issue. If you take on rulekeepor,
remember that *any* ambiguity in rule chan
ories
here?
On Fri, 6 Apr 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>(a)bandoned (l)awless
>(v)oluntary (d)eported
>(w)rit of FAGEderegistered emself by mista(k)e
>(p)roposald(e)stroyed
>(r)atification
(snip)
> Left in 2015:
>
I got the SLR but not the FLR. In the past the forum has had a length
limit and FLR-lengthed messages needed manual approval from omd,
but e would add an automatic exception for rulekeepors. Don't know
If that's still true (I'm guessing the FLR is the one where you deputized?)
In any case, ma
18, Kenyon Prater wrote:
> PAoaM amends 2445 by removing Without Objection as a method of pending a
> proposal. Want me to pend it with paper?
>
> On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 12:57 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > I submit the following proposal, Paydays Fix, AI-2.
&g
eam wrote:
> > I resign Referee. Gnomic is starting to get inertia with its initial
> > culture and history and I'd like to help it out (it's also why I've been
> > away lately, sorry).
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 9:47 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> &g
The Herald is reminded of quarterly reductions that were required
April 1. :)
On Sun, 8 Apr 2018, Corona wrote:
> Court:
>
> KarmaEntity
> -
> SAMURAI
> -
> +4 Aris <-- SHOGUN
> +3 G.
> +2 ATMunn
> +2 Alexis
> +2 Telnaior
> +2 o
> +2
Oh, if it's just "an office" you're after and don't care which, the Tailor
has gone silent too...
On Sun, 8 Apr 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Oh, sorry ATMunn - should get to the end of messages before quick responses.
> I deputized because, since I was the one
and making mills worthless.
>
> I'm gonna try and write a contract to coordinate the altruism but I don't
> know if it'll work.
>
> On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 11:06 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > That is v. annoying. I'm not feeling al
s the welcome package enacted, though you did this
> move in the discussion forum?
>
> 2018-04-05 3:43 GMT+03:00 Kerim Aydin :
>
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 5 Apr 2018, אורי פופקו wrote:
> > > How does one gain coins? Do I have any to begin with?
> >
> &
ng, but the act-on-behalf rules might have some holes (but
AFAICT, nothing here against the intent of those rules).
On Mon, 9 Apr 2018, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> Is a timing scam an abuse of an office? Does acting on omd’s behalf change
> this?
>
> Gaelan
>
> > O
On Mon, 9 Apr 2018, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> Is a timing scam an abuse of an office? Does acting on omd’s behalf change
> this?
Thinking about this more, all the info on auction end timing was public,
and my rapid transfer after the auction was just to get it done, offered
no particular game adva
snipe them back). Whether this breaks the rules or not, I
> think we should add a rule to automatically extend actions after a bid.
>
> Gaelan
>
> > On Apr 9, 2018, at 11:01 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > As far as I can tell it's al
e just
> obligated to end it after a certain period of time. You're right, and I
> should make sure that I understand the rules better when I talk about
> these things.
>
> Gaelan
>
> > On Apr 9, 2018, at 11:16 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
I think a reasonable argument can be made that "replaces them" implies puts
them where the old things were?
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018, Corona wrote:
> I was just going over the facility rules, and given that:
>
> At the end of every Agoran Week, Agora destroys any refinable
> assets in the poss
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 9:31 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> >
> > One more step first!
> >
> > I set PSS's master switch to VJ Rada. (Registrar duty).
> >
> > *now* you can act on behalf of e
CFJ to myself.
> >
> > -Aris
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 11:47 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> [No coin needed, was planning to anyway. Here's a CFJ!]
> >>
> >> I deregister every one of the following players with 3 Agoran
It was awarded in 2014 and 2015, but my memory (I think I was the Herald
then) is that voting was lackluster even then. Agree with deletion.
Though I'll note that Corona is still required by law to resolve the
decision for this year (as Failed Quorum I assume).
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, Ned Strange
PM, Ned Strange wrote:
> >>I deputize for the Registrar
> >
> > You'll have to do this again.
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 9:55 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> GUESS WHAT: It's worse than that. There *is* no Refer
But I still see no need for tolling
> because it is simple to just card for the offense while the CFJ is
> pending and then have that card have never happened due to the CFJ if
> it comes out the other way.
>
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:01 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> &g
A couple things:
1. Can a zombie "willfully" consent to joining a contract (R869
requirement)? I don't think so - see R2519. Nonetheless this may
count as a "scare" since on reading that first message, people
might not have known that.
2. I thought there was an "all parties have to have ha
That's what monthly salary is right?
Problem of course is that applies to zombies too - excluding zombies from
salary would balance though of course would devalue zombies.
I was really surprised that the zombie auction prices were so low. In the
current system, the ability to occupy multiple l
re they get and so on so early leads build into big
ones. Redistribution won't help that unless you redistribute so much that
it wipes out all leads (if it does that, why would anyone bother to play the
subgame?)
