You CANNOT do that. The rule doesn't allow you to. So you failed to initiate five. You said you did in the announcement, but you didn't. Maybe you initiated one (the first accurate one, AUCTION 2), or maybe the collection was so ambiguous it all failed.
On Thu, 12 Apr 2018, Reuben Staley wrote: > This is simply a case of Trigon writing down a thing that e didn't actually > mean and everyone else not realizing until after the passing of the proposal. > I wanted there to be five auctions, but clearly the passed text does not > reflect my intent. I, working under the assumption that the rules called for > five separate auctions, initiated five separate auctions. > > On 4/12/2018 2:53 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > > > Reading R2004, it looks like it was *supposed* to be a single auction? > > That's definitely not how the announcement below reads, and not how > > people have been bidding, so I don't know what actually happened. > > (R2004 only allows 1 auction to be started each week). > > > > I'm also looking for anything that says the Cartographer CAN transfer > > land in any circumstances, and all I'm finding is SHALLs. (is there > > a "SHALL implies CAN" somewhere?) > > > > > > On Thu, 12 Apr 2018, Aris Merchant wrote: > > > Oops, you're right. You know, it seems pretty likely that those ones > > > just never began in the first place. > > > > > > -Aris > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 1:38 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > These are independent auctions so only the incorrect ones were just > > > > terminated I think? (Auctions 1,3,4). > > > > > > > > On Thu, 12 Apr 2018, Aris Merchant wrote: > > > > > I agree with G.'s interpretation. I believe that Rule 2549's statement > > > > > that "An Auction also CANNOT be initiated unless the Auctioneer is > > > > > able to give away each item in each of the Auction's lots" is > > > > > applicable, given that the announced items do not in fact exist. Just > > > > > in case, I terminate the ongoing land auction, because some of the > > > > > lots are nonexistent and therefore "the Auctioneer of that Auction > > > > > cannot transfer any item included in a lot in that Auction" (Rule > > > > > 2552). > > > > > > > > > > -Aris > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 11:10 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My interpretation: > > > > > > > > > > > > You describe a particular lot as a "white land unit at XXXX". You > > > > > > do not have > > > > > > a "white land unit at XXXX" to transfer, so anyone can terminate the > > > > > > auction. > > > > > > If no one terminates it, I'm not sure whether you can satisfy your > > > > > > obligation > > > > > > to transfer by transferring a black land unit at XXXX, or not. > > > > > > > > > > > > (oh, just out of curiosity where does it say you CAN transfer > > > > > > particular > > > > > > land units? That wording of that would play into what you can or > > > > > > cannot > > > > > > satisfy). > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 12 Apr 2018, Reuben Staley wrote: > > > > > > > I'd say that these data are less relevant than the coordinates of > > > > > > > the land > > > > > > > units, so it would not invalidate it. But that may just be me but > > > > > > > wanting > > > > > > > to do work to fix it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018, 11:24 Corona <liliumalbum.ag...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wait, I just looked it up (in your own report) and: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > AUCTION 1: The lot is the white land unit at (+1, +2) <-- > > > > > > > > actually black > > > > > > > > AUCTION 2: The lot is the white land unit at (+1, +3) > > > > > > > > AUCTION 3: The lot is the white land unit at (+2, 0) <-- > > > > > > > > actually black > > > > > > > > AUCTION 4: The lot is the black land unit at (+2, +1) <-- > > > > > > > > actually white > > > > > > > > AUCTION 5: The lot is the black land unit at (+2, +2) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gasp! It cannot be! Is it a... SCAM?!?! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > More seriously, does it make the auction initiation invalid? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 8:30 AM, Reuben Staley > > > > > > > > <reuben.sta...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is the second real land auction. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There are currently 5 public, unpreserved, non-aether land > > > > > > > > > units in > > > > > > > > > existence. All 5 are put up for auction. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For the following 5 auctions, I am the announcer, Agora is the > > > > > > > > auctioneer, > > > > > > > > > and the minimum bid is 1 coin: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > AUCTION 1: The lot is the white land unit at (+1, +2) > > > > > > > > > AUCTION 2: The lot is the white land unit at (+1, +3) > > > > > > > > > AUCTION 3: The lot is the white land unit at (+2, 0) > > > > > > > > > AUCTION 4: The lot is the black land unit at (+2, +1) > > > > > > > > > AUCTION 5: The lot is the black land unit at (+2, +2) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~Corona > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. > > http://www.avg.com > > > > -- > Trigon >