There are ways to address both, but I don't think redist
I'll pay to pend it if you submit it.
On Thu, 12 Apr 2018, Ned Strange wrote:
> I couldn't myself write such a proposal, being without assets.
>
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 11:31 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> >
> > I think e should get it all back. It was ha
truction of "Hi" - let's just have the vote on that proposal, and
> possibly destroy the contract later, if the proposal fails.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 3:31 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > I think e should get it all back. It wa
> > previously published ideas on how to fix it.
> > >
> > > In conclusion, I think it's clear now that less affluent people actually
> > > have way more opportunities than lots of people here estimate. Even still,
> > > I
> > > think some reform
My interpretation:
You describe a particular lot as a "white land unit at ". You do not have
a "white land unit at " to transfer, so anyone can terminate the auction.
If no one terminates it, I'm not sure whether you can satisfy your obligation
to transfer by transferring a black land u
oneer of that Auction
> cannot transfer any item included in a lot in that Auction" (Rule
> 2552).
>
> -Aris
>
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 11:10 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> >
> > My interpretation:
> >
> > You describe a particular lot as a "
> just never began in the first place.
>
> -Aris
>
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 1:38 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> >
> > These are independent auctions so only the incorrect ones were just
> > terminated I think? (Auctions 1,3,4).
> >
> > On Thu, 12 Apr 201
On Thu, 12 Apr 2018, Reuben Staley wrote:
> > I terminate the ongoing land auction
>
> I think this intent FAILS as there are in fact 5 going on right now.
By R2004 you only CAN initiate 1 each week. At least that's my reading of
"each Agoran week... the Cartographer CAN and SHALL initiate an
der the assumption that the rules called for
> five separate auctions, initiated five separate auctions.
>
> On 4/12/2018 2:53 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> >
> > Reading R2004, it looks like it was *supposed* to be a single auction?
> > That's definitely not h
ed for
> five separate auctions, *attempted to initiate* five separate auctions.
>
> On 4/12/2018 3:09 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> >
> > You CANNOT do that. The rule doesn't allow you to. So you failed to
> > initiate five. You said you did in the announcement
On Thu, 12 Apr 2018, Edward Murphy wrote:
> G. wrote:
>
> > Sigh. I deputize for the REFEREE to resolve the finger-pointing as
> > indicated
> > below.
>
> Leaving this out of the ADoP history, as you already were Referee
> (unless I missed something else).
The subsequent conversation was tha
On Fri, 13 Apr 2018, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2018, Corona wrote:
>
> > I withdraw my and Quazie's (acting on eir behalf) support for the
> > destruction of "Hi" - let's just have the vote on that proposal, and
> > possibly destroy the contract later, if the proposal fails.
>
> I
On Thu, 12 Apr 2018, Reuben Staley wrote:
> This gag is already old, but the point is that I could go on. Separate
> auctions encourage more competitive play. Imagine if these were all lots in
> the same auction. Every bid would be a shot in the dark. You couldn't
> strategize and attempt to get
I don't consider 1 auctions/5 auctions to be a patch. It works as is,
but some people want it a different way (never mind that includes the
original author). As it's controversial, please leave it on its own.
On Fri, 13 Apr 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> Okay, I'm going to write up a patch propo
However, (and this is the third time I've asked) can anyone point me to
where it says in the rules that the cartographer actually CAN make a
transfer of land from Agora to a land auction winner?
On Fri, 13 Apr 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I don't consider 1 auctions/5 auctions
tographor doesn't make the transfer as the Cartographor is only
> > the
> > > Announcer. Agora, the auctioneer, is authorized the make the transfer.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018, 14:00 Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
urporting to make an entity which is neither the Contract itself nor
> a party to the Contract the Auctioneer of an Auction defined by that
> Contract is INEFFECTIVE." So we don't have to worry about a contract
> making Agora the auctioneer or something.
>
> -Aris
>
&g
When we last had shambling entities we had a rule that any punishments
for crimes transferred to the master. Worth doing.
On Fri, 13 Apr 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> Oh, dang it, forgot to hand incense out to existing players. Without
> objection, I'm going to make it non-zombie players only,
You could actually look at the report to get your answer if you liked. :P
On Sat, 14 Apr 2018, Ned Strange wrote:
> The registrar does have to track these btw. I don't know if e is doing
> so, but any Registrar report with no emotions is not a report.
>
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 10:42 AM, Kenyo
The proposal reads "since" the 1st, so any text with both the right label and
correct hash published between April 1 and when the proposal takes effect
(If it passes) should trigger it. Texts with label but not correct hash (or
vice
versa) shouldn't affect that.
On Sat, 14 Apr 2018, Aris Merch
501 - 600 of 8209 matches
Mail list logo
